By Walt Garlington, an Orthodox Christian living in Dixieland. His writings have appeared on several web sites, and he maintains a site of his own, Confiteri: A Southern Perspective.
In the last essay we wrote, we touched on some of the hubris of President Trump’s inaugural address. After reading Big Tech leader Marc Andreessen’s ‘The Techno-Optimist Manifesto’, it seems likely that he is a powerful force directing Trump’s vision for the States (especially given the reports of Andreessen meeting with Trump multiple times).
A quick comparison between the inaugural address and the Manifesto shows some striking similarities:
Trump:
So, as we liberate our nation, we will lead it to new heights of victory and success. We will not be deterred. . . . The United States will once again consider itself a growing nation, one that increases our wealth, expands our territory, builds our cities, raises our expectations and carries our flag into new and beautiful horizons. And we will pursue our manifest destiny into the stars, launching American astronauts to plant the Stars and Stripes on the planet Mars.
Andreessen:
Techno-Optimists believe that societies, like sharks, grow or die.
We believe growth is progress – leading to vitality, expansion of life, increasing knowledge, higher well being.
We believe we are poised for an intelligence takeoff that will expand our capabilities to unimagined heights.
We believe the global population can quite easily expand to 50 billion people or more, and then far beyond that as we ultimately settle other planets.
We believe the ultimate mission of technology is to advance life both on Earth and in the stars.
Trump:
And it’s the lifeblood of a great nation. And, right now, our nation is more ambitious than any other. There’s no nation like our nation. Americans are explorers, builders, innovators, entrepreneurs and pioneers. The spirit of the frontier is written into our hearts. The call of the next great adventure resounds from within our souls. Our American ancestors turned a small group of colonies on the edge of a vast continent into a mighty republic of the most extraordinary citizens on Earth. No one comes close. Americans pushed thousands of miles through a rugged land of untamed wilderness. They crossed deserts, scaled mountains, braved untold dangers, won the Wild West, ended slavery, rescued millions from tyranny, lifted millions from poverty, harnessed electricity, split the atom, launched mankind into the heavens and put the universe of human knowledge into the palm of the human hand. If we work together, there is nothing we cannot do and no dream we cannot achieve.
Andreessen:
Economists measure technological progress as productivity growth: How much more we can produce each year with fewer inputs, fewer raw materials. Productivity growth, powered by technology, is the main driver of economic growth, wage growth, and the creation of new industries and new jobs, as people and capital are continuously freed to do more important, valuable things than in the past. Productivity growth causes prices to fall, supply to rise, and demand to expand, improving the material well being of the entire population.
We believe this is the story of the material development of our civilization; this is why we are not still living in mud huts, eking out a meager survival and waiting for nature to kill us.
We believe this is why our descendants will live in the stars.
We believe that there is no material problem – whether created by nature or by technology – that cannot be solved with more technology.
Give us a real world problem, and we can invent technology that will solve it.
We believe that out of all of these people will come scientists, technologists, artists, and visionaries beyond our wildest dreams.
This is unsettling. Mr. Andreessen makes numerous statements in his Manifesto that are anti-Christian, yet he has the ear of the president. First is his view of religion, which he views negatively in contrast to the free market, etc.:
We believe the ultimate moral defense of markets is that they divert people who otherwise would raise armies and start religions into peacefully productive pursuits.
The universalism of the Orthodox Church, where all humanity becomes one in Christ Jesus, where all divisions are transcended (Galatians 3:28), is transferred to his preferred community, the ‘church’ of technology:
We believe technology is universalist. Technology doesn’t care about your ethnicity, race, religion, national origin, gender, sexuality, political views, height, weight, hair or lack thereof. Technology is built by a virtual United Nations of talent from all over the world. Anyone with a positive attitude and a cheap laptop can contribute. Technology is the ultimate open society.
Then we have overt occult references, made with positive connotations:
We believe Artificial Intelligence is our alchemy, our Philosopher’s Stone – we are literally making sand think.
He puts his faith not in the Holy Trinity but in AI, which has shown plenty of demonic tendencies:
We believe Artificial Intelligence is best thought of as a universal problem solver. And we have a lot of problems to solve.
