By Stratis Georgiou – a Concerned Orthodox Christian
The Slap Heard Around the Orthodox World
At the First Ecumenical Council in Nicea (in present-day Iznik, Turkiye) in 325 AD – i.e. the Year of our Lord and not CE or the “common era” as the pagans would like us to use as just another insult to the Son of Man – St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, the Bishop of Myra, was so disgusted with the heresy spewing from Arius’ demonically-inspired mouth to the point where he slapped this heresiarch in the face.
St. Nicholas was immediately removed from the Council venue because the Canons of our Church[i] forbid the clergy to strike any man at all.
But, because St. Nicholas was so beloved 1699 years ago – as he is today – this left the other 317 Fathers of our Church in attendance at this Council perplexed about what penance to apply to him.
As Holy Tradition tells us, the Lord Jesus Christ Himself and His Mother, our Glorious Lady, the Theotokos, came to St. Nicholas’ defence by appearing to some of the Fathers during the night with the revelation that no disciplinary action was to be taken against St. Nicholas and that he was to be re-admitted to the Council venue.
Christ and the Theotokos knew that St. Nicholas had acted out of love – and not passion – and wanted to make sure that the leadership of this first, extremely important Council, was clear about this.
In America, it is said that when your President calls on you with a request, you just do it. Now just imagine if God and His Mother tell you to do something. In this context, please take a silent minute and contemplate this: the God-Man Himself and his Holy Mother … together … appeared to the Bishops at this first Ecumenical Council and gave them their marching orders.[ii] What an awesome message, which is, by the way, the word we use to describe Christ in every Divine Liturgy; we also revere and venerate the motherly love, kindness and holy protection (αγια σκέπη) that the Theotokos, the ever-Virgin Mary, imparts on us – and especially monastics – when we (and they) need it most.
Who Will Be Our St. Nicholas as this Age Comes to a Close?
And with the following question, I am sure that this article will become controversial to some and, perhaps, welcomed or long-awaited by others:
Who will slap, hopefully metaphorically but maybe literally, US Archbishop Elpidophoros in the face, the next time he spews out another heresy?
In the history of the Greek Orthodox Archbishopric in the US, we must ask ourselves, as American-based Orthodox Christians (and please notice that I omitted the reference to Greek in this instance), can anything good come out of this hierarch’s Gotham-and-Gomorrah based headquarters?
Truly and sincerely, I ask you, the faithful readers of this site:
Has there ever been anyone else in this position who has looked to curry favour with woke, secular power brokers of his time and kiss his boss’ behind in the same blatant and unabashed way that AB Elpi (as I refer to him) does?
And, if you are thinking that I am being too harsh, I would like to refresh your memory about the history of this hierarch’s very curious – and I’m being euphemistic – pronouncements and behaviours since he came to power (in 2019) by referring you to a previous article published on this site, summarizing a presentation by Fr. Saša Petrović (a Serbian Orthodox Priest), in August 2024 which laid bare AB Elpi’s official writings and acts which are, arguably, heretical and, at the very least not-Orthodox: Fr. Saša’s Warning: Elpidophoros ‘Leads His Entire Archdiocese to Spiritual Destruction’.
You can try ignore these things as “background noise” (see below) out of Christian love, kindness and forgiveness but, at some point, if something appears before you and it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s probably a duck! [iii]
What Gives me the Right to Write this Article?
To be clear, my intention is not to stir up controversy during this year’s nativity fast. (May the Lord strengthen you in your fast and may your peace achieved through the fast to date not be disturbed by this article.)
To provide some additional background for my statement about who the heck am I to write this article, let me first say that I am a nobody. I am a simple, Orthodox Christian man who is trying to be watchful in the age in which I live.
The inspiration for writing this article came to me while I was reading about St. Nicholas’ in the Synaxarion[iv] on his feast day (December 6), very early in the morning, while sitting in silence in front of the armoire (see below) in which my wife and I) keep the icons we have collected from our individual and joint pilgrimages.

My intention in writing this article is to express concern, as a watchful Orthodox Christian, about the actions and writings of AB Elpi, which continue to remain unchecked by The Phanar.[v] In fact, the continuing silence about this US Hierarch’s endorsements of un-Orthodox things from Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew (or EP Bart, as I call him in my publications) about AB Elpi’s shenanigans is actually deafening to some of us.
Look, I understand that a fellow brother or sister Orthodox Christian might be offended by this article and may be thinking: Who does this guy think he is to write an article like this about our US Archbishop?
My answer, as nobody special, is this:
Our Lord gave me eyes and ears and has returned me to the Orthodox Christian path from which I strayed for many years and I am going to use both to be watchful about our faith. The Lord has also given me an ability to analyze things and write, clearly and concisely about them, which I will exercise, from time to time, in a respectful way, to “call’em as I see’em” about our Greek Orthodox leadership in the US (and Canada) when something seems off to me about them.
Now let me circumscribe what I just said by acknowledging that as Orthodox Christians, we must guard against the vileness of our tongues. The tongue, inspired by demonic hubris, can be filthy and hurtful. The Fathers and our modern-day Saints have written extensively about this issue and we must take it seriously. Does this mean, however, that we, as individual Orthodox Christians, should remain wilfully blind and silent when we see and experience things – speeches, writings, discussions and blatant, self-aggrandizing PR stunts or photo-ops – that seem contrary to the tenets of our faith?
