Search Results for: the lie of ecumenism

The Lie of Ecumenism

The first duty of every Orthodox Christian is to defend his faith publicly and to be prepared to accept threats, persecution, ridicule, contempt, and so on. He must be particularly sensitive to Ecumenism, which subverts the only correct belief in the one, true God. The learned Hagiorite monk, Theoklitos Dionysiatis, used many examples to expose how devastating Ecumenism is for Orthodoxy. Unfortunately, the pan-heresy of Ecumenism is encouraged and preserved by the Ecumenical Patriarchate, in the hopes that it will become the lifeboat of this critical and highly dangerous era of ours. Clearly this constitutes a delusion, which many clergy and theologians are unable to abandon.

Ecumenism is a cocktail of various peculiar religious beliefs and eccentric philosophies. It is unacceptable syncretism. Everything fits within it – truth and lies, Orthodoxy and heresy. Ecumenism resembles a collapsing roof, beneath which exists everything that humankind can think of. It is a lie most difficult to discern, yet an attractive lie, which tests the conscience, one’s determination, and one’s faith. It is a charming “nothing”, which takes on an existential “hypostasis” within the soul of those who have not experienced the fullness of Orthodoxy, and who have not found “rest for their souls” (Orthodox studies, 1974, pg. 102)

Ecumenism is not [just] a movement that is casually being promoted by certain “foolish individuals of ambition.” It has a clear, global purpose, which if pondered upon, is shocking. Its construct is demonic, for “it claims that there is no truth in anything. With its mosaic composition, it promises to solve all of mankind’s problems. It comprises the means of a new view of life. It is Godless within its own polytheism. It is irreverent in its acceptance of all the irreverent ones under its roof. It sees fragments of truth everywhere – fragments of a broken mirror – which it aspires to unite. It does not accept a personal God and refuses to accept authentic, divinely inspired doctrines. It does not believe in any revealed Truth. [According to Ecumenism] there is no single absolute Truth but rather many imperfect [truths].”

[Recall how on July 15, 2021, Archbishop Elpidophoros, a representative of the Patriarch of Constantinople, stated that all religions are equal, and one should not be put above the other. According to him “all religions are myriads of paths leading to one God”. (UOJ News, Union of Orthodox Journalists, July 19, 2021)]

Furthermore, Ecumenism does not upset anyone; it does not acknowledge the existence of homelands or religions. [In its view] there is only an ambiguous god. Its goal is one universal religion. In other words, ‘let the people have their gods, even if they are idol-worshiping pagans’, provided there are no fanaticisms, so that world peace may prevail, and those most guilty of the misfortunes of the world might have an unrestricted playing field, and undisturbed activity, to take advantage of nations and keep them under oppression and in total dependency.

Therefore, in the face of this great danger – the pan-heresy of Ecumenism – vigilance and a courageous mindset are needed, as well as public outcry and dynamic resistance [to its tenets].

Archpriest, Father Dionysios Tatsis

The Scandal of Ecumenism – Greek and English

The article was originally written in Greek, and translated into English. Click here to skip down to the English version. 


Ο Σκανδαλισμός του Οικουμενισμού – Αναστάσιος Γεωργίου

Για μας τους Χριστιανούς Ορθοδόξους, ή ταυτότητά μας είναι ή Πίστις μας και η Oρθοδοξία. Όχι Oρθοδοξία «των παπάδων», όχι τῶν Οἰκουμενιστῶν επισκόπων … αλλά Ορθοδοξία του Χριστού, των Αγίων Αποστόλων, των Προφητών και των Αγίων Πατέρων. Αυτή είναι η Ορθοδοξία, για την οποία πρέπει όλοι μας να αγωνιζόμεθα καὶ εάν χρειασθεί να δώσουμε και τη ζωή μας ακόμη, όπως τα εκατομμύρια Μαρτύρων τής πἰστεώς μας.

Ο γνήσιος Ορθόδοξος Χριστιανός δεν παρασύρεται εις τὸν Οικουμενισμό, πού λέει ότι ο Παπισμός είναι εκκλησία, ο Προτεσταντισμός είναι εκκλησία και πρέπει να έχουμε συνεργασία και αγάπη … Ναι, αγάπη! Αγάπη όμως εν Αληθεία, διότι ή Παντοδύναμος Αγάπη συμπορεύεται πάντοτε με την αλήθεια. Ο Θεός διοχετεύει τη δύναμη τής Αγάπης Του, όταν προσκυνήται «ἐν πνεύματι και αληθεία» (Ιωανν. 4,24) Ως Ορθόδοξοι Χριστιανοί αγαπούμε όλους καὶ επιθυμούμε να έρθουν σε επίγνωση της Αληθείας. Έτσι μας δίδαξε «Ο Θεός τής αγάπης». Δεν μισούμε τους ανθρώπους εξ’ αιτίας της αιρέσεως ή της απιστίας των, αλλά και δεν θα αγαπήσουμε ποτέ, μα ποτέ, την απιστία των ή την αίρεσιν χάριν των ανθρώπων, διότι θα αποξενωθούμε από τον Θεόν.

Ο Οικουμενισμός προσπαθεί να βρει κοινά σημεία πίστεως μεταξύ Ορθοδόξων και ετεροδόξων. Ποτέ δεν έλαβε υπόψιν τις βασικές διαφορές που υπάρχουν μεταξύ Ορθοδοξίας και Παπισμού. Διακηρύττει ότι και στις άλλες θρησκείες, ακόμη και στις μονοθεϊστικές, υπάρχει σωτηρία … Έτσι ανατρέπει την θεμελιώδη Χριστιανική πίστη, ότι «ουκ έστιν ἐν άλλω οὐδενὶ ἡ σωτηρία» (Πραξ. 4,12) Ἐν ολίγοις, απορρίπτει τον λόγο τής Άγιας Γραφής.

Προχώρησε ακόμη και στο λατρευτικό επίπεδον. Στην Ασίζη, Ορθόδοξοι Ιεράρχες συμμετείχαν σε πανθρησκειακές εκδηλώσεις και κοινές συμπροσευχές και δοξολογίες με ετεροδόξους, και μάλιστα με Ιουδαίους και Μουσουλμάνους. Στην Καμπέρρα της Αυστραλίας (Ζ’ Γ. Συνέλευση Π.Σ.Ε.), οι Οικουμενιστές κάλεσαν σε συμπροσευχές ακόμη και ειδωλολάτρες, για να αποκτήσουν οἱ Ορθόδοξοι συνείδηση ότι κατά βάθος, μία εκκλησία, ή ένα τζαμί… αποβλέπουν στην ίδια πνευματική καταξίωση του ανθρώπου. Αυτό δεν είναι αυτόματη διαγραφή της εν Χριστώ σωτηρίας και του Ἁγίου Πνεύματος; Αν υπάρχει και κάπου αλλού δυνατότητα σωτηρίας, δηλαδή θεώσεως, τότε γιατί ή εν Χριστώ αποκάλυψη, προφητεία σαρκώσεως στην Π. Διαθήκη, και της ενσαρκώσεως στην Κ. Διαθήκη; Γιατί η Σάρκωση, ἡ Πεντηκοστή, ἡ Εκκλησία, ως Σώμα Χριστού και κοινωνία Αγίων; Αυτές οἱ πράξεις των Οικουμενιστών δεν φανερώνουν απόρριψη του Χριστιανισμού; Επίσης στην Γενεύη, ὁ Γενικός Γραμματέας του Π.Σ.Ε. Eugene Blake, κάλεσε τους ηγέτες όλων των θρησκειών σε μία ὑπερομολογιακή λειτουργία και προσευχή στον καθεδρικό Ναό του Αγίου Πέτρου, όπου ὁ καθένας προσευχήθηκε στη δική του γλώσσα και σύμφωνα με το τυπικό της θρησκείας του. Ἡ ενέργεια αυτή είχε σκοπό να συνυπάρξουν στην λατρεία του ίδιου Θεού.

Όλα αυτά γίνονται για τα συμφέροντα της Νέας Εποχής, και όχι γιὰ την «ἐν Χριστώ αλήθεια», τη ην «εν Αληθεία» ενότητα. Και όμως, το Ιερό Ευαγγέλιο του Χριστού διαψεύδει τις διάφορες προφάσεις και ενέργειες. Όταν οι Οικουμενιστές μας απορρίπτουν και μας περιφρονούν ως φανατικούς και φονταμενταλιστές, ότι δεν έχουμε «πέντε κλωνάρια μυαλό», να γνωρίζουν ότι απορρίπτουν και περιφρονούν τους Αγίους Αποστόλους και τους Αγίους της Εκκλησίας, τους οποίους μιμούμεθα. Αλλά απορρίπτουν και περιφρονούν και αυτόν τον Κύριον, ο οποίος μη θέλοντας να συνάξει οπαδούς θυσιάζοντας την αλήθεια είπε «Μη και ὑμεῖς θέλετε, ὑπάγειν» (Ιωάννης 6,48). Και δεν είναι μόνον αυτές οι προδοσίες των. Είναι πάρα πολλές που είναι δύσκολο να αναφερθούν σ ’αυτό το κείμενο, που γίνονται αιτία να διχάζεται το ποίμνιο της Εκκλησίας.

Αν αγαπούν τον Σωτήρα Χριστό και θυσιάζονται για την πίστη όπως οι προηγούμενοι Άγιοι Πατέρες, πρέπει να απορρίψουν τον Οικουμενισμό και να αντιμετωπίσουν σθεναρά τις δυνάμεις του κόσμου και τις μεθοδεύσεις του. Αλλ’ αυτό απαιτεί την αναβάπτισή μας στην Ορθόδοξη Παράδοσή μας, αλλά και την ενότητα όλων των Ορθοδόξων με την μετοχή στην άκτιστη Θεία Χάρη με τα Μυστήρια της Εκκλησίας. Η παρουσία της Ορθοδοξίας στο σύγχρονο κόσμο οφείλει να είναι πρωταρχικά Πνευματική και Λειτουργική. Η Θεία Λειτουργία, με όλη τη λατρεία μας, είναι ο σημαντικότερος θησαυρός μας, διότι περικλείει και διασώζει δυναμικά το φρόνημα και τη ζωή τῶν Ἁγίων μας, την πίστη και τον Θεϊκό νόμο και τρόπο της ύπαρξής μας. Αν υπάρχει κάτι το πολύτιμο εδώ εις την γῆν, για το οποίον αξίζει να δώσουμε τα πάντα και αυτήν την ζωή μας, είναι ἡ Ορθόδοξος Πίστη του Χριστού μας, τῶν Ἁγίων Αποστόλων, Μαρτύρων, Ιεραρχών, Οσίων, δικαίων καὶ πάντων τῶν Ἁγίων Πατέρων της Ορθοδόξου Εκκλησίας μας.

Βαδίστε, λοιπόν, στα ίχνη τους και πάψτε νὰ σκανδαλίζετε τον πιστό λαό οδηγώντας αυτόν εις την ανυπακοή και τον αποτειχισμόν. Δὲν ἀντέχει άλλο νὰ βλέπει την ισοπέδωση του Χριστού στην πράξη, με τις διάφορες θεότητες. Δεν αντέχει άλλο να βλέπει την ταπείνωση τῆς Ορθοδοξίας. Δὲν ἀντέχει άλλο να βλέπει να ταυτίζεστε με τις δυνάμεις του κόσμου, διότι αγαπήσατε «την δόξα των ανθρώπων μάλλον ἢπὲρ την δόξα του Θεού» (Ιωάννης 12,19). Τί κατάπτωσής! Αλήθεια, σεις οι «ποιμένες» σε ποιόν θεόν πιστεύετε; Τα έργα σας φανερώνουν ότι πιστεύετε στον θεό του Οικουμενισμού που δεν είναι άλλος παρά ο εχθρός του Χριστού, ο Αντίχριστος! Η μήπως δεν γνωρίζετε ότι ο Οικουμενισμός είναι παναίρεσις και οι υπηρετούντες αυτόν είναι αιρετικοί; Πως έχετε λοιπόν την απαίτηση υπακοής από το ποίμνιο, τη στιγμή που το οδηγείτε «στο στόμα του λύκου»;

To Ιερό Ευαγγέλιο μας συμβουλεύει να μένουμε μακριά από τους κακούς ποιμένες, διότι είναι «λύκοι άρπαγες» (Ματθ 7,15) Τα πιστά μέλη της Εκκλησίας του Χριστού, δεν πρόκειται ποτέ να δείξουν υπακοή στους ανάξιους ποιμένες του Οικουμενισμού. Θα μείνουν σταθεροί στην πίστη και θα αγωνισθούν σθεναρά κατά των θεοκάπηλων προδοτών της Ορθοδοξίας και των Πατερικών Παραδόσεων. Μετανοήσατε! Μη γίνεσθε αρνησίχρηστοι, αρνούμενοι το φρόνημα τῶν Ἁγίων Πατέρων οι οποίοι ποτέ δεν συνθηκολόγησαν με αιρετικούς και άρχοντας του κόσμου τούτου σε θέματα πίστεως,

αλλά υπέστησαν τρομερά βασανιστήρια, ακόμη και θάνατον. Ο Κύριος μας παρέδωσε ΜΙΑ ΕΚΚΛΗΣΙΑ, που ομολογούμε στο Σύμβολο της Πίστεως, και μόνον αυτή ή Εκκλησία του Χριστού έχει τη Χάρι να οδηγεί στη σωτηρία της ψυχής.

Καμία θρησκεία εκτός της Ορθοδόξου Χριστιανικής, και καμία Χριστιανική ομολογία δύναται να οδηγήσει στη σωτηρία. Αυτό διδάσκει το Ευαγγέλιο του Χριστού, το οποίο δυστυχώς σεις οι Οικουμενιστές με τα έργα σας το διαγράφετε. Σας παρακαλούμε! Μη γίνεσθε θεομπαίχτες! Μη παραπληροφορείτε το ποίμνιο του Χριστού! Μὴ συνεχίζετε να σκανδαλίζετε τον πιστό λαό. Το ποτήρι της υπομονής του ξεχείλισε. Φοβηθείτε το Θεό, πού σταυρώθηκε και για τη σωτηρία σας. Μετανοήσατε… Δεν είναι αργά.

Scroll Down for English Version


For us Orthodox Christians, our identity is the Orthodox Faith – not the “Orthodoxy of the priests,” or the Orthodoxy of Ecumenist Hierarchs… but the Orthodoxy of Christ, the Holy Apostles, the Prophets, and the Holy Fathers. This is Orthodoxy, for which we must all struggle, and if need be, even give our lives, as did the millions of martyrs who witnessed for the Faith.

10 Martyrs of CreteThe genuine Orthodox Christian is not drawn to Ecumenism, which accepts Roman Catholicism or Protestantism as true churches to whom we must show co-operation and love. Yes, we must love them, but we must love in Truth because Divine Love is always united with Truth. God sends the power of His Love when He is worshiped “in spirit and in truth.” (John 4:24) As Orthodox Christians we love everyone, and we desire that they come to know the Truth. This is what the “God of Love” teaches us. We do not hate anyone because of their heresy or infidelity to Christ, but we will also never love infidelity or heresy for the sake of any person, because that will alienate us from God.

Ecumenism tries to find common ground between the faith of Orthodoxy and heterodoxy, never considering the fundamental differences between the two. Ecumenism proclaims that there is salvation in all religions, thereby overturning the very foundation of the Christian faith and rejecting the teachings of Holy Scripture, which states, “It is by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth … Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved.” (Acts 4:11-12)

Ecumenism even goes so far as to alter Orthodox worship. In Assisi, Orthodox Hierarchs participated in pan-religious events and joint prayers and eulogies with heterodox and even with non-Christians (Muslims and Jews). In Canberra, Australia, (6-3 General Assembly of the World Council of Churches), the Ecumenists even invited pagans and idol-worshippers to joint prayers to persuade the Orthodox conscience that deep down, a church is no different than a mosque in a person’s spirituality. How does this new belief not nullify our salvation in Christ and the power of the Holy Spirit? If humanity’s salvation and theosis are possible elsewhere, then what is the purpose of the Old Testament Prophecies, the Incarnation, the Crucifixion, the Resurrection, Pentecost, and the Church as the Body of Christ? Do these actions of the Ecumenists not demonstrate outright rejection of Christianity? Furthermore, in Geneva, the General Secretary of the WCC, Eugene Blake, invited the world’s religious leaders to a joint liturgy and prayer service at St. Peter’s Cathedral, where everyone prayed in their own language and according to their own confession of faith. The purpose of this was to unite everyone in common prayer to the same God, but not in truth.

All this is done in the interests of the New Age Movement, and not for “Truth in Christ,” or for unity “in Truth.”  And yet the Holy Gospel of Christ rejects as false such actions and pretexts.  When Ecumenists reject us, who uphold Holy Scripture, as fanatics and fundamentalists, they should realize that they not only scorn and reject the Holy Apostles and Saints of the Church, who we imitate, they even scorn and reject the Lord, Himself, who said. “will you also go away?” (John 6:67)

And yet, it is not only these betrayals which cause the flock to be divided, for there are too many others to be listed in this text. If our present-day hierarchs truly loved Christ the Saviour, they would act as did our Holy Fathers, by making sacrifices for the Orthodox Faith, rejecting Ecumenism, and vigorously opposing the idolatrous, blasphemous, and secular forces of this world. Such love demands a rebirth in Holy Orthodox Tradition, but also a unification of all Orthodox faithful through the Sacramental and Liturgical sharing of God’s uncreated Grace in the life of the Holy Orthodox Church.

Orthodox Icon Holy ChurchOrthodoxy’s presence in today’s world must first be Sacramental and Liturgical, a salvific way of life that is found only in the Orthodox Church, the only vessel that can carry us safely through every storm. It is only within this Church that one finds the greatest treasure – the experience of Divine Liturgy and all its worship. This infinite treasure encompasses and preserves the fulness of the Christian Faith, the Mind of God and His Laws as expressed by the Apostles and Holy Fathers, the lives of the Saints, and the meaning of our very existence. If there is anything of unlimited value in this world that is worthy of every sacrifice, even our very lives, it is the Orthodox Faith, which was given to us by Christ, fought for, preserved, and passed down to us by His Holy Apostles, Holy Fathers, Martyrs, Saints and every righteous man or woman of our Holy Orthodox Church.

Therefore, follow in their footsteps and stop scandalizing the Faithful by leading us towards disobedience, heresy, and spiritual failure.  We can no longer bear to watch the degradation and humiliation of Orthodoxy. We can no longer bear the belittling of Christ, the only true God, Whom you lower to the level of other false deities. Nor can we bear to see you consorting with the powers of this world, because you “love the praise of men more than the praise of God” (John 12:43).

What a great fall for you! In which god do you “shepherds” believe then? Your works show that you believe in the god of Ecumenism, who is none other than the enemy of Christ, the Antichrist, the god of the New Age. Do you not realize that Ecumenism is a pan-heresy that incorporates all other past and current heresies? How, therefore, can you expect obedience from your flock, when you are leading us to the “jaws of the wolf”? The Holy Gospel warns us to stay far away far from bad shepherds, for they are “ravenous wolves” (Matthew 7:15) The faithful members of the Orthodox Church of Christ, will never submit to the unworthy shepherds of Ecumenism. They will remain steadfast to the True Faith and will fight vigorously against the traitors of Orthodoxy and her Holy Traditions.

Repent, therefore! Don’t be obstinate in your denial of the phronema and mindset of the Holy Fathers, who never compromised the Faith with heretics and the rulers of this world. Instead, they preferred to endure torture and even death, to uphold The Truth. The Lord, Himself, gave us our Orthodox Church, which we confess in the Creed; and it is only this Church of Christ that has the Grace to lead us to salvation. No other religion or Christian denomination can do this because only Orthodoxy rightly teaches the Gospel of Christ, which you, Ecumenists, distort and undermine. Please stop deceiving the flock of Christ! Stop scandalizing the faithful! Our cup of patience has overflowed. Fear God, Who was also crucified for your salvation. Repent! … before it is too late.

Pope Francis and Patriarch Bartholomew

Archbishop Elpidophoros, Ecumenism, and Orthodox Jurisdictional Unity

Archbishop Elpidophoros of the Greek Archdiocese of America has been, to put it mildly, controversial since his enthronement. Marching with BLM, advocating multiple spoons at communion, seeming to endorse Joe Biden during a prayer at the DNC, and now his speech on The Future of Orthodox-Catholic Relations in the U.S.A. There has been a lot of reaction to the speech. You can read it and/or watch the speech here. The speech has gotten both positive and negative reviews. Some of those defending the speech said that while many barriers to union exist, it is good for us to at least be on a journey together with the Roman Church. Those questioning the speech are often concerned that the Ecumenical Patriarchate is trying to push through a union with Rome that will compromise the Orthodox Faith.

We will leave the discussion on the wisdom of ecumenical dialogue with Rome for another day, as concern over it was not really our first reaction to this speech. Our first reaction was sheer confusion. How can the Greek Archbishop hope to unite with Rome, when we can’t even bring unity between multiple Orthodox jurisdictions in North America? For a century now, we have had multiple Orthodox bishops ruling over the same cities while their parishes pretend, for the most part, as if their fellow Orthodox Christians do not even exist.

Father Josiah Trenham, in an insightful video, had this to stay about our current jurisdictional nightmare:

Father Josiah TremenAs long as we continue to live in these unorthodox jurisdictions, we are trivializing ourselves in the face of the American nation and we are showing that we do not have the love that is sufficient, which is the love of Christ, for each other. We have made no progress towards Church unity. The state of the Churches today, the Orthodox Churches, in relationship to each other in America is far worse than when I converted almost 30 years ago. And it was already going down from the 70’s, which was kind of a peak. I encounter this question of our divisions with our converts constantly. Many converts are simply turned away once they find out that we are content to live apart from each other. That Orthodox believers who hold the same faith don’t actually live together, pastorally speaking, in a common diocese because there are multiple bishops in all of our cities, all of our major cities. This is a humongous false witness .It’s a witness to a faith that is not Orthodox. This is intolerable.

When a priest who has devoted his life to converting Americans to the Orthodox Church describes her situation as “intolerable,” then we all need to pay attention. But it is precisely this “intolerable” situation that no one seems to be addressing. The Greek Archbishop happily spends an hour talking about the need to unite two religious bodies at odds for a millennium over a host of Theological and dogmatic issues. But His Eminence never seems to find the time to discuss uniting disparate jurisdictions who actually all share the same Orthodox Faith. 

