On November 17, 2024, the documentary film People of Christ—Our Time was officially premiered at the National Theatre of the Republic of Srpska in Banja Luka. The film explores the current circumstances surrounding Ukrainian Orthodoxy, focusing on the suffering of the Orthodox Church, its clergy, and the faithful in Ukraine.
Professor Emir Kusturica, one of the heroes and co-authors of the film, stated that this film marks the beginning of a long battle for the survival of Orthodoxy as a culture. He emphasized the ongoing persecution of the faithful and clergy, as well as the destruction of churches belonging to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church under the current government.
Originally premiering on September 18, 2024, in Belgrade, Serbia, the documentary People of Christ—Our Time has emerged as a vital cultural work and garnered significant attention for its poignant portrayal of religious persecution and the resilience of faith amidst adversity. The film’s executive producer, Mirko Radenovic, handed a letter to the Republic of Srpska President Milorad Dodik asking him to mediate the release of Ukrainian priests and declared him the film’s ambassador.
The recent premiere in Banja Luka was attended by Bishop Irinej of Backa and Tamara Damjanović, an MP of the Socialist Party of Serbia, who supported this important cultural event. During the premiere, speakers, including Emir Kusturica, expressed deep concern about the ongoing persecution of Orthodoxy in Ukraine amidst the current conflict.
The interviewees in the film are: Metropolitan Irinej, world-renowned director Emir Kusturica, Ruslan Kalinchuk, an oppressed missionary and literary scholar from Ivano-Frankivsk, Father Nikolai Mohilny from Kyiv who was forced to leave his homeland for his religious affiliation; Vukan Marković, professor of philosophy at the University of Cambridge, Jan Taksjur, a poet, writer, and television presenter from Kyiv who was arrested in 2022 and released in a prisoner exchange in 2023, and Mario Selvini, an Orthodox priest, philosopher, and poet from Italy.
Mirko Radenovic previously explained that the idea for the film arose from the harsh realities in Ukraine, as well as the challenges faced by the Serbian Orthodox Church in Kosovo and Metohija: “This is a reality that is current on the territory of Ukraine, but we can also remember the recent events on our territory, remember the situation in Kosovo and Metohija with our people and the Church. We wanted to show the world what can hardly be seen anywhere in the media,” he said.
“We want to show an objective situation. It is not just a schism in the church, but serious, aggressive, and violent attacks on Orthodox Christians,” the director and screenwriter of the movie, Jovan Markovic, stated.
Above, His Eminence Metropolitan Longin of Bancheny after his beating in Jan. 2024, only one example of the crimes being committed against Christians by both commonplace thugs and professional Ukrainian government thugs.
Kusturica remarked: “Someone sold the war to Ukraine, and the pressing question is who will pay the interest. What will the situation be in areas where Orthodox Christianity is being suffocated?” He drew parallels to historical events, stating, “Every person of goodwill should stand with the persecuted Ukrainian priests. This mirrors the March pogrom in Kosovo, part of a broader effort to destroy Orthodoxy and undermine cultures that prioritize freedom.”
“It is tragic that Europe, which is supposedly democratic, is silent. The situation is tragic, and many priests and citizens are in prisons, and temples have been taken away,” Ukrainian philosopher Ruslan Kalinchuk noted.
Bishop Irinej spoke even bolder: “I don’t think this film needs any commentary or praise. It speaks for itself, but it also tells us all the truth about our world, our times, and ourselves. We can say that there are no forces of evil, including this unfortunate man who portrays the head of the Ukrainian state, or unfortunately of the former state, who I am sure does not believe in the Jewish, Christian, or Muslim faith, and who has gone to war against God. There have been many persecutors of Christians, destroyers, torturers, and villains, from Nero and Diocletian to our days, but no one has ever dared to abolish the Church as such. And this wretch has done it,” commented His Grace concerning the anti-church bill No 8371 signed into law by Volodymyr Zelensky in late summer this year.
“For us Serbs, Orthodoxy is eternal; it is the foundation of our existence. Recently, there were attempts to implement a scenario similar to what is happening in Ukraine in Montenegro. However, the people and clergy organized effectively to resist this and normalize relations within the society. We believed it was essential to create a film that could help people view the current situation more righteously,” Mirko Radenovic stated.
People of Christ—Our Time stands as a powerful testament to the resilience of faith and the importance of solidarity in preserving cultural identities. As the film continues to reach international audiences, it has the potential to inspire dialogue and action in support of those who suffer for their beliefs, reinforcing the need for solidarity among Orthodox Christians worldwide. The film not only highlights the struggles of the present but also serves as a reminder of the enduring power of faith in the face of adversity.
Following the premiere screenings in Belgrade and Banja Luka, the film is set to be shown in Montenegro, North Macedonia, and further among the diaspora in countries such as Austria, Germany, France, the USA, and Argentina.
If anyone knows of an upcoming screening, please drop the information in the comments below.
12 March, 2025
Former CIA officer: U.S. paid Phanar $20 million for the creation of OCU
A former counterterrorism officer claimed that Hillary Clinton offered Patriarch Bartholomew money for the creation of the OCU, which he agreed to.
March 12, 2025 – Former CIA officer John Kiriakou claimed in an interview with American blogger Julian Dorey that Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople had received money for establishing the Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU).
While discussing corruption schemes in Ukraine, Kiriakou also touched on religious matters. According to him, Hillary Clinton, while serving as U.S. Secretary of State, asked Patriarch Bartholomew to declare the Ukrainian Church autocephalous so that it “would no longer be subject to the whims of the Russian Patriarch.”
He stated that the head of Phanar initially did not consider it a good idea, since this issue is the prerogative of the Russian Orthodox Church.
“And Hillary supposedly said, ‘Would $20 million help make a decision? Well, the Greek Orthodox Church is under the thumb of neo-Ottoman Turks.’ So he said, ‘Yes, we could use the $20 million.’ She then said, ‘We have to give it to you through Ukrainian banks.’ ‘That’s fine,’” Kiriakou recounted, referring to an alleged conversation between Clinton and Patriarch Bartholomew.
