By Nicholas – member of the Western Rite Vicariate, a part of the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese in America
As everyone knows, there is a war going on in Ukraine that pits the Russian Federation against the Ukrainian Armed forces. In addition to the fighting on the battlefield, many Westerners also know that there is some kind of religious dimension to the conflict. Because of Tucker Carlson and other influencers, including American Vice President J.D. Vance, Americans vaguely understand that the Zelensky regime has stolen churches, drafted clergy, imprisoned bishops, and beaten Christians trying practice their Orthodox Faith.
Most Americans, who are at all familiar with the situation, seriously object to their tax dollars funding the persecution of Christians. For Ukrainian apologists, this situation has to be handled with the utmost delicacy, as the unvarnished truth about Christian persecution would further erode the already anemic support Ukraine has among American voters. We’ll talk about the truth of the situation in a moment, but first let’s look at the official narrative.
The official narrative goes like this: the religious conflict in Ukraine is between the Russian Orthodox Church, under the devilish KGB agent Patriarch Kirill of Moscow, and the freedom-loving Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU) which was granted official recognition by Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople (an American ally!) The ROC is pure evil. It is not even a Church, but rather is an extension of the vile Putin Regime. In Ukraine, the Russian Church forms a subversive fifth column attempting to undermine Ukraine from within. The Russian KGB pseudo-church is too dangerous to be allowed to operate on Ukrainian soil. Therefore, the restrictions, no matter how severe, put on the Russian Church in Ukraine are entirely justified as war time measures. Anyone questioning those restrictions is a dangerous spreader of Russian disinformation / propaganda, and needs to be shunned at minimum, if not investigated as possible traitors to the United States.
As many of you may know, an American pan-Orthodox delegation met with U.S. Representatives on Capitol Hill on 18 and 19 November 2025. They were there to call attention to, and protest, the U.S. taxpayer funded persecution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC). Immediately, defenders of the “official narrative” swung into action across a broad spectrum of social and legacy media. Congressmen even joined the attack, going so far as to draft a letter to the Department of Justice asking for an investigation into the American delegation.
Rep. Luna with representatives from the ROCOR, OCA, Antiochian, Serbian, and Greek jurisdictions Photo: Society of St. John of Shanghai and San Francisco
Since the meeting, we have been treated to a constant barrage of posts and mainstream reporting framing the persecution in Ukraine as a battle between the Russian Orthodox Church (headed by the villainous Patriarch Kirill) and the real “Orthodox Church” as represented by the Patriarch of Constantinople. Examples are below:


What is missing in the “official narrative?” Any semblance of the truth, because that would absolutely destroy it. So let us deal with the facts, shall we?
There is no Russian Orthodox Church in Ukraine. The Ukrainian Orthodox Church is not headed by Patriarch Kirill. The Ukrainian Orthodox Church is governed by her own synod of bishops led by His Beatitude Onufry, Metropolitan of Kiev and All Ukraine. The title “Your Beatitude” is given to primates of self-governing churches. Metropolitan Onuphry is a native-born Ukrainian from the Western part of the country. He is a Ukrainian leading an independent Church of Ukrainians.
Metropolitan Onuphry of Kyiv has a history of visiting and supporting children, particularly those who are orphaned, disabled, or from low-income families. He is known for making traditional visits to children’s homes during holidays like Pascha (Easter) and Nativity to offer blessings and gifts. He has also supported orphans of the current conflict and children undergoing cancer treatment. Metropolitan Onuphry has repeatedly condemned the impact of the Russian invasion on Ukrainian children and other innocent Ukrainians.
Metropolitan Onuphry has been the permanent primate of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) since 13 August 2014, when the Holy Synod of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church elected him by secret ballot. His Beatitude was not “selected” by Moscow. He was elected by Ukrainian Bishops in a free election because, even before the war, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church was fully self-governing. At the time, even the Patriarch of Constantinople, who would later betray him under U.S. influence (and possible bribes) in 2018, offered him full and unqualified support.
Since His enthronement, Metropolitan Onuphry has been widely admired both within Ukraine and abroad. Prior to the war, His Beatitude was recognized as the most influential spiritual leader in Ukraine. In the rating of TOP-100 people and phenomena in Ukraine, prepared by the Vesti media holding at the end of 2021, experts put the Primate of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church in 15th place on the list. This was far ahead of any other religious leader. Supreme Archbishop of Kiev-Galician Svyatoslav (of the Uniate UGCC) took 58th place, the Chief Rabbi of Kiev and Ukraine Moshe Reuven Asman came in 62nd, and the head of the schismatic OCU “Metropolitan” Epiphanius (the “Church” founded by Constantinople and the U.S. State Department) lagged far behind at 63rd. Here is a quote from the article which announced the ranking:
“The modest and ascetic Metropolitan is an example worthy of imitation: having withstood the crisis years 2018-2019 under his auspices, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church has become steeled and retained its strength of spirit. Moreover, the process is in some way even reversed: among the communities that moved to the newly created OCU in 2018, there are already those who are ready to return back to the UOC,” the compilers of the rating note.
That, of course, was before the war. What happened since? On the first day of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, Metropolitan Onufry offered his blessing to the Armed Forces of Ukraine, giving “our special love and support to our soldiers who stand guard and protect and defend our land and our people. May God bless and cherish them!” He also publicly denounced the invasion and supported both Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. He personally appealed to Vladimir Putin to stop the invasion of Ukraine immediately. At the time, the Metropolitan also stated that, “The Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) has consistently supported and continues to support the territorial integrity of Ukraine and calls on its faithful to pray for peace in our Ukrainian state and around the world… I urge state leaders and all those on whom it depends, to avoid engaging in a new war. War is a grave sin before God!”
As a result of the Russian invasion, the Synod of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church met in Kiev 27 May 2022 to sever all existing ties with the Russian Orthodox Church. Below is a report from the organization Human Rights Without Frontiers:
In an address on May 17, 2025, Metropolitan Onufriy recalled that back on May 27, 2022, at the Council in Kyiv (Feofaniya), the UOC introduced changes to its Statute aiming at full canonical separation from the ROC. References to subordination to the Moscow Patriarchate were removed, the requirement to receive the blessing of Patriarch Kirill was abolished, and the name of the Moscow Patriarch is no longer commemorated during the worship service in the churches and monasteries of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
“The Council introduced a number of fundamental changes to the Statute on Governance, which confirmed the complete canonical independence of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and its disassociation from the Moscow Patriarchate,” reads the Metropolitan’s statement.
Metropolitan Onufry, the head of the UOC, also emphasized that the UOC independently manages all aspects of its internal and external life, including the appointment of bishops, the establishment of dioceses, and the production of holy myrrh.
He asserts that after May 27, 2022, his Church is no longer part of the Moscow Patriarchate and hopes that “the whole family of Autocephalous Local Churches” will acknowledge their “canonical independence.”
Metropolitan Onuphry has consistently supported the Ukrainian War effort, and grieves over the Ukrainian parishes lost due to Russian territorial advances. In regard to those UOC parishes in Russian occupied territory, Metropolitan Onuphry said, “Some of our dioceses and believers found themselves in the occupied territory. We often have no contact with them, we can’t really help them with anything except to pray for them. However, these are our dioceses, these are our people, we pray for them, we consider them our brothers and sisters, and we await their reunification with us in a united, independent Ukraine.” Metropolitan Onuphry also declared that he believed that with God’s help, Ukraine would win the war, “I believe that with God’s help we will win this war and rebuild our Ukraine. I am convinced that in order to succeed in this matter, we must be strong and united, treat our neighbors with love and respect.”
Take a look at his face, and explain why you would want this holy and humble man to suffer?

Well, you wouldn’t. What non-evil human being would? Which is why Metropolitan Onuphry cannot be allowed to exist. The anti-UOC narrative would completely collapse if Western propagandists, including many top-level clerics within the Patriarchate of Constantinople, acknowledged Metropolitan Onuphry’s existence and his truly saintly character. Therefore, he must be unpersoned. Buried. Never spoken of in polite company.
The focus must be on Russia. On a demonized Patriarch Kirill. On a demonized President Putin. On demonizing Americans, who dare speak up for Metropolitan Onuphry, as “Russian agents.” Under no circumstances can Western officialdom and its agents allow anyone to see Metropolitan Onuprhy’s face, hear his words, or even know that he exists.
Which is why those of us who support Metropolitan Onuphry, and his flock of Ukrainian martyrs, need to put his face everywhere. When the enemies of the Church speak of Patriarch Kirill and the non-existent “Russian” Church in Ukraine, we need to post images of Metropolitan Onuphry in response. Make them see the man they would crucify. Make them see not an oppressor, but a martyr for Christ. Not a bully, but a man of love and humility. Not Judas, but Job who praises God in the midst of affliction. Sore trials that Western governments have visited upon him and his beloved people. This is an excerpt from His Beatitude’s 2024 Paschal sermon:
God, our Creator and Maker, Himself comes onto earth to suffering people and accomplishes the feat of the redemption of all mankind. The Incarnate God suffers in the flesh for us people, is crucified on the Cross, dies, descends into hell and destroys it, and most gloriously rises therefrom as God. By His glorious Resurrection, the Lord once again bestows upon us eternal life and bliss, returns us the lost Paradise.
What great and beautiful love of God for His creation!
In the midst of war and persecution, a humble bishop still gives glory to the Resurrected Christ for His great mercy! All Orthodox Christians in the West, whose governments give billions to the Ukrainian Government that persecutes this holy man, should grieve for how little we have done for him and for Christ.
We need to make the enemies of Metropolitan Onuphry come face-to-face with the truth. The persecution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church does not hurt Patriarch Kirill. He is safe in Moscow. It does not hurt Vladmir Putin. He is likewise immune to the West’s wrath. When you support, excuse, downplay, and/or ignore what is happening to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, it is this Ukrainian man and his Ukrainian flock that you are condemning.
We, the Orthodox Christians and all people of good will in the West, cannot turn our gaze and allow Metropolitan Onuphry and his flock to suffer in silence.





https://spzh.eu/en/zashhita-very/93805-chronicle-of-the-reprisals-against-the-clergy-of-the-uoc
Chronicle of the reprisal against UOC clergy17 June 2026
A documented summary of known cases of detention, forced mobilization, and dispatch of UOC clergymen to military units – and why this is precisely a reprisal.
Defending one’s country is a constitutional duty. But a clergyman, under threat of being defrocked, cannot take up arms. Therefore, the forced mobilization of clergy is nothing other than a reprisal against priests and the Church.
In ancient times, one could avoid torment by renouncing Christ. In Soviet times, renouncing the priesthood could help. In today’s Ukraine, renouncing the Church and transferring to the OCU can help one avoid mobilization. But in every age, true Christians have chosen faithfulness. This publication is about those who have remained faithful today.
We have systematized the cases of mobilization of clergymen of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church that are available in the media. Let us make it clear from the outset: these are only the examples that have made it into the public domain. In reality, there are far more of them. Most likely, many times more.
