Bishop Benjamin of the OCA Diocese of the West recently sent a cautionary letter to his clergy. The bishop expressed his concerned that compliance with his COVID directives was “sliding” in some parishes. His complete letter is here. An excellent discussion of the letter is posted here.
Bishop Benjamin is evidently aware that his Fauci-style policies are not popular in the parishes. So in the letter, he encouraged his clergy to blame him for the misery of their people. The Bishop said to inform the Faithful who complain, “That horrible bishop makes me do it.” Based on this letter, there is indeed a lot of horror going on and many things that should rightly terrify faithful Orthodox Christians about Bishop Benjamin and his brother bishops.
So a bishop can make anything a requirement to attend liturgy and receive communion?
In 2020, Bishop Benjamin cooperated with the closing of his parishes. He accepted re-opening them with strict limits such as mandatory masks, “social” distancing, no kissing icons, canceling social activities, and more. At one point, it appears that multiple spoons were being used in his parishes, something he still considers appropriate for those “weaker” in faith. To be fair, Bishop Benjamin is not alone here as some combination of the above happened in many dioceses, in most Orthodox jurisdictions, and all of it was justified under the “emergency” nature of this situation.
However, even as “15 days to flatten the curve” has now become almost a full year of “emergency powers” to “defeat” the virus, the bishop is still demanding parishes comply with the following list:
Nevertheless, I write you today to remind you of the non-negotiable directives you and your flocks are required to follow:
1) Everyone present in the temple must wear a mask that covers their nose and mouth.
2) Everyone must observe social distancing.
3) Should anyone who was present at a service acquire the coronavirus and test positive, you must suspend services for two weeks.
4) You have a blessing to use one spoon for Holy Communion as the virus is not food-borne. However, you may use multiple spoons should you feel it necessary for the “weaker” among your flock.
5) If I learn you are not strictly observing these directives and one of your parishioners dies of COVID 19, I will not hesitate to suspend you.
6) Those who refuse to follow these directives are to be denied Holy Communion until they agree to follow them.
If anyone refuses to wear a mask, that person is excommunicated. If anyone tests positive, then the entire parish is excommunicated for two weeks as the parish will be closed. If a priest is reported to have not scrupulously followed these directives, and a parishioner has died, then everyone is excommunicated until a replacement priest can be located. The episcopal office has truly expanded in power. A bishop can now require whatever he deems appropriate as a pre-requisite for attending liturgy. He can enforce his edicts under the penalty of excommunication, even if his actions have no basis in Holy Tradition, church history, or the sacred canons. Nor must he consult his priests on these matters, as only his opinion is relevant.
As one group of OCA priests wrote, “Freewill is replaced with tyranny of a temporal magisterium that can change from day to day. This is the definition of a cult and not the Holy Church.” Instead of a single Pope in Rome, it appears that the Orthodox Church in America has spawned multiple scattered throughout the land. Among them, obviously, is Bishop Benjamin.
What comes next with all that power?
Contrary to the Church’s behavior in previous epidemics, bishops such as Benjamin have acquiesced to gross violations of the rights and moral obligations of the Faithful. Some bishops have gone even further, not only actively endorsing repressive measures, but even issuing their own requirements above and beyond what was demanded by secular authority. This enthusiasm for authoritarian measures (in the name of protecting public health), combined with seemingly unbounded episcopal power, are truly terrifying as we ponder – what could be coming next?
Here are just a few possibilities that the Bishop Benjamins of the Orthodox world could end up making as “non-negotiable” directives in the future:
- Masks all the way out to 2022 – Or even beyond, according to St. Fauci. The bishops appear to be listening to the public health “experts” uncritically, despite their abysmal track record thus far. At this point, it is quite probable that (should Jesus tarry) our Bishop Benjamin and his brothers will be issuing mask “directives” for years to come. Since infectious diseases are perpetually with us, perhaps even the rest of our lives.