My respectful answer to this question is a resounding – “Heaven No” – and I will continue to pick my spots and speak out and publish when inspired to do so (but only after prayer and research about the issue at hand).
In my daily life, since making my way back to my Orthodox path, I try to speak or write with gentleness, as St. Paul, St. Nektarios, St. Paisios and St. Porphyrios, to name a few, counsel us to do. However, I fully acknowledge that am a struggling sinner and, as such, I often fall short of the ideal of being gentle. Here is my rationale for this: sometimes one must be direct to get the attention of those who can make a change. (I am not sure what, exactly, St. Nicholas was thinking when he slapped Arius but, it could have been this: enough is enough!)
I will say that when speaking or writing about our beautiful, rich and true Orthodox Christian faith, my motivation is never to hurt but, rather, to shine a light on something that does not seem right to me so that my fellow brothers and sisters in Christ can think about the issue for themselves and be watchful for themselves and for their circle of influence (their spouses, their kids, their friends, and their parishes).
In my view, we should not shy away from the marketplace of ideas … which, recently (i.e. in the last four years, especially), has been the target of censorship by the left. And, to be clear, I fully accept and welcome that the “marketplace” includes critiques and corrections, which I will accept with humility. Of course, I may choose to respond to a critique … once … but what I will not do is engage in what happens often in the comment sections of social media platforms: repetitive arguments back and forth that go nowhere and detract from the original point of the article.
By all means, if you have a counterpoint to make about this article, please feel free to make it; likewise, I may choose to retort but beyond that, I will take the advice of Saint Paul (see below) to step away from further dialogue on the issue.
Look, in my journey back to Orthodoxy, I read extensively and came across things that seemed “offensive” – initially – to me. In my case, my training guided me to not rush to judgment. Instead, I re-read the piece in issue to better understand the content and technique of the writer, did my own research on the issue, consulted my trusted Orthodox brethren and spiritual father about it and only then did I form a “final” opinion about it.
Over time, I have identified sources that I trust for my continuing education about our faith. My sources include so-called “professionals” and lay people both of whom have edified my Orthodox Christian learning and journey over the last six or so years.
This article is my way of adding my voice to our Orthodox Christian marketplace of ideas and in this regard, you are free to condemn it or consider it in a way that may edify your Orthodox path … or just file it away in your long term memory and think about again if the concerns that have been raised about AB Elpi’s Archbishopric continue to be borne out by his future writings and behaviours.
Scroll Down to Continue
The Importance of a Lone Voice that Speaks Out
From my readings of the lives of our Saints, I have noticed the following theme: our Saints spoke out in the face of things that were heretical in their times. And, in this respect, remember that it is only in retrospect that we read about their lives and their lessons as Saints.
Hold on now … before you keyboard warriors rush to the comment section to tell me that I am not a Saint and that I should just shut up, let me address both of these possible reactions.
First, I understand and acknowledge that I am the farthest thing from a Saint; however, my hope is that by sticking to my Orthodox path, even though I may fall often,[vi] – and with the help of my wife, my parish priest, my spiritual father, my biological siblings and all of my brothers and sisters in Christ – I will complete the race that St. Paul speaks of (i.e. the process of theosis), and, by the grace of our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ, be judged worthy of admission to the Choir of the Saints and be allowed to sit at eternal Heavenly Banquet table that He has prepared for us.[vii]
Second, I won’t shut up.
St. Mark of Ephesus[viii] was the lone dissenting voice at the Council of Florence in 1439, which basically saved Orthodoxy from the Latin heresy of the Filioque, among other “compromises” proposed at such council. Holy Tradition tells us that his dissent preserved our faith as we know it today.[ix] When the Bishops of his own delegation to this Council tried to intimidate him into accepting the Latin heresies for the sake of ecumenism (i.e. union with the Pope of Rome who had ripped our faith into West and East) he replied as follows:
“There can be no compromise in matters of the Orthodox Faith.”
Holy Tradition has preserved and memorialized the legacy of this St. Mark so that we – as Orthodox Christians – remember that one person, one voice, can make a difference. (For those who need it, we have many examples in the secular world of one person making a difference which you have probably read about in your secular lives.) Therefore, I ask – rhetorically: Why should we, as individual orthodox Christians, remain silent when we see or hear something that does not appear to be Orthodox?
Again, I am not writing this article to cast aspersions about AB Elpi; he has done that all by himself by his pronouncements and his actions over the last five years. My goal is to add my voice to other Orthodox Christian voices who see what I see and hear what I hear and are concerned about the leadership of Greek Orthodoxy in America by AB Elpi and what seems to be wilful blindness and silence from EP Bart.
So What Do We Do About AB Elpi and The Phanar?
The short and ultimate answer is that we leave this up to God.
As we know from the history of the Church, AB Elpi – and EP Bart – are not the only hierarchs who have made questionable statements and engaged in dubious behaviours in their official capacity. And, fortunately or unfortunately, depending on your perspective, we, American Orthodox Christians, live in the times of these hierarchs which, in my view, makes them our problems
My spiritual father recently made a point to me, which I believe we must remember, but, not in the same way our as Protestants friends do (i.e. to the exclusion of the Mother of God, Icons, Holy Tradition, the Sacraments):
Our loyalty should be to Christ and our focus should be on emulating Him in all aspects of our lives, including forgiveness and mercy.