Whether ecumenical dialogue with Rome is a good idea, a bad idea, or just an idea, our separation from Rome is not “trivializing ourselves in the face of the American nation.” Dividing Orthodoxy into multiple, competing jurisdictions is. The divisions harm evangelism, retard the development of viable local communities, make Orthodoxy appear “foreign,” keep our Church in America focused on foreign events, tie up financial resources through duplication of efforts, and ironically, harm Roman Catholics. The ongoing collapse of the Roman Catholic Church in the United States has encouraged many traditionalist Catholics to consider converting to Holy Orthodoxy. As soon as they make that interest known, they are frequently challenged by other Catholics with the question, “Which Orthodox Church are you going to join?” Whether we are united in one Faith or not, our differences are turning away hurting, lost people who desperately need the Orthodox Church.

And we apparently are just fine with this situation, even though we shouldn’t be. As Father Josiah made clear, our current situation is unorthodox and it is intolerable. As the Orthodox Faithful, we have to stop accepting an intolerable state of affairs and pretending it is just normal. We all know it isn’t.

American flag burningIn the United States, we are facing daily riots. We are facing church restrictions or closings in many states, even as other states open up fully. The coming election promises to bring more violence and confrontation. Mainstream political operators and commentators are actively talking about potential civil war or an attempted “color revolution” resulting from an indecisive, contested election. Millions are out-of-work, the economy is struggling, and social pathologies from addiction to suicide ideation to child abuse are exploding.

But did you know that none of what is happening in America is addressed on the Assembly of Canonical Orthodox Bishops Website?

assembly orthodox bishops

If you look at the Assembly website (pictured above), you will see that the Successors to the Apostles don’t have much to say about what is happening in America. Police Officers are being shot while cities burn, but no one in a Mitre seems willing to comment. But fortunately, the bishops did take notice of an explosion in Beirut and the conversion into a mosque in Istanbul of a former church building that was lost in 1453 A.D.

The need for reunion with Rome is not nearly as serious a problem as the fact that our bishops appear to have no connection to each other or to the nation in which they find themselves serving the Risen Christ. “Out-of-touch” does not begin to describe this situation. We, the Faithful, just shrug our shoulders and carry on.  We even make excuses for the situation, so desperate are we to just live the Faith in our parishes.

Rainbow MassMaybe Archbishop Elpidophoros doesn’t understand this, but we don’t live in a remote, mountain village somewhere in an Orthodox country. In the United States and Canada, becoming Catholic is 100 times easier than becoming Orthodox. We all drive past local Catholic parishes on our often torturous commutes to find canonical Orthodox ones. Many of us either were Roman Catholic, or at least considered converting to Roman Catholicism before choosing the much, much harder route of joining the Orthodox Church. We aren’t ignorant of the Roman Catholic Church. We know it, and we have consciously chosen to not be a part of it. We don’t want to attend Roman Catholic liturgies with folk music. We don’t want to partake in Roman Catholic sacraments. We don’t want to expose our children to modern religious “art.” The Orthodox Church is not the same as the Roman Catholic Church, and we know that firsthand.

We have chosen to be Orthodox Christians, and we want our bishops to focus on building our Church in this nation, our homeland, for the Glory of Christ’s Kingdom. We are here. What happens here matters to us, and to our children, whom we are sincerely trying to rear as believing, practicing Orthodox Christians.

Archbishop Elpidophoros called out the issue of mixed-marriages in his speech:

Finally, allow me to speak of a more difficult and painful situation in the life of many of our faithful: the question of mixed or inter-Christian marriages. Allow me to clarify my views on this question, as I remember that my statement back in February of this year at the Leadership 100 Conference generated much controversy. Today, the 63% of marriages that take place in the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese are marriages between an Orthodox and a non-Orthodox Christian. These numbers may even be higher because our data does not take into account Greek Orthodox Christians who marry outside of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese.

Multiple contributors to this blog had spouses convert to Orthodoxy prior to marriage. One of us has a son whose fiancée is a catechumen. She will enter the Church prior to the wedding. We always thought this was how it should be. The Orthodox Church is the foundation of Western Civilization. It is the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. That is how we presented the Faith to our future spouses. Why would you not want to be a member of the one, true Church founded by Jesus Christ?

But Archbishop Elpidophoros just assumes that Orthodoxy is something you are born with like your hair and skin color. Instead of worrying about how to handle mixed marriages pastorally, why are we not concerning ourselves with how to evangelize non-Orthodox spouses so as to convert them? Sure, in the “old country” converting to Orthodoxy could carry heavy consequences. But we aren’t in the old country, are we? While you may not be able to convert to being “Greek,” you can certainly convert to Orthodoxy. The emphasis should be on how to grow the Church, not on how to solve “mixed marriages” that ideally should not even exist.

Our current jurisdictional horror show is not solely the fault of the immigrant communities. It is not solely the fault of the bishops, many of them foreign-born. It is not solely the fault of the ethnic cradle Orthodox who still think of their parishes as cultural centers, rather than as living Christian communities. It is not solely the fault of rich donors or politicians. Nor is it solely the fault of foreign hierarchs who use their American communities too often as piggybanks and, in some cases, as means to gain influence with powerful political and business interests.

No, there is plenty of blame to go around. Those who collaborated on this article are adult converts to the Faith who are raising, or have raised, cradle Orthodox children. We have contributed to this problem as much as anyone else. Every single one of us is guilty before God. We have all failed Him.

Each and every single one of us. It is time we stopped. If we can’t have enough love in Christ to unite with our own Orthodox Brethren, then talking to anyone else is simply a waste of time that leads to even more bitter divisions. It is time that the Orthodox in this country put our own house in order.

Orthodox Reflections Contributors from Greek Archdiocese of America, Orthodox Church in America, and Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America

Temptation of Christ

Freemasonry and the Rise of Ecumenism in the Orthodox Church

The Greek Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church have many, many longstanding disagreements. As a catechumen, many of us learned whole lists of Roman Catholic practices and teachings that we Orthodox find unacceptable. But despite almost 1,000 years of constant disagreement on everything from the Eucharist to Ecclesiology, the Greek Orthodox and Roman Catholics emphatically agree that Freemasonry is a dangerous religious cult.

The Greek Orthodox Church (in Greece, not Constantinople as we shall see) officially condemned Freemasonry first in 1933, and then repeated that condemnation in 2014. The Roman Pope Clement XII first forbade Roman Catholics from membership in the Masons in 1738. Since then, the Roman Catholic Church has condemned Freemasonry 21 times by name. ROCOR also condemned Freemasonry in 1932.

As Americans and Canadians, this can be hard to fathom. We are used to thinking of Freemasons, if we think of them at all, as a men’s social club that does charitable work around the community. We see “conspiracy theory” documentaries about them from time-to-time pop up on TV, of course, but hardly anyone seems to take them seriously. Regardless of our mental image of Shriners in small cars and funny hats helping needy kids, very sober-minded and holy men (on the Orthodox side anyway) consider Freemasonry a serious problem.

Why? Several very important reasons.

First and foremost, Freemasonry is an occult religion hiding in plain sight. For a concise description of this, we can borrow from a Roman Catholic source (Please note: Some Roman Catholic sources are used in this article because, despite their many other errors, Catholic writers are very knowledgeable when writing about Freemasonry):

Freemasonry displays all the elements of religion, and as such it becomes a rival to the religion of the Gospel. It includes temples and altars, prayers, a moral code, worship, vestments, feast days, the promise of reward or punishment in the afterlife, a hierarchy, and initiation and burial rites.

The Greek Church’s condemnation of Freemasonry included the following conclusions:

Freemasonry is not simply a philanthropic union or a philosophical school but constitutes a mystagogical system which reminds us of the ancient heathen mystery-religions and cults—from which it descends and is their continuation and regeneration.

Such a link between Freemasonry and the ancient idolatrous mysteries is also manifested by all that is enacted and performed at the initiations.

Thus Freemasonry is, as granted, a mystery-religion, quite different, separate, and alien to the Christian faith.

Freemasonry rejects Orthodox creeds and dogma, and in place offers a competing neo-gnostic, mystery cult which Kanye West occultcomes complete with its own Theology, rituals and symbols (icons). Much of this occult symbolism and Theology has “crossed over” into other movements and into popular culture, giving the Masonic religion a much wider influence than mere numbers of Freemasons would indicate possible.

Second, Freemasonry tends to attract some of the most intelligent and successful members of any society. In his book The Greek Police Problem (1970), Brigadier Drempelas described how embedded Freemasons were at the top-levels of Greek Society:

To Masonry belong very many intellectuals, politicians, judges, high-ranking state officials, army officers, moneymen, all wealthy Greek Americans and Hierarchs or theologians. The Lodge of Athens up to the year 1963 had as its Grand Master the University Rector, who was also professor at a Theological Faculty…

The situation has been much the same elsewhere in the world. Studies of Freemasons in the United States have found, overall, that they are disproportionately drawn from the upper social-economic classes. Fourteen Presidents of the United States have been Freemasons, including George Washington. If you peruse the list of notable Freemasons on Wikipedia, you will note billionaires, artists, politicians, doctors, scientists, judges, U.S. Supreme Court justices, writers – really men from all over the globe and from almost every conceivable field of human activity.

Putting aside “conspiracy theories” or the like, it is shocking and troubling that so many powerful men, past and present, have been influenced by a religion that our Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church officially declares is “quite different, separate, and alien to the Christian faith.”

Third, these powerful men have not been content to sit around their lodges and discuss the role of Lucifer, the light bearer, in human social evolution. Freemasonry has a strong inclination towards changing the world, and existing governments (particularly monarchs) tend to get in the way.  The role of political Freemasonry in carrying out the February 1917 Revolution in Russia is well-researched. Interestingly, the Communists banned Freemasonry as an unacceptable rival to power after taking control of the country later that year. Freemasonry also played a significant role in other conflicts such as the Greek War of Independence, the French Revolution, and the American Revolution.

Freemasonry is always subversive to the existing religious and social order, which is why it provided many of the political and military leaders of the American Revolution. The Masonic religion, in fact, was essential in preparing the societal groundwork for rebellion long before 1776:George Washington Masonic Regalia

The role of Freemasonry and individual Masons prior to and through the American Revolution was that of the destruction of the traditional social and political order based on an authoritarian philosophy and characterized by inequality and privilege. Speaking generally, in the ancient regime the church and state mutually supported each other in maintaining their respective places of predominance and privilege. Liberalism and liberals, which included Freemasonry and Masons, were declared to be traitorous by the state, and heretical and atheistic by the Church…

… probably no other institution was so widely distributed in the colonies as Freemasonry. Differences in religion, government, and economy, difficulties in transportation and communication, and a spirit of localism and individualism existed from north to south from east to west in varying degrees, but the basic principles of Freemasonry were identical in the approximately one hundred colonial lodges established by 1775, not excepting the colonial governments, had so many leaders of the people in thought or in action from the local community level, as were contained in the ranks of Masonry.

The religion of Freemasonry, and its ideal of brotherhood, helped both motivate and unify the many individual Masons such as George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Patrick Henry, and Paul Revere who were at the center of the American Revolution. After the Revolution, Freemasonry played a very public and prominent role in shaping the ideas and the symbolism of the new nation:

On September 18, 1793, President George Washington, dressed in his Masonic apron, leveled the cornerstone of the United States Capitol with the traditional Masonic ceremony. Historian Stephen Bullock in his book Revolutionary Brotherhood carefully notes the historic and symbolic significance of that ceremony. The Masonic brethren, dressed in their fraternal regalia, had assembled in grand procession, and were formed for that occasion as representative of Freemasonry’s new-found place of honor in an independent American society. At that moment, the occasion of the laying of the new Republic’s foundations, Freemasons assumed the mantles “high priests” of that “first temple dedicated to the sovereignty of the people,” and they “helped form the symbolic foundations of what the Great Seal called ‘the new order for the ages’.”

One might wonder, then, if the anti-Christian influence of Freemasonry accounts for some of our stranger national art and architecture in the city of Washington D.C. For example, the fresco of George Washington in the U.S. Capitol building in which the first president ascends to Heaven the way we Orthodox depict Jesus doing:

Apotheosis George Washington

The Apotheosis of Washington depicts George Washington sitting amongst the heavens in an exalted manner, or in literal terms, ascending and becoming a god (apotheosis). Washington, the first U.S. president and commander-in-chief of the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War, is allegorically represented, surrounded by figures from classical mythology. Washington is draped in purple, a royal color, with a rainbow arch at his feet, flanked by the goddess Victoria (draped in green, using a horn) to his left and the Goddess of Liberty to his right.

It is somewhat bizarre for a “Christian” nation to consecrate and decorate its public buildings in such a fashion. One must wonder at the long-term effect of the Masonic religion on the United States, given its influence on so many men of prominence and on so many public spaces. Could the current cultural and social decline America is experiencing be related to that influence?

Joachim IIIFourth, and perhaps most importantly, Freemasonry created the ecumenical movement that threatens our own Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. For the Greek Church, participation in the ecumenical movement began with Freemasons infiltrating the Church during the end of the 19th Century. In his article, Some preliminary notes on the influence of Freemasonry on early Greek Ecumenism, Scholar and Monk Seraphim (Zissis) details how multiple Greek Patriarchs of Constantinople, Greek bishops, and Greek Theologians were secret Freemasons who promoted the early ecumenical movement. These included Patriarch Joachim III, who first named the Roman Catholics and Protestants “churches” from an Orthodox point of view, and Patriarch Meletios IV (Metaxakis), whose innovations included adopting the new calendar to align with the other “churches” and a keen interest in the Anglican “Church” at a time when sources indicate as many as ¾’s of Anglican clergy were with the Masons.

Freemasons treat unifying the various “Churches” as an essential project, and to that end, dogma that separates one body from another must be eliminated at best or at least downplayed as “optional.” Manley Palmer Hall (1901-1990), magician, Luciferian, and Freemason wrote:

The true Mason is not creed-bound. He realizes with the divine illumination of his lodge that as a Mason his religion must be universal: Christ, Buddha, or Mohammed, the name means little, for he recognizes only the light and not the bearer. He worships at every shrine, bows before every altar, whether in temple, mosque, or cathedral, realizing with his truer understanding the oneness of all Spiritual Truth. All true Masons know that the only heathen are those who, having great ideals, do not live up to them. They know that all religions are one story told in many ways for peoples whose ideals differ but whose great purpose is in harmony with Masonic ideals

The reader will probably recognize in those ideas the kind of “universalist” notions espoused by many ecumenical thinkers of today (“Many paths to God,” “God wills diversity of religion,” “All Churches are essentially the same,” “God will save everyone”). The severe danger of this blasphemous thinking was articulated by Saint Nikolaj Velimirovic in 1930:

The Great Church of Constantinople noted in its own List some heresies by their name, like Uniatism, Chiliasm etc., but the Masonic danger outmatches all other dangers and, unfortunately, numerous intellectuals are affiliated with it. This is the new Arianism; and before us stands a great struggle, which we have to undertake fearlessly in the name of God. The greatest threat to Christianity in the world is not Bolshevism or something else, but Masonry, because it is an enemy [both] external and internal. We say that the Christian religion is the Religion, the sole religion, and that Orthodoxy the only true one; but they [Freemasons] renounce the Gospel and Christ, putting Him on a level with Moses, Buddha, Mohammed

If everything in all religions is true, then nothing is. If all religions can be made one, then so can all governments and all societies.

Besides infiltrating the Holy Orthodox Church, the adherents of the Masonic religion in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, mostly under the guise of fostering Christian cooperation for worthy charitable purposes, was busy laying the ground work for the modern ecumenical movement by organizing meetings and organizations such as the Y.M.C.A., the Parliament of Religions, the World Council of Churches, and more. Masons said all the right things and seemed to be at the forefront of “humanitarianism” as they infiltrated throughout religious and civic organizations.

As one Catholic writer described it:

This “religion” is only apparently tolerant. In fact, it is [an] utmost demanding and intolerant [religion]. The Freemasons say about themselves that they would be the “initiated,” the “perfect” and the “illuminated” people. And the remaining humanity is for them profane, imperfect, and darkened. Historians recognized in Freemasonry the seed of political totalitarianism (e.g. A. Cobban, Historia de las Civilizaciones, quoteted in: A. Bárcena, Iglesia y Masonería, Madrid 2016, 71). The confusion and the deceit of it consists in the fact that Freemasonry praises itself with attractive names and definitions, like “philanthropy,” “humanism,” “intellectuality,” “tolerance,” and at the same time, Freemasonry masks itself with these names.

Work ReligionOne of our biggest problems, as Orthodox Christians, is that we believe our cultural enemies are “secular” or “atheists.” Nothing could be further from the truth. Whether they recognize it or not, the enemies of the One True God are profoundly religious. Whether called “Freemasonry” or “Scientism” or “Antiracism” or “Wicca” or “Antifascism” or “Progressivism” or by any other name, their faith is deep and their god is both demanding of sacrifice and profoundly intolerant. The way for these new faiths was paved through Freemasonry rejecting supernatural Divine Revelation, without which man lies naked before raw power. The Freemason Jean-Jacques Rousseau wrote: “The life of a human being is not only a gift of nature, but a conditioned gift by the state” (The Social Contract II, 5).

The truth is, that like the Masonic religion that prepared the way, the god of all those religious fanatics, whether they recognize it or not, is Satan.

As one Catholic writer explained:

In the first grades of Freemasonry, there is venerated an uncertain and nebulous divinity as the “Great Architect of the Universe,” who in the higher and then in the highest grades becomes more and more concrete; in the higher grades this uncertain divinity is identified as the Lucifer, as Satan, as the good god, the adversary of God; and the true God is here the “bad God.”

Utopia Satan, of course, is the original conspirator against God. He has never ceased his activity. He has never given up. His disciples follow him in wishing to transform this world into their vision of a utopia. Far from trying to create Hell, they are trying to create a Heaven right here on Earth in the form of a new order they control. They believe they are the heroes of this story, and those of us clinging to destructive fables such as Orthodoxy are the villains. Their “god” represents progress, while ours represents the Dark Ages. Key to creating this new order is first and foremost, destroying the old:

Political and social anarchism is a phenomenon which mostly embodies the spirit of Freemasonry, since one of their key principles is “ordo ab chao” [“order out of chaos”]. This means that one must first create a chaos and then build a new, other order, an order created by men.

One could add to that “create religious anarchism” as fostered by the ecumenical movement. Those who support ecumenical dialogue and organizations say that participation is good for the Orthodox Church. It provides a way for us to witness to the world. But aside from its suspicious beginning in the Greek Church under Masonic influence, the ecumenical movement seems less about witnessing to the Truth of the Orthodox Church and more about making her conform to the world and to other faiths. Academics and hierarchs with ecumenical ties are calling for and even implementing innovations that betray and weaken the Orthodox Faith. Innovations frequently cause Faithful to fall away, often lead to schisms, and always weaken the witness of the Faith. Instead of resisting Satan and his plans for this world, a weakened and disunited Church either retreats or, even worse, actively cooperates in her own enslavement by promoting the Satanic Order under various, seemingly innocent guises such as “charity,” “public health,” “science,” “fighting poverty,” “antiracism,” etc.

The ecumenical movement is Satan’s effort to destroy the Church from within. Rather than being the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, the ecumenical movement makes her simply one among many religious bodies dedicated to Jesus Christ. Freemasonry and similar movements have been tools used by Satan to accomplish her reduction in status. Without the preservation of God’s full self-revelation through her holy dogma, the Church is powerless against the world. There is a reason why the Church Fathers fought so vigorously to defend the Orthodox teachings of the Church. If who Christ is does not matter, then how can Christ himself matter? How can the Church stand for truth if she no longer even knows what the truth is?

We can’t really say how, in today’s world, the activities of Freemasonry overlap with other forces such as political movements (Marxism, BLM, antifa, Chinese Communist Party, radical environmentalism), secret societies (Bohemian Grove, Bilderbergers), foundations / think tanks (Rockefeller, Ford, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission), global organizations (UN, EU, IMF, WHO), occult religions (New Age, Wicca, Satanism, Neo Paganism) and activist billionaires (Soros, Gates, Koch, Buffet). What we can say is that Freemasonry was the “grand daddy” of all this, and many of its occult ideas have been “mainstreamed,” even within some quarters of the Orthodox Church. As churches are closed by governments to combat a relatively mild virus, our societies are descending into chaos, authoritarianism, and satanism. All around us are images of the demonic, particularly featuring sexualized children. What would once have been considered an affront to all decency, now masquerades as mere entertainment as we meekly go about our business of trying to survive a government-induced economic catastrophe. All the while, we hear that the “new normal” will allow us to “build back better.”

Meanwhile, many “Orthodox” Theologians collaborate with the Heterodox extolling confusion and immorality.

Abbot Tryphon, one priest who is standing for truth at this difficult hour, has made clear:

Is this not a moment in the history of the Church that demands her priests and bishops stand firmly in the face of the demonic powers that would enslave us all with a secular-marxist future devoid of God?

Not since the earliest days of Christianity have we seen a period where the need for spiritual leadership willing to face martyrdom rather than succumb to the evil powers that would take us all down into the pit of darkness, as we are seeing now.

As Faithful Orthodox Christians, we may not be able to do much about many of the problems in this world. But one thing we can do is refuse to support any ecumenical movements within Orthodoxy. Do not attend the conferences, donate to the organizations, or buy the books. We can refuse to participate in the errors of hierarchs, theologians, and academics who are harming the faith through participation in ecumenism. And we can pray earnestly and fervently for our Church in these troubled times.

Orthodox Reflections Editorial Collaboration – Writers adding to this article are from multiple countries and local Orthodox Churches

Sunday Orthodoxy

Orthodox Reflections and Ecumenism

Sunday OrthodoxyIt has come to our attention that the post Christianity is Dangerous has been interpreted as “ecumenist.” In the post, the example of the 21 Coptic Christians was used to highlight how dangerous it is to profess the name of Christ in the world. In fact, that has been a dangerous thing to do since 33 A.D. Please note the following things:

      • The example of the Coptic Christians beheaded by ISIS was used because it is current, it was recorded on video and widely watched, and it was a massacre of a large number of people. It was chosen an an example because it dramatically illustrates the point of the article. The Coptic Church is non-canonical. The 21 men are recognized as martyrs by the Coptic Church, but not by the canonical Orthodox Church. That was not meant to be implied. A revision to the article has been published that makes this very clear. As the Coptic Church is not canonical, her recognition of these men as martyrs does not make them martyrs of the canonical Orthodox Church.
      • These men died for Christ. Regardless of their status as schismatics, that fact is undeniable. So, again, their example was put forward because it was recent (to illustrate the ongoing danger in professing Christ), it was familiar to everyone (most people don’t die for Christ on video and get worldwide coverage), and it was gruesome. The preceding paragraph in the article had mentioned some of the horrific ways in which canonical martyrs have died.