According to Kiriakou, “The State Department wires $20 million, probably through USAID, to some Ukrainian bank. The Ukrainians do whatever it is they usually do behind closed doors in Ukrainian banks, and they send $15 million to the Patriarch.”
“He then says, ‘Wait a minute, where’s the other five? It was supposed to be $20 million, where’s the five?’ And the State Department replies, ‘Oh, we don’t know anything about that. All we know is that we paid. So now you must declare the independence of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church,’” Kiriakou continued, stressing that this “immediately caused a near-war situation between the Russian Orthodox Church and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.”
According to Wikipedia, John Kiriakou was an intelligence analyst and operations officer in the CIA’s Counterterrorism Center, as well as a senior investigator for the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
It will be recalled that the OCU was established in 2018, while Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013.
As previously reported by the UOJ, immediately after the creation of the OCU, Patriarch Bartholomew stated that he had not taken any money for it, receiving only chocolates from Petro Poroshenko.
https://spzh.eu/en/news/85373-former-cia-officer-us-paid-phanar-20-million-for-the-creation-of-ocu
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qK-0SvDJrEY&t=6s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDUFTQdZZJU
March 18, 2025
Rector of the confiscated UOC church in Cherkassy: There will be no more prayer here
The priest is sure that the OCU representatives are not going to serve in the church from which the believers were expelled.
Archpriest Vyacheslav Klimenko, rector of the church in honor of the icon of the Mother of God “Burning Bush” in Cherkassy, which the OCU representatives took away from the believers on March 18, 2025, commented on the situation. As the Telegram channel “Dozor” writes, the priest served in this shrine for 20 years, and now, together with the believers, he is forced to leave. “We have to leave. And this place remains empty. Empty. It will be empty for them. There will be no more prayer here. Not for the academy… No prayer. It will simply stand here as an emptiness,”- father Vyacheslav shares.
He is sure that the raiders will not serve in this temple. “They will simply do their job, close it, and it will stand like that. But this will be on their own conscience,” the UOC clergyman adds.
As UOJ wrote, on March 18, 2025, representatives of the OCU, together with the police, came to the UOC temple in honor of the icon of the Mother of God “Burning Bush” in Cherkassy, presenting falsified documents for the parish. Orthodox Christians who prayed in this church from its foundation were only allowed to take their utensils and things.
https://spzh.eu/ru/news/85488-nastojatel-otobrannoho-khrama-upts-v-cherkassakh-zdes-bolshe-ne-budet-molitvy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCgYEQbOiec&t=3s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9XPtMF7emo
Dear Representatives of the International Community!
Dear Representatives of Orthodox Reflections!
Dear Brothers and Sisters!
Thank you for supporting and protecting our long-suffering UOC!
God bless you!
Please turn on English subtitles and listen to Ukrainian Orthodox journalist Denis Lapin, who constantly talks about the PERSECUTION of the UOC in Ukraine on his channel “Denis at the Microphone”. And he is also persecuted. Several very important videos were DELETED from Denis Lapin’s channel by the Ukrainian devilish government. And our anti-Christian media were involved in it. satanism of the antichrist Zelensky’s government is developing in Ukraine!!!!
Denis’s video is called “THE CROSS FELL FROM THE TEMPLE OF ALL SAINTS OF THE KIEV-PECHERSK LAVRA! WHAT THE LORD SAYS TO ALL THE PERSECUTORS OF THE CHURCH!!”
(“КРЕСТ УПАЛ С ХРАМА ВСЕХ СВЯТЫХ КИЕВО-ПЕЧЕРСКОЙ ЛАВРЫ! ЧТО ГОСПОДЬ ГОВОРИТ ВСЕМ ГОНИТЕЛЯМ ЦЕРКВИ!!”)
Please, spread this very important information as much as possible!
You can watch it at this link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faoI7vvHKI4&t=1s
Го́споди, Иису́се Христе́, Сы́не Бо́жий, поми́луй нас грешных!
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on us sinners!
With love in Christ!
GOD BLESS YOU!!!
Your sister in Christ, a believer of the UOC and your Ukrainian friend
Tetyana Avramenko
Dear Representatives of Orthodox Reflections and the International Community!
Dear Brothers and Sisters!
Thank you for all that you do to protect ORTHODOXY!
Thank you for supporting and protecting our long-suffering UOC.
God bless you!
Please watch and distribute these important video messages of Orthodox journalist Denis Lapin – one of the greatest defenders of the UOC. Please watch and distribute his video messages. He does a lot of good deeds for the Glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.
But our ukrainian satanic government through our slanderous and lying Goebbels-media, well-paid pro-government lying journalists is trying to PERSECUTE him.
Our Ukrainian GOEBBELS-medias (in the person of the anti-Christian journalists, such as Alla Mazur (she especially hates the UOC), Kateryna Soliar (who dismissively called the UOC in an interview with the traitor of the UOC – the schismatic OCU “Metropolitan” Oleksandr Drabynko – “a cancerous tumor”), Nataliia Moseichuk (she, together with the Head of the SBU Vasyl Malyuk – conducted an interview and they mockingly called our priests of the UOC – “moles in cassocks”), as well as MANY other “honest” Ukrainian journalists (shame on the Ukrainian nation for such godless journalists)), for money, INCENTIVE HATRED AND HOSTILITY TOWARDS THE UOC among unchurched Ukrainians and, in my opinion, are RELIGIOUS CRIMINALS!!!!!.
Please watch the video of Denis Lapin, which is called:
“Срочно!!! Они хотят закрыть рот каждому, кто говорит правду о Церкви, цензура от канала 1+1”
(“Urgent!!! They want to shut the mouth of everyone who speaks the truth about the Church, censorship from channel 1+1”).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87KfdEXIQpA
________________________________________________________________________
Please also watch other important videos with evidence of the PERSECUTION of the UOC:
________________________________________________________________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87KfdEXIQpA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8sZnQC2fv0&t=128s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCjB9kP6lek
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBXBri8Ivbo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ud41UimyMho
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7zikCqstfQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmvSXKejas0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSVfPYcc9Tk
https://spzh.eu/ru/zashhita-very/26714-boeviki-v-ryasakh-ocherednaya-lozh-tsn-o-tserkvi
_______________________________________________________________________
With Love in Christ!