Year 2024Archpriest Ioan Rozman, Khust Eparchy
On March 14, 2024, the secretary of the Khust Eparchy, Archpriest Ioan Rozman, was summoned for questioning by an investigator at the Tiachiv District Police. After the interrogation, upon leaving the police premises, he was detained by armed men in balaclavas and taken to an unknown location. The eparchy later reported that he was serving in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, despite having grounds for exemption from service (many children). As of April 23, 2024, Archpriest Ioan Rozman was still being held in a military unit.
Archpriest Ioann Petechel, Khust Eparchy
On March 27, 2024, employees of the TRC (Territorial Recruitment Center) took away the treasurer of the Khust Eparchy of the UOC, Archpriest Ioann Petechel, who has three minor children. Following a parliamentary inquiry, the police opened a criminal case regarding the unlawful mobilization of clergy of the Khust Eparchy. On April 22, that is, nearly a month later, Fr. Ioann Petechel was released.
Archimandrite Varlaam (Didenko), Khust Eparchy
On August 31, 2024, a report appeared that the Uzhhorod TRC had mobilized Archimandrite Varlaam, the abbot of the Savior-Transfiguration Monastery in the village of Tereblia, Tiachiv District, Zakarpattia region. He was sent to a military training center in Rivne.
Archpriests Vasyl and Stepan Huk, Khust and Odessa Eparchies
On September 22, 2024, after the Sunday Liturgy in the village of Iza, Zakarpattia region, Khust TRC staff took away two UOC priests, brothers Archpriests Vasyl and Stepan Huk. They were held for an entire day; after the faithful came out to the TRC and blocked the road, the priests were released in the evening.
Archpriest Ioann Polishchuk, Cherkasy Eparchy
On October 1, 2024, in Kremenets, Ternopil region, Archpriest Ioann Polishchuk was detained, having recently returned from Germany where he had been ministering to UOC parishioners. Despite high blood pressure, he was denied medical assistance at the TRC and taken to a training center in the Rivne region. It was later reported that Fr. Ioann was subjected to physical and psychological pressure in one of the military units in the Zakarpattia region due to his refusal of mobilization on religious grounds.
Archpriest Vasyl Rosokha, Khust Eparchy
He was mobilized on October 2, 2024. According to his wife, after being held at the Tiachiv TRC, the priest was sent to Rivne.
Archpriest Petro Cholak, Volodymyr-Volynsky Eparchy
On October 25, 2024, the dean of the Novovolynsk Deanery of the Volodymyr-Volynsky Eparchy, Archpriest Petro Cholak, was forcibly mobilized in Lutsk. He was put on a bus, taken to the TRC, and then sent to a training ground. According to the reports, he was being pressured to serve bearing arms.
Archpriest Oleh Melnyk, Ternopil region
On November 2, 2024, the nearly 55-year-old Archpriest Oleh Melnyk was stopped at a checkpoint and taken to the TRC. He was held without food for more than a day, and his phone was confiscated. A published video claimed that one of the TRC employees had used force against him.
Archpriest Andrii Stupnytsky, Rivne Eparchy
On December 13, 2024, TRC employees detained the rector of the Holy Trinity Church in the village of Povcha, Rivne Eparchy, Archpriest Andrii Stupnytsky. It was reported that the priest was on his way to a church service on his name day, had serious health problems, but was declared fit for service. Later, information emerged that he had decided to remain and serve as a chaplain; however, due to his state of health, he was sent home for treatment.
Priest Yevhen Rozhdestvenskyi, Odesa Eparchy
On December 21, 2024, the priest of UOC churches in the villages of Krasna Kosa and Semenivka of the Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi Deanery of the Odesa Eparchy, Yevhen Rozhdestvenskyi, was detained at a mobile checkpoint in the Odesa region while returning from the maternity hospital after his wife had given birth. He was taken to various TRCs and training centers; reports emerged of health problems following a road accident. On December 31, it became known that he had been released.
Year 2025Archimandrite Bohdan (Pylhui), Kharkiv Eparchy
On January 25, 2025, at the Kharkiv–Chuhuiv checkpoint, TCC employees detained Archimandrite Bohdan (Pylhui), the abbot of the men’s monastery in honor of the icon of the Mother of God “Skoroposlushnitsa” in the village of Babai, Kharkiv Diocese. He was sent to a military medical commission and then taken around military units in Dnipro. After this information was made public, he was released.
Protodeacon Andrii Kravchuk, Balta Eparchy
On March 4, 2025, in the city of Podilsk, Odesa region, police stopped Protodeacon Andrii Kravchuk, a cleric of the Holy Dormition Cathedral in the city of Balta and taken to the TRC. The following day, he was released.
Archpriest Vladyslav Batiuk, Rivne Eparchy
On May 22, 2025, in Pochaiv, TRC representatives detained Archpriest Vladyslav Batiuk, the rector of the Trinity Parish of the UOC in the Radyvyliv Deanery, as he was returning from a church service. Without explanation, the priest was taken to the Kremenets TRC, where he was served a summons.
Archpriest Oleksandr Moskovchuk, Odesa Eparchy
On June 10, 2025, the rector of the Trinity Church in the village of Troiandove, Odesa region, Archpriest Oleksandr Moskovchuk, was detained. He was held for several days in various TRCs and military units; reports emerged of pressure to sign a contract. After five days, he was released.
Archimandrite Pafnutii, Pochaiv Skete
On June 11, 2025, in Kremenets, Ternopil region, Archimandrite Pafnutii, the abbot of the Holy Spirit Skete of the Pochaiv Lavra, was detained. He was taken first to the Ternopil TRC and then to a military unit in the Rivne region. A TRC representative stated that the clergyman is subject to mobilization on general grounds.
Archpriest Oleksandr Zhuk, Rivne Eparchy
On the evening of June 11, 2025, in Rivne, TRC employees detained Archpriest Oleksandr Zhuk, the rector of the Church of the Holy Great Martyr Paraskeva in the village of Viliia. The priest was immediately taken to a military medical commission, which he underwent throughout the night. The following day, he was released “due to the absence of grounds for mobilization”.
Protodeacon Andrii Mankevych, Khmelnytskyi Eparchy
On June 11, 2025, Protodeacon Andrii Mankevych, a cleric of the St. Nicholas Cathedral of the Khmelnytskyi Eparchy, was detained after the evening service. Several days later, he was released.
Deacon Maksym Huzenko, Sarny Eparchy
On June 14, 2025, in Sarny, TRC employees detained a cleric of the Intercession Cathedral, Deacon Maksym Huzenko. His phone was confiscated and he was held at the TRC for several days. His subsequent fate is unknown.
Priest Rostyslav Kalinovskyi, Kamianske Eparchy
On June 19, 2025, employees of the Kamianske TRC detained Priest Rostyslav Kalinovskyi from Kamianske, Dnipropetrovsk region. He was taken around various military units, which refused to accept him. Two days later he was released, but on June 24 he was summoned to the TRC again, where pressure was applied to make him sign a contract and take an oath. His subsequent fate is unknown.
Archpriest Ioann Koval, Ternopil Eparchy
On the morning of June 22, 2025, in the city of Shumsk, Ternopil region, TRC employees, together with police, detained Archpriest Ioann Koval as he was on his way to conduct services at the Churches of the Dormition of the Mother of God in the village of Onyshkivtsi and the Protection of the Most Holy Theotokos in the village of Bolozhivka. He was taken to the Shumsk TRC branch.
Archpriest Heorhii Pryimak, Ternopil Eparchy
On June 23, 2025, a report came that TRC employees had detained Archpriest Heorhii Pryimak, the rector of the Trinity Church of the UOC in the town of Vyshnevets. The information that the clergyman was being held at the TRC was published by his daughter.
Later, the Ternopil Regional TRC commented on the forced mobilization of Archpriests Ioann Koval and Heorhii Pryimak, stating that they had not been reserved and are subject to mobilization on general grounds.
Archpriest Ihor Kushniruk, Ternopil Eparchy
On June 24, 2025, a report came of yet another priest of the Ternopil Eparchy abducted by TCC employees — Archpriest Ihor Kushniruk. No further information about the fate of Archpriest Ihor Kushniruk could be found in open sources.
Metropolitan Bohоlер of Oleksandriia and Svitlovodsk
On July 15, 2025, TRC employees detained Metropolitan Bohоlер of Oleksandriia and Svitlovodsk. After a summons and an administrative protocol were issued, the hierarch was released. The Greek news agency Romfea described the detention of Metropolitan Bohоlер as part of the large-scale persecution of the UOC by the Ukrainian authorities.
Archpriests Hryhorii Bakunets and Oleksandr Soltys, Sarny Eparchy
On August 4, 2025, two priests of the Sarny Eparchy were detained. Archpriest Hryhorii Bakunets, the rector of the Holy Spirit Church in Mokvynski Khutory, was on his way to give communion to a gravely ill parishioner who had been left without last confession. On the same day, Archpriest Oleksandr Soltys, the rector of the Intercession Church in Peskove, was also detained.
Archpriest Serhii Shamailo, Volodymyr-Volynsky Eparchy
On August 4, 2025, near Kremenets, Archpriest Serhii Shamailo, the rector of the St. Anna Parish in the village of Shchedrohory, was detained. He was on his way to the Pochaiv Lavra for the All-Night Vigil before the Feast of the Pochaiv Icon of the Mother of God.
Archpriest Yurii Naboka, Kharkiv Eparchy
On August 3, 2025, in Kharkiv, Archpriest Yurii Naboka, a cleric of the Ascension Church, was detained. TRC employees stopped him on his way to the Sunday All-Night Vigil and sent him to Dnipro.
Priest Karp, Chernivtsi Eparchy
On August 7, 2025, in Chernivtsi, TRC employees detained Fr. Karp on Soborna Square. That same evening, it was reported that he had been released.
Archpriests Serhii and Vitalii Kyt, Kharkiv Eparchy
On August 8, 2025, TRC employees detained two brother-priests — Archpriests Serhii and Vitalii Kyt. They were summoned to the SBU ostensibly for questioning, and upon leaving the building they were seized by TRC staff. The priests claimed they had a deferment.
Priest Fedir Hnitetskyi and Deacon Ivan Dmytruk, Bukovyna Eparchy
In August 2025, reports emerged of the detention of Priest Fedir Hnitetskyi and Deacon Ivan Dmytruk. For several days they were taken around various military units.
Archpriest Bohdan Matviev, Kremenchuk Eparchy
On August 25, 2025, on the last day of the cross procession from Kamianets-Podilskyi to Pochaiv, Archpriest Bohdan Matviev, the dean of the Kozelshchyna Deanery of the Kremenchuk Eparchy, was detained. At the moment of his detention, he was transporting sick people to the Lavra. He has five children, and his eldest son is serving at the front. It was later reported that he was at the Rivne training ground.