- Two masks are better than one – Bishop Benjamin and other bishops required masks in Church because the CDC reversed its previous advice and started recommending them. The CDC now recommends double masking. Some “experts” have already started promoting triple masking. Will Bishop Benjamin and the rest hold the line on only one mask for attending liturgy? After all, how effective can one mask be if the CDC says you actually need two? If the Bishops don’t stay current with the CDC recommendations, is that not the same as admitting mask mandates are just so much theatrics and we have all been played? While some bishops will ignore double masks (despite the implications), and others may finally learn to think for themselves, none of us should be surprised if future “directives” from a bishop or two include two masks as a requirement to attend liturgy.
- No vaccine, no liturgy – Bishop Benjamin said that you have a moral responsibility to wear a mask, and you are selfish if you don’t: “It is not about politics, but love and concern for the neighbor. Personally, I feel those who refuse to wear masks and socially distance are being selfish. You may remind everyone of the freedom that comes with obedience.” The Bishop, being the man of God that he is, has already been vaccinated against COVID. He is clearly not selfish and unloving like so many of us who worry about a new, and relatively untested gene therapy. While the vaccine is not yet required, that possibility looms on the horizon. Governments and businesses are already discussing requiring proof of vaccination to fully participate in society. If you need a vaccine passport to travel, attend a movie, or go out to a restaurant – can Church attendance be far behind? If that day arrives, what do you think Bishop Benjamin’s reaction will be? Do you think he will stand up for the right of patients to exercise voluntary, informed vaccine consent and the right of people to live free of behavioral control (the way the Russian bishops have done)? Or will he lecture you on your moral responsibility to be vaccinated and issue a “directive” affirming the requirement for proof of vaccination to attend liturgy? If he does, who will oppose him? Given the silence on vaccine freedom of choice from the entire Assembly of Bishops, and their previous record as a body during this “crisis,” those refusing the vaccine and/or the accompanying electronic tracking may find themselves bereft of episcopal support. Will the priests stand up at that point? Some might, but if the threat of losing a job is enough to silence most priests, it is hard to know how many will be willing to risk actual jail. If you plan to refuse the COVID vaccine (as tens of millions of Americans have indicated they will), then you might want to discuss this petition with your priest and get his honest opinion – before you find yourself locked out of Divine Liturgy and excommunicated.
- More lockdowns on the way – When all this started, more than one hierarch proclaimed there was no choice as a Church but to go along as this was all so “unprecedented.” The implication, of course, was that this was a period of time that would eventually end, and we would go back to “normal.” There is every indication that governments, big businesses, and global NGOs have no interest in letting go of the almost unlimited power an “emergency” has given them. (Bishops as well, one might ask?) As COVID cases drop and vaccines are administered, a new crisis might be needed to justify imprisoning the plebes in their own homes. Perhaps a new “variant” of COVID or a new virus? Possible, but not needed. The global elites already have the next justification for continuing the lockdowns, even if everything is quiet on the virus front going forward. Many of our “best thinkers” are already openly discussing the need for climate lockdowns to reduce carbon emissions and “save” the planet. Does anyone think churches would be exempted from closure this time? Having accepted church closures and stiff regulations to protect public health, is it likely that Bishop Benjamin would oppose such measures that are intended to “save” the Earth? In fact, it is a good question as to whether any of the bishops would oppose any policies from eating synthetic meat to banning cars that are justified based on preventing climate change. In fact, in place of resistance, it is quite easy to foresee many bishops actively endorsing and promoting the entire climate lockdown agenda. The Greeks are especially likely to be on-board, as the Greek Archdiocese is under the control the “Green Patriarch” of Constantinople for whom climate change is an obsession.