May God bless and help you!
Your sister in Christ and your Ukrainian friend
Tetyana Avramenko
UOC announces number of parishioners at Cathedral assembly in Chernivtsi
A total of 4,506 parishioners participated in the assembly, reaffirming their loyalty to the UOC.
On February 16, 2025, 4,506 parishioners participated in the assembly of the religious community of the Holy Spirit Cathedral of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) in Chernivtsi, according to the press service of the Chernivtsi-Bukovyna Diocese on Telegram.
“For four hours, registration for the general assembly of the religious community continued inside the Holy Spirit Cathedral in Chernivtsi. After a joint prayer and the chanting of an akathist before the Pochaiv Icon of the Mother of God, a collective vote was held. 4,506 members of the religious community voted to remain within the Ukrainian Orthodox Church under the leadership of His Beatitude Metropolitan Onuphry,” the press service stated.
It was also emphasized that during the voting, “unknown individuals at Roman Hryshchuk’s rally, posing as a fake community of the cathedral, voted for a transition to the OCU.”
Previously, the UOJ reported that the Holy Spirit Cathedral community in Chernivtsi had reaffirmed its loyalty to the UOC.
_______________________________________________________________________
Chernivtsi ‘European Solidarity’ announces exit from ‘Moscow Patriarchate’
Members of Poroshenko’s Party in Chernivtsi announce participation in UOC cathedral religious community assembly.
Members of Poroshenko’s ‘European Solidarity’ party in Chernivtsi announced their departure from two religious communities of the ‘Moscow Patriarchate Church’ and stated that they are no longer parishioners. This was reported in a post on the official Facebook page of European Solidarity – Chernivtsi.
“Today, the religious communities of the two largest churches in Chernivtsi voted to join the Orthodox Church of Ukraine. These are the Holy Spirit Cathedral and St. Nicholas Church. Our European Solidarity team also participated in the voting and the joint prayer service,” the statement said.
When asked in the comments if any ‘European Solidarity’ members attend these Chernivtsi churches every Sunday, the head of the party’s secretariat, Vitalii Yaremchuk, referred to the UOC as the ‘Moscow Church’ and indicated that they do not attend.
The European Solidarity page also published a congratulatory message from Petro Poroshenko, in which he stated that “until now, Bukovyna was a stronghold of the ROC,” and that “the transition of the cathedral itself indicates an important shift in the consciousness of Orthodox Ukrainians.” Poroshenko did not clarify whether he himself had left the ‘ROC,’ following the example of his Chernivtsi party colleagues.
Previously, the UOJ reported that signatures for the ‘transfer’ of churches to the OCU in Chernivtsi were collected deceitfully.
https://spzh.eu/en/news/84995-uoc-announces-number-of-parishioners-at-cathedral-assembly-in-chernivtsi
https://spzh.eu/en/news/84998-chernivtsi-european-solidarity-announces-exit-from-moscow-patriarchate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfYBsjMucuU&t=1s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZvpSSee5Vk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehxuGdU7ynU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZA2mwL8hQc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctR4NAFDgJw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGKo9hDMxKw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4dbsUIpQMc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1z4GtJVqvc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z915bTQCRSo
Arestovych: You can’t trample 6.5 million people for loyalty to the Church
10 October 2023 15:31
Oleksiy Arestovych stated that the UOC is 6.5 million parishioners, many of whom defend Ukraine at the front, giving their lives for it.
Oleksiy Arestovych, former advisor to the Office of the President of Ukraine, has stated that it is unacceptable to trample the faith of millions of believers in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC), including the soldiers who are parishioners of the UOC and who sacrifice their lives on the frontlines to defend Ukraine. He made these remarks during a broadcast on his YouTube channel.
Arestovych emphasized that it is not permissible to target the 6.5 million people who are part of the UOC, which includes soldiers who are members of the UOC and are giving their lives to defend Ukraine, along with their mothers, relatives, and all who belong to this Church, whether by family tradition or personal choice.
He also reminded that the leadership of the UOC condemned the Russian invasion in its early hours. Arestovych asked whether it is reasonable to consider banning 6 million or even 3 million people. He emphasized that these individuals are not terrorists or involved in subversive activities, as they are sacrificing their lives on the frontlines.
“I remind you that Onufriy condemned the Russian invasion at 7 am, when it was completely unclear whether in 24 hours he would answer to the Russian paratroopers who would come and question him,” Arestovych noted.
Arestovych called for support and assistance to the processes within the Church, rather than attempting to destroy their faith. His statements came in response to concerns and criticisms regarding recent actions targeting the UOC by Ukrainian authorities. He highlighted the need for a more thoughtful and inclusive approach to address these issues.
As reported by the UOJ, Arestovych also mentioned that influential figures in the United States consider attacks on the UOC by Ukrainian authorities as unacceptable.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Arestovych about repressions against UOC: Do we want to be idiots?
15 January 2023 09:22
Arestovych called the repressions against the UOC “primitive political technology of the split.”
Speaking about the repressions against the UOC in an interview with the “There are Rumors” YouTube channel, Oleksiy Arestovych, an adviser to the Office of the President, criticized the actions of the authorities against the believers of the UOC.
“Have you seen the headlines on Fox News when the SBU entered the Kyiv-Pechersk and other Lavras: ‘Zelensky declared war on Christianity’? Fox News is the main channel for the Republicans. Are these headlines good for Ukraine? Judging by the processes that are taking place there (in the UOC – Ed.), we need to win over to our side those who are for us and put severe pressure on those who are against Ukraine. Will we instead put pressure on all 6 million believers who go to this Church and who cannot say a word of Russian? They just go there because their grandparents would go there. Are they hence all enemies and agents?!” Arestovich said.
The adviser to the OP added that such political technology unequivocally harms the state.