Archpriest Volodymyr Hlavatskyi, Rivne Eparchy
On August 29, 2025, in the village of Pyriatyn, Dubno District, Rivne region, TRC employees took away Archpriest Volodymyr Hlavatskyi from the cemetery after the funeral service for AFU soldier Yurii Datsiuk. The summons was handed to him right at the graveside while he was still in his vestments. After a formal military medical commission, Fr. Volodymyr ended up at a training ground.
Bishop Serafym of Novovorontsovka and Hieromonk Havryil, Nova Kakhovka Eparchy
On September 2, 2025, TRC employees detained the vicar of the Nova Kakhovka Eparchy, Bishop Serafym of Novovorontsovka and Hieromonk Havryil. They were sent to a training ground in the Rivne region.
Archpriest Mykola Hubka, Chernivtsi Eparchy
In early September 2025, in Bukovyna, TRC employees took away the 58-year-old Archpriest Mykola Hubka, the rector of the St. Nicholas Parish in the village of Maliatyntsi. He was taken around military units for several days. After some time he was released and returned to his ministry at his parish.
Archpriest Mykola Hryha, Chernivtsi-Bukovyna Eparchy
On September 11, 2025, TRC staff abducted the rector of the UOC Church of the Prophet Elijah in the village of Valiava, Archpriest Mykola Hryha. He was taken to the TRC premises in the city of Chernivtsi.
Archpriest Vadym Olianytskyi, Bila Tserkva Eparchy
On September 12, 2025, in Bila Tserkva, on his way to church, TRC employees detained the rector of the St. George Chapel-Church, Archpriest Vadym Olianytskyi. He was later released, but was required to appear at the TRC upon summons.
Archpriest Mykola Khlan, Shepetivka Eparchy
In early September 2025, a mobilized priest of the Shepetivka Eparchy, Archpriest Mykola Khlan, the rector of the Transfiguration community in the village of Mynkivtsi, Slavuta District, Khmelnytskyi region, was killed at the front. He had been mobilized shortly before his death, despite being under criminal prosecution, with the first-instance verdict not yet having entered into force due to an appeal.
Protodeacon Andrii Kyziun, Kyiv Eparchy
On October 16, 2025, TRC employees detained UOC Protodeacon Andrii Kyziun in Kyiv. After a formal military medical commission, he was taken to a military unit.
Archpriest Vitalii Popko, Kovel Eparchy
On October 16, 2025, near his own home, the Lutsk TRC detained a cleric of the Church of the Pochaiv Icon of the Mother of God in Kovel, Archpriest Vitalii Popko. He has four minor children: two of his own and two adopted orphans. All the necessary documents had been properly filed. On October 17, following wide publicity and the prayers of the faithful, he was released.
Archpriest Kostiantyn Volovyi, Cherkasy Eparchy
On November 17, 2025, TRC employees unlawfully detained a cleric of the Kamianske Deanery, Archpriest Kostiantyn Volovyi. He was abducted on the road from Smila to Cherkasy and taken to the Smila TRC. Despite Fr. Kostiantyn having five minor children and his data being in the demographic register, he was sent to a military medical commission and then to a training center.
When the priest’s relatives came to the Smila TCC and brought documents confirming the reservation, the military commissars refused to accept them. A day later, TRC employees released Fr. Kostiantyn, fearing public backlash.
Protodeacon Valentyn Makovskyi, Chernivtsi Eparchy
On October 25, 2025, TRC personnel detained a cleric of the Presentation Monastery in Chernivtsi, Protodeacon Valentyn Makovskyi. Nothing is known about his subsequent fate.
Priest Oleksii Lukash, Cherkasy Eparchy
On November 6, 2025, in the city of Smila, TRC employees forcibly took away the rector of the Church of the New Martyrs of Cherkasy, Priest Oleksii Lukash. He was taken to the Cherkasy TRC, despite a previously established limited fitness status due to hypertension.
Priest Valerii Floresku, Chernivtsi-Bukovyna Eparchy
On November 7, 2025, a report appeared that TRC staff had detained the rector of the St. Basil the Great parish in the village of Korchivtsi, Priest Valerii Floresku. He was sent to a training ground in the Chernivtsi region.
Archpriest Oleksandr Istratii, Chernivtsi-Bukovyna Eparchy
On November 19, 2025, TRC employees took away the rector of the St. Nicholas community in the village of Marshyntsi, Archpriest Oleksandr Istratii.
Archbishop Andrii of Dnipropetrovsk and Petropavlivsk
On November 26, 2025, in Dnipro, TRC reps detained Archbishop Andrii of Dnipropetrovsk and Petropavlivsk and brought him to the Soborny Recruitment Center of the city. After several hours, the archbishop was released from the building. Closer to nighttime, the bishop was rescued from the distribution center.
Archpriest Vitalii Ahafonov, Kryvyi Rih Eparchy
In November 2025, a cleric of the Transfiguration Cathedral in Nikopol, Archpriest Vitalii Ahafonov, was mobilized, sent to a military unit, and assigned to the position of sniper-rifleman. Fr. Vitalii refused to serve as a sniper, citing the fact that a priest cannot take up arms. As a result, he was taken into custody on charges of desertion.
Archpriest Serhii Savievskyi, Volodymyr-Volynsky Eparchy
On December 2, 2025, the TRC detained Archpriest Serhii Savievskyi, the rector of parishes in the villages of Sylne and Hupaly. After a formal military medical commission, he was sent to the Rivne training ground.
Priest Andrii Panasiuk, Rivne Eparchy
On November 19, 2025, TRC reps detained the rector of the St. Michael’s Church in the village of Bushcha, Priest Andrii Panasiuk, at a bus stop in the village of Zdovbytsia. His phone was confiscated, a military medical commission was quickly conducted, and he was sent to the training ground in Mala Liubasha.
Archpriest Vasyl Drahun, Khust Eparchy
In late December 2025, in Uzhhorod, TRC employees forcibly mobilized Archpriest Vasyl Drahun, the rector of the Church of the Myrrh-Bearing Women in the village of Rakovo. At the time of mobilization, he was receiving inpatient treatment at the regional hospital.
Year 2026Archpriest Mykola Syniuk, Chernivtsi Eparchy
On January 7, 2026, TRC employees detained a cleric of the Chernivtsi-Bukovyna Eparchy, Archpriest Mykola Syniuk, who was serving at the Presentation Monastery in Chernivtsi.
Priest Viacheslav Kalinichenko, Izium Eparchy
On January 8, 2026, at a checkpoint in Chuhuiv, the rector of St. Michael’s Church in the village of Petrivka, Izium Eparchy, Priest Viacheslav Kalinichenko, was detained. He was held for more than 72 hours, then taken to Kharkiv, after which he was sent to Dnipro to a training unit.
Priest Andrii Ilman, Dnipropetrovsk Eparchy
On January 17, 2026, in Dnipro, a cleric of the Holy Spirit Monastery, Fr. Andrii Ilman, was detained. He was stopped near his home as he was on his way to a church service, taken to a distribution point, and was being prepared for deployment to the front.
Archpriest Vitalii Chaban, Volodymyr-Volynsky Eparchy
On January 23, 2026, Archpriest Vitalii Chaban was mobilized during inpatient treatment. He had the status of limited fitness, but after the military medical commission he was taken to a training ground in Starychi, Lviv region.
Archpriests Petro Cholak, Bohdan Hnatiuk, Petro Rud, Serhii Savievskyi, and Vitalii Tsumyk, Volodymyr-Volynsky Eparchy
According to a statement from the eparchial administration dated January 24, 2026, all of them had been mobilized and were serving in the military.
Archpriests Yurii Khavura and Andrii Olasiuk, Deacon Mykola Matviienko, Volodymyr-Volynsky Eparchy
The eparchy reported that Archpriests Yurii Khavura and Andrii Olasiuk are listed as missing in action, and Deacon Mykola Matviienko was killed. Details of their mobilization are not provided.
Archpriest Oleh Ostafiuk, Chernivtsi-Bukovyna Eparchy
On January 26, 2026, a report appeared that TRC employees had detained Archpriest Oleh Ostafiuk, the rector of the parish of St. George the Great Martyr in the village of Nyzhni Synivtsi and the parish of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross in the village of Verkhnі Synivtsi. He was taken to a TRC directly from a checkpoint.
Archpriest Maksym Moskalchuk, Khmelnytskyi Eparchy
On January 28, 2026, Archpriest Maksym Moskalchuk, rector of the Protection of the Mother of God Church in the village of Redvyntsi, was detained in the Khmelnytskyi region.
His phone was confiscated and he was taken away to an unknown location. The following day, it was reported that he had been released.
Archpriest Oleksandr Itsenko, Kyiv Eparchy
On January 28, 2026, TRC personnel detained Archpriest Oleksandr Itsenko in Kyiv, a cleric of St. Cyril’s Monastery. He was stopped while on his way to an All-Night Vigil. At first, he was told that he only needed to update his personal data, but he was then placed in a minibus and taken away to an unknown location.
Archimandrite Herman (Kulakevych), Rivne Eparchy
On February 3, 2026, in Rivne, TRC personnel detained Archimandrite Herman, a monk of St. Barbara’s Skete in the village of Staryi Korets.
At the time of his detention, he was returning from a hospital examination due to an acute case of an acute respiratory viral infection (ARVI). On February 4, it became known that he had been declared fit for service with limitations and sent to one of the military units in the Rivne region.
Archpriest Ioann Chyryk, Volyn Eparchy
On February 3, 2026, in the village of Horodylets, Volyn region, unidentified individuals without presenting documents detained Archpriest Ioann Chyryk, rector of the “Life-Giving Spring” Church.
The following day, a photo of the priest in military uniform appeared on social media, which was presented as evidence of forced mobilization.
Archpriest Oleksandr Cherniadyev, Nikopol Eparchy
On February 6, 2026, TRC personnel detained Archpriest Oleksandr Cherniadyev, rector of the Holy Trinity Church in Nikopol, directly on the church premises and took him to Dnipro.
Bishop Mykyta of Ivano-Frankivsk
On February 11, 2026, in Chernivtsi, TRC staff attempted to detain Bishop Mykyta of Ivano-Frankivsk while he was on his way to a church service. He was forced to take refuge on the grounds of the Holy Spirit Cathedral.
Archpriest Anatolii Chernenko, Cherkasy Eparchy
On February 21, 2026, in the city of Horodyshche, Cherkasy Region, TRC personnel forcibly mobilized Archpriest Anatolii Chernenko, rector of the UOC St. Michael’s Church. After his detention, he was taken to a TRC and then sent to one of the combat brigades for military service.
Archpriest Yaroslav Kruhlenko, Kyiv Eparchy
On February 24, 2026, in Kyiv, TRC reps detained Archpriest Yaroslav Kruhlenko, rector of the UOC Alexander Nevsky Church. He was taken to the TRC on Iordanska Street, then transferred to the Darnytskyi District, and was reportedly scheduled to be sent to Dnipro overnight. Later, the priest’s family reported that they had lost contact with him.
