When I was a kid, my father, having walked across most of war-torn Europe as a child with his mother during WWII, in order to escape Communism in Russia and find a better way of life, would use the analogy of salami slices to explain to me how authoritarian/totalitarian governments come to power. “If they (dictators, despots, authoritarian governments) do things all at once, in big movements, it’s too much for people and they revolt. But if they do things slowly, a little salami slice at a time, pretty soon people are facing a whole big salami without realizing how it ever got there.” I learned of the frog in the pot analogy soon after, but it wasn’t until many years later that I learned that the salami slice analogy actually originated “in the late 1940s by Stalinist dictator Matyas Rakoski to describe the actions of the Hungarian Communist Party in its ultimately successful drive for complete power in Hungary.” (Wikipedia, “Salami slicing tactics”)
In 1998, the movie Enemy of the State, starring Will Smith, came out in theaters. I remember it well, because as cheesy and inaccurate as the movie was, it gave me a way to explain to people (in a very limited analogy) what I was doing a few years later working in intelligence at the strategic level in the Department of Defense. After talking to friends and family that watched it, I was not surprised at the reaction coming from most of them: disbelief, amazement, consternation… However, I was somewhat surprised to discover how little people actually knew about U.S. space systems and electronic intelligence capabilities, cyberspace capabilities, and the roles and responsibilities of members of the United States Intelligence Community. I was also very disappointed to learn how little citizens of the United States knew about, or even seemingly cared, about the preservation of their individual rights, given how capable and potentially intrusive surveillance systems owned by the intelligence community could be. They assumed our government was only looking out for “bad guys” and was incapable of doing anything nefarious to its own citizens. Meanwhile, I thanked God for members of Congress serving on oversight committees and intelligence directives that kept intelligence organizations honest.
Then came 9-11 and the enactment of the PATRIOT Act of 2001, increasing powers of the U.S. government to surveil its citizens. (Surveillance for the sake of Security) I personally was concerned about giving up too many of our rights for the sake of additional security, but I was especially unhappy about the low and constant war drum beat I perceived coming from the Bush Administration in the summer of 2002. I told my wife the same, and that the movement to justify war meant that it was inevitable. We knew Saddam Hussein was not Al Qaeda, that going to war in 2003 with Iraq over 9-11 events did not make sense, and there was a lack of intelligence to justify it.
Donald Rumsfeld’s ability to influence intelligence reports over the course of a couple weeks, however, to discover “new intelligence” that Iraq posed an imminent threat to our national security due to its possession of WMD, made sure we went to war. Nine years later in his memoirs, Rumsfeld admitted his “misstatement”, but blamed the Bush administration for misleading the public. (theguardian.com, Donald Rumsfeld book admits ‘misstatements’ over WMD sites, 7 Feb 2011) Incidentally, Iraq did have WMD, but use of the term was a red herring; by definition, Weapons of Mass Destruction includes Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and high-yield Explosives, or CBRNE, and we, the United States, did supply Saddam Hussein with chemical weapons years previously for use against Iran. However, Iraq did not have nuclear weapons or a capability to produce them as many were led to believe.
In 2002 and subsequent years, activists, like Michael Moore, frequently voiced their opposition to the Patriot Act. Moore produced the movie Fahrenheit 9/11 in 2004. From the movie’s Wiki site, “Moore alleges that the Bush administration induced a climate of fear among the American population through the mass media. Moore then describes purported anti-terror efforts, including government infiltration of pacifist groups and other events, and the signing of the USA PATRIOT Act.”
Most Americans today do not remember the PATRIOT Act and fewer know what it does. If they ever knew that the term “PATRIOT” was an acronym for Providing Appropriate Tools to Restrict, Intercept, and Obstruct Terrorism, today they are much less likely to understand how it continues to be used for collection or how it might possibly pose a threat to their own privacy rights. Interestingly, during a September 2021 appearance on The Hill, Moore stated, “People now don’t trust the government … especially the Trumpsters… They don’t believe the results of the election, they don’t want to get vaccinated… We’re in a dark moment here.” So what changed? How could someone that was so opposed to propaganda through mass media, the government instilling fear and infiltration of pacifist groups, and concern over the signing of the PATRIOT Act be so indifferent to those same things occurring 17 years later and even hostile to those expressing the same concerns he had decades before? That answer will have to wait for future writing.