Obviously, this is the quintessential issue for each of us as we travel along our salvific path; and just as obviously, this is easier said than done. Regardless, I believe this simple rule should be our central goal.
Stated yet another way, I believe that the point of my spiritual’s father advice is to make sure that we are filtering out what Saint Paul calls “stupid controversies, genealogies, dissensions, and quarrels over the law, for they are unprofitable and futile. …” [x] as we walk along our Orthodox paths.
But, this begs the following question: When is enough… enough?
And, this brings me to what I call the longer answer to the question of what we, as an individual Orthodox Christians, can, should, or may do when we observe our hierarchs engaging in things that don’t seem to jibe with the clear Canons of our faith … like concelebrating the Divine Liturgy with the Heterodox.
Answering this question on an individual level involves a lot of introspection and prayer and consultation with your Orthodox advisors and friends about how you want to live your Orthodox Christian life.
Look, it is perfectly fine to worship and remain loyal to Christ in silence so long as when you are asked to deny Him – and, make no mistake, this time in coming – you are prepared to say “No” and confess your faith in Him.
My approach is, obviously, to speak out.
In my lay and professional life, I seek knowledge about something before getting to know that something and only after that do I attempt to share my knowledge and research about it. This has also been true about my journey back to Orthodoxy, through which I came to know the Lord, Jesus Christ, in my daily life.
In my life’s path, I only became curious about our Orthodox faith very late in life and, looking back, I thank God for the struggles that brought me back to it. In this regard, one of the best[xi] experiences I had, about 15 years ago now, was to be trolled on the Internet before trolling was a thing. Why was I trolled? Because I defended a certain group of kids who found themselves in a woke, DEI scenario (before these terms entered our daily discourse) that was destroying their experience in what should have been a fun time in their lives. I stood my ground and emerged stronger and more determined to speak out against injustices and falsehoods and generally, things that don’t seem right to me.
And, so, from where I sit and watch AB Elpi, something is off with him and, in my respectful opinion, it is dark.
I truly hope that I am totally wrong about him. And let me state, for the record (so to
speak) that if he emerges as a champion and stalwart of our Orthodox faith rather than continuing to progress American Orthodoxy down the slippery slope of ecumenism, I will be the first to publish a full and unmitigated retraction of this article. Until then, I will remain watchful and truthful to Orthodoxy and keep adding my voice to situations that I believe call for all Orthodox voices to speak out.
As for striking AB Elpi in the face, literally, if … or should I say when … he makes another pronouncement or a PR stunt that crosses the line between Orthodoxy and heresy, I will leave that to the conscience and discernment of the clergy or other hierarchs close to him at that time. As for a metaphorical strike, I reserve the right to add my voice to other Orthodox faithful who are using our eyes and ears to watch and listen for things from our leadership that are not Orthodox.
[i] There are many Canons of the Church, which were handed down by various Fathers at different times. They have been compiled in what is known as the Pedalion or “The Rudder”. (As a quick aside, I believe that the faithful readers of this site would really enjoy hearing Father Kosmas of the Orthodox Monastery of the Archangel Michael in Australia pronounce the “Rudder” in his Orthodox Talks series, which I highly recommend.) It is beyond the scope of this article to say anymore on the Canons but I will say this for any reader who may have a negative reaction about anything “canonical”: although some of the Canons are clearly dated because they were handed down by the Fathers to deal with very specific, historical, heretical situations or behaviours of their times, the majority of the Canons are timeless. We may not like what they mandate for us as Orthodox Christians (because they are strict) but, they clearly apply to us even today. Fortunately, our spiritual fathers, father confessors and our parish priests, out of love (including tough love), compassion and discernment, apply the concept of economia to mitigate the penances mandated for transgressions of the Canons. (There is so much to say about this concept and its application today … but, perhaps in a future article.) In all events, the reading of the Pedalion should not be undertaken as a novel. As with any works inspired by God, the reading should be done under the supervision and guidance of a priest or spiritual father.
[ii] I know that some of you reading this may experience the same doubt about St. Nicholas’ life (and this event in particular) that St. Thomas felt when his fellow Apostles told him about the resurrection of our Lord. But have no doubt, dear brothers and sisters, about St. Nicholas’ bio or his motive for striking Arius because the Lord, the Theotokos – and the Saints to whom the gift of discernment has been given – know the hearts of men! Please, make an effort to read the lives of Saints, little by little, and your doubts about any aspects of our Orthodox Christian faith will dissipate over time by the power and grace of the Holy Spirit.
[iii] Of course, as Orthodox Christians we must always be vigilant about not being deceived by the little troublemaker, (as St. Paisios calls satan) who can appear as an angel of light. The Saints tell us to ignore “visions” and “signs” when they first appear and if the message is truly from God, He will persist and make it clear to us that it is He who is giving us this message. The same vigilance should be applied to the “duck” saying. However, in the case of AB Elpi, his writings and his actions since being elevated to the position of US Archbishop have given all of us cause to question what is motivating or animating this hierarch.
[iv] You can read an excerpt from the Synaxarion about St. Nicholas Bishop of Myra, the Wonderworker here: https://www.stnicholascenter.org/who-is-st-nicholas/stories-legends/classic-sources/synaxarion. However, I would encourage you to buy the 7-volume Synaxarion set for your Orthodox Christian library. You can order it here: https://sebastianpress.org/synaxarion/. (To be clear, I have no interest in St. Sebastian Press and I certainly don’t have any financial interest in referring the purchase of this set to you.)
