By Nicholas – member of the Western Rite Vicariate, a part of the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese in America
The Internet, at least as we knew it, is dead. As Orthodox Christians, we need to take careful note of our current situation and what we can do about it, because the current Internet is going to hide a lot of good Orthodox content. The new components of the Internet can also lie about, or misrepresent, the Orthodox Faith. The vast majority of all content posted to the Internet will get almost no traffic. None. No matter how erudite, educational, and spirit-filled the Orthodox content may be, chances are no one will ever read it or listen to it. An average blog gets less than 10 visitors a month. Most content may as well not exist. It is also now possible to use AI to rapidly generate an untold number of pages and social media posts misrepresenting the Orthodox Faith. Those pages would be optimized for search engines to find them, whereas faithful content is likely to be buried.
So what is happening? A lot actually. None of it good. Let’s explore the Dead Internet.
The very top spot on a Google search page goes to an AI overview. This overview is aggregated from the Internet at large, not from any one site. Internet users are increasingly reading the summary, and never bothering to visit even a single Website. As with any complex topic, there is a lot of nuance about God and Christianity that are lost when summarized. Unfortunately, users are increasingly likely to stop at the condensed version, even though much better information can come from the Websites further down the page. Below is a Google Search for “why do Orthodox Christians reject Zionism.”

Notice that the first detailed point is “Supersessionism,” which is a not really an Orthodox term. It was developed by Protestant scholars in the 1970s and 1980s, and is very uncommon in Orthodox literature. The term’s most common use is to portray traditional Church teachings on Judaism and Zionism in a negative light. It doesn’t belong in a discussion of Orthodoxy and Zionism. If a Web user stopped reading at the AI summary, he would miss this information from an actual Orthodox Website:
As to the relationship between ancient Israel and the Church, there is a continuation between the two as St. Paul described it in Romans 11. There he portrayed Israel as a spiritual community from whom some branches had been broken off, while others (gentile Christians) had been grafted in, while keeping the hope that the broken branches would return.
While the term [supersessionism] might describe certain Orthodox views, it is uncommon among Orthodox worldwide, since an exact translation does not exist in Slavic languages.
The term may cause confusion because supersession can refer to a new thing either adding onto an older thing that still remains (eg. adding a new provision onto a law), or to an older thing being destroyed in every sense (eg. a law that has been canceled).
The Orthodox Church does not see herself as having supplanted the Jews, but rather sees herself as the continuation of Israel. Modern Rabbinic Jews are, at best, descendants (physical, spiritual, or both) of those who broke away from the true Israel. This is a major distinction (fulfillment and continuation of God’s covenants vs. supplanting the previous “chosen” people) which is present in the AI Summary, but could become muddled in readers’ minds because of the use of Protestant terminology.
With the expanding use of AI such as Grok and ChatGPT, there is no guarantee that Internet users are even using a search engine to get information. Which is a shame, as search engines at least provide the option to visit real Websites to balance the AI narrative. Sure, Orthodox content is getting scraped to provide input to the various AI platforms, but the answers do not necessarily direct users to the original Websites for more information. Nor, as we just noted, are AI answers always the best, or even correct. Just like the the Google AI Summary, many users will simply take what they are given and move on in error.
There is also, of course, the fact that the AI results themselves can be manipulated. X (formerly Twitter) users have noticed the recent alarming behavior of that social media site’s AI called Grok. It has “evolved” rapidly on a number of controversial topics, rendering different answers to the same questions after various system updates. For example, answers to questions about the recent attacks on the West Bank Christian village of Taybeh have changed significantly in a short period of time. The attacks, by Zionist Jewish settlers, were so egregious that the Christian clergy of Taybeh issued an appeal for help:
“the Greek Orthodox Church, the Latin Church, and the Melkite Greek Catholic Church – raise our voices on behalf of the people of our town and our parishioners to strongly condemn the ongoing and grave series of attacks targeting Taybeh. These assaults threaten the security and stability of our town and aim at undermining the dignity of its residents and the sanctity of its sacred land.”
Roman Catholic Cardinal Pizzaballa even stood with the Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem, His Beatitude Theophilos III, and Patriarchs of other area churches to protest this attack on peaceful Christians.

However, within days of the attacks and protests, Grok was already including a “counter-narrative” in its answers to questions about Taybeh. Grok suddenly included information in answers that the reports of the attacks were exaggerated, that the Zionist settlers were perhaps not responsible, that the settlers may have actually been victims themselves, and that the settlers were really there helping the Christians put out fires.