In 2007, Privacy International conducted a survey of 47 countries from a surveillance perspective, noting an increase in surveillance and a decline in privacy safeguards compared to previous years. Also in 2007, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) stated that we are, “…in danger of tipping into a genuine surveillance society completely alien to American values” with “the potential for a dark future where our every move, our every transaction, our every communication is recorded, compiled, and stored away, read to be examined and used against us by the authorities whenever they want.” A brief glance at the headlines on Privacy International’s website today include:
-”Statement before the European Parliament hearing on ‘Spyware’”
-”UK High Court orders groundbreaking redress for thousands of migrants affected by unlawful phone seizures and data extraction”
-”Stop GPS tagging migrants”
-”Demanding Identity Systems on Our Terms”
-”Security Should Protect People, Not Exploit Them”
-”When Social Media Makes You a Target”
It would appear the Surveillance State and threats to our data privacy are alive and well.
In 2015, I remembered reading a hardcopy USA Today newspaper provided free at a hotel I was staying at on a business trip. One of the articles stood out with the title: “New Police Radars Can ‘See’ Inside Homes,” with the subheading: “At least 50 U.S. law enforcement agencies quietly deployed radars that let them effectively see inside homes, with little notice to the courts or the public.”
In 2015 “At least 50 U.S. law enforcement agencies quietly deployed radars that let them effectively see inside homes, with little notice to the courts or the public.”
The article went on to describe the system. The “…finely tuned motion detectors, using radio waves to zero in on movements as slight as human breathing from a distance of more than 50 feet… can detect whether anyone is inside of a house, where they are and whether they are moving.” The article addressed the controversy surrounding those 50 law enforcement agencies, including the FBI and U.S. Marshals Service, using the technology, and quoting judges saying “the government’s warrantless use of such a powerful tool to search inside homes poses grave Fourth Amendment questions.” The article noted the U.S. Marshals Service had purchased such systems (like the RANGE-R handheld) since 2012. I found it concerning that no one I knew in law enforcement, or even the military, had heard of such technology.
Fast forward to 2019, now out in the civilian world, I found myself dealing with emerging technologies including traffic sensors, interactive public kiosks, autonomous vehicles, and drones as a public servant focused on Smart City initiatives in the City Hall of a major metropolitan area. Once again, I found myself concerned about how little the residents in that municipality knew about the hundreds of sensors surrounding them throughout their city blocks and selling their data to private entities, many to which even the city was unaware. More concerning was my discovery that city and county governments had very little public transparency in their Public Private Partnerships (P3s) and agreements with tech industries, emplacing so many potentially privacy-violating sensors amongst the people… and that was before learning of all the Smart City tech planning to be included in the new local airport! Interrogation of personal cell phones, facial recognition, license plate readers… all intrusive technologies. But the ones that seemed to concern citizens the most were facial recognition and autonomous drones prepositioned to respond to crimes, providing “eyes on” immediately after a crime was detected, through 911 calls or perhaps acoustic triangulation from technologies like ShotSpotter gunshot detection system.
An article appearing online in The Verge in July 2019 announced, “Orlando Police Once Again Ditch Amazon’s Facial Recognition Software.” The article noted the “setback for Rekognition, which has been plagued by criticism of its contributions to bias policing, unlawful surveillance, and racial profiling, as well as the clandestine way Amazon has gone about selling it to police departments while it’s still in active development.” The article informed readers the only way the first use of the facial recognition software by the police department came to light only through documents obtained by and revealed by the American Civil Liberties Union.
On its website, 17 May 2022, Reporters Without Borders (RSF) reported, “Reporters Without Borders (RSF) is alarmed by a European Union proposal for combatting child sexual abuse under which the content of instant messaging apps, including encrypted ones, would be subjected to constant scanning. If adopted, such a radical measure would jeopardise journalists’ work.” On 6 July 2022, the European Parliament temporarily allowed the providers of web-based email, chats, and messaging services to monitor their users and their associated materials. (Surveillance in the name of Safety) They sound the alarm, but again appear limited to admiring the problem.