- New and improved threats to public health – Now that would-be dictators have seen how easy it is to seize power in the name of public health, expect that term to become way more expansive than ever. Democratic Senators recently introduced the “Anti-Racism in Public Health Act of 2021,” which would establish a Center on Antiracism at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. This bill will “declare racism a public health crisis and name racism as an historical and present threat to the physical and mental health and well-being of the United States and world.” The new center will “aim to develop new knowledge in the science and practice of antiracism.” Gun violence, right-wing extremism, homophobia / transphobia, and “domestic terrorism” have all been mentioned as additional candidates to be declared a “public health crisis.” The CDC told Bishop Benjamin when to close his churches, when to open them, and how to conduct his worship services. He and most of his brother bishops complied every step of the way. We even see CDC guidelines posted in our parishes as if they were icons. What if the CDC commands Churches to provide anti-racism and other politically “woke” training? What if the parish is required to report anyone with non-conformist / dangerous attitudes that could negatively impact public health? What if the CDC requires regular monitoring of church services to guard against homophobic / transphobic messaging? Or decrees that churches “dangerous” to public health must close? What if the CDC requires church members to sign forms disavowing various wrong opinions and disinformation – all to protect public health, of course? What would Bishop Benjamin do, when he has already enthusiastically gone along thus far to fight a virus with a 99.98% survival rate? What would Archbishop Elpidophoros, who famously marched with BLM, do in those circumstances? If the last year has taught us anything, it is that reality can far exceed the limits of even the most creative imaginations.
Perhaps, given the circumstances, we should all seriously rethink the prevailing attitudes towards the power of bishops.
Bishops seem completely immune to facts and reason.
Masks, social distancing, attendance limits, and even lockdowns are predicated on the rather new and novel notion of asymptomatic viral spread. The asymptomatic spread narrative was effectively destroyed by the publication of a Chinese study involving nearly 9.9 million individuals. It revealed not a single case of COVID-19 could be traced to an asymptomatic individual who had tested positive.
This result was confirmed by a meta-analysis published in JAMA by researchers in the Department of Biostatistics at the University of Florida, Gainesville, and the Cancer Research Center in Seattle, Washington. The study found a massive gap between primary transmitters who were symptomatic and those who were asymptomatic. Those with symptoms wound up transmitting the virus to household members 18% of the time, while those who were asymptomatic transmitted to just 0.7% of household contacts. That is 0.7% in the home, where you are going to be way more intimately connected to others than in Church, at a small business, in a restaurant, etc. Realistically, if you are under 70, then your chance of dying from the virus after casually meeting with people who have no symptoms is 0.00035%, or 1 in 285,714.
Mask-specific research failed to find any benefit to them. Whether one mask or more, they simply don’t work against an aerosolized virus. Then, of course, there are the empirical results of the past year in which mask mandates, draconian lockdowns, and other measures have made no discernible difference in the severity of the outbreaks. Just compare results from draconian states such as New York or California to relatively free Florida to see how little impact any of these measures really had.
Masks are useless and unneeded at best, harmful at worst. There are substantial problems with mask wearing, particularly for children. One study of over 25,000 school-aged children identified 24 distinct health issues associated with wearing masks. The study demonstrated that masks harm children physically, psychologically, and behaviorally. Not just children are impacted. This is a link to an article with over 20 documented reasons why masks are harmful. This is an article one of our contributors did on why your mask in Church will not save anyone. Many leaders, including politicians and even Orthodox bishops and clergy, have been caught not following their own rules on masks.
Given all that data, along with the continuously moving goalposts for returning to “normal,” we fully expected that by now the Successors to the Apostles would have had enough of all this. Lord have mercy, were we ever totally, completely wrong.
For Bishop Benjamin and many of his brethren, facts are never allowed to get in the way of feelz:
Nevertheless, these are not optional directives. And, even if they or you feel they are unnecessary, they will not hurt anyone and may well protect someone who is vulnerable. Finally, you are free to blame me. “That horrible bishop makes me do it.” If one life is spared this devastating disease through these measures, certainly they are worth it.