He accepts evolution as an article of his techno-faith:
We believe in competition, because we believe in evolution.
We believe in evolution, because we believe in life.
Expansion and growth are the key virtues of his religious system:
We believe that since human wants and needs are infinite, economic demand is infinite, and job growth can continue forever.
Combine technology and markets and you get what Nick Land has termed the techno-capital machine, the engine of perpetual material creation, growth, and abundance.
Limitations on human wants/passions are an evil to be overcome:
We believe we should place intelligence and energy in a positive feedback loop, and drive them both to infinity.
We believe we should use the feedback loop of intelligence and energy to make everything we want and need abundant.
We have given short answers to some of those objectionable beliefs above, but we ought to answer the rest as well.
Vincent Rossi (Fr Maximos in monasticism) shows the errors of the theory of evolution using the teachings of St Maximus the Confessor.
Scroll Down to Continue
The Southern agrarian writer, Wendell Berry of Kentucky, gives his usual touching defense of limitations on human desires and actions, although tinged slightly with pantheism:
“We have lived by the assumption that what was good for us would be good for the world. And this has been based on the even flimsier assumption that we could know with any certainty what was good even for us. We have fulfilled the danger of this by making our personal pride and greed the standard of our behavior toward the world – to the incalculable disadvantage of the world and every living thing in it. And now, perhaps very close to too late, our great error has become clear. It is not only our own creativity – our own capacity for life – that is stifled by our arrogant assumption; the creation itself is stifled.
We have been wrong. We must change our lives, so that it will be possible to live by the contrary assumption that what is good for the world will be good for us. And that requires that we make the effort to know the world and to learn what is good for it. We must learn to cooperate in its processes, and to yield to its limits. But even more important, we must learn to acknowledge that the creation is full of mystery; we will never entirely understand it. We must abandon arrogance and stand in awe. We must recover the sense of the majesty of creation, and the ability to be worshipful in its presence. For I do not doubt that it is only on the condition of humility and reverence before the world that our species will be able to remain in it.”
As for never-ending technological innovation, he has few kind words for it:
The paramount doctrine of the economic and technological euphoria of recent decades has been that everything depends on innovation. It was understood as desirable, and even necessary, that we should go on and on from one technological innovation to the next, which would cause the economy to “grow” and make everything better and better. This of course implied at every point a hatred of the past, of all things inherited and free. All things superseded in our progress of innovations, whatever their value might have been, were discounted as of no value at all. (Source)
As industrial technology advances and enlarges, and in the process assumes greater social, economic, and political force, it carries people away from where they belong by history, culture, deeds, association, and affection.
The latest technology is not always good for anything except to the producers of the technology. (Source)
St Basil the Great (+379) also has not a little disdain for the exaltation of the material and the denigration of the spiritual:
Examine what sort of being you are. Know your own nature, that your body is mortal but your soul is immortal, and that our life is twofold in kind. One kind is proper to the flesh, quickly passing by, while the other is akin to the soul, not admitting of circumscription. Therefore be attentive to yourself, neither remaining in mortal things as if they were eternal, nor despising eternal things as if they were passing. Look down on the flesh, for it is passing away; take care of the soul, for it is something immortal. . . . Do not fatten the body excessively and do not seek a lot of flesh. For since “the flesh lusts against the spirit and the spirit against the flesh” [Gal 5:17], and these are opposite to each other, see that you do not add to the flesh and grant great power to what is inferior. For as in the turning of scales, if you weigh down one side you truly make the opposite side lighter, so also with body and soul, the increase of one necessarily produces a decrease in the other. For when the body enjoys well-being and becomes heavy through much fleshiness, the mind is necessarily inactive and slack in its proper activity; but when the soul is in good condition and through care of its own goods is raised up toward its proper greatness, following this the state of the body withers (‘Homily on the Words “Be Attentive to Yourself”’, On the Human Condition, Nonna Harrison, translator, St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, Crestwood, NY, 2005, pgs 96-7, with help from this site).