Archimandrite Raphael (Mosunov), Kyiv Eparchy
On March 4, 2026, in Kyiv, TRC personnel detained Archimandrite Raphael, a lecturer at the Kyiv Theological Academy and Seminary. He was released after some time.
Hieromonk Daniel and Novice Vadym, Kharkiv Eparchy
On March 20, 2026, TRC staff detained monks of the Intercession Monastery in Kharkiv: Hieromonk Daniel and novice Vadym.
Priest Ihor Kovaliuk, Ternopil Eparchy
On March 21, 2026, reports appeared that in Ternopil region, TRC personnel detained Priest Ihor Kovaliuk, a lecturer at the Pochaiv Theological Seminary and a cleric of the seminary church. At the time of his detention, he was on his way to the village of Volytsia to conduct a memorial service.
Archimandrite Leontii and Hieromonk Arsenii, Kharkiv Eparchy
On March 27, 2026, personnel from the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) and the TRC entered the Izium Peschansky Monastery and, using physical force, abducted Archimandrite Leontii and Hieromonk Arsenii. They were taken to a TRC.
Monk Vlasii, Volodymyr-Volynskyi Eparchy
On March 27, 2026, reports emerged that TRC personnel detained Monk Vlasii near the gates of the Miletskyi Monastery. After a formal military medical examination, he was sent to a training unit.
Archimandrite Philaret (Olivynskyi), Vinnytsia Eparchy
On April 7, 2026, in Vinnytsia, police and TRC personnel detained Archimandrite Philaret, a cleric of the Vinnytsia Eparchy and secretary to Metropolitan Varsonofii. He was released two days later.
Archpriest Oleksandr Okruzhko, Kamianets-Podilskyi Eparchy
On April 8, 2026, Archpriest Oleksandr Okruzhko, rector of the Nativity of the Mother of God Church in the city of Dolzhok, was detained in Kamianets-Podilskyi. His phone was confiscated, he was quickly taken through a military medical examination, and sent to a military unit.
Archpriest Bohdan Huliak, Sumy Eparchy
On April 16, 2026, in the city of Trostianets, TRC personnel detained Archpriest Bohdan Huliak, rector of the Transfiguration Church in the village of Soldatske. He was released after some time.
Archimandrite Rufin, Odesa Eparchy
On April 24, 2026, Archimandrite Rufin, a monk of the Holy Dormition Monastery, was reported to have been detained in Odesa. TRC personnel reportedly pulled him out of a taxi and took him away. He was later found to be at a training center near Kharkiv.
Archimandrite Serhii, Chernivtsi Eparchy
On April 27, 2026, TRC personnel detained Archimandrite Serhii, a monk of the Bancheny Monastery, who serves as the guardian of children with disabilities. After Metropolitan Longin and hundreds of believers gathered outside the TRC building in Chernivtsi, the clergyman was released.
Archimandrite Theophil (Koshovenko), Kyiv Eparchy
On May 1, 2026, TRC personnel detained Archimandrite Theophil, a monk of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra. The incident occurred on Lesi Ukrainky Boulevard while the clergyman was on his way to provide spiritual assistance to an elderly parishioner.
Hieromonk Ilia, Zhytomyr Eparchy
On May 1, 2026, in Zhytomyr Region, police detained Hieromonk Ilia, rector of the UOC Church of the Nativity of the Most Holy Theotokos in the village of Novi Vorobi, and handed him over to TRC personnel. He was reportedly sprayed with pepper spray and subjected to physical force. He was then sent to the 95th Air Assault Brigade. Following the rector’s mobilization, representatives of the OCU reportedly sealed the UOC church in Novi Vorobi.
Archpriest Serhii Liakh, Khust Eparchy
On May 4, 2026, residents of the village of Lypcha, Khust district, Zakarpattia region, blocked a road demanding the release from the TRC of Archpriest Serhii Liakh, rector of the UOC Holy Spirit Church. The previous day, the priest had been taken away by TRC personnel. On May 5, Archpriest Serhii Liakh was reported to have returned home and resumed serving at the Holy Spirit Church.
Hierodeacon Yevlohii (Radomskyi), Pochaiv Lavra
On May 5, 2026, while working in a field near the Skete of the Holy Dormition Pochaiv Lavra, TRC personnel detained Hierodeacon Yevlohii, a Lavra monk. He was taken away to an unknown location. Later, he was sent to one of the military units to undergo service.
Metropolitan Volodymyr of Volodymyr-Volynskyi and Kovel, Archpriest Oleksandr Kobenko, and Deacon Dmytro Manetskyi, Volodymyr-Volynskyi Eparchy
On May 7, 2026, near the village of Dernо on the highway between Rivne and Lutsk, TRC personnel stopped a vehicle carrying Metropolitan Volodymyr of Volodymyr-Volynskyi and Kovel, Archpriest Oleksandr Kobenko, and Deacon Dmytro Manetskyi. Without checking documents, the personnel reportedly began forcibly pulling the hierarch out of the vehicle. Archpriest Oleksandr was sprayed with pepper spray, forced to kneel, and beaten. They were then forcibly pushed into a TRC service vehicle. Due to the stress he experienced, the metropolitan suffered a heart attack, while the priest developed an acute allergic reaction to the sprayed gas. Later, the metropolitan and the priest were dropped off near a checkpoint, after which the TRC staff and police officers left in an unknown direction.
Hierodeacon Olympii (Khrashchevskyi), Pochaiv Lavra
On May 15, 2026, while entering Ukraine from Georgia at the Ukrainian border, TRC personnel detained 45-year-old Hierodeacon Olympii, a monk of the Pochaiv Lavra.
Archimandrite Galaktion (Redey), Shepetivka Eparchy
On May 24, 2026, TRC representatives, together with local officials and police, arrived at the UOC St. John the Baptist Monastery in the village of Velyka Kalynivka, Khmelnytskyi region, and detained Archimandrite Galaktion (Redey). He was taken directly from his monastic cell and taken away to an unknown location. Later, information emerged that he was being held at one of the military units in the city of Chortkiv, Ternopil region.
Archimandrite Alexy (Matsola), Shepetivka Eparchy
On May 26, 2026, TRC staff detained Archimandrite Alexy (Matsola), a cleric of the Shepetivka Eparchy. According to available information, he was taken to a training ground in the Rivne region.
Archpriest Volodymyr Zadneprianets, Tulchyn Eparchy
On May 27, 2026, personnel from the Haisyn TRC detained Archpriest Volodymyr Zadneprianets. On June 3, he was released and allowed to return home after being held at the Haisyn military recruitment office.
Archpriest Andrii Lysiuk, Kropyvnytskyi Eparchy
On May 30, 2026, TRC personnel detained Archpriest Andrii Lysiuk, rector of the Church of the Mother of God “Quick to Hear” in the village of Sharivka, Kirovohrad region. His vehicle was stopped while the priest was on his way to a church service. After his documents were checked, Fr. Andrii was taken to a distribution center in Kropyvnytskyi.
Archpriest Andrii Chornyi, Khmelnytskyi Eparchy
On June 4, 2026, police stopped the vehicle of Archpriest Andrii Chornyi, rector of the Church of Saints Cosmas and Damian the Unmercenaries in the village of Lysohirka, and took him to the TRC in Derazhnia. According to the eparchy, the priest has serious health problems. After the military medical examination, he was taken away to an unknown location.
Archpriest Bohdan Katsevych, Volodymyr-Volynskyi Eparchy
On June 4, 2026, Archpriest Bohdan Katsevych, rector of the Transfiguration Church in the village of Osmihovychi, was detained in the city of Volodymyr. At the time of his detention, he was returning from a hospital with his pregnant wife. It was reported that he suffered a heart attack; emergency medical personnel recommended hospitalization, but the TRC leadership refused to release him. After a formal military medical examination, he was sent to a military unit.
Priest Oleksandr Drobiazko, Kyiv Eparchy
On June 4, 2026, TRC staff detained the rector of the UOC Dormition Church in Kyiv, Fr. Oleksandr Drobiazko. He was detained directly near the church. TRC personnel asked the cleric about his religious affiliation, and after he stated that he belonged to the UOC, he was taken to a TRC, where he was placed in handcuffs. In this condition, Fr. Oleksandr was taken through a military medical examination and sent to a training unit in the Chernihiv region.
Protodeacon Mykola Mazurets, Odesa Eparchy
On June 6, 2026, TRC personnel detained Protodeacon Mykola Mazurets, a cleric of the UOC Holy Trinity Cathedral in Odesa. Despite medical documents confirming spinal conditions and myopia, the military medical commission declared him fit for service. On the same day, he was sent to the Vinnytsia region and later to the Mykolaiv region.
Archpriest Volodymyr Sereda, Khmelnytskyi Eparchy
On June 10, 2026, TRC personnel detained Archpriest Volodymyr Sereda, rector of the Church of the Apostle John the Theologian in the village of Korchevka. Despite the fact that he is the father of five children and cares for an elderly blind grandmother, he was taken to the Teofipol TRC, then sent to Khmelnytskyi for a military medical examination, after which contact with him was lost.
Deacon Andrii Virnyi, Lutsk Eparchy
On June 13, 2026, TRC personnel in Lutsk detained Deacon Andrii Virnyi, a cleric of the Church of the Three Holy Hierarchs. Despite the fact that he is a father of many children and that his four biological brothers are serving in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, he was taken to the Lutsk TRC.
What can be seen from this chronologyFirst, the pace of mobilization of UOC clergy appears to be increasing. If 11 people were mobilized during the entire year of 2024, then the number reached 42 in 2025. In less than half of 2026, there were already 49 cases. This suggests that, according to the chronology, pressure on the UOC through the mobilization of clergy has been increasing.
Second, the same pattern is repeatedly described in these cases: a person is detained on the street, near a church, while traveling to visit a sick person, at a cemetery after a funeral service, or even while receiving medical treatment. This is followed by a rapid military medical examination, confiscation of a phone, loss of contact with family members, and transfer to a training ground or military unit.
Third, mobilization is reported even in cases where a person has possible legal grounds for deferment, including having many children, serious health conditions, or caring for a person with a disability.
Fourth, public attention to the actions of TRC personnel regarding the mobilization of clergy, protests by believers, and priests’ refusal to take up arms have, according to these reports, led to some results. In a number of cases, priests were released.
Fifth, the authorities are aware that mobilization has serious consequences for clergy. For example, Viktor Yelensky stated at one of his recent press conferences: “He (the priest – Ed.) cannot take up arms. If he commits even an unintentional killing, he must be removed from the priesthood.” At the same time, according to the DESS head, “We do not grant deferments to such [clergy].”
Thus, according to the author’s interpretation, the state is presenting UOC deacons, priests, and even bishops with a “choice without a choice”: either transfer to the OCU, or face mobilization with the risks of death, injury, or loss of clerical status.
ConclusionThe consistent refusal to grant deferments to UOC priests and the significant increase in reported cases of mobilization indicate, in the author’s view, that the authorities have found an effective way to exert pressure on the Church.