If it saves one life… Well, it won’t, and masks do hurt physically, emotionally, and spiritually. But after all these months, it is quite clear that trying to talk sense into quite a few of our bishops is simply impossible. We are left with prayer only, because logic and reason appear to have completely failed. Fortunately for us, with God all things are possible so we must continue to pray and hope.
The shark has been jumped, doubling down like this makes Orthodoxy look bad.
Millions of Americans have now recognized how contradictory and illogical much of our COVID response has been. Some woke up after so many things changed immediately after Biden was sworn in. Others finally saw the light when the CDC came out in favor of two masks. Realizing people who had recovered from COVID or had been fully vaccinated were still expected to mask and social distance Red Pilled many. The ongoing political drama of opening schools, despite the evidence that it is very safe, was the last straw for untold millions of parents. Even for those who truly believed the official COVID narrative at one time, things have just gone on too long.
But not for Bishop Benjamin. For him, it is forever March 2020. Bishop Benjamin ignores scientific data and all the practical lessons of the last 11 months while blithely dismissing opposing opinions with extreme condescension:
I know we are all getting weary of the pandemic. And I am hearing that the directives I and the Holy Synod have mandated are “sliding” in some parishes. I also realize there are those who consider them intrusive and, for some very odd reason, “anti-Orthodox”. Perhaps it is a reflection of the great divide we are currently experiencing in America. For some among us, the wearing of masks and social distancing oddly have become symbols of where one stands politically, on the right or left.
Months into the “never ending crisis,” an increasing number of the Faithful have tuned out their bishops while many outside the Church wonder aloud, “What is wrong with the Orthodox?” Protestants and even some Catholics (bishops and priests) are offering all kinds of resistance, some even being arrested and going to jail. The Orthodox are conspicuously absent from the ranks of incipient martyrdom at the episcopal level. It is a bad look, and one that, God willing, will not continue as a great opportunity for Christian leadership is being squandered.
We must continue to pray for the bishops. As Lent approaches, perhaps we should even pray more. We need strong leadership now more than ever, so may God have mercy on us all in these terrifying and dangerous times. Simultaneously, we need to remember that the bishops are subject to Holy Tradition, the sacred canons, and to historical precedent. If necessary, the parish clergy and the Faithful should remind them of that reality. On a regular basis.
Vladimir – member Orthodox Church in America
From the bishop’s letter:
On a personal note, I have had my first round of vaccine and hope to resume my parish visitations beginning in late March. You may contact me to schedule an archpastoral visit if you like.
Since he is forthcoming with his personal medical information, he should also write a letter and share the following: Did he have the second dose, too? Which brand? Did he have reactions to the first and/or second doses? Did he report the reactions to VAERS? Does he have new or exacerbated health problems since partaking of the shots?
No one is suggesting we always do blind obedience. At the same time, we should be careful in how we speak about our bishops. Ok,so what if the father (bishop) is naked. What are we going to do about it? Do we go viral and expose him like Ham, or do we cover like Shem and Japheth; you make the choice. St David refused to lift a hand against the Lord’s Anointed in King Saul and for that, he was granted the kingdom himself. Obviously, Saul had lost his dignity, sense of rule, and his mind, but still David refused to assault him. Having blessed disobedience is one thing but going public defaming is a bit too much. Here is the deal: when we become a “man of war” we disqualify yourself from building God’s house. Even if a bishop is in the wrong, a full volume denunciation could disqualify us for being a laborer in God’s vineyard. I would suggest we measure our words much more precisely least we become men of war. God is still in control and He is testing us (just like David) in how we deal with duly ordained authorities even when less than perfect. If we miss this we miss God’s promotion. David got it right. I suggest all read a little book called “A Tail of Three Kings”.
Editors and Staff:
To Seraphim of previous post:
Blessed Disobedience or Evil Obedience? – Full Text with Footnotes @ https://russian-faith.com/good-disobedience-or-bad-obedience-n3270#99 Archpriest Theodore ZisisJun 4, 2019
Also-
You ran a great article back in December of 2020 that is so apropos to Why We Fear the Horrible Orthodox Bishop and His Brethren.