The lessening of the earthly part of man and the strengthening of his soul allows him to find the true Infinity of intelligence and energy through his union with God’s energies:
Vision, deification and union with God are the things which offer man existential knowledge of God. Then man possesses real knowledge of God. The deifying gift of the Holy Spirit, which is a mysterious light, transforms into divine light those who have attained it and not only fills them with eternal light, “but also grants them a knowledge and a life appropriate to God” (3,1,35;CWS p.89). In this state a person possesses knowledge of God. In reply to Barlaam’s teaching that God is known by the greatest contemplators, the philosophers, and that knowledge of God transmitted “by noetic illumination…is by no means true” (2,3,78), St. Gregory Palamas declares: “God makes Himself known not only through all that is but also through what is not, through transcendence, that is, through uncreated things, and also through an eternal light that transcends all beings”. This knowledge, he says, is offered today as a kind of pledge to those who are worthy of it and which “illuminates them unendingly in the unending age”. That is just why the saints’ vision of God is true, “and he who calls it false has strayed from the divine knowledge of God” (2,3,78). Thus anyone who ignores and disregards the vision of God, which offers true knowledge, is in reality ignorant of God (Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos).
We will point out one more fallacy of Mr. Andreessen, that an economy must run on money/the free market/self-interest and not love:
We believe markets do not require people to be perfect, or even well intentioned – which is good, because, have you met people? Adam Smith: “It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own self-interest. We address ourselves not to their humanity but to their self-love, and never talk to them of our own necessities, but of their advantages.”
David Friedman points out that people only do things for other people for three reasons – love, money, or force. Love doesn’t scale, so the economy can only run on money or force. The force experiment has been run and found wanting. Let’s stick with money.
We believe markets, to quote Nicholas Stern, are how we take care of people we don’t know.
The saints of the Orthodox Church show us precisely the opposite. Because of their union with God, made possible by their love for God and their neighbor, they are endowed with the Grace of the Almighty God to produce an abundance of goods out of scarcity. We see this throughout Church history: with Elisha and the multiplying oil (II Kings 4:1-7); the Lord Jesus Himself, Who empowers the saints, Who fed the 5,000 with five loaves and two fish (St Matthew 14); St Euthymius the Great of Palestine who multiplied his monastery’s stores of food to feed pilgrims, etc.
We are entering upon a time of year when many major Celtic saints of the Orthodox Church will be honored: St Brigid of Kildare (1 Feb), St David of Wales (1 March), St Patrick of Ireland (17 March), St Cuthbert of Lindisfarne, England (20 March). So it is in that direction that we turn for one more example of the abundance that comes from self-denial. In Cogitosus’s recounting of the life of St Brigid, we find the following miracles of multiplication:
On one occasion she was moved by pity to give the pork that she was cooking in the cauldron for guests to a dog that came fawning and begging. But when the pork was removed from the cauldron and was divided up for the guests, it was found to be complete, as if nothing had been taken from it. . . .
Once when bishops were coming together as her guests she had nothing with which to feed them. But her need was richly met in the usual way by the manifold grace of God. She milked a cow three times in a single day, contrary to custom. And on this marvelous occasion she gained from the one cow what she would normally have expected to get from three of the best cows (‘The Life of St. Brigit the Virgin by Cogitosus’, Celtic Spirituality, Oliver Davis, translator, Paulist Press, New York, 1999, pgs 124-5).
The ultra-materialist ideology of the Tech Bros, such as Marc Andreessen, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, et al, who are all clinging closely to Donald Trump, is at war with the Orthodox experience of the deification of man and the cosmos in and through the Divine-human, theanthropic, Body of Christ – the Orthodox Church. Mr. Trump is off to a good start in some important ways. However, if his goals align with those of Mr. Andreessen and the rest of his techno-religion practitioners, and there is ample reason to believe this is the case, then in the end all will have been for naught.
We stand instead for the Orthodox way of St Brigid.
To Nicholas’ point that these tech tools are just tools:
The big difference with AI is that it is being heralded as the first man-made device that is smarter and light years faster than humans. More: like it or not, we are in a global AI race (primarily with China). Why? As with the arms race with USSR, the first nation to become the leader of AI will control the world, so we are being told (sold).