        The walls of our Orthodox Churches are covered in the icons of martyrs whose sacrifices we hold up as examples to all generations. Their stories are told in hymns and recited by priests as part of homilies. Their deaths were often gruesome. Frequently we find ourselves, with our children by our sides, listening to how martyrs were skinned alive, cooked to death on hot grates, crucified, beheaded, boiled in oil, frozen to death in a lake, burned alive, and even worse. Most of the time, the torture accompanying death was intended to force the martyrs to renounce Christ. They didn’t, obviously, which is why they are remembered by the Church.

        Gruesome deaths and oppression still occur, and many canonical Orthodox suffer shocking and horrible torture and death for the name of Christ. As noted in the article, most martyrdom occurs in small numbers and obscurely, away from the spotlight. This was an example that actually received worldwide attention. At no point did the author or any other author on this site espouse any kind of ecumenical heresy.

    • A Coptic icon was originally used to promote the article. It was selected by editorial staff for illustrative purposes, again, because the 21 died so recently. We frequently encounter Orthodox Christians who somehow believe that dying or suffering for Christ was something that occurred “in the past” but is no longer happening.  These men were a dramatic and recent example that this is not the case. There was no intention of promoting the Coptic Church or union with the Coptic Church. All contributors to this site are canonical Orthodox. We do not promote or endorse ecumenism in any form. Any and all Coptic Christians are free to convert to the Orthodox Church and become members of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. That is the same offer to all those who are not already Orthodox. That icon is no longer being used.
    • This entire incident also illustrates the tendency of “online Orthodoxy” to devolve into heresy hunting. A reader of the Orthodox Reflections site reached out to us in a personal email, and expressed some concerns over the use of the 21 Coptic Christians as an example. We immediately took his thoughts into consideration, and added this footnote to the article, “*Please note that the Coptic Church is not canonically Orthodox. This horrifying incident is included as a dramatic example of Christian persecution. Due to the ongoing schism, the canonical Orthodox Church does not recognize these men as martyrs.” When we were made aware that some groups online were criticizing the use of a Coptic Icon, we also swapped that our for an icon of the 10 Martyrs of Crete. We are not interested in promoting the heresy of ecumenism. If the examples used in the article are distracting from the primary point of the article, then we have no problem explaining and/or swapping them out. The purpose of the article was not to promote ecumenism, which is a heresy, but to make it clear that we, the Orthodox Faithful, are willing to put risk into the context of the history of the Faith. Whatever distracts from that point is unnecessary.  We answer 100% of all emails and read all comments. If you want to get back to us, we are always listening.

    In Christ,

  • Editorial Staff of Orthodox Reflections

Archbishop Sotirios of Canada and The Order of The Phoenix: A Few Simple But Important Questions for His Eminence

If the title of this article caught your eye and you’re thinking … Hmmm, why does this title seem familiar … it may be because part of it is identical to the title of the 2007 occult fantasy film (targeted at children) Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix.[i]  And for some of you, that should get your Orthodox Christian spidey senses tingling.

The following – which is the very last line of Archbishop Sotirios’ (“AB Sot”) online BIO (with my underlining added) – certainly got my senses prickling:

“His Eminence has also been named Grand Commander of the Order of Phoenix of Greece.”

As unbelievable as this may sound, I didn’t just make it up.  It’s a real thing and its unacceptable, in my view, that this high-ranking Orthodox Christian hierarch holds this title, proudly, so it seems.  But, don’t take my word about this; instead, verify this for yourself here: https://goarchdiocese.ca/archbishop-biography/.  (In fact, remember the following rule as you delve deeper into our faith, regardless of what or who your source is: trust but verify and do not just repeat rumors or sayings from others.)

Before you read further (if you choose to do so), I would like you to know that my goal in writing this expose is not to disparage “his eminence” but rather, to give him the opportunity to address three simple questions:

Q1: Were you aware that the Order of Phoenix of Greece is connected to Freemasonry?

Q2: If “No” to Q1 (and you confirm the connection), will you publicly renounce your Grand Commander title?

Q3: Will you issue an official statement declaring, as Archbishop of the Archdiocese of Canada, that the religion of Freemasonry is not compatible with Christianity and unequivocally renounce it?

If AB Sot decides that he is above having to address these questions – which I believe he should address as the leader of the Greek Orthodox Church in Canada – then, his silence will raise the following question: Why would he remain silent when he could easily quash all doubt about being a Freemason by humbling himself to his parishioners in Canada and answering these question directly, unambiguously and unequivocally.[ii]

In short, if AB Sot “pleads the fifth”[iii] on these questions, then how do we – Greek Orthodox Christians in Canada – remain obedient to him in terms of funding him through our Churches’ membership dues and, more importantly, taking spiritual guidance from him.  On my part, let me more blunt about how I will feel about him if he continues to dodge these questions: I will give him the same respect that I give to the prosperity tele-evangelists of our time.

Who is Archbishop Sotirios?

For non-Canadian readers who may not be familiar with AB Sot, he is the top dog of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of Canada since 2019.  Before then, he was Metropolitan Sotirios … since 1996 … and before then, he was Bishop Sotirios of Toronto beginning in 1979.  Yes, AB Sot has been around a long time and has had a steady (and some might say ruthless) climb to the top.

My first memories of him go back to the late 1990s when I saw him in full regalia in various churches in my hometown.  And, as a fun fact in the six degrees of separation department, AB Sot co-signed my birth and baptismal certificate as the junior priest to the senior one (name purposely withheld) who baptized me.  However, AB Sot really caught my attention during the COVID-19 experiment when he was content to go along to get along instead of being our most senior – Orthodox Christian – voice of protest in Canada.

If AB Sot remains silent in the face of the questions I have posed, then, I would urge caution to my fellow Greek Orthodox Christians in Canada in the event that this hierarch asks you to go along to get along (again) with respect to future governmental action that limits, restricts or denies your right to practice our faith and worship the Lord, Jesus Christ, in the same way that we have done for the last 2000 years or so.  For example, if new laws prohibit the proclamation or discussion of certain parts of the Gospels and Epistles about the passion of the Lord – during the Divine Liturgy in Church and in Bible Study – because they are characterized as “antisemitic”, and AB Sot remains silent to the Government, but asks us to go along with this, will you obey his directive?

Sidebar on Signs of the Times: If your reaction to the above is “this writer is being an alarmist…” or “this is never gonna happen in my lifetime …”, I offer three retorts below in the forms of a rhetorical question, a reference to two literary sources that are modern-day Cassandra-calls about governmental surveillance and “soft-totalitarianism” and an actual and imminent legislative threat in Canada.

First, let me take you back about 10 years ago.  What would you say to someone who told you that a time is coming that there will be more than two gender choices on a Canadian Passport Application?

Second, I urge you to read Rod Dreher’s book Live Not by Lies to understand what soft totalitarianism means and The Age of Surveillance Capitalism (courtesy of Shoshana Zuboff) to understand how extensively governments monitor our movements, our purchases and generally, our behaviours, 24/7.[iv]  And then, just think about how governments everywhere are slowly chipping away at fundamental freedoms, especially speech and religion, through tyrannical laws promoted and passed by secular leaders, who are boldly and openly hostile to Christianity, using technologies that have never before existed.  (If this does not resonate with you, you are being willfully blind.)

Third, read Bill C-367, (first reading in our House of Commons completed in late November 2023; see https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bill/44-1/c-367).  (For American readers, our House of Commons is the equivalent of your House of Representatives.)  If this Bill (as it now stands) becomes law, Christian pastors (including Orthodox Priests) can (and, in my view) will be charged and convicted for proclaiming and preaching the Gospels.  And one more point on this threat: Don’t expect relief from our Supreme Court of Canada if this Bill become law and is challenged as a violation of our fundamental freedoms.  Why do I say this? Well, because of what our courts said about “public health” versus “freedom of religion” just a few years ago, in the context of a recent, worldwide experiment in human behavioural compliance.[v]

The Placement of the “Grand Commander” Reference in AB Sot’s BIO

Is anyone else wondering why the reference to AB Sot’s curious honorificGrand Commander of the Order of Phoenix of Greece – is buried at the end of his BIO?

I don’t think it’s a coincidence.

Doesn’t this last line seem to be hiding in plain sight?[vi]

In my view, his Grand Commander title is exactly where it is – buried in the last line – for a reason: to demonstrate, outwardly and boldly, his allegiance to a certain fraternal organization without attracting any attention from the casual onlooker or admirer, the occasional church-goers who see AB Sot at their church every once in awhile or even the groupies that follow him from church to church, across Canada.

In other words, AB Sot seems to be hiding this title in plain sight.

Think about it: after 45 years of AB Sot’s bishopric in Canada (see above), I am betting that 99% of the Canadian-Greek Orthodox Christians don’t even know about his Order of the Phoenix title.

And perhaps I would have never noticed it either if I did not become curious about the lacuna in his leadership that was revealed during the worldwide governmental experiment of COVID-19.

When Trudeau and provincial premieres (which means state governors, for my American friends) mandated the closure of churches – for the greater good of public health – while keeping “essential services” like liquor and big box stores open, I waited and waited for a statement by AB Sot condemning these closures and for him to fight against these closures but he didn’t do either – and that’s when I became suspicious of his ethos.[vii]

As I watched Orthodox Christian Priests and commentators (and even Roman Catholics and Protestants) speak out against these mandated closures and defy them, at great risk to their priesthoods (i.e. their livelihoods) and, in some cases, their freedom, all I could hear from AB Sot’s HQ in Toronto was crickets and, even worse, bromides and platitudes.

I know that AB Sot was approached by Canadian-Greek Orthodox lawyers to challenge the law, on a pro bono basis – not for immediate relief because litigation (especially constitutional litigation) takes time to make its way to the Supreme Court of Canada – but, rather, to establish a few key precedents as possible “shields” against future governmental action that would seek to deny the free exercise of religion (which is a so-called fundamental freedom in Canada).[viii]

See PDF here for evidence of offer of pro bono legal assistance in protecting religious freedom in Canada.

There was Protestant opposition to church closings in Canada, but where was Archbishop Sotirios in the fight? 

And what did AB Sot do with this offer from the Greek Orthodox legal bar in Canada?

Nothing.  Nada.  He remained silent about it from his papal-like “See” in Toronto.

He ignored it because it would violate his apparent ethos of – we need to go along to get along – a phrase which sickened me in the context of the state’s suppression of our right to worship God in the way that His Son, the Lord Jesus Christ, showed His Apostles and, in turn, they have showed us, by their successors – our Bishops – in an unbroken succession since Pentecost.  In my view, AB abdicated his responsibility during COVID-19 as a Bishop to his Greek-Orthodox constituencies across Canada by not being a loud voice of protest against the Trudeau and provincial governments.

Circling back to the last line of AB Sot’s BIO, to me, it is saying the following:

“I am telling you who I am and what I believe in and yet, I have attained the highest level of ecclesiastical authority in Canada over you … and there’s not a damn thing you can do about it”.

I hope I am totally wrong about what this Grand Commander title means about AB Sot … and I suppose time will tell … if we come to the point, in his lifetime, where the state puts Christians to the ultimate choice: deny Christ or I will put you to death, directly, or indirectly, by making you a criminal and then depriving you of your ability to buy and sell.[ix]

Unfortunately, what I have observed and experienced personally in AB Sot and heard, from first-person testimony, from those who have sat with him, while he conducted the “business” of running Greek Orthodox churches in Canada, have confirmed certain things about him that I did not want to believe.

Now, for anyone that may use this revelation about AB Sot as an excuse to abandon your membership in the body of Christ (i.e. the Church) or become cynical about Greek Orthodox Christianity in Canada, there is a lesson about this in the Gospel of John 11:49-52, which the Orthodox Study Bible (the “OSB”) explains as follows:

“The failings and even wickedness of the officeholder do not diminish the grace of the office itself.” 

Well said, OSB commentators.

However, what that Gospel does not say is to defer to our hierarchs no matter what they say or omit to say.  That would not be in line with the Orthodox Christian ethos that our Saints showed us.  Before they were Saints, these beautiful and bold souls were the elect, the laity – like we – Greek-Canadian Orthodox Christians – are.  And, as the latter, we are full members of the Church and one of the four orders of the Church (with the other three being Bishops, Priests and Deacons) who have the right – and I would say duty – to question, respectfully, the bona fides of an officeholder (even the highest hierarch) and ask him, respectfully, to answer basic questions or explain himself about his actions (or inactions) or titles if they appear to be contrary to the tenets of our faith.[x]

Scroll Down to Continue

Who Am I to Question this Grand Commander?

Let me be clear: I am a struggling sinner but, that doesn’t mean that you should use this an excuse to disregard my message in this article.  As I stated at the outset, verify the things you read for yourself and draw your own conclusions.  It took me years to decide to write this article and submit it for publication.  If you have any concerns or questions about AB Sot – that have arisen over the years because of his actions or omissions – then you may wish to keep reading.

For most of my life, I was an Orthodox Christian in name only and a fair-weather one (literally) at best.  However, for the last several years, I have re-discovered the beauty and richness of our faith and I wanted to know why I should stick with it as opposed to resolving myself to statements, such as this one:

“… all religions are myriads of paths leading to one God.”

This is a very dangerous statement designed to plant a seed of doubt about our Orthodox Christian faith from another top Greek Orthodox hierarch in North America.[xi]

Why do I say dangerous?

Because it is one of those statements that seems innocuous and admirable (to the casual Christian) and consensus-building (to the liberal in all of us) until you read it carefully and try to reconcile it with one of the clearest pronouncements about the Christian faith, directly from Christ Himself in John 14:6 (OSB):

“Jesus said to him [i.e. to the Apostle Thomas], ‘I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.’

How then, do we, Christians, reconcile the statement above about “all religions… leading to one God” with Christ’s own words to us?

Do Buddhism, Islam, or Judaismgiven their stance on Christ – lead to the same God that Orthodox Christians seek to unite with via the process of theosis?

The answer is, unequivocally, “No.”

Furthermore, we, Orthodox Christians, do not have to try to reconcile this heretical statement by Archbishop Elpidophoros (“AB Elpi”) because we know that any religion that rejects the role of the second person of the Trinity – Jesus Christ, the God-man – as the way, the truth and the life and the path to the Kingdom of Heaven is not reconcilable with our Orthodox Christian faith.

Sidebar on Grace and Orthodoxy: I would like to be clear that Orthodox Christians do not discount the Grace of Christ, who will judge all of us (even non-Christians) when our life on earth ends.  I do not want my non-Orthodox Christian friends to think that we, Orthodox Christians, have any say in how or on whom the Lord decides to bestow His Grace, despite any individual members of our faith (including hierarchs) saying anything to the contrary.  The latter is not for us to say.  However, we, Orthodox Christians, can say – and justify beyond a reasonable doubt, (the standard which man uses to judge one another, even for death sentences) using historical evidence – that we practice Christianity in the way that Christ taught his original disciples.  Those practices were then captured in written words and in demonstrable traditions explained to us by the divinely-inspired “Fathers” of the Church and passed down to us since Pentecost.  These two elements – the Word and Holy Tradition – are what we mean by “Orthodox” and “Orthodoxy”. Our bottom line is this: Christ established one churchHis Church, the Church – which has been attacked since the day it became manifest on earth, has suffered schisms (including within the Church itself) and will continue to be attacked from the outside and from within but which can never be broken or divided.  For my protestant friends, I recommend the book Thirsting for God in a Land of Shallow Wells by Matthew Gallatin to understand the differences between the various (thousands) of Protestant denominations and Orthodoxy.  In my view, the following quote from this book captures what Orthodoxy is, succinctly and eloquently, at pages 179-180 of the softcover edition: “The misconception is this: Christianity is essentially a faith that one can individually interpret and apply as one pleases … Thus, true Christianity has no room for personal interpretations, preferences, qualifications, exemptions, or adjustments.  Anyone … who wants to enter into a real relationship with Jesus Christ must accept the fact that the Faith of the Apostles preserved in Holy Orthodoxy is an historical reality, not just a theological school”.  For my Catholic friends, I recommend that you research pre-1054 Catholicism and the slippery-slope changes that your various Popes have introduced since then – and make your way back onto an Orthodox Christian path.

For a more in-depth review of why AB Elpi’s statement is dangerous and heretical – and about some other irreconcilable words and actions spoken and done by him – you should read this article: The Lie of Ecumenism at https://orthodoxreflections.com/the-lie-of-ecumenism/.

But, I digressed slightly – but, purposely – so that you, the Orthodox Christian reader, can begin to question the words and actions of our hierarchs with the eyes and ears that God gave you after doing these things: reading the lives of Saints and various writings from the Fathers of the Church; seeking the advice of a spiritual father or father confessor about the basic tenets and “hard sayings” of Orthodoxy; and finding a good Bible Study group and listening intently and then taking the leader(s) and the presiding priest aside and asking questions – even tough ones.[xii]  Doing these things is important for your growth as an Orthodox Christian and an excellent “check and balance” when hubris gets the best of you (and it will) and you start interpreting the Gospels yourself (as Protestants do) to justify your custom practice of our faith or for the purposes of adapting it (as the RC Popes have done) to the secular world.

And – to finally get to the crux of this article – one of the warnings that I came across during my journey back to Orthodoxy was about the infiltration of Freemasons in our Orthodox Christian Churches[xiii] – especially in the “overseeing” bodies (notice I did not say “governing” bodies) – such as our Archdioceses and, most troubling, in our Patriarchate, called the Phanar, which is currently occupied by Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew (“EP Bart”).

At first, I thought, so what?  Who are Freemasons and why should I be concerned with them being members, deacons or priests or hierarchs in various levels of our Orthodox churches?

Until recently, I didn’t really know much about Freemasonry.

I knew it was some sort of organization or club with a strange symbol on its “temples” but, I never realized that it was a religion until I started reading about Freemasonry’s “god”, its rituals, and and how its members hide in plain sight.[xiv]

And make no mistake about Freemasonry: it is very much a religion that worships a “supreme being”which is not our trinitarian God – but rather, the “light bearer” (i.e. Lucifer) and celebrates and promotes teachings that are diametrically opposed to the tenets of the Church.

Albert Pike, American Civil War general, Sovereign Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite’s Southern Jurisdiction,  author of a book called Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry

To date, the best written source that I have come across about Freemasonry is Michael Witcoff’s excellent exposé: On The Masons And Their Lies: What Every Christian Needs To Know.

Witcoff is a former Freemason (now an Orthodox Christian) and his book provides objectively verifiable proof of his contentions. All Christians would do well to read it so that you understand that Freemasonry is not just an altruistic social club or network of people (mostly men) who will help you climb the corporate ladder.  It is a religion that will cost you your soul, if you do not renounce it and repent before you die.

In On The Masons, Witcoff cites two “… prominent and influential Masonic occultists” who are clear that Freemasonry is a religion.

“[Albert] Pike later asserts that Masonry is ‘the universal, eternal, immutable religion, such as God planted it in the heart of universal humanity … The ministers of this religion are all Masons who comprehend it and are devoted to it; it sacrifices to God are good works, the sacrifices of the base and disorderly passions, the offering up of self-interest on the altar of humanity, and perpetual efforts to attain to all the moral perfection of which man is capable.’”

“Manly P. Hall echoes Pike’s religious indifference, stating that ‘The true Mason is not creed-bound. He realizes with the divine illumination of his lodge that as a Mason his religion must be universal: Christ, Buddha or Mohammed, the name means little, for he recognizes only the light and not the bearer. He worships at every shrine, bows before every altar, whether in temple, mosque or cathedral, realizing with his truer understanding the oneness of all spiritual truth … No Mason can be narrow, for his Lodge is the divine expression of broadness.’”

Having just read these two quotes from these occultists, think back to AB Elpi’s statement that “… all religions are myriads of paths leading to one God…” and compare it to Pike’s view that Masonry is the “… the universal, eternal, immutable religion…” and Hall’s point that the Masonic religion is “universal.”

Is the top US Greek Orthodox Hierarch (and perhaps, his Canadian counterpart, AB Sot, and their “overseer”, EP Bart) trying to gaslight us – via his (and their) silence – that Eastern Orthodox Christianity is no different than Freemasonry?[xv]

If they are not members of the religion of Freemasonry, they should speak up now!

AB Sot’s Apparent Connection to and Silence About Freemasonry

Let’s get back to AB Sot and start with this question about his Grand Commander title: What, exactly, is the Order of Phoenix of Greece? 

Well, according to Wikipedia, it is this (with my underlining added):

“The Order of the Phoenix is an order of Greece, established on 13 May 1926, by the republican government of the Second Hellenic Republic to replace the defunct Royal Order of George I.

The order was retained after the restoration of the monarchy in 1935 and continues to be awarded by the current Third Republic.

The honour is bestowed by the Greek government to Greek citizens who have excelled in the arts and literature, science, public administration, shipping, commerce, and industry. It is also awarded to foreigners who have helped raise Greece’s international prestige.”

Well, that seems OK, right?  Not so fast; let’s take a closer look.

Wikipedia tells us that the current “Order of Phoenix of Greece” replaced the now defunct “Royal Order of George I”, which begs this question: What are the origins of this latter Order?

Another in-depth article in this publication[xvi] has already pointed out the connection of this Royal Order to Freemasonry, so I won’t belabour the point in this article.

However, I will provide this quote from that article which explains the Masonic symbols used by the Royal Order of George I:

“… as evidenced by its symbols which are borrowed from the Knights Templar (full name: The United Religious, military and Masonic Orders of the Temple and of St John of Jerusalem, Palestine, Rhodes and Malta)”.

Given the above, I think it is reasonable to ask AB Sot: Did you know about the connection between your Grand Commander title and Freemasonry?

And, assuming for a moment that AB Sot did not know, (which is doubtful), now that this article (the second one directed at him) has informed him of this connection, he cannot plead ignorance. Here then is another question to his “eminence”: Will you renounce this title and cease wearing its symbols?

It seems to me that AB Sot should – as the true Good Shepherd, our Lord Jesus Christ, always did when his Disciples asked Him – explain himself to his Greek Orthodox “flock” in Canada.

AB Sot’s silence in this situation, will not be golden; on the contrary, it will convict him. (Please see PDF of letter sent by this author to AB Sot asking him to clarify his position concerning Freemasonry.)