“Do we seek a normal power or do we want to be idiots for the sake of a primitive splintering technology? This is political technology, not cultural policy. Everything is very simple: either we act like reasonable people or like idiots. So far we are acting like idiots,” he summed up.
https://spzh.eu/en/news/76389-arestovych-you-cant-trample-65-million-people-for-loyalty-to-the-church
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuAeZ1R7Wqo&t=11s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8pabKLcEdY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gvEo6cEGyY
https://spzh.eu/en/news/84000-14-sriminal-sases-initiated-against-cherkasy-cathedral-seizure-perpetrators
12 January, 2025
14 сriminal сases initiated against Cherkasy cathedral seizure perpetrators
The police are delaying the investigation and attempting to reclassify the cases under lesser charges.Fourteen criminal cases have been initiated against the gang that carried out a violent attack during the seizure of the UOC Cathedral in Cherkasy, reported Archpriest Heorhiy Pohranichny, head of the legal department of the Cherkasy Diocese, to First Cossack.
At the same time, according to the legal expert, the police are deliberately delaying the investigation and attempting to reclassify the cases to lesser charges.
“It is unacceptable to classify injuries such as a broken femur of a hieromonk, or the injuries of a deacon who ‘luckily’ lost six teeth, as minor hooliganism. These injuries include fractured ankles and ribs, yet they are currently being classified as minor,” said the priest. He also noted the shooting incident involving OCU activist Davyd Pshenychny, who fired a traumatic weapon at the cathedral cashier Maria Preshchakova, who narrowly avoided losing her eye.
“As for individuals with moderate and severe injuries, such as fractured ankles, broken ribs, and lost teeth, they are undergoing rehabilitation. For the hieromonk, the situation is particularly serious due to his advanced age. A broken femur at such an age is extremely difficult to heal, and he is still undergoing preparatory procedures for a complex surgery,” said Father Heorhiy. Additionally, dozens of people suffered eye burns from tear gas during the incident.
The legal expert emphasized that diocesan lawyers provided police with video evidence of the brawl, clearly showing the involvement of OCU chaplains, including Nazariy Zasadskiy. However, law enforcement officials have neither included them as suspects nor participants in the criminal cases.
Father Heorhiy also noted that the police are trying to reclassify the case under Article 296 of the Criminal Code – minor hooliganism – while diocesan lawyers believe the actions of the perpetrators should be qualified as robbery, if not more serious offenses.
“Despite everything, the police are trying to split these cases into multiple, fragmented parts, rather than consolidating them into a single investigation. They likely hope that the complainants will eventually withdraw their statements, despite already having victim status in the case,” said the legal expert.
Regarding attempts by the authorities and the OCU to legalize the cathedral seizure, Father Heorhiy called the situation absurd.
He stated that the authorities attributed the cathedral to a so-called “Nativity of Christ” community, which they “re-registered.” According to him, this fictitious parish, along with others used by authorities in similar cases, exists only on paper, with no known real activity.
The UOC priest stressed that “the St. Michael’s Cathedral never belonged to a parish; it was under the direct management of the Cherkasy Eparchy. Therefore, re-registering it as such is legally impossible.”
“In order to seize the cathedral, one must first remove its rightful owner. The rightful owner is the administration of the Cherkasy Eparchy. Legally transferring the property to the city’s ownership through a council session or similar means is impossible. It requires proving that the rightful owner no longer exists or has disappeared without responding to public invitations. However, this will not happen because the clergy and faithful of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church in Cherkasy remain present. They are here, visible, and daily demonstrate their faith,” stated Father Heorhiy.
He added that local authorities are now putting on a show of active management around the cathedral, trying to justify the seizure.
“As for the new ‘owners,’ we see them trying to exploit whatever is available. Some items are already being removed, including construction materials, which is being documented. The city council is also pretending to show concern for the park by cutting down trees and installing benches – something it ignored for years. It is clear this is all a demonstration meant to reduce tensions and distract with other factors,” the priest concluded.
Earlier, the UOJ reported that the UN is awaiting a response from Ukrainian authorities regarding the seizure of the UOC cathedral in Cherkasy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrElCmOwqkg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRD6b_VgzWU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRERG9Sq_2M
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YWhPXcHs4Rk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTNeHyEAI7w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sHWfEvCRzs&t=16s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpNPQ09jfb4&t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwMgtm5wH3M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6i-uNQAiRDQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsS_EvV-_Bg&t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrElCmOwqkg&t=1s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgXfLYvf4xA&t=5s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uF14X1_JpJE&t=16s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_Fqf691UcY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLEBUhm_Mu8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P95GPHH321w&t=7s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoSmgTsbnPs&t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yA1YcF7b5Ts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWMSmD3sgC8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeKAJFuXzuM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EshmmwBP2n0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_0_pmePurA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uF14X1_JpJE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBGOAoHf3vc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Liuay9V-BVk&t=5s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClwsnWjdG7I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUwEYWl7ZkA&t=1s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elE4uzg830o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2pEYE4vn5E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0PhZNFddCk
15 November 2022
Poroshenko Channel Propagandist Calls on Authorities to Ban UOC in Ukraine
Journalist Yanina Sokolova proposes recognizing the UOC as an accomplice of a terrorist state. Yanina Sokolova, an employee of Poroshenko’s “5 Channel”, appealed to the country’s leadership with a proposal to ban the UOC in Ukraine. According to Sokolova, the reason for her appeal was a video from the Kiev-Pechersk Lavra, in which pilgrims sing the song “Song of the Most Holy Mother of God”, which includes the words “Mother Rus’ is awakening”.
As another justification, Sokolova stated that the UOC allegedly “financially supports the enemy”: “More than once, requests for money for the existence of such churches resulted in the fact that money from these churches was allocated for weapons.” “I still don’t understand why this hasn’t been done yet, what is it: an unwillingness to anger the enemy or to cause some kind of dissonance within society,” said journalist Yanina Sokolova.