Hence the Lords of AI were in full attendance at Trump’s inauguration and Trump announced the Stargate Project on day two of his admin. The core danger of AI for me is what Rod Dreher writes about in his new wonderful book, Living in Wonder, as does Joe Allen warn in his book Dark Aeon. It’s not so much whether a machine has the smarts to save the world, but that man comes to believe does.
Once fully operational within the infrastructures of government, media, medicine, military, finance, education, entertainment, communications, agriculture (as is happening now) it’s not a stretch for AI’s seemingly magical powers to be hailed by our materialist, tech-enamored ’ society as worthy of our awe-struck blind obedience and techno-worship. That is already the mindset of the AI developer community in Silicon Valley.
Never forget, the tech titan’s endgame of AI-powered transhumanism is singularity, the merging of your body with machine as the next ‘inevitable’ step in our evolutional journey toward ‘global enlightenment.’ Their promise of Humanity 2.0 couldn’t be more Lucifarian.
I’m tired of so many Christians running scared about the Next Big Thing™ instead of doing something about it. All technology is a tool, and tools can be used for holy or unholy purposes. We are living in an age of unprecedented technological achievement. If you run from it instead of guiding its progression in a manner pleasing to God, you leave a vacuum of power that godless or even God-hating technocrats will happily fill. If you call AI evil and demonic on its face, rather than the demonically-afflicted people who are allowed to guide its development, then you’re making a serious mistake.
Andrew Torba, for all his Protestantism, has it right when he said in 2023 that “Christians Must Enter the AI Arms Race”. Instead of whining and doing nothing, that man made his own LLM and image generator. He’s the only Christian I can think of outside the boys at The Gundo who tries to baptize what is good, true, and beautiful about tech into Christ instead of shunning it or trying to ban it. God gave us minds capable of, as the godless tech oligarch said, “making sand think”. We already co-create with God by having children, so why not co-create with the Holy Trinity to make artificial intelligence that serves Him? Christians ought to make machines angelic, rather than allow them to be made demonic.
Look at how terrified the enemies of God become when young Christian men get together to do something meaningful instead of just complaining about the state of the world: https://archive.ph/aqGFw. They’re terrified that there are intelligent, intensely Christian men (some of whom are Orthodox) in various brotherhoods across the USA actively undermining the godless narrative that all believers are dumb Luddites.
Technology Brothers, Theological Brothers, Orthodox Brothers. The one thing God-haters fear most is brothers working together towards a common goal because it’s these sorts of brothers God uses to shape world history as He sees fit.
Now, on the technology itself:
We don’t have actual artificial intelligence (publically available, anyway), we have large language models. One is an actual independent intelligence, the other is the simulation of intelligence, a hyper-competent chatbot essentially. The former can come to its own conclusions via the parsing of new data (just like a human being), while the latter derives conclusions from its gargantuan data set and cannot expand itself. This is my layman’s understanding of the present technology, no doubt riddled with inaccuracies, but it’s better than nothing. We’ve already reached the point where sufficiently advanced large language models overlap with the dumbest human beings.
We have gotten more than a few strange, and frankly unanticipated, reactions to Walt’s article. Strange in the sense that the article is not actually about technology. Or even the dangers of any particular type of technology. Some of us make our living in tech, and so we could absolutely write up articles about certain types of tech – CBDC, surveillance platforms, drones, AI decisioning, facial recognition, etc.
In fact, we have. This is one, written by a tech resource:
https://orthodoxreflections.com/our-resignation-to-mass-surveillance/
There are more written by industry insiders. But the specifics of various platforms was not what this article was about. It isn’t about the underlying technology at all. The article is about the religious aspirations that are attached to the technology, which is a type of Utopian millennialism. Through technology, we can establish the Kingdom of God on Earth, only we’re going to be the gods. We can solve any problem with technology, so says Andreesson. We can support 50 billion people. We can be God – the oldest and chief temptation of man (Genesis 3:5 “You will be as gods, knowing good and evil”.)