AB Sot’s silence is extremely troubling when other Orthodox and non-Orthodox Christian churches and hierarchs have officially, and publicly, renounced Freemasonry as not being compatible with our Christian faith. Renunciations Witcoff has compiled in On The Masons … in Chapter 10 Masonry and the Churches and which I have excerpted below, with my underlining added:

Roman Catholics: “… the 1983 Congregation For the Doctrine Of The Faith formalized a new Declaration on Masonic Associations. … Under the new rule, any Roman Catholic who participates in Freemasonry is considered to be ‘in a grave state of sin and may not receive Holy Communion … the Church’s negative judgment in regard to Masonic association(s) remains unchanged since their principles have always been considered irreconcilable with the doctrine of the Church and therefore membership in them remains forbidden.’”

Protestantism: “For this section, I will speak only of two major Protestant groups which, despite being heterodox themselves, nevertheless confess an orthodox view of the Holy Trinity. … The Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod declared that ‘… Freemasonry serves as a primary example of such an organization that espouses and promotes teachings and practices that conflict with the fundamental teachings of the Christian faith. … One of the Landmarks of Freemasonry is the belief in the existence of a Supreme Being. However, the supreme being of Freemasonry is officially a generic god designed by intent to be universally acceptable to all who would seek admittance to the Masonic Lodge. This god is a unitarian, not trinitarian Supreme Being. … The Scriptures teach that Christians with integrity are to confess Christ and His Gospel boldly and without compromise … In the view of this evaluation, it is a compromise of the Christian confession to take part in ritual, religious acts, in the name of a generic deity, that intentionally delete the name of the true God and Jesus Christ whom God has sent to be the only savior of the world.’

“The Orthodox Presbyterian Church came to precisely the same conclusions in 1942.  In their Report Of The Committee on Secret Societies, their Ninth General Assembly wrote that ‘The committee finds that the evidence presented concerning the religion of Masonry permits but one conclusion.  … that Masonry is a religious institution and as such is definitely anti-Christian. … [and] that membership in the Masonic fraternity is inconsistent with Christianity. …”

Eastern Orthodox Churches and Hierarchs: “On its official website, the Orthodox Church of America unambiguously declares that It is forbidden for an Orthodox Christian to be a member of the Masonic Fraternity because many of its teachings stand in direct conflict with those of Orthodox Christianity.’

“The Archbishop of Cyprus in 1815, Cyprianus, made the same point – but far more graphically.  In The Aphorism Against Freemasonry, he wrote that [they] ‘… that pursue after such a diabolic and lawless employment of Freemasonry, and all they that follow unto their infatuation and unto their error, let them be excommunicated and cursed by the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. After death, they shall be unpardoned, indissoluble, and bloated. Groaning and trembling, as Cain, shall they be upon the earth. … The wrath of God shall be upon their heads, and their portion together with Judas the betrayer.  As angel of the Lord will prosecute them with a flaming sword and, unto their life’ termination, they will not know of progress.  …’

The bishops of the Church of Greece also convened in 1933 to study the Lodge as group. After careful examination, they concluded that Freemasonry is not simply a philanthropic union or a philosophical school, but constitutes a mystagogical system which reminds us of the ancient heathen mystery-religions and cults from which it descends, and is their continuation and regeneration … Such a link between Freemasonry and the ancient idolatrous mysteries is also manifested by all that is enacted and performed at the initiations … Thus Freemasonry is, as granted, a mystery-religion, quite different, separate, and alien to the Christian faith.’

The Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia insists on excommunication for Masonic affiliation.  In 1932, the ROCOR Council of Bishops wrote to the Faithful that Freemasonry is a secret international organisation to struggle with God, Christianity, and all National Governments, and especially Christian Governments.  In the international organization the first place of influence and importance belongs to the Jewish membership.  Because of this, and other important reasons, it is forbidden for all Orthodox Christians to become Freemasons.

Noticeably absent are statements similar to the above from the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of Canada and the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America and the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople lorded over by, you guessed it, AB Sot, AB Elpi and EP Bart, respectively.[xvii]

In light of the above, I think it behooves AB Sot – if he is not a Mason – to declare, on his television program that the religion of Freemasonry is not compatible with Orthodox Christianity, and to circulate an encyclical to this effect, to be read by parish priests in Canada, for the first seven weeks of the new Orthodox year that begins on September 1, 2024.  (And, I would urge my American Orthodox Brothers and Sisters to ask AB Elpi to do the same.)

If AB Sot remains silent, well, then, I would urge him to re-read the book The Soul After Death – and not just the 296-pager for laypeople but, rather the 1200+ page ‘desk reference’ manual that he should have read at some point during his careers – which may lead him to renounce Freemasonry and repent, sincerely, before he dies.

If AB Sot “Takes the 5th” on Freemasonry, What Can Canadian-Greek Orthodox Christians Do About it?

As members of the body of Christ, we, the elect, are the fourth pillar of the Church (in addition to deacons, priests and bishops) and as such have a moral obligation to be conscientious objectors if any of the latter are behaving – by their acts or omissions – in ways that are contrary to the tenets our faith.

Obviously, one must have evidence of acts or omissions before one should demand answers, and in the case of AB Sot, we have his act of accepting a Masonic title (unknowingly or not) and his omission (his silence to date) regarding the religion of Freemasonry.

In my view, it’s very simple what needs to done to get AB Sot to explain his Grand Commander title and renounce Freemasonry: demand answers, respectfully, and if he ignores our demands, cut off his funding!

Here’s a Three-Step Plan to request and obtain answers to the questions noted-above:

  • Step 1 – Petition AB Sot: Your local parish council or board of your local Greek-Orthodox church in Canada should resolve to send AB Sot a formal petition requesting answers to the questions I posed in the introduction.[xviii]
  • Step 2 – If AB Sot Ignores You, Stop Paying Your Dues: If AB Sot chooses to ignore your petition, your parish council or board should resolve to suspend the payment of AB Sot’s monthly vig until he breaks his silence on the above-noted questions.
  • Step 3 – If Your Parish or Board Ignores You, Withhold Your Funds: If your parish council or board ignores you, the parishioners of your local church – then you have a moral obligation to withhold your membership dues and donations – pending action by your parish council and board and answers from his “eminence”. Instead of your donations in church, copy and print out the following and put it in the collection basket, until your parish council or board takes action to issue the petition to AB Sot and AB Sot answers the questions noted-above:

“UNTIL YOU SEND A PETITON TO AB SOT TO EXPLAIN HIS GRAND COMMANDER TITLE AND RENOUNCE FREEMASONRY AND HIS EMINENCE ADDRESSES BOTH, I AM WITHHOLDING MY MEMBERSHIP DUES AND MY DONATIONS.” 

Now, before implementing the above-noted plan – especially Step 3 – you should pray about it.  (As Orthodox Christians, we know that we must pray before any task, decision, or action; we may not always do so but, we should do so in this case and for those who have one, seek the advice of your spiritual father.)

And here are three other things to do in connection with above-noted Three-Step Plan:

  • First, make sure that your Church has enough money to pay its overhead and obligations to civil authorities;
  • Second, put aside the membership dues you withhold in a bank account or in a safe place at home until your parish takes action and AB Sot addresses the three questions above – or resigns; and
  • Third, consider redirecting your withheld weekly church donations to the poor or to monasteries for prayers for the living and the dead (in addition, of course, to your own daily prayers for both).

These three things will assure that you do not use the petition to AB Sot as an excuse to not give the alms that you were going to give, which is an important and edifying duty of every Orthodox Christian.

I know that the above plan may seem a bit harsh – and that your local priest will try to convince you that you should not withhold your financial help to your church – but, as I said above, make sure that your church has enough money to pays its bills … and then be firm on withholding the monthly dues that AB Sot collects.  (If AB Sot takes legal action against you – get together with other parishes and retain one lawyer to defend all of you. If this extremely unlikely and scandalous scenario materializes – he will have revealed who he is.)

Look, we are living in very strange, clearly apostatic times, where we are not sure that we can trust our governments or our spiritual leaders in Canada (given what happened during the COVID-19 era).  These times require that we, Orthodox Christians, in local parishes, make sure that we are being led by hierarchs that are faithful leaders of Orthodoxy and not wolves in sheep’s clothing or false teachers.

Remember, the questions that we are asking his “eminence” to answer are “no brainers” – that any deacon, priest or hierarch who has no affiliation or allegiance to Freemasonry can and should address humbly and unambiguously.

As of the date I finished this article (early September 2024), I could not find any record of anyone ever asking AB Sot, directly, to address his Grand Commander Title and renounce Freemasonry … so I am asking now, via this article.

Maybe his “eminence” will answer these questions when someone in his close circle notifies him of this article (and make no mistake, the PR industrial complex that surrounds him keeps tabs on anything and everything relating to his image.)

Maybe he will surprise us and humble himself to his parishioners and provide us with answers to the questions above, which will inspire confidence that he is the Orthodox Christian leader that we want and need in Canada, given the imminent and further Canadian government encroachments into our freedom of religion.

This is his “eminence’s” chance to address these questions once and for all and put an end to the cloud of controversy that surrounds this hierarch and Freemasonry.

On the other hand, if AB Sot remains silent, becomes indignant and states, or implies, in an encyclical or on his television program that he does not have to address the three questions above, then, in my view, he will be revealing who he really is and you – and I – can govern ourselves accordingly with respect to this man now and for the times to come.

To be clear, I am truly hoping that I have gotten AB Sot completely wrong about what spirit seems to be animating and sustaining him in the high office he holds (for now).

—Stratis Georgiou: A concerned Orthodox Christian who will call out pandering by Church leaders wherever he finds it.


[i] It is beyond the scope of this article to examine the likely spirit of the author of the Harry Potter series of books, J.K. Rowling but, I would like to point out one thing about her now that may be an indicator of where she stands on Christians and Christianity.  In 2019, even though she had been against tattoos for most of her life, she got one that says: Solve et Coagula. For Ortho-Christians who have done their research into Freemasonry, this should be enough to distance yourself from her and her writings.  Why? Because the Freemasons worship, among other satanic images, the Baphomet. Here is a good, succinct description of what the Baphomet image is, from a BBC website (but with my underlining added): “The best-known modern image of Baphomet was drawn in 1856 by the French occultist Eliphas Levi, in his book Transcendental Magic: Its Doctrine and Ritual. He envisaged a winged hermaphrodite with a torch between his horns and a pentagram on his forehead. Its arms bore the Latin words SOLVE (separate) and COAGULA (join together) – the powers of “binding and loosing” usurped from God. Levi’s drawing was the inspiration for the Satanic Temple’s new monument. “It contains all these binary opposites – above and below, part animal, part human. Male and female,” says Greaves. “It embodies opposites and celebrates contrasts.” (https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-33682878#:~:text=Levi’s%20Baphomet&text=Its%20arms%20bore%20the%20Latin,the%20Satanic%20Temple’s%20new%20monument.) I purposely chose not to reproduce this image because I will not do their (i.e. Satanists’) bidding.  However, I urge you, as a serious Ortho-Christian to do your research about Freemasonry so that you can recognize its spirit in the people around you, in well-known (falsely altruistic) institutions (domestic and global), the political age in which we live, the secular leaders of the West, and, sadly, in some of our Eastern Orthodox hierarchs.  May they come to repentance and may God have mercy on all of them, especially the last group who are false teachers and the modern-day “brood of vipers” of which St. John the Baptist and Christ spoke.

[ii] For those who may be thinking … this writer is being disrespectful and disobedient to His Eminence … I would like to offer this perspective: I don’t think its disrespectful to ask tough questions of the leaders of the Orthodox Church. However, to be clear, when we interact with our priests, spiritual fathers, father confessors, and any hierarchs, we must honour the office – as the lesson behind John 11:49-52 tells us.  But – and please edify me if I am stating something heretical – any and every Christian is permitted to ask respectful questions and express legitimate concerns to any one of the foregoing persons and receive an answer.  Their answers may not satisfy us but, unlike Christ, who was the perfect, sinless, God-Man who did not have to answer Pontius Pilate or the Pharisees who tried to trap him using His Word, silence from our hierarchs about acts and omissions that appear to be irreconcilable with the tenets of our faith is not acceptable.

[iii] I used this well-known American phrase – because it just rolls off the tongue when one reads it – even though “pleading the 5th” is not a thing in Canada.  Rather, in Canada, the right to remain silent (to prevent oneself from self-incrimination), is in Section 7 of our Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the “Charter”), which is embedded in our Constitution and which is, theoretically, the highest law of the Canadian land. In practice, however, our Charter is much weaker in wording than the Bill of Rights in the US Constitution.  Why? Because our Prime Minister of the time – Pierre Elliot Trudeau … yes, Justin Trudeau’s father – who got our provinces to repatriate our Canadian Constitution (in 1981 …which is not that long ago compared to 1774) from Britain had to make compromises.  The net result is that our Constitution’s weaker wording and the inclusion of a major loophole in it (the now infamous “Notwithstanding Clause”, which allows our provinces to override our so-called fundamental freedoms by simply invoking this clause), makes it laughable in terms of protecting individual and supposedly inalienable rights.  And, as if these two giant holes in our Constitution were not enough, when you combine the latter with a lefty-trendy-touchy-feely Supreme Court of Canada that is openly anti-Christian, you get a precarious situation for Christians in Canada as it descends deeper into the abyss of secularism in every facet of its society.  Again, apologies for the digression but, for some of the readers of this article, it will be important to understand why Canada is not a great place to live anymore if you’re straight, Christian and believe in meritocracy.  But again, don’t take my word for it; take a look at what Jordan Petersen thinks of Canada now versus the Canada of 20 or even 10 years ago in this National Post article from August 9, 2024: https://nationalpost.com/opinion/i-will-see-this-contemptible-re-education-process-through-to-its-absurd-end.

[iv] I would be remiss to not mention two earlier “Cassandras”, George Orwell and Aldous Huxley for their brilliant, dystopian novels, 1984 and Brave New World, respectively.  I absolutely love the phrase “Christianity without tears” in the latter work.  This three-word phrase captures what people expect of Christianity today and why many abandon their faith when they face trials in their life and ask this demonically-inspired question, which atheists love to promote: “Where was God when X happened?” … where X is any problem in life, from an unjustifiable (by worldly standards) death, a devastating illness, a serious financial loss to absurdly secular problems like not being able to get the latest Birkin bag because you don’t have a connection at Hermes!  One of the things I love about our Eastern Orthodox faith is that is tells us, in no uncertain terms, that Christians will suffer on this earth just because they are Christians. It also warns us that betrayals will come from everywhere (from within, from your own family and from without, in various forms) but, that those who endure will end up in the Kingdom of Heaven.  Now, for non-Christians and for fair-weather Christians, who are completely enamoured with life in this world and are scared about or don’t really believe in life after death, this hard Christian teaching must be absolutely terrifying to them … so terrifying that they call us fools for believing it.  For me, as I read more and more about the lives of Saints and I use my eyes and ears to see and hear what is happening in this world, I am terrified about remaining in it for long enough to experience Revelation. I pray for the strength and guidance (and especially grace) from our trinitarian God to stick to the Orthodox path that I began not long ago.  I still have many passions to kill so I hope that God gives me the time I need to kill all of them; however, for me, my biggest fear is dying before that happens … not leaving this world behind.  Make no mistake, I am not trying to sound like a hero.  I still worry too much but, I trust Christ more and more because I have lived long enough to experience answers to my prayers.  For reasons only He knows, God has been very merciful to me.  I have had my share of tribulations but, not like others; I have not truly suffered in life and sometimes, I wonder why.  And for the pop-psychologists who will use this line to suggest that I have lost my mind, I wonder about why God has been so merciful to me in a healthy way and I thank God every day for my good fortune.  At this point in my life, I pray for one main thing: to have the strength to lay down my life before denying Christ in any way.

[v] For those that did not guess the (obvious) answer, I am referring to COVID-19.  (And, as I write this, I see that “Dr.” Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (let’s call him “Ted Ross”), the current Director-General of the World Health Organization is beginning to lay another foundation for repeating another world-wide lockdown due to a monkey-pox outbreak in Africa.  Look, if you believe Ted Ross, then, you probably also believe that Ted Lasso is real too.  You will recall that in the US, conservative judges stopped the tyranny of the secular-liberal majorities who attempted, under the guise of COVID-19, to close synagogues and churches in so-called red states. However, you might want to ask yourself: What happens when the composition of the US Supreme Court justices (conservative vs. liberal) changes?  The conservative courts in the US are the last frontiers in the West resisting new laws that have been labeled as “anti-hate speech” laws.  The major issue with these new laws is that they do not define what hate speech is. This is a very dark worldwide trend because it gives prosecutors discretion to target and charge Christian “dissidents” and hand them over to activist judges, who may then decide and declare that our Christian Gospels are hateful and must no longer be allowed to be proclaimed by anyone.  If you think I am hyperbolizing, take a minute to look at this YouTube video, which is spot-on: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/hZWHip3xfC8?feature=share. However, before you – my American Orthodox Christian friends – take comfort in the current conservative majority of your Supreme Court, you should know that there is a new threat to freedom of speech and religion that has emerged from within, that is, from Republican or so-called “red” states with high concentrations of Christian Zionists who have lobbied for the passing of “antisemitism” laws that will criminalize certain parts of the Gospels. This is based on Protestant Evangelicals’ staunch belief in the religious theory of Dispensationalism, which is a direct result of Sola Scriptura. (If you have ever wondered why Orthodox Christians are so against the doctrine of Sola Scriptura when it comes to understanding the Word of God, these latest laws are a case in point!) Finally, if you think that this misdirected zeal by Evangelicals will blow over because it is only at the state level, you underestimate the power of the this lobby in Washington: on Wednesday, May 1, 2024 (a ironic date for this type of legislation … or maybe not), the US House passed the Antisemitism Awareness Act, which is aimed at stopping pro-Palestinian protests on college campuses. However, like its state-level counterparts, it will have unintended consequences on Christians’ free practice of our religion.  And, although there are no (apparently) Evangelical justices on your Supreme Court, it remains to be seen whether any of the current judges will risk being labeled as antisemites if they strike down legislation that has resulted in the successful criminalization of the proclamation of the Gospels. Therefore, please stay watchful and vigilant of tyranny my American friends, lest it creep in while you slumber!

[vi] The italicised phrase in the latter part of this sentence is a not so subtle hint about what Freemasons do in our society, which is staying under the radar (except to other “brothers”) or hiding in plain sight.  Again, don’t take my word for it: read about Freemasonry for yourself and then think back to this article and AB Sot.

[vii] I am sure that people will come out of the woodwork and focus on my criticism about keeping liquor stores and other retail stores open and closing churches during COVID-19 … just to try to lure me into a rabbit hole that would take away from the main point of this article.  Please, save your words because I won’t take the bait.  Look, I have heard all of the reasons why we needed to keep liquor and big box stores open and none can get around the fact that Canadian governments (at all levels) chose to suspend the fundamental freedom of religion which is (supposedly) “guaranteed” in our Charter; see Endnote iii about this fake guarantee.   Our Canadian Constitution (our theoretical highest law of the land) was supposed to be a proclamation not a grant – of rights that all human beings have (bestowed by God).  Instead, it’s a sham document that was subordinated to the “privileges” of buying alcohol and going to Costco during state-imposed lockdowns in COVID-19 era.  To me, it’s simple and it boils down the this: our secular governments completely devalued our spiritual hospitals – that is, our Eastern Orthodox Churches – in the name of the greater good and sought to make us, Orthodox Christians, pariahs for wanting to worship God during – and thank Him – for the mild-tribulation of COVID-19.  Yes, you read that right, Thank God for COVID-19!  Again, I included this as a reminder, to my fellow Orthodox Christians, about the words of St. John Chrysostom (the “Golden-Mouth”) because we tend forget to Thank God for All things!  This is another topic that I would like to cover in another piece but, if you’re an Orthodox Christian and you’ve never heard this saying before and are curious about why we would thank God in bad times, please research it and also try to pick up a short (65-page) book titled, Life’s Difficulties are Blessings, Saint Nektarios Monastery, Roscoe, New York, which is a compilation of sayings about this from Saints and Monks from the Holy Mountain.

[viii] The case in point is the Canadian Truckers Blockade in Ottawa, dubbed the Freedom Convoy, that resulted in arrests of protesters who were not violent or destructive of private property (unlike the professional mobs and anarchists acting under the guise of BLM in the US).  As the world knows, Justin “the Hair” or “His Nibs” Trudeau not only charged the leaders but, used the power of our Federal government to acquire the names of protesters and ordinary people who contributed funds to the support the protest and freeze their bank accounts.  If you’re thinking, wait … “Wouldn’t freezing people’s bank accounts cut off their ability to buy and sell?” … you would be spot on. It’s truly scary what a low threshold the Hair used to implement the Emergencies Act (a despicable piece of Canadian legislation because of its vagueness) on February 14, 2022. Trudeau’s invocation was litigated and in late January 2024, our Federal Court (Trial Level) ruled that this action was unreasonable and unconstitutional (… Ya think?).  The case is called Canadian Frontline Nurses v. Canada (Attorney General) and you can click on this link if you want to read all 183 pages of it.  Or, you can just flip to Paragraph [372] and read the crux of it.  The decision came way too late, after the damage has been done to the protesters who were charged and jailed and to those whose bank accounts were seized but, at least the case established a precedent that can be used to, perhaps, get an injunction before His Nibs (or his successor) tries this again. By the way, His Nibs is appealing the trial decision so we’ll get some insight into how our Canadian Federal Court of Appeal sees this issue and, who knows, it may even reach our Canadian Supreme Court.