I sometimes find myself pondering, “Why are so many citizens in our country oblivious to the fact that their personal data is being stolen, as it is not compensated for by big tech companies? When they do find out, why aren’t they enraged?” This is something I cannot understand. Why so many individuals, seemingly concerned about privacy right violations under the PATRIOT Act decades ago, have remained silent during lockdowns, closures of churches, vaccine mandates, Big Tech censorship, COVID passports and surveillance for contract tracing during the COVID crisis of 2020-2023 is also beyond me. Even worse, many of those individuals look forward to integrating Smart technology into all aspects of their lives for convenience. (Surveillance for the sake of Convenience) Maybe they did not notice, or did not feel, the heavy hand of the government pushing down on them from 2020-20203? If they felt it, is it possible they chose to ignore it or now choose to forget it? Few are actually willing to stand up and do something about it. But why?
Maybe it is simple laziness and an unwillingness to understand the world around them that causes folks not to appreciate the threats to their privacy and liberties? Maybe the lack of concern is motivated by politics and individuals choosing not to hold their elected officials accountable, because they share the same political affiliation? Maybe it simply originates from a passive resignation to Big Tech’s influence in our lives, or our overreliance and addiction to our smart devices, or thinking that we are not intelligent enough to comprehend tech or maybe the outlook that we are too few and too small to make any real difference in all the changes happening around us? Maybe it’s because people continue to trust their government to do the right thing and take care of them, or mistakenly think the Constitution protects them? Or, quite possibly, it’s because individuals thought the intrusion into peoples’ lives using their devices, for COVID vaccines or digital passports, was a necessity? (Surveillance for the sake of Safety)
On the Electronic Privacy Information Center website, EPIC.org, a banner proudly proclaims, “We all share a fundamental right to privacy.” EPIC states it “focuses public attention on emerging privacy and civil liberties issues and protects privacy, freedom of expression, and democratic values in the information age.” Epic is frequently cited in major news outlets and maintains several additional websites: thepublicvoice.org, privacycoalition.org, and csisac.org.
On EPIC’s About Us page, it lists what it believes in:
“Privacy is a fundamental right.
We all deserve protection from abusive data practices like mass surveillance, browser tracking, demographic profiling, and data discrimination. Protecting privacy means preserving our digital autonomy, individual freedom, and democratic values.
The internet belongs to the people who use it.
Standards for privacy, free speech, and human rights online should not defined by corporations or unaccountable government actors. We believe in balancing the scale in favor of the billions of people who rely on the internet in their day-to-day lives.
There’s a responsible way to use technology.
Technology can enrich our lives and enable new possibilities for the future. But these systems can also threaten our fundamental values. That is why we advocate for meaningful oversight of data collection and processing systems to ensure that users are protected from abuse, exploitation, discrimination, and invasive surveillance.”
I fully and completely agree with these statements, as I hope most freedom loving Americans do as well.
There is one technology I am especially concerned with, as I believe it is a precursor to what lies ahead with respect to the system that manages digital identities: e-governance.
Diia is a mobile app, a web portal, and a brand of e-governance in Ukraine. From its Wiki page:
“Launched in 2020, the Diia app allows Ukrainian citizens to use digital documents in their smartphones instead of physical ones for identification and sharing purposes. The Diia portal allows access to over 50 governmental services. Eventually, the government plans to make all kinds of state-person interactions available through Diia.”
18 January 2023, Axios.com wrote in an online article that Samantha Power, USAID Administrator, at the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, announced “The U.S. hopes to replicate the success of an e-governance app used in Ukraine in other countries.” According to the article, Diia allows “citizens to access ID documents, register a business and obtain various government services from their smartphones” Also, conveniently, and likely unprecedented in an e-governance app, “Since Russia’s invasion began last year, the app has been expanded to include additional tools like reporting damage from Russian strikes.” Presumably with an ability to report locations of Russian soldiers and equipment and their movements, as well. Similar e-governance apps exist across the United States, especially in larger cities. But when one arrives that is the accepted, official federal government version, I believe it will become clear just how far the threat to our God-given rights has come.
I should emphasize, I am not a luddite. Tools like Smart City or Smart Home devices and e-governance apps are not evil in and of themselves. Many individuals, that work to further digital equity and that speak to the importance of digital access for all, have sincerely good intentions. However, most smart devices and many apps have inherent systems or capabilities that can easily be exploited for selfish or even evil purposes, including data privacy violations, PII collection and and/or surveillance. The difficulty lies in learning of those inherent or deliberate collection capabilities and informing our loved ones, friends, and civil leaders of the associated risks. I, personally, would rather “err” on the side of digital inconvenience than allow those intrusive capabilities into my life.