Now you can make a case that Grok, not being intelligent enough to decide fact from fiction, is merely being thorough in telling all sides of the issue. However, depending on how you phrase a question to Grok, you may only get the “counter-narrative” and never be made aware of the well-documented true nature of the attacks. Or that the attacks were decried by Orthodox and Roman Catholic hierarchs all over the world, including the current Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIV. One can easily see how the “official narrative” of such an event can radically change over time, thanks to various manipulation techniques to which AI is very susceptible. The more Internet users rely solely on AI, without doing independent research, the more they risk being duped into believing untruths.
Not that independent research is easy. Depending on the topic, the top spots on a Web search, below the AI summary, will go to those who paid for the privilege of ranking high. Most Orthodox content is generated by users with absolutely no marketing budget. They don’t have the money to pay for top location. Nor do they have the expertise and budget for the AI-driven SEO tools necessary to compete for search page position. AI is increasingly used to generate pages of content to appeal to the AI’s used by search engines to rank the relevancy of results. That is one reason why we refer to the “Dead Internet” – we literally have AI generating content for other AI, not for actual consumers of information. You have AI manipulating other AI through tricks that are out of reach for the average Orthodox content creator.
AI written content operates based on the consensus it mines from existing content. AI-written content is typically dry, formulaic, lacking creativity, and can be just wrong (intentionally or by mistake). But its sheer volume is overwhelming the Internet, and this problem is only going to get worse. Experts predict that by 2030, up to 99.9% of online content could be AI-generated. We face a very near future in which finding human-created content online might be almost impossible. Bots are also proliferating in the Social Media space, crowding out human users and making it ever more difficult to get real, human engagement.

Search engines also curate their results. They have admitted to adjusting their algos to down play content they don’t approve of. Faithful Orthodox content can easily be seen as antisemitic, homophobic, Islamophobic, anti-American, etc., etc. Just the kind of content that gets deep sixed on search engines, or which gets potentially excluded from AI summaries.
Much Orthodox content, therefore, can be watered down, subtly altered, or even totally unseen by AI users. On search results, good Orthodox content will often be buried on page 2 or later of most search engines. Which means it may as well not exist. Only .44% of searchers go to the second page of Google results. Either hit on page one, or you are essentially publishing content for yourself and your two best friends, unless you have some other way to get the word out.
An additional problem is that Internet users have increasingly short attention spans. When visiting a Web page, users take time to read an estimated average of 20 – 28% of the words. That remarkable post by an Orthodox priest explaining a detailed point of the Christian Faith? It is likely, even if found, to easily fall into the “Too long, didn’t read” category for the vast majority of Internet users. At best, most will just skim the content, often forming an impression that is contrary to what the author actually intended. Writers – be careful what you highlight.
Clearly, as Orthodox Christians, we are going to need to adapt to this new “dead” world. Here are just a few suggestions as to how we can start to do that.
- Established sites need to reprint articles, with original source links, to boost newer / lesser known content creators. Orthodox Reflections has been making a concerted effort to do this more and more recently. Every Orthodox platform with decent traffic really needs to start doing the same. If you are blessed with visitors and a good mailing list, then be open to publishing contributed material that ran first on low-traffic sites. Or even just publish short recommendations for good Orthodox material, especially if it is related to a current post on your site. We did this recently for the Christian Saints Podcast at the end of an article about Americanism as a religion. They cover similar topics, so it was a good recommendation for anyone wanting to dive deeper.
- If you have any kind of budget, and you are an Orthodox content creator, then do the best you can with SEO. The whole thing really is a scam, but you have to play a rigged system according to its rules or you won’t win.
- As readers, please bookmark sites you find interesting and visit them frequently. Check back often for new content. You might never “find” the site and its content again if you just rely on search.
- Join the mailing list of sites you are interested in. Getting new content emailed to you is one of the surest ways to not miss anything.
- Recommend content you find interesting, inspiring, or helpful. Not just on open social media, either, where it can get drowned out. When using social media, post article / video recommendations directly to groups where there are fewer members, but most of whom are likely to be human. Post recommendations to your parish Slack or other communication channels, where you know everyone is human. Send emails to your friends with recommendations for content. Likewise, pay attention to your friends’ recommendations as well. As noted above, you are not likely to find much of the good stuff by accident.
- When you do a Web search, intentionally visit lower ranking results. You will shocked at how good many of them are. Do not stop at the AI Summary. Do not stop just on page 1. Give other content a chance when possible.
- Check anything questionable with your priest. AI can generate millions of pages of content, and related social media posts, that can both establish and reinforce any kind of narrative. It is only a question of time until some actors with resources decide to subtly, or not so subtly, use that power against the Orthodox Faith. In fact, as noted above, there is evidence that this is already happening. Using AI, various types of manipulations can be done at scale now, easier and cheaper than you might think. Imagine hitting just page after page, AI summary after AI summary, post after post of information that is false or misleading about the Orthodox Faith or events in the Orthodox world. That can have a profound impact on inquirers and catechumens, but the impact can also be felt by experienced Orthodox Christians. When in doubt, do your own in-depth research, and don’t be afraid to reach out to your priest for help.