This is presented as especially contradictory against the background of claims that DESS grants deferments to representatives of small religious movements and pagan organizations, arguing that they are critically important for Ukraine’s economy and public life.
The lives of martyrs and confessors of the first centuries can be found in the lives of the saints. The accounts of those who suffered for Christ during the Soviet era can be found in their biographies and court records.
We should not forget those clergy members who have received the difficult cross of confession of faith in our own time. But above all, we should pray for them and do everything we can do for their release.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUDiM_PoWH4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Y2VPmj19i4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61HlGcDHWXI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnObYp-gpVk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaV_yme6pUs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFz3g1ghW14
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpbAlgBcGJ8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wAvSF2-szQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6wAIVwof5c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wy-yEv52nU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E85P5US11io
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_gd-SfQgw0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNXOCWXfKL4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBlK5cj7sLM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hK9iIbCZGk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8L4ftmXJrs8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyKFhB9UMSk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44lFecQ2AQU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfKKgeRgqaM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCU1MGjzpkg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5hH3FkCK2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7q7wZgNBXK8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhE_t2nQlQ0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFjvkIaMyfc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ebgP6n85lI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EV1c9iQFmSc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ejeaLkClWA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXgQpZvDK10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YoCrPebwXjM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xcDxoEiwpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mSuXvHnQ94
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGwGMrCtIV4
https://spzh.eu/en/news/93094-parishioners-brought-to-lavra-by-buses-on-epifaniys-name-day-media-
12 May 2026
“Parishioners” brought to Lavra by buses on Epifaniy’s name day, media
People from different regions were brought in an organized manner to the “service” of the head of the OCU at the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra.
On the name day of OCU head Epifaniy Dumenko on May 12, 2026, near the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra, a large number of buses were spotted, which, according to media reports and eyewitnesses, were used to bring participants of the festive service to the monastery. According to information from the Telegram channel “Fortress Lavra”, there were at least 13 buses at the monastery, some of which were parked closer to the Paton Bridge to avoid attracting attention.
After the service ended, people headed en masse to the buses and soon left the monastery grounds. According to eyewitnesses, among those who arrived were both laypeople and OCU clergy. Some buses, according to media reports, arrived from the Zhytomyr region.
The authors of the publications note that it’s not the first time that transportation of people for OCU events at the Lavra has been organized. According to them, “the people who were brought in stood through the service, appeared on media cameras, and then dispersed,” while the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra itself continues to be used as a “stage set” for events organized by Dumenko’s structure.
As the UOJ reported, on this day, the National Reserve staff cut off the locks and forcibly seized St. Anna’s Conception Church at the Far Caves of the Lower Lavra.
___________________________________________________________________________
https://spzh.eu/en/news/93081-reserve-seizes-annozachatievsky-church-from-uoc-in-lavra
12 May 2026
Museum staff cut off the locks and seized St. Anna’s Conception Church at the Far Caves despite the absence of final rulings on the monastery.
On May 12, 2026, employees of the National Reserve cut off the locks and forcibly seized St. Anna’s Conception Church at the Far Caves of the Lower Lavra.
As Archpriest Nikita Chekman reported on his Telegram channel, museum representatives took this step despite the fact that court proceedings between the monastery and the state over the right to use the Lavra buildings are still ongoing. The courts have not yet issued final rulings in the relevant disputes.
The lawyer pointed to the particular cynicism of the reserve employees’ actions. They took advantage of the absence of people on the premises and broke the locks without any official notice. Some time after access to the shrine had been blocked, the reserve sent letters to the monastery claiming that the brethren had allegedly removed their belongings voluntarily.
“Any unilateral actions to change the actual use of churches and premises while a court dispute remains unresolved must be carried out exclusively in the manner and within the limits provided by law, with respect for the rule of law and the judicial process,” Archpriest Nikita Chekman stressed.
According to the lawyer, such actions not only contradict the principles of the rule of law and respect for the judicial process, “but also offend the feelings of believers, for whom the shrines of the Lavra hold special spiritual significance.”
Earlier, the UOJ reported that a TRC detained an archimandrite of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra in Kyiv.
________________________________________________________________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vlQJIWzsUU
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-Mv67i8w5YY
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Oe3qx1pE3cg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sWv3RbIk9A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pkz2-cWHPbg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7q7wZgNBXK8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5hH3FkCK2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpbAlgBcGJ8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wAvSF2-szQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhE_t2nQlQ0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFjvkIaMyfc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ebgP6n85lI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EV1c9iQFmSc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ejeaLkClWA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXgQpZvDK10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YoCrPebwXjM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YoCrPebwXjM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xcDxoEiwpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebHwYprZK7A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itoWHUWCMWM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBODDkHhclo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wlzuECvfGE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02UScLHQI24
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGoHWqiDK40
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=In8h8xRz9sM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVmx1mi5wwM
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Lc6Bj6Sp0I4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtxEo5x8v7c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn2T9LOrFsM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmIr5HyRwE0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0DE7JWI5hA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9qRnYe2BF0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuOh6EtJDoU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hs7qDUmCiMs
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/O7ssMPYj7po
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAkfNlAzFUE
Your “Holiness,” Patriarch Bartholomew!
This is a friend of of the representatives of Orthodox Reflections, Tetyana Avramenko, speaking to you (I’ve attached my photo so you can see who is speaking to you).
I learned that on March 22, 2026, you arrived in Georgia for the funeral of Patriarch Ilia II at the Holy Trinity Cathedral in Tbilisi. And you even had the AUDACITY, after all the evil you brought to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and ALL of Orthodoxy, to participate in the funeral service for Patriarch Ilia II, a man of holy life and the godfather of 50,000 children!!
All Georgians SINCERELY loved and respected him! You, Patriarch Bartholomew, are the OPPOSITE of the Georgian Patriarch Ilia II! If he embodies only GOODNESS and GRACE, then you, “Your Holiness” Patriarch Bartholomew, embody EVIL AND GODDESS-PROOF ABOMINATION. And if the soul of the righteous Georgian Patriarch has gone to the Kingdom of Heaven, then where will your soul go after your death? Can’t you guess? Don’t you fear hell and eternal fire? Don’t you fear God’s judgment? In vain! You should FEAR all of this! You deserve it. After all, Zelensky is leading the persecution of our hierarchs, priests, deacons, monks, and parishioners of the UOC in alliance with you, “Your Holiness” Patriarch Bartholomew! And you have NEVER raised your voice in defense of the UOC!
ETERNAL SHAME ON YOU, Patriarch Bartholomew!
Dear international community!
I invite you all to read two articles by the Union of Orthodox Journalists about the “good deeds” of Patriarch Bartholomew, along with Zelensky and his entourage, aimed at intensifying the persecution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. Our long-suffering Metropolitan Arseniy, who was held in prison for almost two years, completely UNFAIRLY, because human rights in Ukraine have been completely trampled by the Ukrainian government, led by Zelensky, is now in the hospital with ischemic heart disease! He underwent surgery! The time spent in a Ukrainian prison has caused HUGE DAMAGE to his health!
I, Tetyana Avramenko, a parishioner of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and friend of the representatives of Orthodox Reflections, have also attached my short video messages to the Orthodox members of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and other videos. Please disseminate as widely as possible the information from the Union of Orthodox Journalists’ articles about Zelenskyy and his entourage, in alliance with Patriarch Bartholomew, persecuting the Ukrainian Orthodox Church!
God bless you!
With love in Christ
Parishioner of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and friend of the representatives of Orthodox Reflections
Tetyana Avramenko
____________________________________________________________________________
https://spzh.eu/ru/news/92058-novinskij-borbu-s-upts-zelenskij-vedet-v-sojuze-s-patriarkhom-varfolomeem
Novinsky: Zelensky is waging a fight against the Ukrainian Orthodox Church in alliance with Patriarch Bartholomew.
March 25, 2026
A UOC archdeacon stated that there is documentary evidence of meetings between Phanar exarchs and the leadership of the OP, where persecution of the Church was planned.
UOC archdeacon and former MP Vadym Novynsky told the Spanish channel HerQles that the persecution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church by the Ukrainian authorities is carried out in direct coordination with Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew. “I will repeat once again, so that there is no doubt: Zelenskyy and Yermak personally led this entire struggle against the Church. They did everything in coordination with Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew. He assisted them in everything and sometimes complemented them,” stated Father Vadym.
According to the clergyman, there is documentary evidence of this coordination. “Two exarchs of the Ecumenical Patriarch visit Ukraine periodically. “There’s even paper evidence of them holding a meeting with the leadership of the presidential administration, where they outlined plans for the persecution of our Church,” the archdeacon reported. He added that the goal of these joint actions was to secure the defection of at least 50% of the priests, bishops, and parishioners of the UOC to the OCU. “But they didn’t even achieve 10%. Because they seized churches—that doesn’t work. They didn’t bring people to them. They didn’t capture anyone’s soul,” the archdeacon stated.
Father Vadim also accused Patriarch Bartholomew of never raising his voice against the persecution of the UOC clergy: “Never, not once did he raise his voice: ‘What are you doing, persecuting priests, persecuting bishops, when bishops are beaten, thrown into prison, placed under house arrest under trumped-up pretexts?’ And he supports it in every possible way.”
According to Father Vadym, the SBU, court officials, regional and district administrations, and the police are also involved in the fight against the UOC. “Everyone, everyone is involved in this process,” the priest emphasized.
The Union of Orthodox Journalists previously reported that, according to Father Vadym Novynsky, Patriarch Bartholomew plays a major role in the persecution of the UOC.
____________________________________________________________________________
https://spzh.eu/en/news/86492-novynskyi-patriarch-bartholomew-plays-a-major-role-in-persecution-of-uoc
Novynskyi: Patriarch Bartholomew plays a major role in persecution of UOC28 May 2025
Protodeacon of the UOC told Tucker Carlson about the role of the Ecumenical Patriarchate in the persecution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
Speaking on the program of well-known American journalist and public figure Tucker Carlson, UOC Protodeacon and former MP Vadym Novynskyi pointed to the involvement of the Ecumenical Patriarch in the persecution of the Ukrainian Church.
“Unfortunately, the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople has played a very large and destructive role in all of this,” the clergyman emphasized. “Regrettably, they are acting in unison, hand in hand (with the Ukrainian authorities. – Ed.). The fact that he has never once raised his voice in defense of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, despite all the persecutions, proves that he is, in fact, complicit in all of this.”
At the same time, Fr. Vadym noted that the UOC continues to receive support from other Local Churches and their patriarchs – in particular, the Patriarchates of Jerusalem, Georgia, and Serbia.
“The Church will not be defeated. The true canonical Church will not be overcome. The Communists couldn’t defeat us in the twentieth century, because the Head of the Church is Christ – and the consequences will be dire for those who oppose Him. We will endure these trials and be purified. And we are very grateful to you and to all who are doing anything for our Church,” the protodeacon stressed.