She called for the UOC to cease to exist as an “unsafe religious organization that threatens the territorial integrity of the country” and to recognize the Church as an accomplice of a terrorist state. “And I want to tell the Moscow priests only one thing: go to Moscow!” the “5 Channel” employee concluded her speech. Earlier, the Union of Orthodox Journalists reported that a member of parliament from the “EU” demanded that the monks be forcibly expelled from the Lavra and handed over to the OCU.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxqI6TA6DnY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2JRDafG3H8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P22_4Kp-ihY&t=1s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-ir9HaQFQ4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrRP_dA6-L8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D04TIpf4FYU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTKCPIOuBoI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWoMzcvfqXs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdF9aIAKHC4&t=4s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSjdj1oRic8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqvcEkLH2Mc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxHgnoQuI18
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRKm2uPUHzQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWAxNmr7GIo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsie7P0nOhM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxX5ZW-OjYk&t=6s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWN2iGy1jtE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMrtIWqFCC8
“The Kremlin hand” in the people’s pockets: who are they, UOC persecutors?
Too often those who attack the UOC the most turn out to be corruptionists or people with guilty consciences. Why?
Persecution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) in recent years has become part of the state’s systemic policy. We have often heard that the necessity of banning the UOC is a “matter of national security”. Deputies and politicians at all levels, followed by many Ukrainians, are convinced that it is impossible to be both a patriot of Ukraine and a member of the UOC at the same time. However, as it turns out, those who most loudly proclaim the defense of national interests are often the ones who are not averse to stealing a substantial sum from the people under the cover of these very cries.
Disguising their actions with rhetoric about national security, officials pursue purely mercenary goals – lining their pockets. The accusations against the Church for numerous violations are simply a diversion from their own crimes.
In this article, we will present several examples of how officials, who have been most outspoken against the Church, later found themselves either in the dock, under suspicion, involved in dubious schemes and machinations, or abroad.
Maxym Kozytsky, head of the Lviv Regional Military AdministrationHe became known for his loud statements against the UOC. It was Kozytsky who was behind the almost complete destruction of the UOC in the Lviv region, including the physical demolition of St Volodymyr’s Church in Lviv. At the end of November, he pathetically declared that there were no longer any UOC communities left in the Lviv region. Today, it is known that Kozytsky is suspected of embezzling millions of hryvnias in humanitarian aid, constructing a “family” road worth 25 million hryvnias leading to a resort owned by his father, as well as having indirect ties with the Russian “Gazprom”.
Anatoliy Bondarenko, Mayor of CherkasyCherkasy became notorious for the most shocking and bloody clashes during the “voluntary transfers” to the OCU. First, the seizure of the Nativity of the Virgin Monastery in 2023, and then the seizure of the Archangel Michael Cathedral. The whole world saw footage of UOC believers and clergy being brutally beaten by OCU activists when their legs, arms, and jaws were broken, when they were gassed and shot at with traumatic weapons.
Naturally, all this would have been impossible without the support of the city leadership. However, Bondarenko not only did not hide this but even boasted of his involvement in the seizures. In particular, after the seizure of the cathedral, the OCU elected him as the head of the parish council. And just before the takeover, the mayor personally announced its “transfer” to the OCU.
Why such activity? The fact is that Bondarenko has long been accused of corruption. Back in 2017, the Prosecutor’s Office issued him a notice of suspicion under Part 2 of Article 364 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (“Abuse of power”) for illegal enrichment worth several million. Publications about this appeared on the all-Ukrainian “Suspilne”. Prior to this, local journalists from “Lakmus” and “1800” relentlessly questioned the mayor about his huge estate on the bank of the Dnieper River, the land for which he had bought at bargain basement prices. The entire city is buzzing about Bondarenko’s schemes. Apparently, through bloody attacks on “Moscow priests”, the mayor decided to prove his patriotism and silence his critics.
Former Mayor of Rivne, Oleksandr TretiakWhile holding office as mayor, Tretiak ran an active campaign against the UOC, strongly supporting the forced “transfers” of communities to the OCU. At the same time, his public service was tainted by corruption scandals. According to the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU), Tretiak was accused of “violating the requirements for preventing and resolving conflicts of interest”. In particular, he paid additional bonuses and salaries to the office staff of the city council, for which the court removed him from his position for one year.
It is noteworthy that just one year after taking office as mayor of Rivne, Tretiak bought a house at half the market value, partly financed by a consumer loan from Oschadbank for 30 years. The official told journalists he had bought the house for less than 3 million hryvnias, or about 90,000 dollars. However, it later emerged that the same house had been sold just a month earlier for 220,000 dollars.
Fedir Androshchuk, head of the National Museum of Ukraine’s HistoryIt was Androshchuk who oversaw the demolition of the Tithe (Desiatynnyi) Monastery, calling it “rubbish”. He also organised fundraising for the demolition of the shrine. On his Facebook page, Androshchuk wrote: “It will be very symbolic to finish this clean-up by Easter! Therefore, we ask all concerned citizens to support the fundraising. Let’s protect our history and culture together!”
After some time, he left the country. According to MP Solomiya Bobrovska, Androshchuk went on a business trip and disappeared. “Apparently, he took advantage of his other citizenships (why he has them is another question), went on a trip to Italy and Sweden, and according to the response to my parliamentary inquiry, he went missing at the opening of an exhibition in Lithuania,” Bobrovska wrote. No one has explained how a high-ranking official, in violation of Ukrainian law, holds another citizenship.
Meanwhile, Androshchuk stated that he lives and works in Sweden, whose citizen he is and where he pays taxes. In other words, the official who was involved in the demolition of our sacred sites had no intention of living in Ukraine. He has held the passport of another state (in this case, Sweden) for several years.
Oleksandr Supruniuk, Mayor of NetishynSupruniuk became ill-famed for his harsh attacks on the UOC. He publicly referred to the Church as “biological weapons” and actively supported the seizure of temples. Subsequently, it turned out that his activities were aimed solely at personal enrichment. The situation is aggravated by the fact that Supruniuk profited from the war. For example, drones purchased by the executive committee of the Netishyn City Council at Supruniuk’s behest for over 20 million hryvnias contained components much cheaper than those declared, causing a loss to the budget of more than 6 million hryvnias.