[v] This is an alternate name of the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople currently presided over by Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew: https://www.patriarchateofconstantinople.com/index.html
[vi] Again, please consult the lives of Saints about this. No matter how often you fall, you must get back up, repent and do everything possible to not succumb to the same temptation (or a different one) that led to the same, prior fall. Yes, this very easy to say and hard to live by … but, as Orthodox Christians, this is our obligation. And a final word for those that think they can “game” God’s infinite mercy by “faking” repentance: He knows your heart when it comes to genuine effort and repentance.
[vii] You know that question that people like to ask at parties and other social gatherings about the historical figures that you would like to host as dinner guests. Well, hands downs, for me it is Christ, the Theotokos, and our Saints. If I make it to Heaven, I can’t wait to ask them about their lives in the times in which they lived and about so many other questions I have for each of them … assuming asking questions is a thing in Heaven, the place “… where there is no pain, nor sorrow, nor suffering, but life everlasting”: see the Eastern Orthodox memorial service prayers. I take Christ the Word at His word about Heaven and I try to live my life being telos-bound toward it.
[viii] Here are two sources of the story of St. Mark of Ephesus: https://stmarkofephesus.org/life-of-saint-mark-of-ephesus/ and https://www.oca.org/saints/lives/2020/01/19/100228-saint-mark-archbishop-of-ephesus
[ix] Again, please do not think – and comment – that I am comparing myself to St. Mark of Ephesus.
[x] St. Paul’s Letter to Titus 3:8-15.
[xi] When I say “best”, I mean this in retrospect. At the time, the situation was very trying, including death threats again me and bullying of my children in school, the latter of which actually strengthened their characters. I was pilloried in local and cross-border press by what we know today as the liberal media who pursued only those facts that suited the false narrative about me that made for sensational headlines. (as a quick aside, in 2015, as I watched Donald Trump, the businessman, launch his first presidential bid and witnessed what the liberal media did to him and then, in 2019, what the same media did to those who spoke out against the COVID-19 narrative that Dr. Fauci was pushing, I realized that I had been an early victim of this type of “journalism”.) In my experience, I lost “friends” who believed the false narrative about me and even some family members shunned me or were quick to lecture me about my stance at the time. However, I never wavered in my stance because it was a correct approach (notice I did not say the correct approach) for the situation I found myself in. Time has vindicated my stance and it has become a wonderful life lesson for my kids about the power of thick skin and strong character. I believe that this experience has prepared me for the struggles that I will face in my Orthodox path; however, to be clear, I know the assault on my character will pale in comparison to what is coming for Christians but, as this age comes to a close, regardless of whether this actually occurs in my lifetime, I now have Christ on my side who has provided the following divine counsel: “But when they deliver you up, do not worry about how or what you should speak. For it will be given to you in that hour what you should speak; for it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father who speaks in you.” Matthew 10:19-20.







https://spzh.eu/en/zashhita-very/89322-patronal-feast-with-his-holiness
2 December 2025
Patronal Feast with His Holiness
When the supernatural is placed at the service of political expediency.
The Greek branch of the UOJ has published an archival article by priest and theologian Anastasios Gotsopoulos, written on December 1, 2014. It concerns the events that took place during the visit of then-Pope Francis on the Patronal Feast of the Ecumenical Patriarchate. The article also contains a reference to an earlier visit of Pope Benedict XVI to Constantinople.
“Unfortunately, what is described in the article published eleven years ago remains relevant, because this year, during the visit of Pope Leo XIV to Constantinople on the Feast Day of St. Andrew, the same things occurred as in 2006 and in 2014,” the editorial board of the Greek branch of UOJ writes.
When the supernatural sacrament is used to serve expediency…We have once again witnessed what took place at Saint George’s Church in Constantinople on the Feast Day of Saint Andrew (November 29–30, 2014). and, apparently, we will see it again and again so that we gradually become accustomed and, without resistance, move toward the restoration, as His Holiness put it, of “full communion” with the “primatial sister Church of Rome,” “presiding in love” if we refer to the Fathers.
The fact that this tempts some of our Orthodox brothers does not concern us too much: we easily label them “fanatics,” “fundamentalists,” “provincials,” mock them and that is enough for us. Especially since we have allies in this endeavor – the media and politicians of all stripes, who are undoubtedly interested in the care of Bartholomew and Francis for the “restoration of the Temple of God, that is, the Church,” as revealed to us by the “brother, Bishop of Rome” Francis!
I will not analyze the words about “full communion” spoken by the Ecumenical Patriarch. A profound theological text, “The New Ecclesiology of Patriarch Bartholomew”, has already appeared, pointing to serious deviations from the faith. But does anyone doubt that the Patriarch’s address to the Pope on Saturday, November 29, 2014, in the Patriarchal Church signifies full acceptance of the Dogmatic Constitution “On the Church” and the Decree “On Ecumenism” of the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965)?