Earlier, the UOJ reported that Fr. Vadym Novynskyi spoke to Carlson about the daily seizures of churches in Ukraine.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Em3Q4jKEcDU
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/amWNCJcJDQ4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5KiEy2N4Ro
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FY1dTIgDqmE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPMMA60J388
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ffo-uOCpF-U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIpllNSOPvw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmIr5HyRwE0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5n6rX28jWbY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02UScLHQI24
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebHwYprZK7A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=In8h8xRz9sM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsXS3dYXna0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QifqEk7iof0
Why those who incite hatred against the Ukrainian Orthodox Church should be jailedПочему разжигатели ненависти к УПЦ должны сидеть в тюрьме
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdRhW6fa520https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKuGJVPm7dAMP
MP on expulsion of UOC from Volodymyr cathedral: “No katsaps here anymore”
https://spzh.eu/en/news/90567-mp-on-expulsion-of-uoc-from-volodymyr-cathedral-no-katsaps-here-anymore
31 January 2026
After the first “service” of the OCU in the Dormition Cathedral of Volodymyr, taken from the UOC, Member of Parliament Ihor Huz delivered a political statement прямо from the ambo. On January 31, 2026, MP Ihor Huz spoke inside the Dormition Cathedral in the city of Volodymyr, from which the Ukrainian Orthodox Church community had been driven out at the end of 2025. He posted a video of his speech on Facebook. The address came after the first religious event in the cathedral, led by Serhii Dumenko. Standing on the ambo beside the head of the OCU, the MP claimed that “Moscow’s power” over the cathedral had supposedly lasted “for centuries” and had now ended. He described what happened as the “return of the Ukrainian Church” to the “heart of the princely city” and framed the event as “a step toward a great victory.” At the same time, Huz stressed that “there will be no Moscow here anymore,” contrasting it with “the Ukrainian spirit, Ukrainian prayer, and Ukrainian truth.” The MP also pointed to one of the cathedral’s wall paintings depicting the imperial family executed by the Bolsheviks, asserting that it had been created by “katsaps” – a derogatory slur for Russians. In closing, he said the Volodymyr City Council would soon finalize documents to transfer the St. Volodymyr chapel to the OCU, and he urged former UOC parishioners to return to the cathedral, insisting that the “church has been freed from Moscow’s grip.” As the UOJ reported, in Volodymyr, Dumenko conducted a “liturgy” in the Dormition Cathedral seized from the UOC.
————————————————————————————————————————–
He threatened the sky and shouted that he would expel the monasteries. When Epiphanius and his retinue visited Vladimir, what was there?
Грозил небу и кричал, что изгонит монастыри. Как Епифаний со свитой Владимир посетил, что там был
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooprrWfvGNI
Published on the YouTube channel “Denis at the Microphone” by Orthodox journalist Dens Lapin.
http://www.youtube.com/@Dennisspeaking
I recommend everyone subscribe to this Orthodox channel to stay informed about news concerning the entire Christian world, as well as the persecution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
_________________________________________________________________________
MP threatens to seize two UOC monasteries in Volyn
05 February 2026
https://spzh.eu/en/news/90630-mp-threatens-to-seize-two-uoc-monasteries-in-volyn
Ihor Huz intends to negotiate the termination of the lease of two UOC monasteries in Volyn with the Ministry of Culture. People’s Deputy of Ukraine Ihor Huz stated in an interview with «Radio BUH» that he plans to speak with Culture Minister Berezhna regarding the termination of the lease for the Zymne and Nyzkynychi monasteries in Volyn. The deputy criticized the decision of former Volyn Regional State Administration head Yuriy Pohuliayko to extend the lease of the Zymne Monastery until 2069, calling it “dangerous for state interests”. According to Huz, a person with patriotic views could not have made such a decision during wartime. The MP cited the city of Volodymyr as an example where, at the end of January, the Dormition Cathedral was returned to the state and transferred to the OCU after the lease agreement expired and court rulings were issued. “Soon I plan to meet with the Culture Minister to discuss this issue. Yes, there are legal difficulties, as the lease agreements for Zymne and Nyzkynychi monasteries were extended until 2069 and 2050. But the state has levers – these are NSDC decisions and other legal mechanisms. Therefore, I am confident that these issues will be resolved in the near future,” Huz stated. Earlier, the UOJ wrote that in Volodymyr Dumenko conducted a «liturgy» at the Dormition Cathedral seized from the UOC.
__________________________________________________________________________
In Volodymyr, Dumenko leads “liturgy” at Dormition Cathedral seized from UOC
https://spzh.eu/en/news/90558-in-volodymyr-dumenko-leads-liturgy-at-dormition-cathedral-seized-from-uoc
31 January 2026
Serhiy Dumenko awarded the Deputy Head of the Volyn Regional State Administration with an order for services to the OCU. On January 31, 2026, the head of the OCU Serhiy Dumenko visited Volodymyr, where he led a religious event at the Dormition Cathedral, from which the authorities expelled the UOC community at the end of 2025. As reported by the local resource “Rayon Volodymyr”, in his speech at the cathedral, Dumenko shared that he had dreamed of serving in the churches seized from the UOC. In particular, at the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra and the Dormition Cathedral in Volodymyr. At the event, Dumenko awarded Deputy Head of Volyn Regional State Administration Taras Shkiter with the Order of Prince Volodymyr for his services to the OCU. Dumenko noted Shkiter’s special role in expelling UOC parishioners from the Dormition Cathedral and transferring the shrine to the OCU. Also present at the religious gathering was MP Ihor Huz, who promised that the next shrines that the authorities would take away from the UOC and give to the OCU would be the Sviatohirsk Dormition Zymne Monastery and the Dormition Nyzkynychi Monastery. Earlier, the UOJ wrote that in Volodymyr, security forces beat and abducted the sexton of the UOC cathedral.
Dear Representatives of Orthodox Reflections!
Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ
Thank you for all you do! May God bless you and all your good deeds!
The persecution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) is intensifying in Ukraine.
The Ukrainian authorities, led by Zelensky and the security forces, are relentlessly persecuting and abusing the faithful of the UOC, our priests, and hierarchs! They are committing one crime after another against the UOC!
Patriarch Bartholomew! “Your Holiness!” What will you say at the Judgment of God? Aren’t you afraid? I consider you a religious criminal, because you are one of the main culprits in the persecution of our UOC! You have no heart, no conscience, no fear of God!
Dear brothers and sisters in Christ!
Please widely disseminate the following information from the Union of Orthodox Journalists and Ukrainian journalist Denis Lapin (links to the UOJ video and Denis Lapin’s YouTube channel will be below the text). Please support Denis’s YouTube channel.
dennislapin.com/support
https://paypal.me/supportDennisUA
May God reward you and help you in everything!
GOD BLESS YOU!
With love in Christ
UOC parishioner and your Ukrainian friend
Tetyana Avramenko
___________________________________________________________________________
https://spzh.eu/en/news/90462-baturyn-authorities-force-st-nicholas-monastery-nuns-out-into-the-street
27 January 2026
Baturyn authorities force St. Nicholas Monastery nuns out into the street
The director of the preserve, with the help of police, evicted the sisters of the monastery without a court ruling.
On January 27, 2026, the head of the National Historical and Cultural Preserve “Hetman’s Capital,” with the participation of police officers, unlawfully – without any court decision – forced the sisters of the Baturyn Krupytsia St. Nicholas Convent out onto the street. This was reported by UOC attorney Archpriest Nykyta Chekman. The nuns have no other housing besides the monastery cells, where they are officially registered as residents. Nevertheless, they were put out on the street, and the doors of the church and the residential building were sealed. As the attorney notes, a premises-use agreement had been concluded between the monastery and the preserve, with its term set through January 27, 2026. However, for the period of martial law, under Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 634 of May 27, 2022, the user (tenant) has the right to an automatic extension of the agreement. There are no court decisions whatsoever terminating the right of use or ordering eviction. Accordingly, the attorney believes the actions of the preserve’s director and other involved persons show signs of criminal offenses, in particular: Article 356 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine – arbitrariness (self-will); Article 365 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine – abuse of power or official authority. Fr. Nykyta also presented photographs showing the monastery’s ruined condition when it was handed over to the UOC, and what it looks like now. Earlier, the UOJ reported that police stormed the Kremenets Theological School and evicted the female students.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIt4iAzuKzA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jx_7asNOxQ
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/q9_2ijJ2834
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/IVIRkoKi834
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3I8w2Wi7yyw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfil448DHLk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMVguGHgm0U
Dear Representatives of the International Community!
Dear Representatives of Orthodox Reflections!
Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ!
Thank you for all your good deeds for the glory of the Lord.
Please listen to the facts about the Judas Iscariots in the Ukrainian Parliament (VRU), who, for 30 pieces of silver, are ready to trample the most Sacred things, Sling mud at everything Holy, and spit in the souls of Orthodox believers!
Patriarch Bartholomew! You too, listen and read! Because the persecution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church is your fault. But you will have to answer for all your religious crimes at the Judgment of God!
Yulia Tymoshenko and “Metropolitan” Epiphanius (Primate of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine-OCU) have interacted, in particular, Tymoshenko attended his “enthronement” in 2019, supporting the creation of the OCU, which was an important political event, and Epiphanius is a KEY figure of the schismatics in the Ukrainian painful church issue, while Tymoshenko is a well-known politician.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/jnMBXzYP29w
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/3AdJW1JA8TM
Should the law banning the UOC be repealed?14 January 2026
https://spzh.eu/en/mysli-vsluh/90229-should-the-law-banning-the-uoc-be-repealed
It turns out that MPs from Batkivshchyna were taking money for “the right” votes. Could the vote for the law banning the UOC also have been “bought”?
Ukraine has been rocked by yet another shameful scandal at the very top of power. The head of Batkivshchyna, Yulia Tymoshenko, was handing out money to her MPs in exchange for “correct” voting. In an audio recording published by NABU, Tymoshenko, counting out the needed amount, explains how they should vote in this case or that.
What immediately strikes you (more precisely – what hits your ears) is that the participants speak to each other in “the language of the enemy” – the very language whose study, not long ago, triggered a furious media witch-hunt against an Orthodox school at the Holosiiv Monastery. Yet the figures in earlier corruption scandals involving Zelensky’s inner circle also spoke Russian.
But the real issue, of course, is not the language. The real issue is that Ukraine’s laws, as it turns out, are adopted (or not adopted) for money. And in that light, the law popularly dubbed “the ban on the UOC” is exactly what concerns us. In both the first and second readings, Tymoshenko’s deputies voted unanimously “in favor”.
And basic logic suggests this – if Tymoshenko was “buying” votes in 2026, what would have stopped her from doing the same in 2023 and 2024? Especially since there are grounds to suspect that this kind of “unanimity” may not have been confined to Batkivshchyna alone, but could also have existed within larger factions.
That is why the question can now be raised about the legitimacy of certain decisions of the Verkhovna Rada. In particular, the legitimacy of that very “law banning the UOC” – previously known as draft law No. 3871. And beyond all its other “shortcomings” (such as discriminating against the country’s largest confession), this law now poses grave questions about the transparency of the vote itself. There is no doubt this must become the subject of an investigation by law enforcement agencies.