Serhiy Hamaliyi, former Head of the Khmelnytskyi Regional AdministrationHamaliy is another “patriot-foreigner” on our list. According to media reports, he holds a Polish passport, a fact he concealed when appointed to his position. He also kept his long-standing connections with the criminal world under wraps. In 1997, law enforcement detained him for drug possession and racketeering as part of a criminal group. As head of the Khmelnytskyi Regional Military Administration, Serhiy Hamaliy actively organized the transfer of UOC communities to the OCU. His methods included forging believers’ signatures and using administrative pressure. Over 30 complaints from UOC believers were submitted to the courts, reporting coercion to “transfers”. On 14 March 2023, Hamaliy was dismissed from his position following a scandal involving drunk driving. A few months later, he made his declaration public, revealing that he earned 17 million hryvnias in 2023 and that his wife had purchased a 180-square-metre house in Poland.
Oleksandr Symchyshyn, Mayor of KhmelnytskyiSymchyshyn is well known for his aggressive attacks on the UOC. In the spring of 2023, Khmelnytskyi became a record-breaker for the number of temples transferred to the OCU, carried oud by Symchyshyn’s administration and, of course, with his knowledge. He also found himself at the centre of a corruption scandal.
But even here, the “refined patriot” turned out to be a corrupt official. He implemented a scheme “straight from the repertoire” of Ostap Bender: the city takes out a loan for a waste processing plant, which is paid off from the city budget, and then waste removal companies raise their prices. This created a situation where the city’s residents paid twice, and the potential amount of embezzlement exceeded one billion hryvnias. Meanwhile, the declared loan amount was 28.5 million euros, while the total cost of the project was 36.5 million euros. This discrepancy attracted the attention of representatives from the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD).
Mykhailo Holovko, head of the Ternopil Regional Military AdministrationMykhailo Holovko made highly expressive calls to the central government to transfer the Pochaiv Lavra to the local council. Why? To expel the UOC from there and hand it over to the Uniates. He stated that the regional council would initiate an appeal to Kyiv to transfer the Pochaiv Lavra into the ownership of the regional community. “And we will already find a way to expel the Russian Church from there, we will find a way to break the contract,” Holovko promised.
He made this statement on 21 June 2023, and just five days later, on 26 June, Holovko was arrested for extorting nearly 1.8 million hryvnias from a volunteer in exchange for signing completion acts for construction and repair work on municipal facilities.
Conclusions: Corruption and persecution of the Church as related phenomenaWe have presented only seven examples of the most prominent “patriot-corruptionists”. In reality, there are many more. Their tactics are simple yet highly effective – to pit the people against each other to distract them from their shady dealings. There is a cartoon on the web that very accurately captures the essence of this strategy.
Thus, it becomes clear: the persecution of the UOC often serves as a “security smokescreen” for corrupt schemes. Shout about “Moscow priests”, and suddenly you are a refined patriot beyond any suspicion. Ukrainian officials act like skilled manipulators and con artists – with their talk of “agents in cassocks”, they simply distract public attention from their own crimes. By loudly proclaiming from high podiums that the Church should be banned, they create the illusion of fighting for national interests, while simultaneously increasing their personal wealth.
In other words, if you hear politicians claiming that the Church is the “Kremlin hand”, pay close attention to where their own hands are at that moment. Because in 99 out of 100 cases, those hands are reaching into your pockets.
https://spzh.eu/en/zashhita-very/83490-the-kremlin-hand-in-the-peoples-pockets-who-are-they-uoc-persecutors
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Rjf3YZSA3c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLQfdxa4YUY&t=11s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P22_4Kp-ihY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdF9aIAKHC4&t=4s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P22_4Kp-ihY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsFFCIkDIzw
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/LHLdN_2XARU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEy1RD8StNM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HG20LfNrH3w&t=1s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNfXP9V-Tg0&t=238s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLUo5Cf7iOQ&t=46s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DhNsrvQNHc&t=11s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9TWlAOhPus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPnnza0VA5c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdlElx9-GDs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aRuonVwPFTU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGk-H2wGeC4&t=3s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_A3cBNSP33w&t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_xtjiAu0bg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DC1M6U2sibg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmvSXKejas0&t=8s
Another case opened against human rights activist Kokhanovska
A fourth charge has not yet been formally presented to the head of “Women’s Power of Ukraine”; the authorities limited their actions to a search.
On December 21, 2024 law enforcement conducted a search at the apartment of Orthodox human rights activist Viktoria Kokhanovska in connection with a fourth criminal case opened under Article 161, Part 1 (inciting religious enmity and hatred). Kokhanovska shared a video with her comments on the Women’s Power of Ukraine channel.
During the search, phones, flash drives, and laptops were confiscated. Kokhanovska claims that the new case was initiated because previous cases were “falling apart, and they need to create problems.” In the video, she states that the case was opened over a post by a priest’s wife, which Kokhanovska had shared on her social media.
The police came to Kohanovska’s home the day after a missile strike on Kyiv, during which her building was damaged.
Although a fourth charge has not been formally presented to the head of “Women’s Power of Ukraine,” investigators limited their actions to confiscating equipment. Kokhanovska’s status in the fourth criminal case remains undetermined.
As previously reported by the UOJ, on April 19, 2023, the investigative department of the Pechersk Police Department initiated a criminal case under Part 3 of Article 296 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (hooliganism) after Kokhanovska and other believers opened building No. 39 of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra, which had been unlawfully sealed by reserve staff and law enforcement.
On the same day, police forcibly detained Kokhanovska near the Lavra. On April 21, she was placed under 24-hour house arrest and informed of charges under Article 161, Part 1 (inciting religious enmity and hatred).
On August 15, Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) officers conducted a search at her apartment, and the following day, the SBU presented her with a new charge under Part 2 of Article 436-2 (denial of Russian aggression).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlxbH87kyAY&t=10s
https://spzh.eu/en/news/83661-another-case-opened-against-human-rights-activist-kokhanovska
President Volodymyr Zelensky: the story of one mistakeIn 2019, the Orthodox voted for Zelensky because they saw him as the antipode of Poroshenko. Today we have a completely different person in front of us. Why?