What Andreesson’s ideas amount to is just another millennial heresy. Not any different than Marxism, though the mechanism is not class struggle but tech innovation. The end result is the same, humans end up in a post-scarcity, Star Trek style paradise in which each man is totally free to pursue whatever he dreams of. That is what Walt is criticizing, not any given tech platform, but the desire to apply guided evolutionary principles to mankind through a technologically based “benevolent” dictatorship that will transform humanity into a next level of being.
This way lies transhumanism, which all the Tech Bros have dabbled in to a greater or lesser extent. We can transform ourselves and our environment through the application of technology. Trust us – we can fix everything.
Do you see that while your comments are valid, these are just tools, so were the tools employed by the builders at the Tower of Babel? So were the carpentry tools used to hammer Christ to the Cross. The same tools that built the Temple in Jerusalem. The same tools used to build the great churches of Orthodoxy. Sure these are just tools, and we need good men to wield them. But we have in this article a very good example of a very deluded group of hubristic men who will take these tools and pervert their use to their own glorification, and to our own damnation. It is perfectly fine to follow a different course with these tools, but we first have to recognize the absolute spiritual folly of following the one laid out by the so-called Tech Bros. That way lies Hell.
That is what we are fighting against – a new religion which is really an old religion dressed up in new clothes. That the would-be priests of this new religion exert outsize influence on Trump, himself prone to extreme hubris, is of genuine concern. The U.S. government can print an unlimited amount of money, in the current system, to pursue any wild scheme it chooses. That includes Utopian goals that will end in tears. But because Trump has now been labeled a “conservative”, many will turn a blind eye out of loyalty and because Trump banned men in women’s sports and improved immigration enforcement, etc. Further, just like you did here, speaking out on this subject is met by an immediate reaction by some that those expressing concern are attacking technology (as if we are all luddites) rather than what is really happening – attacking the techno religion and false goals of that religion that are surrounding the technology and affecting its use and future course of development.
My problem with the article is that it rightfully called out the godless technocrats, but then the solution proposed to the problem they create amounted to “become a saint and make abundance miraculously”. Unfortunately, we do not all possess the grace of God in such measure as St. Brigid does. What then for the little man who struggles, but in God’s infinite wisdom is not given the gift of miracleworking?
It is more about focusing on Orthodox spirituality and not being deceived. But we can all appreciate the practical steps that Torba took.
Your notes are offensive to me personal, because I am not scared of the technology. You produce a stew of ideas expressed in a militant fashion.
On the other hand, it seems to me that, you are not clearly understanding the Christian Orthodox Faith. In fact, you are trying to give a bitter lesson to the Orthodox believers like we are some kind of cavemen.
More than chanting in the choir of the godless technologists, it is good and useful to understand how fast the human mind can turn from decent to wicked. After Alan Turing invented the mechanical computer to decipher “The Enigma”, the next electronic generation here, was produced, after the war, to keep track of the black people during the segregation time. Then, the smart scientists realized the immense possibilities in different socio-economic sectors of the society.
The last paragraph on the “technology itself” it is already outdated like it is written by a generous grandpa. Please, do some effort and read the book “Dark Aeon” by Joe Allen.
One serious point, Orthodox do not have the equivalent in the West of an Andrew Torba who is out building his own comprehensive tech platform. We could use our own tech development.
I find it very sad how the liberal mindset has taken over what was once a reputable page that fought against the madness of the Covid years. Oh how quickly the devil works in some.
Could you elaborate on what is “liberal” in Walt’s article, in your opinion?
Sigh….If you can’t see that those who pushed the C insanity are the same ones pushing AI, then I have no idea what to tell you.
For over 50 years the Club of Rome, the World Economic Forum and Klaus Schwab, and the rest of the climate change grifters have promoted the idea of scarcity and limits to growth. They promote a future where “You will own nothing and be happy” while you “Eat ze bugs.” While Orthodox should not fall into dialectical traps, I can see why the techno-optimism of Andreessen and an era of abundance might on the surface sound like a better alternative to Net-Zero depopulation schemes.
Wait until you figure out that your “two sides” are actually all on the same team.
Shall we sit around gazing at our navels?