[ix] Ten years ago, I would have said “NFW” to anyone who said that anti-hate speech laws will be directed against the Christian Gospels.  I would have replied as follows: “Not gonna happen in my lifetime, even if a guy named Gavin Newsom gets elected as the California Governor.” Fast-forward 10 years and just think about the executive orders that Newsom – that little French Laundry-eating, slick-willy looking, pencil-neck metrosexual – issued during COVID-19 and is now using to promote LBGTQ literature in state schools. The existence of Gavin Newsom alone strengthens my belief that I will live to see the words of the Lord Himself come to be: “And you will be hated by all for My name’s sake.” (Matthew 10:22, OSB).  Although this scenario may seem frightening to think about if you are Christian, don’t let it (and them, the demonically-inspired and powered secular globalists hiding in plain sight) put you in despair because you know how this ends for us … and them: IC XC NIKA!  The best way to combat this fear is to trust the Lord when He says “But when they deliver you up, do not worry about how or what you should speak.  For it will be given to you in that hour what you should speak…” and “…he who endures to the end will be saved.” (Matthew 10:19 and 10:22, OSB, respectively).  The key is repentance, walking an Orthodox path (and gathering, without proselytizing, people within your sphere of influence to join this path) and prayer “without ceasing” (as St. Paul says) to the Lord to give you the strength to endure the things that are coming as this age comes to a close.  And if you think that this will take supernatural strength, you’re right but, only the kind infused in humans by the Holy Spirit because in those times, those who have sold their souls to the little troublemaker (as St. Paisios refers to the devil) and turn to him for help will understand that he lied and is now ready to torment your soul for eternity.  Finally, for those who may be wondering “Where can I read about people with the type of strength that I need?”, I direct you to read the lives of Christian Saints and to eye-witness testimony of those who endured the gulags and torture in the 20th century, which was the bloodiest century for Christians.  See, for example, the 1989 interview of Pastor Richard Wurmbrand available here: https://youtu.be/4GUC5HyxTDw?si=-Jv5guqbcxbPnlM1.  This humble man describes how he smiled as he was arrested and taken by the secret police to his imminent death. When these thugs asked him why he was smiling, he explained that he was reminded of what Jesus Christ promised him about this situation, which is what I quoted above.  I don’t know if the average Christian knows how bad the 20th century was for Christianity – in terms of killings – far worse than the brutal first three hundred years after Christ’s reign on earth: “Estimates suggest that 45–70 million Christians were martyred in the 20th century, making up more than half of all Christian martyrs in the last two millennia. This includes Christians killed in situations of witness, as a result of human hostility, or who lost their lives prematurely. Some say the average annual rate of martyrs at the end of the 20th century was around 160,000, or 1.6 million between 1990 and 2000. This number includes many Christians killed in the Rwandan genocide and the Sudanese civil wars, as well as over 20 million in Soviet prison camps.”  The source of this quote is the unholy Google search engine as at August 19, 2024, which generated this answer via AI.  This is the search query I used when researching this question: “How many Christians were killed in the 20th century”.  Again, please don’t take my word for it; instead, repeat my query and see what you get from Google for yourself.  (I wonder how long it will take Google to direct its programmers to manipulate its current AI algorithm to disappear the answer I received.)  Finally, I believe that the 21st century will be worse than the 20th century in terms of Christan killings and I hope that if faced with the same fate of Pastor Wurmbrand, I have one iota of his strength to be as fearless as he was and to proclaim – to the police who arrest me, the judge who sentences me, and to my jailors, torturers or executioners – that Jesus Christ is Lord and to feel free to kill me for His name’s sake.  Like I said, this is what I pray for these days.

[x] See Endnote ii.

[xi] I chose this statement on purpose and some of you may have recognized, immediately, who said it.  For those who didn’t, it was US Archbishop Elpidophoros (“AB Elpi”), on July 15, 2021, during his speech at the International Religious Freedom Summit held in New York City. When I first read the commentary about this statement, about four years ago, I did not appreciate how dangerous the statement was, coming from this hierarch, who is, by the way, very chummy-chummy with AB Sot and EP Bart.

[xii] Please do not be the gal or the guy who attends Bible Study for social reasons, to hear your own voice, to disrupt the lesson of the day, to argue, or to make gratuitous comments.  You are there to learn about the lessons in the Gospels.  You should prepare for each session and, by all means, note questions that arise in your mind because of the lesson and write them down and think about them and seek answers to them … before posing them to the leaders or the presiding priest.  And, even when you receive answers from the leaders or presiding priest, you may want to check the answers with a spiritual father or an elder (male or female) at a Monastery.  The answers you get in parish context may not always be aligned with what a spiritual father or monk or nun may advise … and eventually, you will sense (through the help of the Holy Spirit) when you are customizing our faith rather than struggling to follow it.

[xiii] We have had at least one Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople (Meletius IV) who was a 33rd Degree Scottish Rite Mason (and if you are familiar with Albert Pike’s book, you will understand how astonishing and disgusting this is).  I really hope that this man, Meletius, repented before he died because if he didn’t, I can only imagine how he will be judged by Christ who, in his own words, called-out the hypocrites and false teachers of his time directly to their faces.  EP Meletius was, in effect, the highest false teacher one can be in our Orthodox Christian hierarchy and I am sure that when he died – if he did not repent sincerely before he died – his soul had a treacherous journey to its current state, which is only a foretaste of what awaits him.  If he didn’t repent and renounce Freemasonry, I think he is experiencing the anguish that the Rich Man experienced – as related in the parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus – multiplied by 100.

[xiv] Here are two videos about Freemasonry that should pique your curiosity about what Freemasonry is. The first one is only about 5.5 minutes long: https://youtu.be/2S4LFiUa7Zw?si=U3FoI5jdaUtnwJja. The second one is a mammoth 5-hour exposé that provides specific information about Freemasonry that can be verified independently: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Yhv9ZMby68Ig/.  I have no idea how much longer the latter video will remain available.  The latter link is a “Bitchute” link because the previous YouTube link that I used to watch it, over a year ago, was taken down a few weeks after I watched it.  And remember what I said earlier: trust but verify all sources and their pronouncements before forming your own conclusions.

[xv] One possible answer to this question is: only if AB Elpi means the “supreme being” that Freemasons worship … i.e. Lucifer (according to Abert Pike).  In my view, AB Elpi’s statement should have been grounds for EP Bart to convene a synod to question what, exactly, the US archbishop meant by this statement … unless, of course, EP Bart is of the same view or ethos as AB Elpi (which may also include AB Sot).  Look, I understand that I am being provocative by this statement but, Freemasonry is the polar opposite of Eastern Orthodox Christianity in its theology, Christology and soteriology and I find it very suspect that the Greek Orthodox Archdioceses of Canada and the US and the Phanar have not condemned Freemasonry as being incompatible with Christianity.

[xvi] See the article Is Freemasonry Systemic in the Greek Orthodox Church? published on October 7, 2020 and available here: https://orthodoxreflections.com/is-freemasonry-systemic-in-the-greek-orthodox-church/. I think this article poses a rhetorical question.  To me, it is a call to action to us, the elect, to root out the Masonic infiltrators in our local Orthodox churches, expose them and prevent them from rising in ranks and using their positions to deceive unassuming Orthodox Christian about what being a Freemason means.

[xvii] The Antiochian Archdiocese has also been noticeably silent about condemning Freemasonry, and although I have not looked into this archdiocese deeply, there are many sources available on the Internet that state, unequivocally, that this Archdiocese is teaming with Freemasons in all of their senior ranks.   (However, I would be remiss if I did not warn you about vetting your Internet sources very carefully before rushing to judgment.  My list of “Go To” sources on the Internet is very small and constantly vetted for proclamations that can be verified.)

[xviii] Here is a simple letter that all Parish Council and/or Boards in Canada can use to petition AB Sot to answer three simple questions relating to Freemasonry:

[Date]

By E-Mail: office@goarchdiocese.ca

Archbishop Sotirios

Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of Canada

86 Overlea Boulevard

Toronto, Ontario, Canada  M4H 1C6

Your Eminence,

It has come to our Parish’s attention that, according to your biography on the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of Canada’s website, you hold the title “Grand Commander of the Order of Phoenix of Greece”.  Based on our research, this title replaces the now defunct title of “Royal Order of George I”, which has a strong connection to Freemasonry.

Based on our research about Freemasonry, we understand that it is a religion which is not compatible with our Orthodox Christian faith.  In fact, Freemasonry has been renounced by Protestant Church denominations, the Roman Catholic Church, and several Eastern Orthodox Churches.  In light of our research into Freemasonry, we, the Parish Council or Board of ■ [insert name of your church] respectfully request your answers to the following questions, within 30 days of the date of this letter:

Q1: Were you aware that the Order of Phoenix of Greece is connected to Freemasonry?

Q2: If your answer to Q1 is “No”, now that you are aware that the Order of Phoenix of Greece is connected to Freemasonry, will you publicly renounce your Grand Commander title?

Q3: Will you issue an official statement declaring, as Archbishop of the Archdiocese of Canada, that the religion of Freemasonry is not compatible with Christianity and that you unequivocally renounce it?

Your Eminence, we mean no disrespect by asking these questions of you, the answers to which we believe are simple.

As you can appreciate, it is of utmost importance to us to confirm that our Church and especially our hierarchs have not been infiltrated by Freemasons.

We look forward to your responses.

Sincerely,

 

                                                                 

[Name]

President

  1. Board Members and All Parish Members

The National Security State versus the Orthodox Faith

The following post was originally published as part of Why the US National Security State’s Orthodox Christian Obsession? That is a very lengthy post, and there was concern among some readers that the information below was not getting the exposure it deserves. After multiple requests, we are publishing just this section as a stand-alone piece dedicated to the topics of undermining the Russian Orthodox Church and the Orthodox Faith generally. 

For those who have not read the original article, here is what is meant by the word: “blob” used below:

The US National Security State is so lavishly funded that it has swallowed up almost all of society (media, Pharma, manufacturing, technology, NGOs, foundations, education, research, development, religious organizations, non-profits, think tanks). Many analysts openly refer to this interlocking system of control as the blob.

Isolate and Neuter as Much of the Russian Orthodox Church as Possible

The actual Russian Church on Russian soil is out of reach for the blob. Protected by a formidable Russian military and security establishment, armed even with nuclear weapons, the Russian Church at worst sustains pin pricks from the blob.

However, the Russian Orthodox Church also operates on foreign territories where she is way more vulnerable. The Ukrainian Orthodox Church, though it was self-governing for decades before the war, was considered part of the canonical territory of Moscow. Since 2022, the UOC has been undergoing horrific persecution at the hands of the government in Kiev. Her lawyer, Robert Amsterdam, revealed in February 2024 that his team had learned from the Assistant Secretary of State under President Trump that the destruction of the UOC was a primary goal of US policy. The UOC had refused to fully break with Moscow (before the war, a formal break in May 2022 did occur as a result of the fighting), refused to be a nationalist propaganda organization, and had refused to embrace the modern American “democratic” agenda (LGBTQ, drug legalization, Climate Change, anti-Russian extremism, abortion). To crush this “disobedience” to the dictates of the National Security State, a plot was hatched involving former Ukrainian President Poroshenko, Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, and the US Government to create a compliant replacement for the UOC (the so-called “Orthodox Church of Ukraine”) and then to destroy the canonical church.

According to Amsterdam, thanks to a traitorous Patriarch Bartholomew, the UOC has become the “target of a vicious and unlimited campaign of intimidation, perpetrated by the Ukrainian authorities.” Independent third parties, such as the UN, have reported on the violence and persecution against the UOC. The vast majority of canonical Orthodox Christians in the world have continued to support the UOC.

Paschal Homily of Metropolitan Onuphry in 2023 to the suffering Ukrainian Orthodox Church

Of course, the US justifies all this under the guise of combatting the “soft power” (a phrase repeated ad nauseum in anti-Orthodox hit pieces) the Russian Orthodox Church represents for the nefarious Putin regime. Of course, if the blob’s entire rule were not based on economic exploitation and the immoral destruction of civil society, perhaps such “soft power” would be less of a threat? Or, perhaps if “democratically” elected leaders better represented the concerns of the majority of their constituents, rather than those of sexual and other minorities, such “soft power” would also be less of a threat? No one really explores such questions, as the answers would threaten the power of the blob. Better to try and “cancel” the Orthodox Church instead.

Ukraine was just the beginning. Government meddling in the affairs of local Orthodox Churches has now spread to Estonia, home to hundreds of thousands of ethnic Russians who are also canonically Orthodox. Estonia, a member of NATO, is trying to break the ties between its local Orthodox Church and the Russian Church:

The Estonian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate (MPEÕK) cannot continue its activities under the jurisdiction of the head of the Russian Orthodox Church, Patriarch Kirill, who has threatened Western countries, including Estonia, and called for the killing of Ukrainians, said Interior Minister Lauri Läänemets (SDE).

 

“Looking at what he has said, what their (MPEÕK – ed.) boss has said, what difference is left between a Muslim religious leader who suggests that everyone in the West needs to be slaughtered and Moscow Patriarch Kirill who says that every Ukrainian needs to be killed and that they’re in a holy war against all other religions,” Läänemets told ERR Friday.

 

Läänemets said that while the synod’s position is acceptable and constitutes movement in the right direction, “the problem remains. It does not solve the problem because the church’s head in Moscow, in whose jurisdiction it remains, is still Patriarch Kirill,” he added.

 

“The problem will be solved once this subordination is no more. How they’ll do it, whether the decision will be made in Moscow or whether they’ll make it in Estonia, I cannot say,” the minister said. “Words must be followed by actions. We cannot be completely sure they are being sincere until that happens,” Läänemets noted.

So much for freedom of religion and free association. Or even simple honesty, as Moscow Patriarch Kirill has never said that every Ukrainian needs to be killed. In fact, Orthodox bishops never call for anyone to be killed. As for a Russian Orthodox Holy War, that is not against the Ukrainians. It is against the blob itself.

The blob will, of course, make sure that the Estonian Orthodox Church compliantly separates from Moscow. Either that, or it will be replaced as in Ukraine. And after the Orthodox Christians in Estonia are isolated, then will come the demands for them to “modernize”. Just as in Ukraine, where even blob official news outlets admit that the persecution of the UOC is not really about a no longer existing tie to the Russian Church, but is really about the acceptance of gay sex:

One of the largest American media, NBC News , claims to have found out the reason for the persecution of the UOC . According to journalists, believers and priests are oppressed and discredited because they are the most ardent opponents of LGBT people.

 

The material says that Kyiv accuses Orthodox priests of spying for Moscow, but they deny such accusations.

 

Journalists also cite the words of LGBT activist Maxim Mishkin, who called believers and priests of the UOC “the most anti-gay people in Ukraine.”

First they came for the UOC, then the Estonians. We should expect the blob to come for all Orthodox Christians everywhere they can reach. As Greek Protopresbyter Theodore Zisis has warned, this looks like a global campaign against all of Orthodoxy:

The aim of the heretical West, incited by the Devil, is to, in time, dismantle the Orthodox Church, that is, the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, and to de-Christianize the Orthodox East, as it has already de-Christianized itself.

Just breaking ties between Moscow and historically related Orthodox Churches is not enough. That is nibbling at the edges, no matter how successful the efforts are to force the newly isolated Orthodox Christians to embrace US-sanctioned “modernity”.

The blob needs to completely discredit the Russian Orthodox Church.

To that end, paid, kept, Western Orthodox academics, journalists, and clergy are highly useful. This includes the Fordham University dwellers of the Orthodox Christian Studies Center. They are currently running a petition asking religious leaders to denounce the Russian Orthodox Church:

These pressing issues are amplified within the context of the Russian war of aggression in Ukraine. From the very beginning, this conflict took on a distinctive character, in which Russia, a nation primarily identifying itself as Orthodox Christian, invaded Ukraine, another predominantly Christian nation, without any immediate provocation from the side of the latter. Ironically, citizens of both countries were, until recently, affiliated with one and the same Orthodox Church.

 

It is of utmost importance to emphasize that President Vladimir Putin of the Russian Federation, alongside Russia’s politicians and soldiers, has not only violated their international obligations. More profoundly, he has committed a blasphemy against God. This pertains to individuals who identify themselves as Christians and who often criticize the West for deviating from Christian values. Despite engaging in the construction of new churches and monasteries, lighting candles, fervent prayer, participation in sacraments, and partaking of Holy Communion, these individuals paradoxically compound their sins by issuing orders for murders, personally engaging in war crimes, and publicly justifying actions that run contrary to humanity and the Creator.

 

The support of this “hybrid war” of unprovoked aggression, the justification of its violence, and the persecution of any priest and believer who speaks the truth against the war—all these committed acts demonstrate a conscious and deliberately-argued position. All these testify to the extent that the Russian Orthodox Church has deviated from the Gospel and preaches something alternative to the Word of God. All Christians must critically ask whether the teaching preached publicly and unabashedly by the representatives of the Russian Orthodox Church is indeed the true message of the Christ event.

 

We beseech you to actively and immediately engage with the appropriate international institutions to facilitate the establishment of an international task force dedicated to holding accountable, through sincere and impartial analysis, those bishops, priests, and laity within the Russian Orthodox Church whose statements, testimonials, sermons, communications, and fabrications have sanctioned and bestowed divine approval upon violence, war, and aggression against the people of Ukraine.

 

Numerous publications have meticulously analyzed these distressing facts, underscoring the urgency for a formalized initiative that compels the attention of Churches and cannot be disregarded. Your active engagement in establishing such an entity will be a significant step toward addressing these critical issues at an institutional level.

 

A Church that only outwardly remains “Christian” but has lost its evangelical spirit cannot be a sister to those Churches and communities that follow the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ.

 

The endeavors elucidated above transcend a mere conflict with the Russian Orthodox Church. Rather, they embody a dedicated striving on its behalf—for the Church, for the community of believers guided by the Holy Spirit and the Gospel, liberated from deceptive political theology and detrimental religious ideology. Progressing resolutely toward genuine peace requires the fearless proclamation of truth, regardless of the inherent challenges it may pose.

 

You are summoned to denounce injustices, advocate for repentance and atonement, and actively seek transformative change within the temporal realm. We ask you, our pastors, to courageously proclaim the inconvenient yet profound truth.

According to the official narrative, the Russian Orthodox Church is not really a “church” so much as a state-supported shill for unprovoked Russian aggression. The Russian Church has betrayed the Gospel and is worthy only of loathing and condemnation, just like the Russian Government which controls it. (That traditionalist Orthodox “betray” the modern Gospel of Inclusion is a charge leveled at all of us, not just the Russian Church.) Further, the Russian Church outwardly looks “Orthodox”, but has really been infested with evil.

So nothing to admire here you mistaken Westerners. Liars, crooks, and murderers the whole lot of them. Just move along, embrace the WOKE agenda, and be the demoralized slaves the blob needs you to be. Slava Ukraini!

That none of this is true is completely irrelevant to those whose ultimate source of funding, and ultimate object of loyalty, is the blob. That the war in Ukraine was deliberately provoked by the West, that the government in Kiev persecutes Christians, and that the Russian Orthodox Church has absolutely not endorsed or committed war crimes are all truths that the “Orthodox Fifth Column” will never admit. Instead, they will keep pushing this false narrative as long as the blob feels threatened by the moral stature of the Russian Orthodox Church.

Ruin What You Can Reach

While the core of the Russian Orthodox Church is beyond the reach of the blob, the Patriarchate of Constantinople is firmly under its control. For us in the West, this is the source of our greatest danger. If the blob can’t stop traditionalist-minded Westerners from seeking inspiration from Orthodoxy, then perhaps it can ruin it so that no one cares about it anymore. In this drive to destroy the Orthodox Faith in the West, the blob can rely on more than a few Orthodox collaborators.

To ruin Orthodoxy, there must be substantial changes to teaching and practice that will make the “official” looking church no longer the actual church. Before we look at some of those necessary changes, let us recognize that the Patriarchate of Constantinople unilaterally doing the things below would probably result in a global schism.

If you are trying to destroy Orthodoxy as a competing worldview, however, breaking the unity of the Church is most definitely a benefit.

With that in mind, here are some of the distinctive things about the Orthodox Church the blob is trying to be rid of.

The Orthodox Church is the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church

There is one true path to God, and that is through the Church founded by His Son and Our Lord Jesus Christ. Further, the Orthodox Church teaches that she, herself, is the Israel of God – not a secular country in the Middle East currently committing unspeakable crimes. Such calm assurance of unchanging truth is attractive to Westerners, besieged as they are on all sides by uncertainty and doubt.

So that has to go, and the vehicle to get rid of it is the ecumenical movement, particularly through engagement with Rabbinic Judaism and the Roman Catholic Church. Through this movement of “dialog” and “cooperation”, changes can be made to the Orthodox Faith and to her claims about herself. Changes that make Orthodoxy just like all the other failed “religions” of the West, and thus removes the threat Orthodoxy poses for the blob.

To start with, the Church’s vision of herself as the continuation of Israel, and thus her hostility to both the Talmud and Zionism, has got to go! But don’t worry, the blob has people working on that right now. One of them is Eugen J. Peniuc, professor and author of The Old Testament in Eastern Orthodox Tradition. Pentiuc is the Dean (under Constantinople) of Holy Cross Seminary and a modernizing influence par excellence. The information below is taken from a review of his book, with screen captures of his actual words following:

He urges both Orthodox hierarchs and the grass-roots faithful to take a stand against ‘these perilous teachings,’ beginning with a plea to revise anti-Jewish statements in hymns and liturgy, especially those on Good Friday. He refers favorably to the changes Pope John XXIII instigated in the Roman Catholic church when he interrupted the 1959 Good Friday liturgy to ask that the adjective ‘perfidious’ be removed from the prayer for the Jews (39–40). This section exemplifies two notable aspects of the many that make Pentiuc’s book so valuable: it acknowledges the unsavory treatment Jews and their scriptures have suffered at the hands of Christians, and it puts Orthodoxy into conversation with the Western church in a refreshingly sanguine fashion. At the same time, Pentiuc suggests that a mild Christian supersessionism may be unavoidable if the Orthodox church is to remain consistent with its historical hermeneutics, which it most certainly will do. Christian triumphalism, on the other hand, is ‘easily discarded,’ and the author punctuates his point with a nod to Ephrem the Syrian: ‘Humility is so powerful that even the all-conquering God did not conquer without it.’ Pentiuc argues that the strongest blow against supersessionism is in fact the complementarity of the two biblical testaments. As Origen wrote, there is one God, whose main attributes are love and justice, and both attributes are present in both testaments (59). Pentiuc gracefully allows his readers to draw the connection between Origen’s dictum and the Mount Sinai icon that introduced the book for themselves.

The above passages point the way towards what is called “dual covenant” theology (Jews are saved by being Jews, Christians through Christ). This is a radical innovation in Church teaching. Pentiuc’s book also endorses serious liturgical changes, postulates that Rabbinic Jews understand the Old Testament better than the Orthodox Church, and calls for rooting out antisemitism, even when that means censoring / suppressing historical writings such as those of St. John Chrysostom. The Church must change, says Pentiuc, to be more acceptable to Rabbinic Jews. This man is Dean of an Orthodox Seminary, not just some random academic.