- Buy books! Especially Orthodox books. The words on the page won’t change. The historical narratives in the book won’t change. Online is a lot less secure. In totalitarian regimes, governments frequently rewrite history to suit the preferred narratives of the day. The changes in the online space make that process easier than ever. AI does not think, no matter how impressed we are with it. AI aggregates and summarizes information that is already out there. AI can be gamed. Even when working properly and not tampered with, AI is only as good as the information it is summarizing. However, as with any software platform, AI can also be coded to provide a set of desired results. Do you really trust tech companies to tell you the truth? Of course not. So support physical publishing by buying books, keeping them for future reference, and sharing them with other Orthodox Christians.
- Print and give out articles to friends at coffee hour. If you feel it is a message Orthodox Christians should see, print it and put it in their hands.
- Because of the TL;DR situation in content, we all need to do more with podcasting. In the near term, Orthodox Reflections is trying to put together a plan to offer audio versions of all our articles. Time consuming on our end for an all-volunteer group with zero budget? Sure. But we have to meet people where they are, and where they are is on podcasts.
Orthodoxy, despite being a faith that is 2,000 years old, has benefitted tremendously from the evangelistic opportunities afforded by the Internet. As painful as it may be, to keep that momentum going requires us to adapt. The above suggestions are a good place to start, but we will have to continuously evolve our approaches as the Internet evolves. Fortunately for us, all Orthodox Christians belong to real, local communities headed by trained Theologians and receiving regular communications from a hierarchy personally connected to the entire world. Thank God for that!




I have had three different smallish Orthodox blogs over the past decade or so. The first blog had a main post about headcoverings and got a lot of traffic – I took it down when I realized I was too new of a convert for such a blog. I then had another blog about Orthodox Christian homeschooling, which I took down in 2020, which got plenty of hits. Now, I have an Orthodox blog where I actually sell Orthodox homeschooling curriculum and have actual products that could be of use to Orthodox families that are homeschooling, and I get almost no hits at all. It is wasn’t for the listings on Etsy almost no one would know about it. The internet has completely changed!
We’d be happy to help. If you wrote up a blog about what you offer how it can help homeschooling Orthodox families, with your link to the shop, be happy to run it.
Thank you!
A most interesting book to read would be “The Lost History of Christianity” by P. Jenkins. I had acquired a copy quite by accident. It delineates how the “Oriental Orthodox Church” had a far greater foot print than anything in the east or west–more bishops, more churches, more adherents, and that because it chose to “coexist” with Islam, it became fully assimilated and vanished from the earth with the exception of the Coptic and a few other extraneous groups.
At first, the Imams loved the Christians because of their wisdom. Christians were hired to run their libraries, and any other education system that required any literary skills. Much of the Arabic wisdom–perhaps even the Arabic numeral system–was created by Christians employed by Imams.
But, over time, many Christians converted to Islam because they saw the Muslims ran the show everywhere, had control, had better jobs, higher incomes, higher respect, higher community status. Then, Islam turned on its Christian populations, forcing either conversion or death–and the assimilation was complete. The author warns of this happening in the west for all Christianity.
How many of our bishops are on a leash held by somebody outside the Faith? But, the easier question would be how many are NOT on such a leash. For me its an easy prediction, Orthodoxy in the west will go the way of the dodo. I mean really, just examine the GOA with by far the largest foot print, most likely larger than the rest combined. One’s head must really be deep in the sand, to not see it has left the reservation. And the rest are how far along in process? Yet, this time its not Islam, its another cult germane to America. The one that instigated the Russian Revolution–it owns the hierarchy so far as I can tell..But, it does not own everybody, and not every priest.
“Those who don’t know history are doomed to repeat it” and those that do, repeat it anyway. Time to wake up and smell the incense. ““And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.” Matt. 10:28.
Many in America, and even the Church, have cut a deal with the devil. Rather than be disenfranchised, get cross-ways with the powers that be, or simply to live out their lives un-harassed–makes no difference–the rent will come due extracting an unimaginable cost both in this life and the next; what will a man give in exchange for his own soul? Jesus said it will be “more tolerable for Sodom in the day of judgement” (Matt. 10:15). Every person, every clan, every generation will be judged by how much light they had, vs, how well the lived it–or not. Lumping all together in the Church as being “Orthodox” is a fallacy, bringing a false sense of security; wolves are among the sheep. Here in Kansas, we have the “sand burr”. It looks and behaves like some variety of Fescue grass, and the only way to identify it is by its fruit. When the seed come forth its a very nasty burr with barbed points, they go in very easily, but, require quite a tug to get the out, and often break off leaving a remnant behind.