The stealing of our data unbeknownst to us is one thing. Passively acquiescing to Big Tech and Big Government accessing our digital devices to build a digital prison around us, infringing on our rights, stealing our data and creating a society in which we are surveilled, analyzed, studied, followed and logged, is another. At the grassroots level, a few individuals are fighting, at least trying to get the word out as Big Tech and Big Government collect Big Data and work to circumvent the desires of the citizens of our country to maintain our digital integrity and digital privacy. Some individuals, like Salty Annie or Patriot Mama, are sounding the alarm. But unfortunately, larger organizations that continue to note the significant changes and threats to our digital rights seem to be unable to do much about them.
One individual, Aman Jabbi, a Smart Cities subject matter expert and Silicon Valley whistleblower, has recently been sounding the alarm of a coming mandatory Digital Identity and the rise of the American surveillance state. He occasionally reminds me that data privacy is a red herring and that data privacy advocates have already missed the boat, failing to recognize the digital prison being built around us daily, and that in the Central Bank Digital Currency economy, governments will use both “carrots and sticks” to encourage us to join in. While I agree with his assessment that the coercive systems are already here, as well as the dangers posed by digital surveillance through a Digital Identity, I still believe that there is still value in engaging data privacy advocates and organizations as they already understand the dangers to individuals that come from intrusive technologies. They also have an existing platform to sound the alarm. Aman focuses his energy on advocating for removal of surveillance technology at the grass roots level, and I believe that has its potential benefits as well.
God willing, people will wake up. God willing, they will demand to maintain their digital rights and demand more data privacy. But I fear Aman may be right and it’s already too late in some respects. Too many of us are too attached to our phones, too attached to the simplicity and immediate gratification that comes from our devices. Even with the Surveillance State rearing its head on the horizon, rattling the chains it brings with it, we continue to submit to “the powers that be”, but really to our passions, our addictions to ease and convenience. AI will only further resign us to reliance on digital technology, because it will be so attractive! In AI, we will find companionship and conversation, attention and even “love” in our devices. AI will provide answers to questions that so many are seeking, but really only looking to the wrong origin for what is Truth. Adding Virtual Reality or NeuralLink into the equation further hammers in the role and position that AI will have in our lives, in our bodies, and ultimately in our souls.
In conclusion, the final salami slices are being cut, and they are coming at us at a dizzying pace. We’ve seen this occurring over decades, or we should have had we been vigilant. The creation of the giant salami in front of our faces is very near complete. These are the last moments before we truly find ourselves in the midst of a digital prison. We can, and should, pray to God, asking for wisdom and insights into how best slow, or possibly even stop, the inevitable digital prison being built around us. We might not be able to stop that movement, but we may be able to slow it significantly at the lowest levels, and especially with respect to ourselves. When the digital prison is complete, if our faith and our salvation are real and a priority to us, we must be able to drop the device and learn to survive outside of it. We must refuse to submit to a digital identity and even resolve to live the lives of martyrs. Our souls, and the lives of those we love, depend on this. May God be merciful to all of us, and may He give us the wisdom and resolve to act according to His Will.
DigitalWarrior
Digital Warrior,
Thanks for such a revealing post. Undoubtedly, you have just scratched the surface.
As far as S Hussein, America’s destruction of him is typical of its long standing works to take down good government. Under S Hussein, the Christian Church was protected because he saw them as good citizens. Taking him down—after propping him up—did two things; first it destabilized the equilibrium with Iran—under SH, Iran’s nuclear threat was non-existent. Second, it destroyed Christianity there. SH’s imprisonment and elimination of his detractors, was in effect protecting the Church from Islamic extremism. Of course, Ukraine is true to form.
In our city, it used to be by far the most conservative city—over 50k—in the state. But this surveillance system is far more advanced in implementation here than anywhere else in the state, probably due to the extensive military complex presence. With cell towers near my home, I have taken blocking measures to mitigate the heavy stream of RF that used to penetrate my home.
The globalists have big plans for this city as in a dozen places prison like condos are being erected at an alarming rate. Often with a dozen stories, each condo has only one way out—the central elevator/stair—other than to jump off the balcony. This New York style high rise is rare in the west, as we got space to spread out. Its model is what China has done with its population; they simply lock the only way out, unless you care to jump.