God bless you!
Thank you for all your good deeds!
Your sister in Christ and your Ukrainian friend
Tetyana Avramenko
________________________________________________________________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMVguGHgm0U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyXxyHL0XDs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4PiDkFZ4UE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWvI2h47kMo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YTQsEEL3bU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAcAp8scp0Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAcAp8scp0Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcFZi3VzOvI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePyXqVtsBuw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_PssDKzhPg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_Zaq66oTH8
https://spzh.eu/en/news/89850-zelensky-wishes-death-to-putin-in-his-christmas-message
Zelensky wishes death to Putin in his Christmas message
24 December 2025
The presidential address included the phrase “May he parish”, said in the context of a Christmas wish. In the Christmas address to Ukrainians, published on the President’s website on December 24, 2025, Volodymyr Zelensky actually wished death upon Russian President Vladimir Putin. “Since ancient times, Ukrainians have believed that, on Christmas night, the heavens open. And if you tell them your dream, it will surely come true,” he said. Speaking about the people’s Christmas wishes, Zelensky stated: “Today, we all share one dream. And we make one wish – for all of us. ‘May he perish,’ each of us may think to ourselves.” At the same time, according to him, when addressing God, Ukrainians ask “for something greater” – peace for Ukraine and an end to the war. In the same address, he repeatedly spoke about Christian values, the Nativity of Christ, prayer, and faith. Concluding the address, Zelensky wished Ukrainians “peace”, “goodness and truth may prevail”, ending the greeting with the traditional Christian salutation: “Christ is born! Glorify Him!” As reported by the UOJ, Zelensky stated that “Ukrainians are together tonight – marking Christmas on the same date, as one big family”, despite the fact that millions of believers of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church continue to celebrate Christmas on January 7.
_______________________________________________________________________
https://spzh.eu/en/news/89849-zelensky-all-ukrainians-celebrate-christmas-on-the-same-date
Zelensky: All Ukrainians celebrate Christmas on the same date
24 December 2025
Volodymyr Zelensky recorded a new video with Christmas greetings. In the Christmas greeting, published on the President’s website on the evening of December 24, 2025, Volodymyr Zelensky stated about the “unity” of Ukrainians, claiming that the country supposedly celebrates Christmas simultaneously, “as one big family”. “Ukrainians are together tonight – marking Christmas on the same date, as one big family,” Zelensky’s address says. He stated that Christmas Eve is “a unique time, filled with a special spirit, with its own special magic for all of us,” when families gather at one table. But then Zelensky warned of Russia’s “attempts to take all of this away from us”. “But despite all the suffering that Russia has brought, it is not capable of occupying or bombing what matters most. That is our Ukrainian heart, our faith in one another, and our unity,” said Ukraine’s President in his Christmas greeting. As the UOJ wrote earlier, Volodymyr Zelensky signed a decree establishing a new professional holiday – Programmer’s Day. Zelensky decided that the most suitable date for the new holiday is January 7 – the day when millions of citizens of Ukraine, believers of the UOC, continue to celebrate Christmas according to the Julian calendar.
___________________________________________________________________________
https://spzh.eu/en/news/89857-
SBU shows what to do with those who celebrate Christmas on January 7
25 December 2025
The video of the SBU features its employees breaking down the apartment doors with the comment: “Who comes ‘caroling’ to those who celebrate Christmas on January 7.” On December 24, 2025, a video titled “Does everyone know when Christmas is?” appeared on the TikTok channel of the SBU. In the footage, officers with automatic weapons break down the doors of an apartment. Over the video, the authors placed the caption “Who comes ‘caroling’ to those who celebrate Christmas on January 7.” The video is accompanied by the soundtrack of the carol “Good evening to you, dear host.” The SBU did not clarify whether this video is a real threat to those Orthodox who adhere to the Julian calendar or if it is a kind of humor from the law enforcement officers. The video was not appreciated in the comments. “Free country,” wrote KAZUKI with irony, placing his words in quotes. “Those who have celebrated on the 7th all their lives come,” emphasized Valeriy. “Communists also came to those who celebrated Christmas in principle, now new communists,” wrote Future_pilot. This is a reminder that on January 7, Christmas is celebrated in Ukraine by the UOC, UOC-KP, and the Exarchate of the Ecumenical Patriarchate. In the world, Christmas is celebrated according to the Julian calendar in the Jerusalem, Georgian, Russian, Serbian, Macedonian, Polish Churches, as well as on Mount Athos. Earlier, the UOJ wrote that the SBU reported the number of cases opened against the UOC clergy.
___________________________________________________________________________
https://spzh.eu/en/news/89853-stefanchuk-shiftingchristmas-and-other-church-dates-is-a-matter-of-ideology
25 December 2025
Stefanchuk: Shifting Christmas and other church dates is a matter of ideology
The Rada Speaker stated that celebrating church holidays according to the Julian calendar is “no longer remembered by anyone”. The Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Ruslan Stefanchuk, stated in a broadcast of the Telethon that the changes in the calendar of church holidays are ideological in nature and intended to define Ukraine’s place in the civilized world. He explained the necessity of the calendar date reform initiated by Volodymyr Zelensky. “Any historical calendar is a certain calendar map of the state. Any calendar dates are not just about days in the calendar, it’s about who we are with and who is against us. And therefore, it is an important ideological thing,” Stefanchuk emphasized. He assured that “today, no one even remembers that just a few years ago we had a completely different calendar plan”. Stefanchuk reminded teh audience that Christmas was moved from January 7 to December 25. The Day of the Protection was shifted from October 14 to October 1. St. Nicholas Day is celebrated on December 6 instead of the 19th. The Day of Ukrainian Cossacks was also moved to October 1. The Day of the Armed Forces of Ukraine now coincides with St. Nicholas Day – December 6. According to Stefanchuk, the war revealed several problematic calendar coincidences: “Days of national tragedy coincide with professional holidays. Also, several different dates inherited from the Soviet era and the years of independence are concentrated». On December 26, the Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada plans to hold a large meeting with representatives of the government, the President’s Office, the Academy of Sciences, the Institute of National Memory, and the public to discuss the logic of building a law on the new calendar system. Earlier, the UOJ wrote that Zelensky declared January 7 as Programmer’s Day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pT5N_zzqMeU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSXAci4bu-w&t=1s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_Zaq66oTH8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqhpP01ZY_U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttzJIBdYOYo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LX9MNF4baSY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-v4nfIwB5eA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJWdtk2Gxv4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjc2GaCAkyM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emSCdPwmaWQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJDiFeUsUrI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jX5zGCLtSGw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QDd1WR3qwo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kgf5q3VcpdU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFA1_48NjHc
https://spzh.eu/en/zashhita-very/89322-patronal-feast-with-his-holiness
2 December 2025
Patronal Feast with His Holiness
When the supernatural is placed at the service of political expediency.
The Greek branch of the UOJ has published an archival article by priest and theologian Anastasios Gotsopoulos, written on December 1, 2014. It concerns the events that took place during the visit of then-Pope Francis on the Patronal Feast of the Ecumenical Patriarchate. The article also contains a reference to an earlier visit of Pope Benedict XVI to Constantinople.
“Unfortunately, what is described in the article published eleven years ago remains relevant, because this year, during the visit of Pope Leo XIV to Constantinople on the Feast Day of St. Andrew, the same things occurred as in 2006 and in 2014,” the editorial board of the Greek branch of UOJ writes.
When the supernatural sacrament is used to serve expediency…We have once again witnessed what took place at Saint George’s Church in Constantinople on the Feast Day of Saint Andrew (November 29–30, 2014). and, apparently, we will see it again and again so that we gradually become accustomed and, without resistance, move toward the restoration, as His Holiness put it, of “full communion” with the “primatial sister Church of Rome,” “presiding in love” if we refer to the Fathers.
The fact that this tempts some of our Orthodox brothers does not concern us too much: we easily label them “fanatics,” “fundamentalists,” “provincials,” mock them and that is enough for us. Especially since we have allies in this endeavor – the media and politicians of all stripes, who are undoubtedly interested in the care of Bartholomew and Francis for the “restoration of the Temple of God, that is, the Church,” as revealed to us by the “brother, Bishop of Rome” Francis!
I will not analyze the words about “full communion” spoken by the Ecumenical Patriarch. A profound theological text, “The New Ecclesiology of Patriarch Bartholomew”, has already appeared, pointing to serious deviations from the faith. But does anyone doubt that the Patriarch’s address to the Pope on Saturday, November 29, 2014, in the Patriarchal Church signifies full acceptance of the Dogmatic Constitution “On the Church” and the Decree “On Ecumenism” of the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965)?
“Brother” Francis went even further, explaining the thoughts of his “brother” Bartholomew and referring in considerable detail to the Decree “On Ecumenism”. As a true Jesuit, he naturally remained silent about another document of the same Council – the Decree “On the Eastern (Uniate) Churches”. Nevertheless, a careful listener can easily perceive that His Holiness has this in mind and is proposing precisely this model for the unification of Catholics and Orthodox Christians. It is no coincidence that Cardinal Leonardo Sandri, Prefect of the Congregation for the Eastern Churches, was present in his retinue…
I suppose that after all this, the Great Council of the Orthodox Church, if it ever takes place, should – on the recommendation of the relevant Chancery in Constantinople – recognize the Second Vatican Council as the Eighth Ecumenical Council! This is becoming an urgent necessity: some high-ranking Orthodox hierarchs need to acquire at least some consistency and ecclesiological justification, which the Seven Ecumenical Councils – outdated, as practice shows – fail to provide.
Since the “Patronal Feast with His Holiness” has already been performed in the same settings, I will turn to my archive, to what happened in the same place in 2006. At that time, I wrote:
“The described practice [of joint prayers] is applied not only within the framework of the World Council of Churches. Overall, a certain strange disregard for theology (especially ecclesiology) and the development of an ecumenical ‘ecclesiology,’ intended to ‘theologically’ justify anti-canonical behavior, combined with the introduction into church life of PR methods, have led to practices that leave a deep bitterness among the People of God. Particularly illustrative is what occurred during the last visit of the Pope to Constantinople for the Patronal Feast of the Ecumenical Patriarchate on November 30, 2006. This is not about meetings and events outside the Patriarchal Church of Saint George – conversations, joint statements, greetings from the balcony – but about what took place inside the church, going beyond a simple joint prayer with the non-Orthodox.
The Pontiff is greeted with the words: ‘Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.’”
Of course, at a meeting, the head of the Roman Catholic Church will be called the “Pope and Bishop of Rome” although, strictly speaking theologically, these titles do not belong to him, since he is a heretic. Both titles are used here as technical terms or polite forms of address for the guest, without theological or ecclesiological significance. In the same sense, non-Orthodox communities are referred to as “Churches” but not in the strict ecclesiological sense, for the Catholic Church was, is, and will remain one. In church tradition, alongside precision, there exist courtesy and economy: Saint Cyril, sharply condemning Nestorius for his errors, still addressed him as “honorable,” “most honorable,” “most pious bishop,” and called him “Your Holiness”.