In December 2024, Ukraine was shaken by a scandal – a cooking show was filmed in the Refectory Church of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra. Many Ukrainians, including high-ranking representatives from various religious denominations, called this event sacrilegious. At the same time, the show’s producer, AKIM HALIMOV, instead of apologizing, suddenly attacked the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, which was expelled from the Lavra’s Refectory Church nearly two years ago. AKIM HALIMOV referred to the UOC as “filth” and “Muscovites” and urged the authorities to “throw it out of our country”. At first glance, this seemed like the reaction of an emotionally unstable individual. However, this is not entirely the case. Halimov’s statement reflects the state of the ecclesiastical sphere in Ukraine as of the end of 2024.
The level of religious intolerance in Ukraine has reached a “red line”. This intolerance is directed exclusively at one (and the largest) religious denomination in the country – the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, which nearly a quarter of modern Ukraine’s population identifies with, amounting to over 6 million people. Its communities are being systematically liquidated (the authorities in Lviv region have declared that they have completely cleansed the area of parishes belonging to this denomination). Its churches are being physically demolished (there are reported cases in Kyiv, Lviv, and Ivano-Frankivsk). Furthermore, the country has been rocked by scandals involving the forcible transfer of churches from the UOC to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU), which in practice often resemble militarized seizures. During such incidents, believers, priests, and even bishops sustain severe injuries. For instance, during the seizure of the cathedral in Cherkasy, Metropolitan Theodosius suffered a concussion after being struck with a bat, and parishioners were shot at with traumatic weapons by individuals in camouflage right inside the cathedral. Additionally, a special law, 3894–IX, has been drafted and enacted against the UOC, aiming to dismantle this denomination in one sweeping blow. In effect, the authorities have declared war on the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and are conducting it by all the rules of military strategy.
Most political scientists and experts agree that behind all this looms the dark shadow of one person – President Volodymyr Zelensky. This is especially strange given that, at the beginning of his presidency, his position on religious matters was the exact opposite.
As a presidential candidate, in April 2019, he stated to RBC Ukraine: “The issue of religion is number one. We never discuss things that divide families and society. I never do that. Never.” After becoming president, he convincingly said that, regardless of religious affiliation, the main idea for Ukrainians should be to live with mutual respect: “Would it really matter to us which Church Kadeniuk or Lobanovsky go to?” And in a meeting with the believers of the Rivne Eparchy of the UOC in May 2019, Zelensky emphasised that “the state should not interfere with the Church”.
This position distinguished Zelensky favorably from his rival in the presidential elections, Petro Poroshenko (the sitting president at the time), who based his campaign on persecuting the believers of the UOC and aggressively promoting another Ukrainian denomination, the OCU. It was under Poroshenko’s presidency that the systematic persecution of UOC communities began, with the aim of forcing them to join the OCU.
Zelensky himself, while heading the popular comedy television project “95 Quarter”, mocked his opponent for this, referring to the Tomos (the document granting legitimacy to the OCU) as a “thermos”.
Thus, Volodymyr Zelensky positioned himself as a politician detached from church matters, which is quite in line with the provisions of the Ukrainian Constitution (it states that the Church is separated from the state).
As a result, it was Zelensky who won the 2019 election. Poroshenko, who had bet on the “Armovir” (Army-Faith-Language) slogans, suffered a resounding defeat. Thus, the new President could not fail to understand that using the religious issue for political purposes was not only illegal but also counterproductive. Nevertheless, by the end of 2024, we see that Zelensky has resumed the persecution of the UOC, doing it much tougher than his “teacher”. But at what point did the current President decide to change his policy towards the Church? And for what reasons?
Power and the UOC: a sudden 180-degree turnaround
Undoubtedly, the turning point was the war that Russia unleashed against Ukraine. However, the UOC showed in the very first hours of the war whose side they were on. On the first day of the invasion, Metropolitan Onuphry condemned Russia’s aggression and called on his flock to defend their Homeland. This position was reaffirmed in all subsequent statements by the UOC Synod. In May 2022, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church held a Council, during which it actually severed all ties with the Russian Orthodox Church and made these changes to its Statute (“Constitution”, the governing document of the Church). In other words, the UOC showed that it was with the people of Ukraine.
Zelensky saw and knew this. On 12 March 2022, he thanked the UOC for its assistance in organizing a humanitarian convoy to besieged Mariupol. The same attitude was shown by all other representatives of the government. The head of the President’s Office, Andriy Yermak, wrote in March 2022 that “useful idiots” were spreading the idea of a religious conflict in society due to the presence of a “Russian Church” in Ukraine. The same sentiment was expressed in April of that year by the Speaker of the Verkhovna Rada, Ruslan Stefanchuk, who commented on the idea of a legislative ban on the UOC: “During the war, we have no right to adopt any law that divides Ukrainian society.” A similar stance was taken by Yermak’s advisor and the de facto spokesperson for the President’s Office, Mykhailo Podoliak, who, during this period, called for “not speculating” on the issue of banning the UOC, because otherwise, “we may face internal conflict, and today, unity, which Ukraine has demonstrated to the world, is far more essential and much more important.” Furthermore, Podoliak stated at the time that the UOC was a structure different from the ROC, one that rejected Russian aggression. It is important to note that this was said before the UOC Council.
Oleksandr Tkachenko, the then Minister of Culture, in September 2022, sharply reprimanded journalists who referred to the UOC as the “Moscow Patriarchate”: “I do not know any ROC representatives in Ukraine. There is the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, which, at the last Synod, distanced itself precisely from the ROC.”
But then, not much time passed before government representatives began saying completely opposite things about the UOC.
In January 2023, Podoliak stated that the UOC was a “propaganda institute” that “works for the values of another country”. Other figures of our research made similar claims during this period. Stefanchuk said that the UOC “poses a national security threat to Ukraine”. Tkachenko, completely forgetting his previous statement that he “did not know about the ROC in Ukraine”, calmly referred to the UOC as the “Moscow Patriarchate” and claimed that it allegedly supported the war. In other words, within two to three months (from September 2022 to January 2023), the authorities made the decision to completely change their stance towards the UOC.