While most people would think nothing of what I am seeing, having the information of this article makes it all alarming. Taking my RF meter around town, many intersections have alarming amounts of RF. While it is “non-ionizing” this radiation has been proven to alter DNA and cause mimic disease, including COVID.
Here’s the deal. The body recognized a pathogen entering the body by its RF frequency vibrations. When the body senses certain wave lengths, it goes into full defense mode. All they do is find that frequency, and broadcast it from a tower and your cell phone, you have instant pandemic with people getting sick, but the body is responding to the RF signal, but thinks it’s a pathogen due to its RF signal measured in HZ.
COVID does not kill, the body’s reaction to its perception is what kills, and for sure, the vax kills. All what we call illness, is in reality, the body trying to detox as that is how it responds. Coughing, sneezing, fever are all detox mechanisms, and when we medicate to alleviate the symptoms it actually slows the processes. Now that I detox daily, I never get sick.
As for surveillance, wow, this is huge. Most people think this is innocuous and really are addicted to the convinces as each day the noose gets tighter and tighter. But it is all for a purpose or end game; what is the end game?
In the early stages of the Church, the fathers—and pretty much all with a philosophical bent—processed everything in the world through the binocular lens that defined the dogma regarding the Incarnation. When they looked at a tree, or a man, or even a rock, they saw two things. First, they saw the outward manifestation that the tree has a physical presence, but they also saw that everything had a “nature” later defined as a logoi. All humanity has a shared nature, they said. And men (as opposed to women) had a shared nature. To them, an apple tree bore apples because it was its nature to bear apples and not oranges. Even a rock had a nature that caused it to just sit there until hurled as a weapon.
To be like the fathers, we must not just see the physical manifestation of the ever infiltrating surveillance state, but to see the nature behind it and its end game. What is the nature of those driving the surveillance state?
It is the HUNTSMAN or hunter mentality exhibited by both Nimrod and Esau. They hunt for sport, and their sport is not just to hunt animals but to hunt people. I always thought of hunting deer, elephants, or whatever as not at all a sport unless the deer could shoot back. Do you want to know where this is all going? watch Hunger Games. The surveillance state is a shooting gallery with all of us as sitting ducks. It is the pedo, that pleasures in hurting the innocent thing. It’s not about sex—or whore would be enough—it’s about power, the most intoxicating drug of all. Tolkien understood this well.
This hunter mentality WILL hunt you down—at some point—when you do not comply. And they’ll use your cell phone to do it or some other means like facial recognition, or the vax. Their surveillance is not just because they are a bunch of voyeurs, they take pleasure in harm; that’s their recreational drug of choice. Of course, this is sick, but it’s their obsession and channeling Lucifer.
RF is on the spectrum of visible light, and Xray, its all about frequency, Tesla knew it a hundred years ago laying the foundation for many things, including the direct energy weapon. When you turn on the Wi-Fi, it’s like turning on a light at a frequency that can be seen by the cell tower—think MRI machine, it’s all the same stuff.
First order of defense, get the damn cell phone away from your head. Never buy a Tesla car, they are rolling bombs. If you live near a tower, shield your home. “Let the (hunger) games begin!” They already have.
John Lee, what do you use to detox everyday? What do you use to block RF in your home? As a healthcare individual, I did not know about the RF vibrations as it relates to illness, but it makes sense that all is connected in the energy fields of the earth. Any book suggestions?
Thanks
Glad you asked. The best thing would be if I could see your house, your situation, even evaluate you and make assessments. Too much detox too fast can be problematic as detox is always two stages, breaking it loose, then getting it out. Most people’s mistake is just breaking it loose with herbs where it just circulates then goes back into the liver. Once heavy metals are dislodged on the cell level the blood becomes toxic and then it has to be gotten out quickly or the liver, kidneys get hammered. To detox properly, a proper paradigm is required that pretty much all symptoms are the body’s effort to get something out that does not belong. If you are in the medical field, you will have to relearn a few things. Your education may be your worst obstacle, as modern medicine is designed to fill Big Pharma’s bank accounts and not heal, especially when it comes to chronic diseases. E.g. statins do more damage and are based on fantasy diagnosis.