“Brother” Francis went even further, explaining the thoughts of his “brother” Bartholomew and referring in considerable detail to the Decree “On Ecumenism”. As a true Jesuit, he naturally remained silent about another document of the same Council – the Decree “On the Eastern (Uniate) Churches”. Nevertheless, a careful listener can easily perceive that His Holiness has this in mind and is proposing precisely this model for the unification of Catholics and Orthodox Christians. It is no coincidence that Cardinal Leonardo Sandri, Prefect of the Congregation for the Eastern Churches, was present in his retinue…
I suppose that after all this, the Great Council of the Orthodox Church, if it ever takes place, should – on the recommendation of the relevant Chancery in Constantinople – recognize the Second Vatican Council as the Eighth Ecumenical Council! This is becoming an urgent necessity: some high-ranking Orthodox hierarchs need to acquire at least some consistency and ecclesiological justification, which the Seven Ecumenical Councils – outdated, as practice shows – fail to provide.
Since the “Patronal Feast with His Holiness” has already been performed in the same settings, I will turn to my archive, to what happened in the same place in 2006. At that time, I wrote:
“The described practice [of joint prayers] is applied not only within the framework of the World Council of Churches. Overall, a certain strange disregard for theology (especially ecclesiology) and the development of an ecumenical ‘ecclesiology,’ intended to ‘theologically’ justify anti-canonical behavior, combined with the introduction into church life of PR methods, have led to practices that leave a deep bitterness among the People of God. Particularly illustrative is what occurred during the last visit of the Pope to Constantinople for the Patronal Feast of the Ecumenical Patriarchate on November 30, 2006. This is not about meetings and events outside the Patriarchal Church of Saint George – conversations, joint statements, greetings from the balcony – but about what took place inside the church, going beyond a simple joint prayer with the non-Orthodox.
The Pontiff is greeted with the words: ‘Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.’”
Of course, at a meeting, the head of the Roman Catholic Church will be called the “Pope and Bishop of Rome” although, strictly speaking theologically, these titles do not belong to him, since he is a heretic. Both titles are used here as technical terms or polite forms of address for the guest, without theological or ecclesiological significance. In the same sense, non-Orthodox communities are referred to as “Churches” but not in the strict ecclesiological sense, for the Catholic Church was, is, and will remain one. In church tradition, alongside precision, there exist courtesy and economy: Saint Cyril, sharply condemning Nestorius for his errors, still addressed him as “honorable,” “most honorable,” “most pious bishop,” and called him “Your Holiness”.
However, it is an entirely different matter to sing hymns and commemorate a heretic as the canonical Pope and Bishop of Rome during a service in the Patriarchal Church, on an equal footing with the Patriarch of Constantinople!
From simple joint prayer to concelebrationUnfortunately, the joint prayer in Constantinople did not remain a simple act of supplication but grew into an incomplete concelebration. At the official Patriarchal and Synodal Divine Liturgy of the Patronal Feast, the Pope was granted the right to recite the Lord’s Prayer; he was censed as a canonical bishop; and most importantly, he received from the Patriarch the liturgical kiss of peace before the Holy Anaphora and responded in kind. All of this is permitted only to concelebrating priests and hierarchs! He did not enter the Holy Altar – yet. He was even granted the ambo, and he took the opportunity to proclaim papal primacy in the very Patriarchal church!
We will allow ourselves a few questions.
– When serving with the Ecumenical Patriarch, if a cleric – whether a priest, bishop, or even the Primate of an Autocephalous Church – does not concelebrate but only prays in the Holy Altar, would the officiating Patriarch exchange the liturgical kiss of peace with him? Of course not: according to the liturgical order, it is permitted only between concelebrating clergy. So how, then, is it offered to the Pope? Does he concelebrate with the Patriarch?
– Is it permissible to use the liturgical kiss of peace, the highest moment of manifest unity in truth and love, contrary to liturgical tradition, reducing it to an act of social courtesy, emotional sentiment, or church politics?
– Is the liturgical kiss of peace a self-sufficient act, or a prerequisite for “confessing with one mind” the Trinitarian dogma as formulated in the Creed? If there is no confession of shared faith – as there is no shared theology – what meaning does the liturgical kiss have between an Orthodox hierarch and a heretical leader?
– Since when is a heretic permitted to pray at a service as a canonical Orthodox Christian?
– Can a heretic, much less the head of a heresy, represent the Orthodox faithful at the Divine Liturgy, reciting the Lord’s Prayer as their Primate?
– To say the “Our Father,” is unity of faith not required? Does such unity exist with the Pope?
– “Our Father” is the principal prayer, preparing the faithful for the “daily bread” of the Divine Eucharist. Can one who is categorically forbidden from receiving the Holy Gifts ask for this Bread during a Divine Liturgy celebrated by Orthodox Christians? What meaning can such a prayer have?
– If the Pope did not merely attend but actively participated in the Divine Liturgy, why was he ultimately not admitted to Communion? Some might answer: the statutes of our Church do not permit it, since he is of another faith. But was everything else he did truly permissible?
– How does all this align with the clear position of Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew: “Communion in the sacraments is not permissible until full unity in faith is achieved… The path to unity through Eucharistic communion is a step backwards… Eucharistic communion without unity of faith is like banknotes without gold backing”? Or does “communion in the Sacraments” refer only to the moment of Holy Communion, and not to the entire Divine Liturgy of the faithful? Is such a theological partitioning of the Liturgy permissible?