What happened? Could it be that representatives of the Church took some hostile actions towards the state? No. The UOC still helps the army more than any other denomination, supports migrants and victims of hostilities. In addition, it is the UOC that has suffered the most from the war. The majority of the hundreds of destroyed churches belong to this denomination, and dozens of its clergy have been killed or wounded during the fighting.
Nevertheless, Volodymyr Zelensky suddenly begins his attack on the UOC. On 1 December 2022, he held a meeting of the National Security and Defence Council (NSDC), during which he instructed to draft a bill to ban the activities of “religious organizations affiliated with the Russian Federation” and gave the go-ahead to expel the UOC from the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra. The President also ordered the “activation of measures to identify and counteract the subversive activities of Russian intelligence services in Ukraine’s religious sphere”. At the same time, large-scale searches by the SBU have been taking place in monasteries, churches and eparchial offices of the UOC across the country since the end of November.
In fact, the Ukrainian secret police found nothing, and their actions were more of a public intimidation nature. They were meant to show society that “there is no smoke without fire”, and that the UOC is an enemy of Ukraine.
Obviously, the task of black PR against the Church was assigned not only to the Security Service but also to Zelensky’s former media colleagues.
Almost all central and regional media outlets in Ukraine began to talk about the UOC in a derogatory and offensive manner, labelling it as “Kremlin supporters”, “agents of Putin”, “FSB agents”, and so on. But the President’s friends from the “95 Quarter” went the furthest. After Zelensky’s statement on the UOC, they released a blasphemous issue of the program “Bayraktar News”, in which they said that “Ukraine bans on its territory the activities of the Russian father, the Moscow son and the bunker spirit”. (a direct mockery of the dogma of the Trinity). The actors also made crude remarks on air about the UOC, using offensive language and de facto called for the beating and killing of priests. This program sparked mass outrage among Ukrainians. Lawyers for the Ukrainian Orthodox Church filed a lawsuit, but it had no consequences. And everyone understands for what reasons. The head of the SBU, Maliuk, openly stated on “1+1” that all issues related to his organization’s work on the UOC are personally overseen by Zelensky: “Right now, all of this is happening under the leadership of our President of Ukraine.”
The beginning of terror
In fact, after this program and the inaction of law enforcement, a green light was given for the harshest actions against the UOC. Since then, there has been a surge in violence against the clergy and believers of the Church.
On 25 December 2022, in a UOC temple in Chornomorsk, a man with a knife attempted to stab a priest during a service. On 2 January 2023, in a UOC church in Vinnytsia, an offender slit a priest’s throat with a razor. In April 2023, a thug attacked Bishop Nikita of Ivano-Frankivsk on the street and punched him in the face several times. In November 2023, during the seizure of the UOC Monastery of the Nativity of the Holy Theotokos, Priest Serhiy Pashchenko was brutally beaten – his jaw was broken in two places. At the same time, an elderly parishioner, Oleh Slobodianyk, had his leg broken. And these are just a few of the most well-known examples. In reality, there are many more.
In the spring of 2023, a wave of mass and brutal seizures of UOC temples began in Western Ukraine, which, with varying success, has continued across the country to this day. In fact, UOC eparchies in the Lviv and Ivano-Frankivsk regions have been completely destroyed, with a dire situation in the Ternopil, Volyn and Khmelnytskyi regions. Almost all the UOC churches in the Kyiv region have been seized.
At the same time, the authorities pretend that none of this is happening. Officials and representatives of “court” denominations convince the West that Ukraine is a country of exceptional religious freedom. Those who speak the truth are thrown into prison, as happened to the UOJ journalists. The persecution of the UOC is only openly discussed abroad. Among those speaking out was the new US Vice President JD Vance, and similar statements were made by politicians such as Catherine Whiteford, Tulsi Gabbard, Vivek Ramaswamy, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission.
Yet, the question remains: why did Volodymyr Zelensky start this shameful campaign against his own people? After all, the millions of UOC believers are just as Ukrainian as everyone else: atheists, Catholics, Protestants, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, and so on. Their right to religious freedom is guaranteed by the Constitution. Why is this right so cynically taken away from them?
“Do you want to lose the war? Then start a war against God, ban the Church”
Perhaps, we should go back to that period of 2022, when Zelensky, together with his entourage, so lightning-fast changed his attitude to the church issue. Let us recall that it happened in November-December. It was the time when the lightning counter-offensive of Ukraine, which resulted in the liberation of significant territories of the country, was booted and in fact ended. At the same time, the people on a wave of euphoria expected more and more victories. And they were demonstated to the people. Victories over their own fellow citizens.
Faithful soldiers began to massively record appeals from the front to the authorities, demanding to stop repression against their Church.
“There are millions of us, Orthodox,” said one of the warriors and called on the authorities to stop the persecution of the UOC. Another remarked that he was defending not only the state but also his Church at the front.
Well, one of the priests explained that the war against the UOC would lead Ukraine to defeat.
“Do you want to lose the war? Then start a war against God. Ban the Church. Take away the temples. Beat and abuse the priests. Beat and abuse their parishioners. And you will lose the war. Because not a single person in history has ever won nor will anyone ever win a war against God – this is an obvious thing,” the clergyman said.
These words were said at the beginning of 2023. And now, almost two years later, it is difficult to claim that he was wrong. After Zelensky began the terror against his own Orthodox citizens, the situation on the front line is not encouraging for Ukrainians. One could call it a coincidence, or one could see a pattern.
Petro Poroshenko, who once made the “victory” over the “wrong” Church the main trump card of his policy, has ingloriously lost. Volodymyr Zelensky, who is undoubtedly a talented and intelligent man, decided to follow in Poroshenko’s footsteps. And so, he is making the same mistake.
Those who fight against God have no prospects.
https://spzh.eu/en/zashhita-very/83622-president-the-story-of-one-mistake
https://spzh.eu/en/news/83563-song-and-dance-ensemble-performs-in-lavras-refectory-church
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLPvqY4DCZ8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdu_86vUhlk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEQ5GhnTCr4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrS2v-YUs3g&t=17s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65dzE4xCqQY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sETtE9cj8vQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JD2cYnmXKI&t=1696s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBjIr0YBb2o&t=3s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxDlK2Vh5us