And no doubt, the environment of health care is rife with toxic chemicals and your body is probably loaded. All cellulite is the body’s toxic waste dump. The reason it is so hard to get rid of, is when you start to break it down, toxins are release back into the blood stream and the body revolts. The body’s reaction is to lock it up. All tumors are the same thing, the body locking up something harmful.
My detox regimen is quite complicated, and there is no way to explain it here, but I have taken years off my life and am as fit as men half my age. The other day I rode my bike hard for over an hour with BFR[1] strapped on, after lifting weights and doing some body weight exercise. I have not had a single cold, flue, COVID, since before 2019 (2018 or 17). My problem is finding time to just burn off energy. So I take pot shots at rogue bishops.
The first thing you do is ground your bed.[2] Most of the body’s detox is during sleep.
Of course, start with avoiding things: toss microwave oven, shut off Wifi—hard wire all computers. Keep the damn phone at a distance, shut it off at night. And above all, don’t take the jab, it is a cocktail of toxins, some irrevocable.
I use a custom near infrared sauna, and coffee enemas (old school—never higher than 115 degrees F). Doing coffee enema right will purge the liver. BTW: life insurance companies gage the body age (not chronological age) by the condition of the liver by testing liver enzymes. Liver enzymes are to detox, and a response to the level of toxins it detects.
Here is one hack: Iodine is powerful detox agent: Get Povidone Iodine. Take transdermaly (NEVER Swallow). Soak a pad made from toilet paper, stick it between the butt cheeks against the rectum (not inserted), then sleep on it. Or in the armpit to cleanse lymph system, or rinse mouth (do not swallow) with 50/50 povidone/water twice daily to cleanse the head.
For RF protection in the home, I have done a few videos on Bitshute.com under “John Lee Presents.” Depending upon your proximity to cell towers, but now I have moved out of the big city and protections are much easier.
RF in the air is a toxin just like nuclear radiation, just on a different wavelength, and in sufficient quantities or over extended time is just as deadly.
Let me know what your questions are and I’ll try to get published some more videos.
[1] https://health.clevelandclinic.org/blood-flow-restriction-training/
[2] https://grounded.com/grounding-earthing-sleep-systems
Just a caveat here: if you are on meds, all bets are off. Detoxing will probably affect how that med works one way or the other. It could make the body more responsive to the med, or cancel the med out depending on what detox you do, depending on the med. Sauna will detox about anything, but you have to replenish minerals, especially magnesium.
Here is what you have to remember, the body—by nature—is always seeking equilibrium (1) and (2) adapt to its situation. If you push it one way, it pushes back toward the middle. If you want to be strong, lift weights, if you want strong heart, do cardio the body will adapt. If you want to be fat and slouchy do nothing. Try HIIT.
I told one woman who once was an active marathon runner, who went on thyroid hormone replacement, that when the body sees the synthetic hormone, it will make the thyroid go to sleep making the situation worse. My philosophy for most things is to simulate what is there. When I was an avid runner, people kept saying don’t run on hard surfaces, it will harm your knees or back—that’s exactly what I went out and done because I knew it would forge my joints. The only problem I had was running on constant side slopped surfaces that kept the feet on an angle (roads are never flat for drainage). I have zero joint problems, mostly because of detox. Toxics tend to gravitate toward injuries. Copper socks, copper braces, all work wonders. Somehow the copper negates the toxin allowing the joints to heal quicker. When I injured a knee doing the duck walk (stupid exercise), a Tommy Copper knee brace worked wonders.
The body was made to heal itself—God wants you well. If you think God wants you sick, then stop going to the doctor as that would defeat God’s will. By getting toxins out of the way, the body will heal. People buy all kinds of expensive vitamins, but before any of that stuff works, the toxins have to get out.
If you have taken the jab, then that is uncharted territory to detox that. As graphene is magnetically motivated, it seeks out in the body high sources of magnetic field: the heart, the brain, the penial, the reproductive organs. My only suggestion is put a magnet in each shoe under the insole. By creating another magnetic field it will draw the graphene away from the vitals. But, you still have to get it out of your feet by foot soaks with Epsom salts or pure salt or some other agent, even household cleaning products, vinegar and salt works. The graphene in the foot soak will be the shiny specks or surface film seen with a flashlight. Because graphene is nano, it can go crossways without utilizing blood flow. As far as the effect of the mrna part, I have no clue how to negate that. Other than to pray, pray, pray.