– What can be said about granting the ambo to the head of heresy for preaching? Can we, as Orthodox, remain indifferent, untroubled, or unmoved when, in the Most Holy Patriarchal Church, the Pope preaches papal primacy with his head uncovered? From the pulpit of Saints Alexander, Gregory, John Chrysostom, Photius, and Philotheos, error is proclaimed! Is this not a desecration?
– Finally, should we not, with all due reverence, ask the presiding hierarch of that Divine Liturgy:
Can one tolerate and justify the above as “noble conduct” or mere “formal expressions during the service”?
Or, perhaps, this could be excused by oikonomia? Is even a partial concelebration of the Pope and the Patriarch permitted under oikonomia? The answer is categorical: no! Never, anywhere, has any saint allowed a condemned heretic, much less the head of a heresy, stubborn in error, to actively participate in the Divine Liturgy.
And what irresistible necessity demanded a “concelebration” with the Pontiff? For what “higher attainment,” unattainable by other means, was the ecclesiastical order violated? Ultimately, what benefit for the Church could justify praying together with the Pope? Thus, there exists not a single condition under which oikonomia could legitimize the Pontiff’s active participation in an Orthodox service.
Moreover, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew has spoken explicitly about “Eucharistic communion” with the non-Orthodox:
“This question is essentially ecclesiological, and for the sake of ecumenical dialogue, it would be appropriate and useful to state unambiguously… that the Eucharistic communion sought by some between Orthodox and non-Orthodox Christians amid the ongoing schism cannot be accepted by the Orthodox Church, even under oikonomia.”
And, of course, “Eucharistic communion” does not begin with the words “approach with the fear of God, with faith and love” and does not end with “Save, O God, Your people”…
Or, applying this to contemporary practice, one might echo the Athonite monks: “But are we to do this under the guise of oikonomia? And how can oikonomia permit the desecration of the sanctuary? …And what could be more ruinous than such an ‘oikonomia’? It is clear communion with them, an abandonment of all good, and a subversion. For he who receives a heretic is subject to his accusations, and he who communes with the excommunicated is himself excommunicated, as one who violates the canon of the Church.”
This concern is by no means caused by “stubborn false brothers, forming groups of fanatical defenders of the so-called foundations, captives largely of religious unbelief, neo-Manichean fundamentalism, projected metaphysical guilt, and a casual approach to living like sectarians, peddlers of ‘pure religion’”. (How sad it is to hear such characterizations from an Orthodox hierarch in the presence of the Patriarch, delegations of Autocephalous Orthodox Churches, and non-Orthodox on the Patriarchate’s Feast Day, indiscriminately thrown at all believers who maintain any reservations regarding dialogues!) On the contrary, these practices are condemned even by the proponents of inter-Christian dialogue and the ecumenical movement themselves as theologically unfounded and ultimately undermining the very basis of theological dialogue.
Archbishop Stylianos (Harkianakis) of Australia, a hierarch of the Ecumenical Patriarchate and for twenty years co-chair of the Official Theological Dialogue with the Roman Catholics, mentions in his speech of May 10, 1985, the “tragic errors”:
“First of all, an excessive friendliness with Rome prevailed, expressed irresponsibly and theologically completely unchecked… Many hierarchs, unfortunately, hurry to embrace at the most sacred moment of the Divine Eucharist, when we proclaim ‘let us love one another…’. This is the moment when we express the highest and deepest unity only of those who are concelebrating.
Ministers are not permitted even to kiss co-faithful hierarchs and clerics present in the Holy Altar. Nevertheless, there are Orthodox hierarchs, whose names I will not mention, who, well-intentioned but unaware of the weight of theological responsibility, kiss non-Orthodox clerics, although this has no sacramental grounding and is done irresponsibly: from the common Chalice they will not receive Communion. So why kiss them at all?
Another error, no less tragic: in an effort to be polite to one another, many Orthodox hierarchs, unfortunately, call the Pope “the first bishop of Christianity”. This is yet another theological falsehood. The Pope… in divided Christendom is neither first among equals nor even equal among equals! The Pope should stand after the last Orthodox bishop, as he now remains in schism and heresy. This is so obvious that it hardly needs stating… The Roman Throne in its present state cannot, according to Orthodox theology, be called “presiding in love”. When such things are said, they are irresponsible words. Regrettably, they stir up much fuss and inflict harm, all the while providing us with no tangible gain. In this way, we give the impression that we are hastening to establish Intercommunio, Eucharistic communion with the non-Orthodox… By addressing the Pope or Rome with patristic titles full of specific meaning, we only undermine the dialogue and offer it no support. This is simply a lie – such forms of address are a theological falsehood.”
In this context, it is worth noting a particularly significant address by the Abbot of the Holy Monastery of Xeropotamou, Archimandrite Joseph, during Patriarch Bartholomew’s visit to the monastery on August 21, 2008. The Abbot spoke, with due reverence but also exceptional clarity:
“Here, Your Holiness, allow us, your children, who approach you with filial boldness, to speak on two matters that trouble our hearts and tempt our monastic consciences, as well as the consciences of very many devout Orthodox Christians who turn to us.
The first matter concerns the ongoing recognition by Your Holiness – through official speeches and joint prayers in church and on television – of representatives of a thoroughly secularized and unrepentant modern papism.