However, it is an entirely different matter to sing hymns and commemorate a heretic as the canonical Pope and Bishop of Rome during a service in the Patriarchal Church, on an equal footing with the Patriarch of Constantinople!
From simple joint prayer to concelebrationUnfortunately, the joint prayer in Constantinople did not remain a simple act of supplication but grew into an incomplete concelebration. At the official Patriarchal and Synodal Divine Liturgy of the Patronal Feast, the Pope was granted the right to recite the Lord’s Prayer; he was censed as a canonical bishop; and most importantly, he received from the Patriarch the liturgical kiss of peace before the Holy Anaphora and responded in kind. All of this is permitted only to concelebrating priests and hierarchs! He did not enter the Holy Altar – yet. He was even granted the ambo, and he took the opportunity to proclaim papal primacy in the very Patriarchal church!
We will allow ourselves a few questions.
– When serving with the Ecumenical Patriarch, if a cleric – whether a priest, bishop, or even the Primate of an Autocephalous Church – does not concelebrate but only prays in the Holy Altar, would the officiating Patriarch exchange the liturgical kiss of peace with him? Of course not: according to the liturgical order, it is permitted only between concelebrating clergy. So how, then, is it offered to the Pope? Does he concelebrate with the Patriarch?
– Is it permissible to use the liturgical kiss of peace, the highest moment of manifest unity in truth and love, contrary to liturgical tradition, reducing it to an act of social courtesy, emotional sentiment, or church politics?
– Is the liturgical kiss of peace a self-sufficient act, or a prerequisite for “confessing with one mind” the Trinitarian dogma as formulated in the Creed? If there is no confession of shared faith – as there is no shared theology – what meaning does the liturgical kiss have between an Orthodox hierarch and a heretical leader?
– Since when is a heretic permitted to pray at a service as a canonical Orthodox Christian?
– Can a heretic, much less the head of a heresy, represent the Orthodox faithful at the Divine Liturgy, reciting the Lord’s Prayer as their Primate?
– To say the “Our Father,” is unity of faith not required? Does such unity exist with the Pope?
– “Our Father” is the principal prayer, preparing the faithful for the “daily bread” of the Divine Eucharist. Can one who is categorically forbidden from receiving the Holy Gifts ask for this Bread during a Divine Liturgy celebrated by Orthodox Christians? What meaning can such a prayer have?
– If the Pope did not merely attend but actively participated in the Divine Liturgy, why was he ultimately not admitted to Communion? Some might answer: the statutes of our Church do not permit it, since he is of another faith. But was everything else he did truly permissible?
– How does all this align with the clear position of Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew: “Communion in the sacraments is not permissible until full unity in faith is achieved… The path to unity through Eucharistic communion is a step backwards… Eucharistic communion without unity of faith is like banknotes without gold backing”? Or does “communion in the Sacraments” refer only to the moment of Holy Communion, and not to the entire Divine Liturgy of the faithful? Is such a theological partitioning of the Liturgy permissible?
– What can be said about granting the ambo to the head of heresy for preaching? Can we, as Orthodox, remain indifferent, untroubled, or unmoved when, in the Most Holy Patriarchal Church, the Pope preaches papal primacy with his head uncovered? From the pulpit of Saints Alexander, Gregory, John Chrysostom, Photius, and Philotheos, error is proclaimed! Is this not a desecration?
– Finally, should we not, with all due reverence, ask the presiding hierarch of that Divine Liturgy:
Can one tolerate and justify the above as “noble conduct” or mere “formal expressions during the service”?
Or, perhaps, this could be excused by oikonomia? Is even a partial concelebration of the Pope and the Patriarch permitted under oikonomia? The answer is categorical: no! Never, anywhere, has any saint allowed a condemned heretic, much less the head of a heresy, stubborn in error, to actively participate in the Divine Liturgy.
And what irresistible necessity demanded a “concelebration” with the Pontiff? For what “higher attainment,” unattainable by other means, was the ecclesiastical order violated? Ultimately, what benefit for the Church could justify praying together with the Pope? Thus, there exists not a single condition under which oikonomia could legitimize the Pontiff’s active participation in an Orthodox service.
Moreover, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew has spoken explicitly about “Eucharistic communion” with the non-Orthodox:
“This question is essentially ecclesiological, and for the sake of ecumenical dialogue, it would be appropriate and useful to state unambiguously… that the Eucharistic communion sought by some between Orthodox and non-Orthodox Christians amid the ongoing schism cannot be accepted by the Orthodox Church, even under oikonomia.”
And, of course, “Eucharistic communion” does not begin with the words “approach with the fear of God, with faith and love” and does not end with “Save, O God, Your people”…
Or, applying this to contemporary practice, one might echo the Athonite monks: “But are we to do this under the guise of oikonomia? And how can oikonomia permit the desecration of the sanctuary? …And what could be more ruinous than such an ‘oikonomia’? It is clear communion with them, an abandonment of all good, and a subversion. For he who receives a heretic is subject to his accusations, and he who communes with the excommunicated is himself excommunicated, as one who violates the canon of the Church.”
This concern is by no means caused by “stubborn false brothers, forming groups of fanatical defenders of the so-called foundations, captives largely of religious unbelief, neo-Manichean fundamentalism, projected metaphysical guilt, and a casual approach to living like sectarians, peddlers of ‘pure religion’”. (How sad it is to hear such characterizations from an Orthodox hierarch in the presence of the Patriarch, delegations of Autocephalous Orthodox Churches, and non-Orthodox on the Patriarchate’s Feast Day, indiscriminately thrown at all believers who maintain any reservations regarding dialogues!) On the contrary, these practices are condemned even by the proponents of inter-Christian dialogue and the ecumenical movement themselves as theologically unfounded and ultimately undermining the very basis of theological dialogue.
Archbishop Stylianos (Harkianakis) of Australia, a hierarch of the Ecumenical Patriarchate and for twenty years co-chair of the Official Theological Dialogue with the Roman Catholics, mentions in his speech of May 10, 1985, the “tragic errors”:
“First of all, an excessive friendliness with Rome prevailed, expressed irresponsibly and theologically completely unchecked… Many hierarchs, unfortunately, hurry to embrace at the most sacred moment of the Divine Eucharist, when we proclaim ‘let us love one another…’. This is the moment when we express the highest and deepest unity only of those who are concelebrating.
Ministers are not permitted even to kiss co-faithful hierarchs and clerics present in the Holy Altar. Nevertheless, there are Orthodox hierarchs, whose names I will not mention, who, well-intentioned but unaware of the weight of theological responsibility, kiss non-Orthodox clerics, although this has no sacramental grounding and is done irresponsibly: from the common Chalice they will not receive Communion. So why kiss them at all?
Another error, no less tragic: in an effort to be polite to one another, many Orthodox hierarchs, unfortunately, call the Pope “the first bishop of Christianity”. This is yet another theological falsehood. The Pope… in divided Christendom is neither first among equals nor even equal among equals! The Pope should stand after the last Orthodox bishop, as he now remains in schism and heresy. This is so obvious that it hardly needs stating… The Roman Throne in its present state cannot, according to Orthodox theology, be called “presiding in love”. When such things are said, they are irresponsible words. Regrettably, they stir up much fuss and inflict harm, all the while providing us with no tangible gain. In this way, we give the impression that we are hastening to establish Intercommunio, Eucharistic communion with the non-Orthodox… By addressing the Pope or Rome with patristic titles full of specific meaning, we only undermine the dialogue and offer it no support. This is simply a lie – such forms of address are a theological falsehood.”
In this context, it is worth noting a particularly significant address by the Abbot of the Holy Monastery of Xeropotamou, Archimandrite Joseph, during Patriarch Bartholomew’s visit to the monastery on August 21, 2008. The Abbot spoke, with due reverence but also exceptional clarity:
“Here, Your Holiness, allow us, your children, who approach you with filial boldness, to speak on two matters that trouble our hearts and tempt our monastic consciences, as well as the consciences of very many devout Orthodox Christians who turn to us.
The first matter concerns the ongoing recognition by Your Holiness – through official speeches and joint prayers in church and on television – of representatives of a thoroughly secularized and unrepentant modern papism.
Your Holiness, together with Saint John Chrysostom, we, humble and unworthy, beseech You: ‘Do not accept any foreign dogma under the pretext of love.’ Both recently and in earlier times, Holy Mount Athos has testified and assured You, and we, the miserable monks of Xeropotamou, together with the devout faithful who share our concerns, ‘remain faithful to the faith of the holy Apostles and holy Fathers, out of love also for the heterodox, to whom it is truly helpful when the Orthodox, by maintaining a consistent Orthodox stance, point out the extent of their spiritual illness and the way to its healing.” We earnestly and reverently request that henceforth “the theological dialogue be in no way accompanied by joint prayers, participation in liturgical and worship gatherings of one another, or other actions that could create the impression that our Orthodox Church recognizes Roman Catholics as a full Church, and the Pope as the canonical Bishop of Rome. Such actions mislead both the fullness of Orthodoxy and the Roman Catholics, creating in them a false impression of what Orthodoxy thinks of them…” Since we cannot deny that we share “the same spirit of faith” with Your Most Divine Holiness, “as it is written: I believed, therefore I spoke”, so “we also believe, therefore we speak…” In Your fatherly love, forgive us this confessional digression and look upon the faces of our humble brotherhood, which regards You with the greatest reverence.”
In his response, the Ecumenical Patriarch did not consider the concerns exaggerated or malicious and even praised the abbot for his words and his concern, and “reassured” him: “We commend your sensitivity, we commend in a fatherly way your love of truth and sincerity, and we reassure you, briefly repeating: the guardians are aware.”
Of course, it would be better if such “patriarchal” assurances were not needed to “reassure” us. Who bears responsibility for the fact that part of the Orthodox faithful is concerned about the “guardians” and has the gravest reservations regarding some of their actions? Are the “guardians” themselves truly not accountable for this situation?
P.S. Some may think that I am right, yet consider my words too “harsh” or “disrespectful.” However, I would ask such people, together with their remarks about the “harshness” or “disrespectfulness” of my words, to also present their own proper, respectful protest against that which is ecclesiologically and canonically unacceptable and which again occurred in Constantinople on 29–30 November 2014.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJWdtk2Gxv4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYJie5DwEjY&t=7s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQ3dhfxx29Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsoySF4lDWI&t=1s
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/azREHaq9ve8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cy7lH_EG68E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJGvZHOhoM4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pB-Vo-04e_c&t=60s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ti9_PRGbXc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEYV1zPaK7Q&t=4s
inb4 Metropolitan Onuphry’s sins get leaked to the public.
Thank you for the clear message in this article. May God be merciful to the UOC and may He enlighten all those who persecute her out of ignorance.