As noted by Pentiuc in his book, liturgical and other reforms to make a Christian body more acceptable to Rabbinic Jews have already occurred in the Roman Catholic Church:

It’s well known that the Catholic Church put many restrictions on Jewish power and influence historically, such as totally barring them from positions of power during the Fourth Lateran Council. This Jewish anxiety over Christian antisemitism has led the ADL to take significant interest in even obscure issues of the Church, such as the use of the Latin Mass. After restrictions on the Latin Mass were lifted by Pope Benedict XVI, the ADL released a lengthy complaint, including references to the Church’s “2,000-year history of anti-Semitism” and the “great suffering and pain imposed on the Jews by the church through the centuries,” and finally summarized by stating how “The wider use of the Latin Mass will make it more difficult to implement the doctrines of Vatican II and Pope John Paul II, and could even set in motion retrograde forces within the church on the subject of the Jews, none of which are in the interest of either the church or the Jewish people.”

Do the proponents of the Latin Mass realize that Jewish groups are, at least partially, responsible for not only the Vatican II liturgical reforms, but also the continuing suppression of the TLM? How is this all working out for the Roman Catholics? Does anyone think it will work any better for the Orthodox, should we go down that path? Constantinople trying this on its own will no doubt lead to a serous schism. But, then again, maybe for the blob that is exactly the point?

Pentiuc is not alone in his desire to remake the Orthodox Church into a more Jewish-friendly institution. Archbishop Elpidophoros of the Greek Archdiocese has also been concerned about an increase in antisemitism:

“I am worried by the spread of antisemitism internationally,” Archbishop Elpidophoros of America, spiritual leader of Greek Orthodox faithful in North and South America, told an audience in Thessaloniki, Greece’s second largest city.

 

He added that he is particularly worried that “the ointment of the Church does not heal wounds, but spreads the fire” of antisemitism, though he didn’t give any specific examples.

 

“Evil has a name, an identity and a history, and it is called fascism and Nazism. … It has no relation to Christian theology despite the efforts of some to dress their far-right ideology with the cloak of Christianity,” Elpidophoros said.

Emphasis added to make sure the reader spots the same ideas as in Pentiuc’s writing. His Eminence Archbishop Elpidophoros of America is the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Holy Cross. The same board that appointed Pentiuc to his current position. The Archbishop and the academic are obviously on the same page when it comes to modifying the Orthodox Faith in regards to her traditional teachings on Rabbinic Judaism.

An interesting tidbit concerning Pentiuc is that part of his work at Holy Cross was underwritten by a grant from the Lilly Endowment:

Holy Cross recently received a grant of $ 1,125,995 from Lilly Endowment Inc. through its Compelling Preaching Initiative to help establish The Scriptorium: Preaching and Teaching the Word of God in a Digital Age, the proposal for which was designed and written by Fr. Pentiuc in consultation with Dr. James C. Skedros, outgoing Interim Dean of Holy Cross, and Dn. Gary Alexander, HCHC’s Vice President for Administration and Finance. The aim of the initiative is to foster and support preaching that inspires, encourages, and guides people to come to know and love God and to live out their Christian faith more fully.

The use of foundation money to “buy” results from academics is something Orthodox Reflections has explored before.

As a last example of the anti-“antisemitism” movement within Patriarchate of Constantinople-affiliated Churches, please see the announcement below:

The Holy Synod was informed that the MoC was signed on 27 February in Nicosia between the Orthodox Church of Greece, the Orthodox Church of Cyprus, the Church of Greece, the Ministries of Education of Greece and Cyprus, the Central Board of Jewish Communities in Greece (KIS) and the Jewish Museum of Greece (JMG). It provides for the implementation of actions aimed at preserving the memory of the Holocaust and combating anti-Semitism and any form of racism.

 

In addition, the Holy Synod was informed that the Church of Greece’s Inter-Orthodox Centre was invited specifically as the only representative of Greece to attend the European Practitioners Network against Antisemitism (EPNA), which includes organizations from the entire European Union.

All of this focus on combatting “antisemitism” in the Orthodox Church really astounds given the situation in Gaza and the West Bank. Most Palestinian Christians are Orthodox. Hundreds of them are in Gaza, and an historic Orthodox Church there was bombed by the IDF with serious loss of life.  Thousands of Palestinian Orthodox Christians are suffering oppression under brutal Israeli occupation in the West Bank. The Patriarchs of Jerusalem and Antioch are speaking out against these atrocities on a daily basis. On the other hand, the Patriarchate of Constantinople and related Churches feel the need to focus on combatting “antisemitism”, which is evidently just as bad as mass murder.

Thank God the blob seems to have less control over Tucker Carlson than over the Patriarchate of Constantinople. (Click here for Carlson’s show on Christian persecution in Israel.)

The ecumenical movement within the Orthodox Church is not just fixated on changing our truth claims associated with Rabbinic Judaism. We are also barreling towards ever closer ties to the Roman Catholic Church. Pope Francis and Patriarch Bartholomew have now published a book together on environmentalism, of course.

The Atlantic magazine, one of the most official of all the mouthpieces for the blob, just ran a glowing comparison between the “modernizing” of Pope Francis and Patriarch Bartholomew versus the “bastion of militancy” to be found in Moscow under Patriarch Kirill:

On one side, Bartholomew has spent three decades trying to make Orthodoxy more compatible with the modern liberal world. He openly urges the faithful to accept evolution and other scientific tenets. He has been a passionate advocate for environmental protection. And, like Pope Francis, he has quietly promoted a more accepting attitude toward homosexuality. But Bartholomew’s power is more limited than the pope’s. There are eight other Orthodox patriarchs, each of whom presides over a national or regional Church, and Bartholomew’s role is that of “first among equals.”

 

Kirill, who heads by far the largest national Church, has made it into a bastion of militancy. He has given the war against Ukraine his full-throated support, and some of his priests go further, preaching about the glory of firing Grad rockets and dying in battle for Russia. Kirill’s tediously Manichaean tirades—about saintly Russia defending “traditional values” against the gay-pride parades of the decadent West—are much more than a justification for Putin’s autocracy. His anti-modern ideology has become an instrument of soft power that is eagerly consumed by conservatives across the Orthodox world as well as by right-wing figures in Europe (such as Hungary’s Viktor Orbán). It has even won adherents in the United States, where some evangelicals and right-wing Catholics seek a stronger hand in the culture wars.

When everyone, even a writer for the Atlantic, realizes that Patriarch Bartholomew is closer to Pope Francis than to a fellow Orthodox Patriarch, the handwriting is on the wall. The divide is real, and the blob fully intends to keep pushing the Orthodox patriarchates further apart, and Constantinople ever closer to Rome. Recently, the Patriarch of Constantinople expressed a desire that Christians in the East and the West begin celebrating Easter on a “unified date” rather than adhere to separate Lenten calendars:

“It is a scandal to celebrate separately the unique event of the one resurrection of the one Lord,” Patriarch Bartholomew I, who holds the title “first among equals” in Eastern Orthodoxy, said in a recent homily, according to Orthodox Times.

 

The ecumenical patriarch made the comments during a homily on March 31, which marked Easter on the Western calendar and the second Sunday of Lent on the Eastern calendar.

 

“We extend a heartfelt greeting of love to all Christians around the world who celebrate holy Easter today,” Bartholomew said during the homily. “We beseech the Lord of Glory that the forthcoming Easter celebration next year will not merely be a fortuitous occurrence but rather the beginning of a unified date for its observance by both Eastern and Western Christianity.”

Changing Orthodox teaching on the Church as Israel, purging our liturgies of “antisemitic” references, suppressing the “antisemitic” writings of our saints, and aligning calendars will all bring Constantinople closer to the Roman Catholic Church, while almost assuredly completely severing any remaining ties with Moscow, and a large portion of the rest of the Orthodox world as well.

Well done, blob. Well, done.

We could list many, many other reasons for concern about the growing ties between the Patriarchate of Constantinople and Roman Catholicism (encouraged and funded by the blob, of course), but we are already running long in this article as it is.

Time to Welcome the LGBTQ and the God of Democracy!

LGBTQ issues would seem to be settled in the Orthodox Church. Marriage is between one man and one woman. Sex outside of marriage is a sin. The case seems pretty air tight. In fact, when Greece became the first Christian Orthodox-majority country to legalize “same-sex marriage”, the Church’s reaction was swift and strong. Met. Seraphim of Piraeus was just one of the hierarchs who publicly excommunicated Greek MPs who had voted for same-sex marriage: “No, no, no we will not accept those who do this. To fall away from the Christian faith, it is a betrayal of Christ. And unfortunately, it would be better if they had not been born.” His Eminence also, “raised issues of overturning human ontology and physiology by implementing the woke agenda, which aims to deconstruct Christian doctrine, ethics and culture.”

But for the blob, gay sex is a sacrament. The refusal of the Church to normalize and bless it cannot be allowed to stand. Luckily, the blob has allies within Orthodoxy for whom gay sex, women’s ordination, and transgenderism are very much open questions in need of dialog and “engagement”. The description below is from a video produced by the Orthodox Christian Studies Center at Fordham:

Orthodox Christians are called, first and foremost, to love all—for “God is love.” But the reality for many lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Orthodox Christians today is that their relationship to the Church is defined not by love but by apathy, exclusion, and condemnation. As a faith, we must choose love and compassion—to “love thy neighbor”— instead. This requires no change of faith, but a fuller, more compassionate understanding of what our faith in loving God truly requires of us.

 

We are pleased to present this conversation about ministering to LGBTQ+ Christians. Drs. Christina Traina of Fordham University and Ashely Purpura of Purdue University discuss the opportunities, challenges, and resources for ministry among LGBTQ+ faithful. “We cannot say we are loving God & be cruel to the people who we encounter in our lives. If you are not letting that love transform you & your relationships, then I do not know what Orthodoxy is.”

The video is below. From endorsing rogue do-it-yourself Orthodox same-sex “weddings” and female ordinations, to speculating on transgender saints, to casting aspersions on the celibacy of monks and nuns, to speculating on the future of polyamory within Orthodoxy – packing this much blasphemy into a single video is truly a satanic tour de force.

The probable key, to eventually changing so much Orthodox teaching in the West, could be summed up in one word (a favorite of the blob) – Democracy! Many “Orthodox” hierarchs, clergy, and academics speak glowingly of liberal democracy heralding the dawn of a Golden Age of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Once the people, as manipulated and controlled by the blob, have spoken through their Democratic God, then we mere mortals have no choice but to comply. An example of the obsequiousness of some “Orthodox” hierarchs towards democracy and the US political order are the remarks of Archbishop Elpidophoros at the ceremony in the White House honoring Greek Independence in 2024:

In addition to these democratic ideals, which are sadly being diminished around the globe, we are here to acclaim and remember those whose commitment to the cause of liberty and democracy cost them the dearest price of all – their lives: The Immortal Heroes of 1821, who like those of 1776 and those of every generation who have been willing to lay “so costly a sacrifice upon the altar of Freedom.” We say “Eternal Memory” to all our brave warriors for peace and justice.

 

Mr. President, you have long been a close and trusted friend of the Greek-American family, and we consider you to be one of our very own, even from those very early days in Wilmington. But you are so much more than our beloved friend.

 

As President of our Great Country, you have led the world in championing freedom and the sovereignty of Nations. You continue to be the leading advocate for the cause of our Ukrainian brothers and sisters, who are still fighting two years later for their very lives against the unjust and inhuman invasion of their land. You continue to stand with Ukraine and for your unbreakable and unshakeable support, we are very grateful indeed.

 

Also, as sons and daughters of the Mother Church of Constantinople, whose longest serving leader in history, His All-Holiness Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, counts you, Mr. President, as a beloved friend – we thank you for your unwavering support of the purely spiritual mission of our Ecumenical Patriarchate.

 

Mr. President, we thank you for your commitment to Greece and to Cyprus, and for a just and peaceful solution to this Island Nation, that has been scarred by a violent invasion and forced division for half a century, a solution that will abide by the international law and a rules-based international order. We are on your side, Mr. President, just as you are on the side of democracy and liberty.

 

May God bless you, Mr. President, together with the First Lady, your family, and our Nation’s armed forces, with health, long life, His abiding grace, and His invincible strength.

How can an Orthodox hierarch openly discuss an “altar of Freedom”? Orthodox temples have altars. They are not dedicated to human freedom, but to God. This phrase makes no sense, except as a nationalist sentiment in which we don’t worship God, but some kind of manifestation of the liberal world order of the blob. Given our history in Orthodoxy of royal saints, this phrasing couldn’t be more out of place. Orthodoxy can work within almost any system of government, but there is precious little in the history of liberal democracy to commend it as spiritually superior in any way. We also see in the speech his fawning over Biden. Archbishop Elpidophoros is extremely prone to sucking up to powerful men, be they presidents, political operators, or business tycoons. Extra points if they have Greek heritage!

The short speech was like a National Security State “buzzword bingo” card. Praise for “democratic ideals”? Check! Praise for the US? Check! Praise for President Biden personally? Check! Cover up Ukrainian persecution of the Orthodox Church? Check! Blame the war in Ukraine solely on the Russians? Check! Talk glowingly about the rules-based international order? Check! Freedom and democracy? Check! Praise the armed forces of the United States? Check!

Does any rationally thinking person believe Archbishop Elpidophoros would ever stand up to any dictates of the blob he so enthusiastically serves? Of course not. Whatever the “democratic” will of the people dictates, that he shall do. “We must marry same-sex couples, ordain women, oppose any form of patriotism or border control, support the availability of abortions, and forever be continuously open to changing anything and everything about our Orthodox Faith! Otherwise, we will be guilty of discrimination under democratically enacted laws! Are we a Church that preaches the Gospel of love, or a far-right extremist organization?”

Nicholas – member of the Western Rite Vicariate, a part of the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese in America

Why the US National Security State’s Orthodox Christian Obsession?

Russia is not just an enemy of the West. Russia, and her Orthodox Church, are the enemy of the West. Russia, under her deranged dictator Vladimir Putin, is out to destroy everything the West stands for. The war in Ukraine, unless the rampaging Mongol Hordes are stopped, is just a prelude to invading Europe. Only the might and financial resources of NATO, led by the United States, can save the world!

Thus was it in the beginning. Is now. And ever shall be. That is, at least until Russia is defeated, broken up, and stripped for spare parts.

But, why? Independent analysts, politicians, world leaders, and thinkers of all stripes very much doubt the truth of the preceding narrative. As President Trump asked, during the 2016 election season, “Why can’t we get along with Russia?” Even the Obama administration had tried to improve relations with Russia at one point, offering the famous “reset”. Not anymore.  Almost two full presidential terms since Trump asked that pertinent question, the official fearmongering around Russia is higher than ever.

Why?

Money, power, and control. Russia is the only remotely believable justification for our trillion dollar system of “national security”. A system that completely owns and runs America. In the last 20 year period, the US has spent $14 TRILLION on foreign interventions. Our military budget, everything included, exceeds $1 trillion a year. The total for Ukraine has been over $100 billion in just the past two years. There is so much money sloshing around, that the Pentagon routinely announces having “lost track” of billions of dollars. No one bats an eye. More just keeps getting allocated.

Being even remotely related to “National Security” means never being accountable for anything.

Americans know our tax dollars get converted into ships, missiles, tanks, artillery, aircraft, satellites, spy networks, drones, etc. But that’s just the tip of the iceberg. There is so much more that Americans have no clue about. For example, the US has an enormous, secretive, bioweapons program whose size and funding over the last two decades have exploded. According to RFK Jr.’s research, 13,000 scientists around the world are currently employed by it, funded by unknown billions (trillions?) of dollars, working in some 400 labs. What are they working on? The holy grail of warfare – bioweapons that can decimate the enemy while new vaccines are developed to protect our own population against them.

The influence of this massive bioweapons apparatus was shown during COVID. Our COVID responses were labeled “countermeasures” and were ordered by the US Department of Defense (DOD) in partnership with the HHS. On its own, HHS did not have the authority to sign contracts for hundreds of millions of novel medical products. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) noted in its July 2021 report on “Covid-19 Contracting:” HHS “partnered” with DoD to “leverage DoD’s Other Transaction Authorities (OTA)…which HHS lacked.” (p. 24)

Acting as separate federal agencies within the limits of their authorities, neither HHS nor DOD would have been able to order 100 million doses of unapproved, untested “vaccine”. So they “partnered” in order to break the constraints of their authorities.

Isn’t government of the people, by the people, and for the people a wonderful thing? How would the US public have reacted, had more people realized the DoD oversaw the development, manufacture, and distribution of the COVID countermeasures, and not the “public health” establishment?

Unfortunately, most Americans still have no clue about any of that. The censorship has simply been too extensive. Mike Benz, the executive director of the Foundation for Freedom Online, dropped these truths in a chilling podcast with Tucker Carlson:

  • “What I’m essentially describing is military rule. What’s happened with the rise of the censorship industry is a total inversion of the idea of democracy itself.”
  • “Democracy is getting the NGOs to agree with Blackrock, to agree with the Wall Street Journal, to agree with the community and activist groups who are onboarded with respect to a particular initiative.”
  • “The fundamental nature of war changed [with Crimea’s annexation]. And NATO, at that point, declared something that they first called the Gerasimov doctrine… All you need to do is control the media and the social media ecosystem, because that’s what controls elections.”
  • “Google began as a DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) grant by Larry Page and Sergey Brin when they were Stanford PhDs… and then became a military contractor.”
  • “NATO was publishing white papers saying that the biggest threat NATO faces is not actually a military invasion from Russia. It’s losing domestic elections across Europe to all these right-wing populist groups.” – (Watch for more on this below.)

Why is the CIA trying to close down a conservative financial news Website? 

Speaker Johnson believes so strongly in limited government that he supports the FBI being able to break the law. Why do the policies never change, no matter who is officially “in charge”?

Under the guise of protecting the West from the “Russian threat”, the National Security State can exercise extreme censorship, buy journalistic access, spy on anyone, publish blatant lies, manipulate elections, set up blackmail schemes, and then just cover it all up. Politicians, of course, get in on the act. Lost an election? Must be Russian interference. Incriminating evidence found? Must be a Russian intelligence operation. As long as there is a veneer of “democracy” behind which to hide, who is ever going to be the wiser?

Even when people are exposed to the truth, they often dismiss what is happening directly before their eyes. How could any of this be true? How could “they” get away with all this?

Money. Great big, huge piles of filthy money. The US National Security State is so lavishly funded that it has swallowed up almost all of society (media, Pharma, manufacturing, technology, NGOs, foundations, education, research, development, religious organizations, non-profits, think tanks). Many analysts openly refer to this interlocking system of control as the blob.

Unlimited control. Unlimited budgets. Forget being king, this is power on a godlike level.

Power that is predicated on Americans, and Westerners in general, accepting that Russia is such an existential threat that we have to believe, fund, and follow those who are “protecting” us from the evil Mongol Horde.

Which brings us to a really big problem for the National Security State and all the pigs feeding from that seemingly bottomless trough of sweet, sweet tax payer money. Many Westerners, particularly middle and working class Americans, don’t feel threatened by Russia anymore.

The blob, it turns out, is really bad at running things. Whether that is by accident or by design is debatable. What is not debatable is that a whole lot of very normal Americans are sick of wars, inflation, debt, lack of well-paying jobs, poor health care, poisoned food, collapsing infrastructure, unchecked migration, crime, collapsing morals, the constant LGBTQ propaganda, transgenderism everywhere, bad schools, censorship, and loss of privacy. Above all, we are sick of feeling like our government hates us and wants us dead.

Many Americans don’t believe anymore that the West is spreading goodness and truth around the world. We aren’t the good guys. Our wars all end up lost, fought for reasons that make no sense, and with horrific consequences. What it means to be a patriotic American has been turned on its head.

Citizens of Western countries know things are dangerously off kilter, but they have no idea what to do about it. In truth, Western citizens are so beaten down and demoralized that they can no longer even imagine a better world. A world in which their societies are being built up, instead of torn down. A world in which their leaders care about them.

But then there is Russia, which seems like a beacon of sanity in an insane world. Not only are many Westerners losing their fear of Russia, they are actually seeing it as a possible role model for revitalizing their own failing civilizations!

The blob has noticed that even formerly stalwart supporters of the National Security State, such as American Evangelicals, are asking uncomfortable questions while rejecting the National Security “narrative”. Knowing a threat to its power when it sees one, the blob is deploying journalists to write about Americans with the utter gall to openly admire a nation that they have been explicitly commanded to fear and vilify.

One such effort is called ‘Crisis of masculinity’: The American Right’s bromance with Vladimir Putin by Cristina Maza, the National Security Correspondent of the National Journal:

Nevertheless, a growing number of right-wing Americans view Putin as an attractive leader and a symbol of moral purity. And some are even converting to the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia, known as ROCOR. This phenomenon was on display when popular right-wing media personality Tucker Carlson traveled to Russia in February to conduct a fawning interview with Putin, allowing the Russian leader to pontificate about Moscow’s imperial ambitions for hours. Carlson’s interview might be the most high-profile example of the Right’s adoration of Putin. But a growing body of research suggests that admiration for the Russian leader’s brand of authoritarian Christian nationalism is proliferating among the American Right.

 

“The Russian church has become this instrument of soft power for Russia around the world. It really sought to position itself as a global moral leader,” said Katherine Kelaidis, a research fellow at the Institute of Orthodox Christian Studies, Cambridge who focuses on Western approaches to Eastern Christianity. “It’s meant as this tool to bring conservative people and traditionalists, particularly on the issues of gender and sexuality, in North America and Western Europe onto the Russian side. And it’s been super effective.

 

“I’m shocked, when I listen to Fox News or talk radio, the extent to which there is a reflexive sympathy for Russia that I don’t think you would have seen even five years ago,” Kelaidis added. “The amount of chatter you can see online of the vilification of Ukraine among American conservatives is also fascinating.”

 

In her recent book Holy Russia? Holy War? Why the Russian Church is Backing Putin Against Ukraine, Kelaidis argues that Putin’s brand of religious nationalism is increasingly attractive to those on the American Right, who fear and resent the so-called “woke agenda” of the liberal Left.

 

While the U.S. legalized same-sex marriage, Russia labeled the LGBTQ movement as an extremist group and banned any mention of gay rights in public. Such moves are aspirational for segments of the Right in the United States.

 

Researchers such as Kelaidis argue that the number of converts to Russian Orthodoxy in the U.S. is small compared to the ballooning number of Christian nationalists who share a general admiration for Putin and his brand of hyper-masculine, authoritarian politics. Figures like Putin and Orbán are also attractive to the Far Right because they demonstrate an alternative to liberal democracy.

 

“It’s a crisis of masculinity,” Kelaidis said. “Putin and the Russian Orthodox Church very self-consciously style themselves as this very muscular, masculine Christianity. But I think the thing underneath that is a deeper disaffection with Western civilization’s relationship with itself. … They’re dissatisfied with what liberalism has wrought, philosophically speaking.”