Your Holiness, together with Saint John Chrysostom, we, humble and unworthy, beseech You: ‘Do not accept any foreign dogma under the pretext of love.’ Both recently and in earlier times, Holy Mount Athos has testified and assured You, and we, the miserable monks of Xeropotamou, together with the devout faithful who share our concerns, ‘remain faithful to the faith of the holy Apostles and holy Fathers, out of love also for the heterodox, to whom it is truly helpful when the Orthodox, by maintaining a consistent Orthodox stance, point out the extent of their spiritual illness and the way to its healing.” We earnestly and reverently request that henceforth “the theological dialogue be in no way accompanied by joint prayers, participation in liturgical and worship gatherings of one another, or other actions that could create the impression that our Orthodox Church recognizes Roman Catholics as a full Church, and the Pope as the canonical Bishop of Rome. Such actions mislead both the fullness of Orthodoxy and the Roman Catholics, creating in them a false impression of what Orthodoxy thinks of them…” Since we cannot deny that we share “the same spirit of faith” with Your Most Divine Holiness, “as it is written: I believed, therefore I spoke”, so “we also believe, therefore we speak…” In Your fatherly love, forgive us this confessional digression and look upon the faces of our humble brotherhood, which regards You with the greatest reverence.”
In his response, the Ecumenical Patriarch did not consider the concerns exaggerated or malicious and even praised the abbot for his words and his concern, and “reassured” him: “We commend your sensitivity, we commend in a fatherly way your love of truth and sincerity, and we reassure you, briefly repeating: the guardians are aware.”
Of course, it would be better if such “patriarchal” assurances were not needed to “reassure” us. Who bears responsibility for the fact that part of the Orthodox faithful is concerned about the “guardians” and has the gravest reservations regarding some of their actions? Are the “guardians” themselves truly not accountable for this situation?
P.S. Some may think that I am right, yet consider my words too “harsh” or “disrespectful.” However, I would ask such people, together with their remarks about the “harshness” or “disrespectfulness” of my words, to also present their own proper, respectful protest against that which is ecclesiologically and canonically unacceptable and which again occurred in Constantinople on 29–30 November 2014.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJWdtk2Gxv4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYJie5DwEjY&t=7s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQ3dhfxx29Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsoySF4lDWI&t=1s
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/azREHaq9ve8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cy7lH_EG68E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJGvZHOhoM4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pB-Vo-04e_c&t=60s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ti9_PRGbXc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEYV1zPaK7Q&t=4s
I agree with Stratis Georgiou’s article. As a (Greek) Orthodox Christian, I am very concerned about the worldly path that the Greeks are following. I gently raised my concern with my Greek priest. He gave me a run-around answer about ‘obedience,’ and he now looks at me as a troublemaker. This is not a good situation. We need people to speak up. Thank you for your courage.
Dear Representatives of Orthodox Reflections!
Dear Representatives of the International Community!
Dear Brothers and Sisters!
Christ is risen!
God bless you!
First of all, I want to thank you for all your articles, for your support and protection of Orthodoxy, for all your great work for the glory of God and for your support and protection of our persecuted UOC!
I would like to express my special gratitude to Mr. Tucker Carlson for all his huge work for the glory of God! For the fact that he is not silent, but he speaks a lot about the persecution of the UOC in Ukraine!
After May 20, 2025, the Law on ban of the UOC entered into force completely and the satanic authorities of Ukraine, together with their surroundings, Goebbels media, SBU (SSU) and the ukrainian police strengthened the persecution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church! Demon- satanist-persecutor of UOC – Zelensky, together with the SBU (SSU), incredibly strengthened the persecution of our UOC. All of them do not consider members of the UOC for people.
The UOC is more persecuted, they mock the UOC, they spit on the UOC, as people-demons once spat in the Face of Jesus Christ. Our hierarchs of the UOC are sitting either in a pre-trial detention center or under house arrest … OCU raiders are still capturing the temples of the UOC. And the terrible devilish performances and events take place in the Kiev Pechersk Lavra
My heart is flooded with blood, my heart is crying, I feel very wounded … But I believe in Christ, that He will help us to go through this difficult time of persecution. I want to pay your special attention to one fact. But I will quote it with emotions. It concerns the main persecutors of the UOC – the SBU (SSU) demons. … I will also leave links to the corresponding videos.
What a horror !!! What a shame !! Please listen and watch this video in which the main persecutor of the UOC-demon Neron Zelensky rewards the SBU(SSU) employees (persecutors and tormentors of our Orthodox hierarchs, monks, priests, deacons and believers of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC)) on the day of the “holiday” of the SBU-SSU (March 25, 2025). And to the head of the SBU (SSU) Vasily Malyuk, whom you also can see in this video, satanist Neron Zelensky appropriated (by decree № 299/2025 dated May 8, 2025) – the title of Hero of Ukraine with the presentation of the Order of the Golden Star to Malyuk !!!
This is horror, injustice and eternal shame on them !! And for what merits did the satanist Nero Zelensky present awards and the high ranks to these satanists of the SBU(SSU) and their boss – Vasily Malyuk ???? For their brutal interrogations and tortures of our clergy and believers of the UOC in the cellars of the SBU? For their persecutions and terrible repression of 7 million believers of the UOC? For violation of human rights, the Constitution of Ukraine, the norms of international law and the lawlessness that Malyuk and all his subordinates of the SBU (SSU) create in relation to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) ?? For this persecution of our UOC they have such honors ?? And will all these orders, gold stars, high titles of the SBU (SSU) and head of the SBU(SSU) Malyuk help them in HELL? I don’t think so … And what will they say at the Court before God? Probably, they will tell how they tormented and persecuted the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) of which our God Jesus Christ is the Head…
Please disseminate this information.