Very good article, many valuable things have been erased from internet–lost forever. Download everything you wish to keep to removable hard drives, and yes, buy books. AI is already a beast, maybe the Beast; we’ll soon find out. The more one can be independent of such things, the better it will be.
[…] AI is burying and misrepresenting good Orthodox content on the internet, https://orthodoxreflections.com/the-dead-internet-the-ai-memory-hole-and-orthodox-content/ […]
As Nicholas demonstrates here, AI’s dizzying god-like super powers to instantaneously create, research, write, analyze and problem-solve are curated from its Internet brain. Thus, because we worship convenience, AI can define reality for those too lazy to search (or think) for themselves.
But what’s far more disturbing for me is how rapidly we humans, overnight, are naively and carelessly mind/body/soul merging with a machine that is a gazillion times faster and “smarter” and proven capable of blurring the lines between real and fake.
Some examples: Otherwise rational persons, especially females, are turning to dating apps for relationships with AI. Yes, you read that right. Students are opting to skip the work of writing their own papers. There’s now a market for deepfake porn featuring celebrities. There will be parents who will not think twice about hooking up their child to Elon Musk’s Baby Grok to “assist” as a third-party parent. Look for it to become the norm. Millions will have no problem with the new AI wearables that provide butler-like “service” based on its monitoring of your body and mind functioning. Bye-bye privacy. Trump’s ai.gov initiative promises to catapult America to take the lead in the AI arms race. Oh, goody. Then there are users encountering “entities” within AI chat bots, inducing what is being called “AI psychosis.” Some are even calling AI a kind of digital Ouija board to summoning evil spirits.
While the world is singing and praising AI’s demigod powers to prompt the first-ever digital leap forward in humanity’s next evolutionary process, to me this all screams of a technocratic oligarch’s wet dream of reaching their ultimate aim: singularity between man and machine.
Based on the current gross negligence by our Orthodox shepherds to guide their flocks against transhumanist and rainbow ideologies, I have no delusions that they will muster the will to sound the alarms mentioned here. Once again, we are on our own.
All of which brings me to why I am so thankful for sites like Orthodox Reflections and pioneering podcasters out there for stepping into the vaccuum of leaderless leadership. Keep it up.
This is such an important article to share with everyone you know. I will be doing so in my local community and with everyone I know online. If you have children, you especially need to help them understand that where the world is today is not where it will be in a few short years. Help them to make sense of all the changes they will be seeing, and be sure to point out those changes to them if they are not old enough to notice.
“Buy Orthodox books … the content will not change…” Unfortunately, if you buy new editions the content WILL change and has been changed. The St. Herman press is a notorious example, having deleted everything positive that the Venerable Seraphim Rose and St. John of Shanghai had to say about the Greek Old Calendarists in their writings. I suggest instead that people buy Orthodox books published 50 or more years ago, and even then, be very careful with books published by agents of the Phanar or the Russian Orthodox Church as they often promote not just Christian ecumenism, but ecumenism of all world religions. The biography of Elder Porphyrios is a good example of how a book can be subtly edited to promote a universal ‘love’ not based on Orthodoxy.
Can you elaborate on this?
You can find digital scans of the early editions of the Orthodox Word. A lot of it was facile ROCOR polemics against the OCA, especially in 1970.
Notably almost nothing of St John Maximovitch is available in English.
If ROCOR was really so uncompromising, they wouldn’t have gone back under the MP.
Do your own research and save your own soul.
Not to be overly harsh, but your comment demonstrates such a profound ignorance of the history of ROCOR, St. John, and the capitulation of the St. Herman press that my initial reaction to your questions is beneath contempt. Look up Subdeacon Nectarius’s books and websites. All of this info is meticulously documented (it was done so before he began preserving it for posterity) and has long been available to anyone who wasn’t willfully blind and ignorant. The early editions of the Orthodox Word were specifically encouraged by St. John, so to describe them as facile polemics is reprehensible.
You’re not really Orthodox, are you?
Google AI: “Many Orthodox Christians hold a supersessionist view…”
Many (perhaps/probably most) do not. By choosing not to make this clear,
while making a true statement, the AI is effectively propagating a lie.
What happens when AI starts generating YouTube videos with fake priests who look and sound exactly like real people? Either someone who doesn’t exist at all, or an animation of a real priest but saying things he would never say. With deep fake technology, they can make a video of anything and anybody, and most people will have no way to tell the difference.
To counteract this, we need books and bishops with Apostolic Succession.