Clearly the author, a supposedly “serious” journalist, is not trying to fairly present what is going on either within American Orthodoxy, or among the “Right-wing” Evangelicals (the larger problem) who admire some aspects of Russia. While there are a lot of factual errors in this article, it is not really our goal here to debunk this or any other “hit piece”. We can’t pass up, however, pointing out that the writer is too brainwashed to realize we actually do have a crisis of masculinity in the West.

Rather, our goal, after looking at a couple more examples of hit pieces, is to address the most important question of all – why are so many of these pieces being written now?

Another hit piece was done by Meagan Clark Saliashvili in Texas Monthly. Here is how Orthodox priest Fr. John Whiteford, the good man at the center of this “journalistic” atrocity, described his experience with her:

“Sometime last year, Meagan Clark Saliashvili contacted me about whether I would agree to be interviewed for an article she wrote for Texas Monthly on the growth of Orthodoxy in Texas. Meagan is an independent reporter who is a convert to Orthodoxy, married to a Georgian man, and a graduate of Harvard Divinity School. I was not unaware of the liberal bent to her past reporting, but I hoped since she was a recent convert that she would be honest and sincere, even though I had reasons to doubt she would be. However, I figured if she was going to write a hit piece, it probably wouldn’t matter whether I spoke to her or not, and speaking to her might help.

 

As it turned out, the article was not about the growth of Orthodoxy in Texas at all but was an extremely biased attempt to paint me, my parish, and other Orthodox Christians as racists, conspiracy theorists, and authoritarians. However, the fact that I did talk to her, and allowed her to visit my parish resulted in her putting in many details that contradicted much of what she was trying to accomplish. I am not sure if these things were included in the original version of the story or not, but I was contacted by a fact checker from Texas Monthly (a first from any news outlet I have ever interacted with) and pointed out to him several relevant facts that did appear in the article as published. On the other hand, I did not anticipate how this would negatively impact some people in the parish, and that is my biggest regret about agreeing to this.”

Saliashvili has an Ivy League education with a Masters from Harvard Divinity School. She is a freelancer, having lost her job at Religion Unplugged back in 2023. She was able to gain a good priest’s trust as an Orthodox convert, only to then pepper her article with the same kind of alleged Orthodox links to racism, extremism, and authoritarianism as seen in the Maza piece excerpted above.

One of the pioneers of anti-Orthodox hit pieces is Sarah Riccardi-Swartz, a “scholar” of Orthodoxy in the U.S. and author of the book Between Heaven and Russia. Supposedly an Orthodox Christian herself, she has made a career attacking “fellow” Orthodox as being “right-wing” extremists in the thrall of Vladimir Putin:

“Because Orthodoxy is small (in the U.S.), they think that these Orthodox figures online are helpful because we’re getting more converts in,” she said. “They think we are building American Orthodoxy. No, we’re not. We’re creating an American Orthodoxy that’s not in line with the gospel but rather with right-wing extremism.”

 

These tensions — over gender, nationalism and the impacts of the Russia-Ukraine war — reflect the identity battles fragmenting Orthodoxy around the world.

Regardless of the author or the publication, one has to wonder where the real money comes from to finance such “journalism”? And more importantly, why are these pieces being written?

To spread fear, and to establish a “good” versus “bad” concept of Orthodoxy.

Linking the targets of these articles (traditionalist Orthodox converts, other Christians who admire Russian cultural renewal) to extremism, racism, and (possible) treason is all about spreading fear. The fear of “cradle” Orthodox that their beloved Church is being hijacked by a dangerous political movement. The fear of potential Orthodox converts that, while they are seeking an authentic encounter with God in the Church founded by Jesus Christ, they could really be joining some kind of radical cult. Fear of even being seen visiting an Orthodox Church, because now you could be associated with “those people”. Fear of traditional Orthodox Christians that going to Church might be dangerous, because Antifa and other violent extremists could be watching. The fear that employers may find your Orthodox affiliation online, and fire you under the pretense your Church is an extremist organization. The fear that the FBI and other three-letter agencies will now have the cover they need to investigate, harass, spy on, and censor Orthodox Christians and other conservatives as threats to national security. Fear that some of the more “liberal” Orthodox bishops in the West may feel compelled / empowered to take action against traditionalist priests and parishes.

Fear that this unwanted attention is only the beginning.

The blob draws its power from fear. Fear of Russia, and fear of the consequences of not following the official narrative of the blob.

Hit pieces like these will have impacts, but less than the authors and their handlers would like. The Orthodox Church is not a political organization. The moral teachings of the Orthodox Church were never meant to be part of the political processes of a malfunctioning, oligarchic state. The Orthodox Church is here to bring humanity face-to-face with the Living God, not to win elections. The Church builds saints, not activists, and Orthodox saints are not known for surrendering to fear.

On the political side of all this, however, the obsession with “Right-wing Extremism” betrays the fact that the populist “Right” (as noted above in the list from Benz) scares the blob in ways that the “Left” does not. The Left is comprised of people the blob can easily control. Their list of concerns is quite small, and easy for the blob to deliver on: LGBTQ rights, Climate Change, abortion on demand, and the never ending fight against “systemic racism”. These people are easy to bribe. Easy to manipulate. Easy to distract. They don’t do deep analysis. They don’t demand structural changes to address deep-rooted economic problems. They hate Russia with a passion, and have become extremely, dangerously “patriotic” thanks to the US Govt’s WOKE agenda. Even when they riot, they only engage in fits of destructive rage. There is never any danger they could, or would, actually take on the blob. They are the ultimate handmaidens to tyranny.

The “Left” is also easy to terrify. Just pointing out that Russia, and actual Orthodoxy, are opposed to their modern “rights”, such as abortion and “same-sex marriage”, is enough to send them into hysterics. The bad man is coming who wants America to look more like Russia in ways that actually look a lot like New York City circa 1961.

The actual “Right-wing”, however, is a real threat to the blob. The authentic “Right” focuses on local autonomy, reducing the federal government, withdrawing from NATO, balanced budgets with massively reduced spending, truly solving economic problems (increasing job growth, taming inflation, reducing the cost of living), a pro-peace foreign policy, an orderly civil society, border enforcement, reducing crime, protecting children from sexualization, quality education, and parental rights. That is a blob killing agenda. All the more frightening for the blob, the “Right” has proven its ability to put hundreds of thousands of ordinary, pissed off people on the streets of Washington just by asking them to come. For the blob, this is all completely unacceptable. Clearly, anything that bolsters the “Right” has to be discredited, or at least co-opted.

It’s not what actually happened on J6 that keeps “them” up at night.

Another purpose of all these hit pieces is to establish the official narrative of the “good” (modernized, often cradle) Orthodoxy run from Constantinople versus the “bad” (traditional, often convert) Orthodoxy run from nationalistic, evil, mean Moscow. That is why hit pieces like these usually praise certain hierarchs and academics, while casting others as “villains”. How that develops in the future could prove very dangerous for Orthodox traditionalists. The blob, as we will cover more in depth later, has not shied away from outlawing Orthodox Churches while founding “new” Orthodox bodies to replace them. No thinking individual should believe that what the blob is willing to do to Ukrainians, it would be unwilling to do to Americans. Lots of people currently in jail wrongly believed the Constitution was worth the paper it is printed on.

Still, hit pieces calling traditionalist Orthodox Christians bad names are unlikely to do enough to prevent Americans from discovering the True Church founded by Christ through His Apostles. Nor are mere words likely to discourage enough non-Orthodox conservatives from noticing that, morally and economically, Russia is moving in the opposite direction of the West.

More “direct action” is needed. Which, of course, the blob is already pursuing.

Isolate and Neuter as Much of the Russian Orthodox Church as Possible

The actual Russian Church on Russian soil is out of reach for the blob. Protected by a formidable Russian military and security establishment, armed even with nuclear weapons, the Russian Church at worst sustains pin pricks from the blob.

However, the Russian Orthodox Church also operates on foreign territories where she is way more vulnerable. The Ukrainian Orthodox Church, though it was self-governing for decades before the war, was considered part of the canonical territory of Moscow. Since 2022, the UOC has been undergoing horrific persecution at the hands of the government in Kiev. Her lawyer, Robert Amsterdam, revealed in February 2024 that his team had learned from the Assistant Secretary of State under President Trump that the destruction of the UOC was a primary goal of US policy. The UOC had refused to fully break with Moscow (before the war, a formal break in May 2022 did occur as a result of the fighting), refused to be a nationalist propaganda organization, and had refused to embrace the modern American “democratic” agenda (LGBTQ, drug legalization, Climate Change, anti-Russian extremism, abortion). To crush this “disobedience” to the dictates of the National Security State, a plot was hatched involving former Ukrainian President Poroshenko, Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, and the US Government to create a compliant replacement for the UOC (the so-called “Orthodox Church of Ukraine”) and then to destroy the canonical church.

According to Amsterdam, thanks to a traitorous Patriarch Bartholomew, the UOC has become the “target of a vicious and unlimited campaign of intimidation, perpetrated by the Ukrainian authorities.” Independent third parties, such as the UN, have reported on the violence and persecution against the UOC. The vast majority of canonical Orthodox Christians in the world have continued to support the UOC.

Paschal Homily of Metropolitan Onuphry in 2023 to the suffering Ukrainian Orthodox Church

Of course, the US justifies all this under the guise of combatting the “soft power” (a phrase repeated ad nauseum in anti-Orthodox hit pieces) the Russian Orthodox Church represents for the nefarious Putin regime. Of course, if the blob’s entire rule were not based on economic exploitation and the immoral destruction of civil society, perhaps such “soft power” would be less of a threat? Or, perhaps if “democratically” elected leaders better represented the concerns of the majority of their constituents, rather than those of sexual and other minorities, such “soft power” would also be less of a threat? No one really explores such questions, as the answers would threaten the power of the blob. Better to try and “cancel” the Orthodox Church instead.

Ukraine was just the beginning. Government meddling in the affairs of local Orthodox Churches has now spread to Estonia, home to hundreds of thousands of ethnic Russians who are also canonically Orthodox. Estonia, a member of NATO, is trying to break the ties between its local Orthodox Church and the Russian Church:

The Estonian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate (MPEÕK) cannot continue its activities under the jurisdiction of the head of the Russian Orthodox Church, Patriarch Kirill, who has threatened Western countries, including Estonia, and called for the killing of Ukrainians, said Interior Minister Lauri Läänemets (SDE).

 

“Looking at what he has said, what their (MPEÕK – ed.) boss has said, what difference is left between a Muslim religious leader who suggests that everyone in the West needs to be slaughtered and Moscow Patriarch Kirill who says that every Ukrainian needs to be killed and that they’re in a holy war against all other religions,” Läänemets told ERR Friday.

 

Läänemets said that while the synod’s position is acceptable and constitutes movement in the right direction, “the problem remains. It does not solve the problem because the church’s head in Moscow, in whose jurisdiction it remains, is still Patriarch Kirill,” he added.

 

“The problem will be solved once this subordination is no more. How they’ll do it, whether the decision will be made in Moscow or whether they’ll make it in Estonia, I cannot say,” the minister said. “Words must be followed by actions. We cannot be completely sure they are being sincere until that happens,” Läänemets noted.

So much for freedom of religion and free association. Or even simple honesty, as Moscow Patriarch Kirill has never said that every Ukrainian needs to be killed. In fact, Orthodox bishops never call for anyone to be killed. As for a Russian Orthodox Holy War, that is not against the Ukrainians. It is against the blob itself.

The blob will, of course, make sure that the Estonian Orthodox Church compliantly separates from Moscow. Either that, or it will be replaced as in Ukraine. And after the Orthodox Christians in Estonia are isolated, then will come the demands for them to “modernize”. Just as in Ukraine, where even blob official news outlets admit that the persecution of the UOC is not really about a no longer existing tie to the Russian Church, but is really about the acceptance of gay sex:

One of the largest American media, NBC News , claims to have found out the reason for the persecution of the UOC . According to journalists, believers and priests are oppressed and discredited because they are the most ardent opponents of LGBT people.

 

The material says that Kyiv accuses Orthodox priests of spying for Moscow, but they deny such accusations.

 

Journalists also cite the words of LGBT activist Maxim Mishkin, who called believers and priests of the UOC “the most anti-gay people in Ukraine.”

First they came for the UOC, then the Estonians. We should expect the blob to come for all Orthodox Christians everywhere they can reach. As Greek Protopresbyter Theodore Zisis has warned, this looks like a global campaign against all of Orthodoxy:

The aim of the heretical West, incited by the Devil, is to, in time, dismantle the Orthodox Church, that is, the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, and to de-Christianize the Orthodox East, as it has already de-Christianized itself.

Just breaking ties between Moscow and historically related Orthodox Churches is not enough. That is nibbling at the edges, no matter how successful the efforts are to force the newly isolated Orthodox Christians to embrace US-sanctioned “modernity”.

The blob needs to completely discredit the Russian Orthodox Church.

To that end, paid, kept, Western Orthodox academics, journalists, and clergy are highly useful. This includes the Fordham University dwellers of the Orthodox Christian Studies Center. They are currently running a petition asking religious leaders to denounce the Russian Orthodox Church:

These pressing issues are amplified within the context of the Russian war of aggression in Ukraine. From the very beginning, this conflict took on a distinctive character, in which Russia, a nation primarily identifying itself as Orthodox Christian, invaded Ukraine, another predominantly Christian nation, without any immediate provocation from the side of the latter. Ironically, citizens of both countries were, until recently, affiliated with one and the same Orthodox Church.

 

It is of utmost importance to emphasize that President Vladimir Putin of the Russian Federation, alongside Russia’s politicians and soldiers, has not only violated their international obligations. More profoundly, he has committed a blasphemy against God. This pertains to individuals who identify themselves as Christians and who often criticize the West for deviating from Christian values. Despite engaging in the construction of new churches and monasteries, lighting candles, fervent prayer, participation in sacraments, and partaking of Holy Communion, these individuals paradoxically compound their sins by issuing orders for murders, personally engaging in war crimes, and publicly justifying actions that run contrary to humanity and the Creator.

 

The support of this “hybrid war” of unprovoked aggression, the justification of its violence, and the persecution of any priest and believer who speaks the truth against the war—all these committed acts demonstrate a conscious and deliberately-argued position. All these testify to the extent that the Russian Orthodox Church has deviated from the Gospel and preaches something alternative to the Word of God. All Christians must critically ask whether the teaching preached publicly and unabashedly by the representatives of the Russian Orthodox Church is indeed the true message of the Christ event.

 

We beseech you to actively and immediately engage with the appropriate international institutions to facilitate the establishment of an international task force dedicated to holding accountable, through sincere and impartial analysis, those bishops, priests, and laity within the Russian Orthodox Church whose statements, testimonials, sermons, communications, and fabrications have sanctioned and bestowed divine approval upon violence, war, and aggression against the people of Ukraine.

 

Numerous publications have meticulously analyzed these distressing facts, underscoring the urgency for a formalized initiative that compels the attention of Churches and cannot be disregarded. Your active engagement in establishing such an entity will be a significant step toward addressing these critical issues at an institutional level.

 

A Church that only outwardly remains “Christian” but has lost its evangelical spirit cannot be a sister to those Churches and communities that follow the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ.

 

The endeavors elucidated above transcend a mere conflict with the Russian Orthodox Church. Rather, they embody a dedicated striving on its behalf—for the Church, for the community of believers guided by the Holy Spirit and the Gospel, liberated from deceptive political theology and detrimental religious ideology. Progressing resolutely toward genuine peace requires the fearless proclamation of truth, regardless of the inherent challenges it may pose.

 

You are summoned to denounce injustices, advocate for repentance and atonement, and actively seek transformative change within the temporal realm. We ask you, our pastors, to courageously proclaim the inconvenient yet profound truth.

According to the official narrative, the Russian Orthodox Church is not really a “church” so much as a state-supported shill for unprovoked Russian aggression. The Russian Church has betrayed the Gospel and is worthy only of loathing and condemnation, just like the Russian Government which controls it. (That traditionalist Orthodox “betray” the modern Gospel of Inclusion is a charge leveled at all of us, not just the Russian Church.) Further, the Russian Church outwardly looks “Orthodox”, but has really been infested with evil.

So nothing to admire here you mistaken Westerners. Liars, crooks, and murderers the whole lot of them. Just move along, embrace the WOKE agenda, and be the demoralized slaves the blob needs you to be. Slava Ukraini!

That none of this is true is completely irrelevant to those whose ultimate source of funding, and ultimate object of loyalty, is the blob. That the war in Ukraine was deliberately provoked by the West, that the government in Kiev persecutes Christians, and that the Russian Orthodox Church has absolutely not endorsed or committed war crimes are all truths that the “Orthodox Fifth Column” will never admit. Instead, they will keep pushing this false narrative as long as the blob feels threatened by the moral stature of the Russian Orthodox Church.

Ruin What You Can Reach

While the core of the Russian Orthodox Church is beyond the reach of the blob, the Patriarchate of Constantinople is firmly under its control. For us in the West, this is the source of our greatest danger. If the blob can’t stop traditionalist-minded Westerners from seeking inspiration from Orthodoxy, then perhaps it can ruin it so that no one cares about it anymore. In this drive to destroy the Orthodox Faith in the West, the blob can rely on more than a few Orthodox collaborators.

To ruin Orthodoxy, there must be substantial changes to teaching and practice that will make the “official” looking church no longer the actual church. Before we look at some of those necessary changes, let us recognize that the Patriarchate of Constantinople unilaterally doing the things below would probably result in a global schism.

If you are trying to destroy Orthodoxy as a competing worldview, however, breaking the unity of the Church is most definitely a benefit.

With that in mind, here are some of the distinctive things about the Orthodox Church the blob is trying to be rid of.

The Orthodox Church is the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church

There is one true path to God, and that is through the Church founded by His Son and Our Lord Jesus Christ. Further, the Orthodox Church teaches that she, herself, is the Israel of God – not a secular country in the Middle East currently committing unspeakable crimes. Such calm assurance of unchanging truth is attractive to Westerners, besieged as they are on all sides by uncertainty and doubt.

So that has to go, and the vehicle to get rid of it is the ecumenical movement, particularly through engagement with Rabbinic Judaism and the Roman Catholic Church. Through this movement of “dialog” and “cooperation”, changes can be made to the Orthodox Faith and to her claims about herself. Changes that make Orthodoxy just like all the other failed “religions” of the West, and thus removes the threat Orthodoxy poses for the blob.

To start with, the Church’s vision of herself as the continuation of Israel, and thus her hostility to both the Talmud and Zionism, has got to go! But don’t worry, the blob has people working on that right now. One of them is Eugen J. Peniuc, professor and author of The Old Testament in Eastern Orthodox Tradition. Pentiuc is the Dean (under Constantinople) of Holy Cross Seminary and a modernizing influence par excellence. The information below is taken from a review of his book, with screen captures of his actual words following:

He urges both Orthodox hierarchs and the grass-roots faithful to take a stand against ‘these perilous teachings,’ beginning with a plea to revise anti-Jewish statements in hymns and liturgy, especially those on Good Friday. He refers favorably to the changes Pope John XXIII instigated in the Roman Catholic church when he interrupted the 1959 Good Friday liturgy to ask that the adjective ‘perfidious’ be removed from the prayer for the Jews (39–40). This section exemplifies two notable aspects of the many that make Pentiuc’s book so valuable: it acknowledges the unsavory treatment Jews and their scriptures have suffered at the hands of Christians, and it puts Orthodoxy into conversation with the Western church in a refreshingly sanguine fashion. At the same time, Pentiuc suggests that a mild Christian supersessionism may be unavoidable if the Orthodox church is to remain consistent with its historical hermeneutics, which it most certainly will do. Christian triumphalism, on the other hand, is ‘easily discarded,’ and the author punctuates his point with a nod to Ephrem the Syrian: ‘Humility is so powerful that even the all-conquering God did not conquer without it.’ Pentiuc argues that the strongest blow against supersessionism is in fact the complementarity of the two biblical testaments. As Origen wrote, there is one God, whose main attributes are love and justice, and both attributes are present in both testaments (59). Pentiuc gracefully allows his readers to draw the connection between Origen’s dictum and the Mount Sinai icon that introduced the book for themselves.

The above passages point the way towards what is called “dual covenant” theology (Jews are saved by being Jews, Christians through Christ). This is a radical innovation in Church teaching. Pentiuc’s book also endorses serious liturgical changes, postulates that Rabbinic Jews understand the Old Testament better than the Orthodox Church, and calls for rooting out antisemitism, even when that means censoring / suppressing historical writings such as those of St. John Chrysostom. The Church must change, says Pentiuc, to be more acceptable to Rabbinic Jews. This man is Dean of an Orthodox Seminary, not just some random academic.

As noted by Pentiuc in his book, liturgical and other reforms to make a Christian body more acceptable to Rabbinic Jews have already occurred in the Roman Catholic Church:

It’s well known that the Catholic Church put many restrictions on Jewish power and influence historically, such as totally barring them from positions of power during the Fourth Lateran Council. This Jewish anxiety over Christian antisemitism has led the ADL to take significant interest in even obscure issues of the Church, such as the use of the Latin Mass. After restrictions on the Latin Mass were lifted by Pope Benedict XVI, the ADL released a lengthy complaint, including references to the Church’s “2,000-year history of anti-Semitism” and the “great suffering and pain imposed on the Jews by the church through the centuries,” and finally summarized by stating how “The wider use of the Latin Mass will make it more difficult to implement the doctrines of Vatican II and Pope John Paul II, and could even set in motion retrograde forces within the church on the subject of the Jews, none of which are in the interest of either the church or the Jewish people.”

Do the proponents of the Latin Mass realize that Jewish groups are, at least partially, responsible for not only the Vatican II liturgical reforms, but also the continuing suppression of the TLM? How is this all working out for the Roman Catholics? Does anyone think it will work any better for the Orthodox, should we go down that path? Constantinople trying this on its own will no doubt lead to a serous schism. But, then again, maybe for the blob that is exactly the point?

Pentiuc is not alone in his desire to remake the Orthodox Church into a more Jewish-friendly institution. Archbishop Elpidophoros of the Greek Archdiocese has also been concerned about an increase in antisemitism:

“I am worried by the spread of antisemitism internationally,” Archbishop Elpidophoros of America, spiritual leader of Greek Orthodox faithful in North and South America, told an audience in Thessaloniki, Greece’s second largest city.

 

He added that he is particularly worried that “the ointment of the Church does not heal wounds, but spreads the fire” of antisemitism, though he didn’t give any specific examples.