To watch these videos with English subtitles, please turn on English subtitles in YouTube
God bless you!
With Love in Christ
Your sister in Christ and your Ukrainian friend
Tetyana Avramenko
___________________________________________________________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8s4NFCVk4o&t=118s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxrnJnlO_1k&t=1454s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9Pn8-xFvbI
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/1WPYzkIbnZw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhFUPwppDk4&t=3s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDCPwYtlqZI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxrnJnlO_1k&t=1456s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCM6FT-Ecwk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQiZ1_aMmV8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4p6faUm3gA&t=9s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqpZ4Zycffk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHDXGV34qd8&t=240s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLde5KQkzQI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=672OkbeNtEg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DYN8WHsdxE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i88OOmpxyQo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPBaMzT35mE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QD2QHRurjFs&t=12s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApUqcDxx4d4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cpv-cH8dWM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFmWgoxoAvs&t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StHVMKZCo10&t=6s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x60EsyRhkLc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUUBtdKhpUw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ID0O4tPfm84
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYa12UYVDLk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rfp1HbMl5gY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iveq3XJilbs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edmw8pitC_8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4SBxeZZ7tI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClD9N-xLOvs&t=5s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTklwnpJjUk&t=572s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4VVDgXtnxE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwPMbWHcdLU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wujPD_qFfn8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAe9FhdWhcQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNwjPL-v0V4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmIr5HyRwE0&t=10s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9DpwY8HICY&t=464s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NTJOJEp2KM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FcitBLJDxo
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/1RYmvwpWRnI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9yZM64gvWA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKje-yLNaM8&lc=UgzZTdCl8PMx0YjszwR4AaABAg.AG5wA82ChO0AG6-gmjCMY1
This is your daily reminder that “common era” was not popularized by pagans, but by talmudic jews.
I use “pagans” very widely.
One of the problems with “obedience” to a Church run by a man regardless of who that man may be is we may be obedient to a Church run by a demonic tyrant. To me as long as the Orthodox Church is run by men it’s no more correct than the Catholic Church run by the Pope. For me the liturgy and communion is the Church. The rest is details that I can accept or reject.
Black Bart sent Elpi over here with the explicit instruction to gather all the American Orthodox churches under his omophorion, and I remember thinking at the time, “That’s gonna go down well with the OCA and ROCOR.” Pretty sure that if Black Bart persists in his determination to hook us up with Rome at all costs, the other jurisdictions, both American and international, will turn their backs on him. The real question is, what will the American laity do? For myself, I’m already looking into membership in an alternate jurisdiction. It’s not local, so I’m not sure how often I’d be able to make it to church. But the only way anyone will get through to these two is to vote with their feet – AND wallets. Money always talks.
You raise a very important question about what American parishioners should do given AB Elpi’s continuing shenanigans. On my part, I am lucky that my parish and our priest are conservative. Yes, parish priests have to be “obedient” to their Metropolitans, many of whom have NOT been appointed by AB Elpi. The Metropolitans have to be obedient to Ab Elpi but, there is room for conscientious objections. I would leave a parish if my parish priest became liberal and started drinking the Kool-Aid of a humanism.
You should be pushing the godless priest out the door, not the other way around. The same goes for your archbishop. Grow a spine, gather a mob, and go throw him out of the liturgy like the saintly laity of the past.
You must lose this protestant mentality of “I don’t like the heretic pastor so I’m leaving”. It’s your parish, and your Church, given to you as a gift by Christ Himself. Don’t let some mealy-mouthed world-worshippers push you around; Push the heretics out!
One can’t stay in communion with heresy. That’s why I joined the GOC Synod under Metropolitan Demetrius.
The answer to your question is no one. No one with any ability to affect anything will do anything. Lay people and ROCOR priests will continue to write “bold” expositons on the internet, as though anyone needs to be told that LP is a heretic. But the bishops and ruling bureaucrats will quietly hope the scandal passes while they continue to collect their NGO checks.
Take the black pill now before the next COVID happens.
I hear you. But the Orthodox faithful, including the cool, omniscient black-pilled, should contemplate their role in perpetuating the mess.
For instance, what would happen if Elpidophoros and/or Black Bart were met with a scene like that at the link below everywhere they went, esp in America? It would require some organization, but nobody is keeping you from hopping to it.
https://www.helleniscope.com/2024/11/25/the-faithful-in-greece-protest-heretic-bartholomew-no-to-easter-with-heretics/
Hello Austen, I understand your view and where it is coming from but, I am hopeful that if the physical part doesn’t happen, the metaphorical “slaps“ will happen more often. CSJ makes an excellent point that, in Greece, the Orthodox faithful are more vociferous about their disapproval of EP Barts directive to con celebrate with the Catholics next Easter. However, think about what happened during the first Trump presidential bid: people withheld their true views on Trump. It may be the same thing regarding EP Bart and AB Elpi and the tipping point may be how brown-nosy they are during Easter 2025.
If a partiarch or archbishop crosses the line, why can’t the Orthodox Church give them the same sort of treatment that Patriarch Nestorius got?
Bart and Elpid are evil. Working for the devil.