It is definitely worth taking a look again. Keepup the “good fight.”
Doxa to Theo, John D.
Excerpts:
The Error of Blind Obedience to Bishops – According to the Saints of the Orthodox Church
December 8, 2020
By Nektarios Dapergolas, Doctor of History
This article was forwarded us to by a contributor in Canada. It is very timely as discussions over the actions of our Orthodox Bishops have been particularly intense in this time of COVID.
________________________________________
From the Apostle Paul to the Cappadocian fathers, and from Saint Athanasios to Fotios the Great, when all our Holy Church Fathers speak of improper obedience, they urge the faithful to defy and disobey those ‘ecclesiastical shepherds’ who are wrong and heretical. This issue is very timely because we live in a particularly dangerous time, a time of great dogmatic and spiritual confusion, a time when some church hierarchs are increasingly compelling the faithful to obey their demands to deviate from the teachings of our Holy Church by adopting various profane aberrations and blasphemous innovations (and here I include all that we have endured these last few months, the arbitrary church lock downs and sterilizations, worshipping with masks, prohibiting the veneration of Holy Icons, packaged church bread, and the heightened fear of illness and death, even at the Holy Chalice). From this point onwards, we shall bear witness to newer, modern saints, who urge the faithful to disobey heresy and erring bishops when there are good reasons to do so.
Let us begin with Saint Nicodemus of Mount Athos, who was perfectly aligned with St. John Chrysostom’s writings several centuries ago when he wrote, “If your elder is mistaken in the affairs of the state and its institutions, do not be curious. If, however, he is wrong in matters of the Faith, leave and abandon him, be he a man or even an angel from heaven.”
Recall also the impressive foresight of the famous Russian Saint John Maximovich (1897 – 1966), Bishop of Shanghai and San Francisco. The Saint’s foresight is an explicit exhortation against blind obedience and all types of delusional fantasies. In his words:
“In the last days, evil and heresy will have spread so widely that the faithful will not be able to find a priest or shepherd to protect them from delusion and guide them to salvation. At that time, the faithful will not receive safe guidance from men; but their guide will be the writings of the Holy Fathers. Especially at this time, every believer will be responsible for the whole fulness of the Church. Brethren, it is time for us all to undertake our responsibility to God and to history. Do not tolerate any more foolishness or misguidance from priests or archpriests. Do not turn a blind eye for you will be co- responsible. The Saints are forewarning you.”
Another great contemporary ecclesiastical figure who cautions us is the late Metropolitan (and great Orthodox protagonist) Augustine Kantiotis. This man was deeply respected by great modern-day saints, such as St. George Karslidis, who referred to him as a “Confessor of Christ,” and St. Paisios, who amidst other eulogies, even named him “the new Chrysostom of the Church.” Hear, then, what this great modern hierarch had to say regarding the holy writings on the subject of obedience:
“The bishop must obey the Gospel. This is why when the Bishop is ordained, he is ordained under the Gospel. As the Fathers say, this means that the people shall obey the Bishop on one condition – that the Bishop obey the Gospel. But when the Bishop does not obey the Gospel and does not do according to the Holy Canons, then the clergy and the people are not obliged to obey the Bishop. In the event of a dilemma because of a contradiction between the Gospel and the bishop’s teaching, ‘we must obey God rather than human beings!’ (Acts 5:29) And then heroic clergymen and monks, even ordinary lay people – in cases where the bishops are silent and the pulpits are silent – then every clergyman and lay person has the right and the obligation to say those things which the Bishops dare not say either because of cowardice, or a worldly spirit, or misapprehension. Whenever the pulpits were silent, simple and humble monks and people, men and women, supported Orthodoxy. Let us not forget that Romania was liberated from Ceausescu with the help of an obscure cleric who lit the fuse of freedom and destroyed Ceausescu’s dictatorship and tyrannical regime. Therefore, each clergyman is not a slave of his hierarch, but is only obligated to obey his Bishop when that Bishop is a contender in the holy struggle.”
Right now, the bishops are making decisions that materially affect our practice of the Faith. They are justifying these decisions on the basis of our health, our safety, and our fear. In such a situation, not getting feedback from the laity is grossly negligent. How do the bishops know that we are afraid, if they never ask us or even our priests?
OR, loved this post! There was no link to buy that pamphlet by Fr. Theodore. Do you have that link? Thanks!
What happen to Super Bowl “SUPERSPREADER,??????????
Leave the OCA like I did, there are a few jurisdiction s that put their TRUST IN GOD and NOT MAN as the psalmist says.
Dear brothers and sisters in Christ-
Here are two important-must reads for ALL Orthodox on the topics of “obedience” and personal responsibility.
Doxa to Theo, John
Blessed Disobedience or Evil Obedience? Archpriest Theodore ZisisJun 13, 2019
https://russian-faith.com/explaining-orthodoxy/blessed-disobedience-or-evil-obedience-authors-foreword-n3317
– Author’s Foreword
This article is from Author’s Foreword of the excellent booklet — Blessed Disobedience or Evil Obedience? — written by Archpriest Theodore Zisis. The full booklet is available via these links:
• Author’s Foreword
• Chapter 1 – Immediately After Ecumenism Came Homosexuality
• Chapter 2 – Blessed Disobedience or Evil Obedience?
• Chapter 3 – The Holy Scriptures on Obedience
• Chapter 4 – The Holy Fathers on Obedience
• Chapter 5 – Do We Have the Right to Speak?
The small fruit of this tireless struggle for the purity of Orthodoxy was this small pamphlet, which illuminates the subtle and painful topic for many of genuine obedience – that obedience taught by the holy fathers, but which, unfortunately, is still neglected and little known to us. And if the doctrine of true obedience is completely forgotten, then false teachers and false pastors will triumph, who will lead the flock in the wrong way, dragging it along with them into the abyss of eternal perdition.
June 2006 Archpriest Theodore Zisis
Blurred Lines: Priestly Pastoral Care and the Responsibility of the Laity
by Archpriest Steven Ritter https://stjamesorthodox.org/blurredlines
Excerpt:
This is important because there is an idea out there, prevalent among many laity, and even encouraged by some clergy, that a large aspect of salvation is contingent upon this concept of obedience. While this statement, taken in raw form without context contains much truth, too often the ideas engendered behind it are culled from monastic materials that are not appropriate to the lay state or cultivated within the lay community. Obedience is paramount in the Christian life; as Christ Himself was obedient to His Father in all things, so we too are called to be obedient to His teachings. And obedience is central to the issue of free will and the human person. St. John Climacus devoted his second longest chapter in the Ladder of Divine Ascent to this concept of obedience and its importance in the monastic environment. But even here obedience to “rules”, although we know for certain that his tradition had such rules, is not a cause of concern in the Ladder; rather it is reflective on an intimate and free associative relationship within the confines of the monastery. This relationship is one that is entered into freely and even gratefully as part of the spiritual direction and spiritual growth in the community.
Fantastic article! I sincerely thank you from the bottom of my heart for writing this, as it has just confirmed what I always secretly believed to be true. If any Bishop disagrees with my personal opinion, then he is WRONG! If he happens to agree with me, the few times it may happens, I gladly agree that he is RIGHT! Slava Isusu Christu!
Not even close to any point made in the article. Did you not read it, understand it, or are you intentionally trying to mispresent it?
Do you always deal in total and complete strawmen, or just today?
Are we now facing a new Sergianist “church” in Amerika?
In light of these pseudo-scientifical and un-Orthodox measures that have been embraced by these bishops I can now viscerally relate to the positions taken by St. Nil of Sorsky and the non-possessors!