 

“Evil has a name, an identity and a history, and it is called fascism and Nazism. … It has no relation to Christian theology despite the efforts of some to dress their far-right ideology with the cloak of Christianity,” Elpidophoros said.

Emphasis added to make sure the reader spots the same ideas as in Pentiuc’s writing. His Eminence Archbishop Elpidophoros of America is the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Holy Cross. The same board that appointed Pentiuc to his current position. The Archbishop and the academic are obviously on the same page when it comes to modifying the Orthodox Faith in regards to her traditional teachings on Rabbinic Judaism.

An interesting tidbit concerning Pentiuc is that part of his work at Holy Cross was underwritten by a grant from the Lilly Endowment:

Holy Cross recently received a grant of $ 1,125,995 from Lilly Endowment Inc. through its Compelling Preaching Initiative to help establish The Scriptorium: Preaching and Teaching the Word of God in a Digital Age, the proposal for which was designed and written by Fr. Pentiuc in consultation with Dr. James C. Skedros, outgoing Interim Dean of Holy Cross, and Dn. Gary Alexander, HCHC’s Vice President for Administration and Finance. The aim of the initiative is to foster and support preaching that inspires, encourages, and guides people to come to know and love God and to live out their Christian faith more fully.

The use of foundation money to “buy” results from academics is something Orthodox Reflections has explored before.

As a last example of the anti-“antisemitism” movement within Patriarchate of Constantinople-affiliated Churches, please see the announcement below:

The Holy Synod was informed that the MoC was signed on 27 February in Nicosia between the Orthodox Church of Greece, the Orthodox Church of Cyprus, the Church of Greece, the Ministries of Education of Greece and Cyprus, the Central Board of Jewish Communities in Greece (KIS) and the Jewish Museum of Greece (JMG). It provides for the implementation of actions aimed at preserving the memory of the Holocaust and combating anti-Semitism and any form of racism.

 

In addition, the Holy Synod was informed that the Church of Greece’s Inter-Orthodox Centre was invited specifically as the only representative of Greece to attend the European Practitioners Network against Antisemitism (EPNA), which includes organizations from the entire European Union.

All of this focus on combatting “antisemitism” in the Orthodox Church really astounds given the situation in Gaza and the West Bank. Most Palestinian Christians are Orthodox. Hundreds of them are in Gaza, and an historic Orthodox Church there was bombed by the IDF with serious loss of life.  Thousands of Palestinian Orthodox Christians are suffering oppression under brutal Israeli occupation in the West Bank. The Patriarchs of Jerusalem and Antioch are speaking out against these atrocities on a daily basis. On the other hand, the Patriarchate of Constantinople and related Churches feel the need to focus on combatting “antisemitism”, which is evidently just as bad as mass murder.

Thank God the blob seems to have less control over Tucker Carlson than over the Patriarchate of Constantinople. (Click here for Carlson’s show on Christian persecution in Israel.)

The ecumenical movement within the Orthodox Church is not just fixated on changing our truth claims associated with Rabbinic Judaism. We are also barreling towards ever closer ties to the Roman Catholic Church. Pope Francis and Patriarch Bartholomew have now published a book together on environmentalism, of course.

The Atlantic magazine, one of the most official of all the mouthpieces for the blob, just ran a glowing comparison between the “modernizing” of Pope Francis and Patriarch Bartholomew versus the “bastion of militancy” to be found in Moscow under Patriarch Kirill:

On one side, Bartholomew has spent three decades trying to make Orthodoxy more compatible with the modern liberal world. He openly urges the faithful to accept evolution and other scientific tenets. He has been a passionate advocate for environmental protection. And, like Pope Francis, he has quietly promoted a more accepting attitude toward homosexuality. But Bartholomew’s power is more limited than the pope’s. There are eight other Orthodox patriarchs, each of whom presides over a national or regional Church, and Bartholomew’s role is that of “first among equals.”

 

Kirill, who heads by far the largest national Church, has made it into a bastion of militancy. He has given the war against Ukraine his full-throated support, and some of his priests go further, preaching about the glory of firing Grad rockets and dying in battle for Russia. Kirill’s tediously Manichaean tirades—about saintly Russia defending “traditional values” against the gay-pride parades of the decadent West—are much more than a justification for Putin’s autocracy. His anti-modern ideology has become an instrument of soft power that is eagerly consumed by conservatives across the Orthodox world as well as by right-wing figures in Europe (such as Hungary’s Viktor Orbán). It has even won adherents in the United States, where some evangelicals and right-wing Catholics seek a stronger hand in the culture wars.

When everyone, even a writer for the Atlantic, realizes that Patriarch Bartholomew is closer to Pope Francis than to a fellow Orthodox Patriarch, the handwriting is on the wall. The divide is real, and the blob fully intends to keep pushing the Orthodox patriarchates further apart, and Constantinople ever closer to Rome. Recently, the Patriarch of Constantinople expressed a desire that Christians in the East and the West begin celebrating Easter on a “unified date” rather than adhere to separate Lenten calendars:

“It is a scandal to celebrate separately the unique event of the one resurrection of the one Lord,” Patriarch Bartholomew I, who holds the title “first among equals” in Eastern Orthodoxy, said in a recent homily, according to Orthodox Times.

 

The ecumenical patriarch made the comments during a homily on March 31, which marked Easter on the Western calendar and the second Sunday of Lent on the Eastern calendar.

 

“We extend a heartfelt greeting of love to all Christians around the world who celebrate holy Easter today,” Bartholomew said during the homily. “We beseech the Lord of Glory that the forthcoming Easter celebration next year will not merely be a fortuitous occurrence but rather the beginning of a unified date for its observance by both Eastern and Western Christianity.”

Changing Orthodox teaching on the Church as Israel, purging our liturgies of “antisemitic” references, suppressing the “antisemitic” writings of our saints, and aligning calendars will all bring Constantinople closer to the Roman Catholic Church, while almost assuredly completely severing any remaining ties with Moscow, and a large portion of the rest of the Orthodox world as well.

Well done, blob. Well, done.

We could list many, many other reasons for concern about the growing ties between the Patriarchate of Constantinople and Roman Catholicism (encouraged and funded by the blob, of course), but we are already running long in this article as it is.

Time to Welcome the LGBTQ and the God of Democracy!

LGBTQ issues would seem to be settled in the Orthodox Church. Marriage is between one man and one woman. Sex outside of marriage is a sin. The case seems pretty air tight. In fact, when Greece became the first Christian Orthodox-majority country to legalize “same-sex marriage”, the Church’s reaction was swift and strong. Met. Seraphim of Piraeus was just one of the hierarchs who publicly excommunicated Greek MPs who had voted for same-sex marriage: “No, no, no we will not accept those who do this. To fall away from the Christian faith, it is a betrayal of Christ. And unfortunately, it would be better if they had not been born.” His Eminence also, “raised issues of overturning human ontology and physiology by implementing the woke agenda, which aims to deconstruct Christian doctrine, ethics and culture.”

But for the blob, gay sex is a sacrament. The refusal of the Church to normalize and bless it cannot be allowed to stand. Luckily, the blob has allies within Orthodoxy for whom gay sex, women’s ordination, and transgenderism are very much open questions in need of dialog and “engagement”. The description below is from a video produced by the Orthodox Christian Studies Center at Fordham:

Orthodox Christians are called, first and foremost, to love all—for “God is love.” But the reality for many lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Orthodox Christians today is that their relationship to the Church is defined not by love but by apathy, exclusion, and condemnation. As a faith, we must choose love and compassion—to “love thy neighbor”— instead. This requires no change of faith, but a fuller, more compassionate understanding of what our faith in loving God truly requires of us.

 

We are pleased to present this conversation about ministering to LGBTQ+ Christians. Drs. Christina Traina of Fordham University and Ashely Purpura of Purdue University discuss the opportunities, challenges, and resources for ministry among LGBTQ+ faithful. “We cannot say we are loving God & be cruel to the people who we encounter in our lives. If you are not letting that love transform you & your relationships, then I do not know what Orthodoxy is.”

The video is below. From endorsing rogue do-it-yourself Orthodox same-sex “weddings” and female ordinations, to speculating on transgender saints, to casting aspersions on the celibacy of monks and nuns, to speculating on the future of polyamory within Orthodoxy – packing this much blasphemy into a single video is truly a satanic tour de force.

The probable key, to eventually changing so much Orthodox teaching in the West, could be summed up in one word (a favorite of the blob)Democracy! Many “Orthodox” hierarchs, clergy, and academics speak glowingly of liberal democracy heralding the dawn of a Golden Age of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Once the people, as manipulated and controlled by the blob, have spoken through their Democratic God, then we mere mortals have no choice but to comply. An example of the obsequiousness of some “Orthodox” hierarchs towards democracy and the US political order are the remarks of Archbishop Elpidophoros at the ceremony in the White House honoring Greek Independence in 2024:

In addition to these democratic ideals, which are sadly being diminished around the globe, we are here to acclaim and remember those whose commitment to the cause of liberty and democracy cost them the dearest price of all – their lives: The Immortal Heroes of 1821, who like those of 1776 and those of every generation who have been willing to lay “so costly a sacrifice upon the altar of Freedom.” We say “Eternal Memory” to all our brave warriors for peace and justice.

 

Mr. President, you have long been a close and trusted friend of the Greek-American family, and we consider you to be one of our very own, even from those very early days in Wilmington. But you are so much more than our beloved friend.

 

As President of our Great Country, you have led the world in championing freedom and the sovereignty of Nations. You continue to be the leading advocate for the cause of our Ukrainian brothers and sisters, who are still fighting two years later for their very lives against the unjust and inhuman invasion of their land. You continue to stand with Ukraine and for your unbreakable and unshakeable support, we are very grateful indeed.

 

Also, as sons and daughters of the Mother Church of Constantinople, whose longest serving leader in history, His All-Holiness Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, counts you, Mr. President, as a beloved friend – we thank you for your unwavering support of the purely spiritual mission of our Ecumenical Patriarchate.

 

Mr. President, we thank you for your commitment to Greece and to Cyprus, and for a just and peaceful solution to this Island Nation, that has been scarred by a violent invasion and forced division for half a century, a solution that will abide by the international law and a rules-based international order. We are on your side, Mr. President, just as you are on the side of democracy and liberty.

 

May God bless you, Mr. President, together with the First Lady, your family, and our Nation’s armed forces, with health, long life, His abiding grace, and His invincible strength.

How can an Orthodox hierarch openly discuss an “altar of Freedom”? Orthodox temples have altars. They are not dedicated to human freedom, but to God. This phrase makes no sense, except as a nationalist sentiment in which we don’t worship God, but some kind of manifestation of the liberal world order of the blob. Given our history in Orthodoxy of royal saints, this phrasing couldn’t be more out of place. Orthodoxy can work within almost any system of government, but there is precious little in the history of liberal democracy to commend it as spiritually superior in any way. We also see in the speech his fawning over Biden. Archbishop Elpidophoros is extremely prone to sucking up to powerful men, be they presidents, political operators, or business tycoons. Extra points if they have Greek heritage!

The short speech was like a National Security State “buzzword bingo” card. Praise for “democratic ideals”? Check! Praise for the US? Check! Praise for President Biden personally? Check! Cover up Ukrainian persecution of the Orthodox Church? Check! Blame the war in Ukraine solely on the Russians? Check! Talk glowingly about the rules-based international order? Check! Freedom and democracy? Check! Praise the armed forces of the United States? Check!

Does any rationally thinking person believe Archbishop Elpidophoros would ever stand up to any dictates of the blob he so enthusiastically serves? Of course not. Whatever the “democratic” will of the people dictates, that he shall do. “We must marry same-sex couples, ordain women, oppose any form of patriotism or border control, support the availability of abortions, and forever be continuously open to changing anything and everything about our Orthodox Faith! Otherwise, we will be guilty of discrimination under democratically enacted laws! Are we a Church that preaches the Gospel of love, or a far-right extremist organization?”

Nicholas – member of the Western Rite Vicariate, a part of the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese in America

The Greek Revolution of 1821 Remains Incomplete

To read this article in Greek, click here.

What did the Greek Revolution of 1821 achieve? And why should it take the Greeks four centuries to free themselves from the Ottoman yoke? Well, it wasn’t for a lack of trying. One main reason why Greece’s many attempts to expel the Turks had failed, is that a free Greece (a return to the glory of Byzantium and the peak of civilization) was not in the best interests of the European powers of the time. England, France, Germany were afraid of losing control of the imperial and colonial system in the face of Greek progress. They knew what a free and idealistic Greece could achieve. They feared a glorious Greek Orthodox return to superpower status. As a result, when Greece was freed from Ottoman slavery in 1821, the Royal European powers of Germany, England, and France persecuted the heroes of the Greek revolution.

Before proceeding, let us consider what these Royal European powers had in common. At the time, they had formed a type of modern “union” that controlled trade and politics. To maintain their wealth and power, the European Kings created a type of partnership between their families through marriage. By this means, they were able to retain the power and wealth amongst their own family members. This Royal Society functioned as a type of Royal Lodge in the same spirit and manner as Freemasonry.

Freemasonry likely began when Solomon’s Temple was being built in Jerusalem, and it is likely associated with Zionism. It is rooted in the ‘Guild’ system, (like the royal families), a type of organization created for mutual aid, protection and to promote professional interests. The higher levels also have a religious purpose, which is the worship of Lucifer (Satan) and the promotion of the Antichrist, a goal of the Zionists as well.  Freemasonry was first organized as a Grand Lodge in London on June 24, 1717, electing a Grand Master (Anthony Sayer) and Grand Wardens. While Greece languished under the Ottoman yoke, this organization spread through the English Empire. It prospered in Europe and formed an important part of her economic and social life. Today it is the world’s largest secret social organization, which includes many rulers, politicians, intellectuals, church leaders, and even “Orthodox” bishops.

In 1821, a protagonist of this system was Klemens von Metternich (1773 – 1859), an Austrian diplomat of royal descent, who strongly opposed liberalism, nationalism and electoral reform, in other words, all the Greek ideals. Instead of allowing Greece to create her own Government, Metternich and others like him, came to Greece to “help her government” by imposing a Monarchy which was an extension of the European Royal Families (Guilds).

With Metternich’s influence, the Bavarian Prince, Otto Friedrich Ludwig, became the first King of Greece in 1832 at the London Convention. As a result, the  popular leaders and heroes of the Greek Revolution, such as Generals Theodore Kolokotronis and John Makrygiannis, who opposed Bavarian rule, were imprisoned as traitors and sentenced to death. They were later released due to the pressure of the people and their judges (such as Anastasios Polyzoidis and George Tercetis) who resisted the Bavarian pressure and refused to sign the death sentences.

England and the Bank of Rothschild, which had given loans to Greece, imposed taxes more unbearable than those of the Turks. The people complained that they had exchanged the hated Ottomans for the Bavarians. In addition, the Roman Catholic King Otto did not respect the Greek customs and traditions, and many Greek Orthodox considered him a heretic. However, the king’s heirs had to be Orthodox, according to the 1843 Constitution.  After many struggles, the Greeks succeeded in dethroning King Otto in 1862. However, in 1863 the Great Powers of Europe reinstated Prince Wilhelm of Denmark as George the First and the next King of Greece. Greece had exchanged Ottoman slavery for a pseudo-freedom under the most powerful “Royal Guild”.

The Monarchy was finally officially abolished and exiled in 1974, but afterwards, and again under the influence of foreign powers, the same families have continued to govern Greece from one “election” to the next. Many of these politicians have been photographed attending Masonic events, such as the Rotary, and greet one another differently, in a manner which resembles the secret handshakes associated with Freemasonry. The Freemasons infiltrated many parts of the Greek Government, even the Greek Orthodox Church. The Freemasons also continue to manage the Lodge of King George the First, the “Grand Lodge of Greece Phoenix,” which they, themselves, admit on their website.

The Grand Lodge of Greece Phoenix was created in Greece on May 13, 1926, to replace the inactive Royal Lodge of King George the First. The Lodge prevailed after the restoration of the Monarchy in 1935 and is rooted in Freemasonry. Evidence of this includes the symbols which the Monarchy borrowed from the Lodge of the Knights Templar (full name: The United Religious, military, and Masonic Orders of the Temple and of St John of Jerusalem, Palestine, Rhodes and Malta).

There are many indicators of Freemasonry.  The words “Grand Commander”, “Order”, “Lodge”, “Guild”, etc., are usually associated with Freemasonry and have nothing to do with Orthodoxy. Freemasonry has incorporated the symbols and rituals of many Masonic Military Lodges into many Masonic Guilds since at least the 18th century. This can be seen in the “Red Cross of Constantine” in the Guild of Malta, received by Pope Francis in 2019, and in the “Guild of the Temple”.

Note the similarity in the eight-pointed silver stars of the Order of the Phoenix, the Royal Order of King George the First, and the Red Cross of Constantine. On the surface, a cross seems Christian, but it is a common Masonic practice to combine the occult with Christian symbols. The phrase “My power is the love of the people” in the center of the Cross of the Royal Order of King George the First, shows the underlying spirit which Holy Scripture calls us to investigate. When Holy Scripture says “The Lord is my hope and my strength” (Psalm 28:7) and “The Lord is the strength of my life” (Psalm 27:1), it is very problematic for an Orthodox leader to confess that his power comes from the love of the people, rather than from God.

Another symbol of Freemasonry is the five-pointed star which is found near the top of the cross on the necklace of the Grand Commander of the Order of the Phoenix. An archbishop of North America, who serves under the Patriarchate of Constantinople, was named Grand Commander of the Order of the Phoenix in Greece and received this necklace with this emblem. This means that he has been recognized for promoting Masonic principles and ideals.

Freemasons appear to be Christian and faithful to Christ because many of them attend church and receive the Holy Mysteries, such as Holy Communion. They call one another “brother,” referring to the Orthodox Christians who believe in the Holy Trinity, but they also call “brother” the members of their Masonic Lodge which teaches that the “Great Architect of the Universe” is some other god. This is problematic because having siblings in two different families implies that one has two different fathers – God and Satan. Jesus Christ, however, teaches that “no one can serve two masters” (Matthew 6:24), and that is why the official Orthodox Church of Greece forbids its members from participating in secret societies that reject the Holy Trinity.

Despite these warnings, many find it alluring to “belong” to a Masonic “society” that will bring them worldly wealth and power. The betrayal of Judas for 30 pieces of silver (the price of a slave at that time) shows that the betrayal of Faith and Country is nothing new. That Masonic societies promote “charitable” works is questionable, at best, from a scriptural viewpoint. When Judas returned the 30 pieces of silver, even the murderous High Priests of the Temple deemed it inappropriate to return “blood money” to the treasury and used it to purchase a field for the burial of foreigners. Therefore, it is not proper or right to use charity as a “mask” of betrayal; and this type of charity does not cancel sin. In addition, Holy Scripture teaches that we should not show off our personal gifts to be honored and praised by men, but by God.

Freemasonry and the “Royal Guilds” have negatively impacted, not only Greece, but also certain Hierarchs in the Orthodox Church. So, it is no coincidence that some Orthodox bishops have fallen into the heresy of Ecumenism and collaborated with their governments during the Covid-19 scare, to close churches seemingly for the people’s safety, but in reality, to persecute the Orthodox Church. The Greek governing officials then continued their attack on Orthodox ideals with the gay marriage and adoption law, and they subsequently plan to return Greece to political slavery with the new digital identity card. These are all the results and the goals of a Masonic government. We must realize that Freemasonry hates Christ and the Greek individual because he is Orthodox. These two elements obstruct Freemasonry from more easily pursuing its goals.

Therefore, Greece was never free after the fall of Constantinople. This small but amazing country is still struggling since the time of the Pope’s disastrous Fourth Crusade, which left her dangerously vulnerable to the Turks (and even greater evils). According to the official decision of the Synod of the Church of Greece in 1933, “Orthodox Christians must reject the Masonic movement and renounce it if they have joined it in ignorance of its aims”.

Greece, the cradle of Democracy and Orthodoxy, is a threat to the principles and aims of Freemasonry, which seems determined to infiltrate her and conquer her from within, by its attacks on her government, her economy, her society, and her Orthodox Church.  So, what did the Revolution of 1821 achieve? Dear reader, it made a very difficult and bloody start. Our small and blessed country continues to be feared and hated by many. That is why the blood of our heroes still cries out to us from the sacred soil of Greece, urging us not to just resist our visible and spiritual enemies, but to fully uproot them.

The Revolution of 1821 was never just Greece’s revolution. It was and is everyone’s revolution against the tyranny of the devil. Our struggle will succeed only if we remain steadfast in the Orthodox Faith and the ideals of the Land that fought for them.

Demetrios Georgiou


Η Επανάσταση του 1821 Παραμένει Ατελής

Τι πέτυχε η Επανάσταση του 1821; Και γιατί να πάρει τον Έλληνα τέσσερεις αιώνες να ελευθερωθεί από τον Οθωμανικό ζυγό;  Πολλές φορές η Ελλάδα επιχείρησε να διώξει τους Τούρκους αλλά δεν τα κατάφερε. Ένας κύριος λόγος είναι ότι μια ελεύθερη Ελλάδα, δηλαδή, μια επιστροφή στην δόξα του Βυζαντίου και στην κορυφή του πολιτισμού, δεν συνέφερε στις Ευρωπαϊκές δυνάμεις (Αγγλία, Γαλλία, Γερμάνια) οι οποίες φοβήθηκαν μη χάσουν τον έλεγχο του αυτοκρατορικού και αποικιοκρατικού συστήματος εξ αίτιας της Ελληνικής προόδου. Βασικά, γνωρίζοντας τι μπορεί να καταφέρει ένας ελεύθερος και ιδανικός Έλληνας Ορθόδοξος, φοβήθηκαν μια υπερένδοξη Ελληνορθόδοξη υπερδύναμη.  Γι’ αυτόν τον λόγο, όταν η Ελλάδα ελευθερώθηκε από την Οθωμανική σκλαβιά το 1821, οι βασιλικές Ευρωπαϊκές δυνάμεις (Γερμανία, Αγγλία, Γαλλία), καταδίωξαν τους ήρωες της Ελληνικής  επαναστάσεως.

Πριν προχωρήσουμε, ας εξετάσουμε τι κοινό είχαν αυτές οι βασιλικές δυνάμεις Αγγλίας, Γαλλίας και Γερμανίας. Εκείνη την εποχή, ήταν ένα είδος μοντέρνας «ένωσης» η οποία ήλεγχε πολλές εμπορικές συναλλαγές και πολιτικές εξουσίες. Για να διατηρήσουν τα πλούτη και την εξουσία τους, οι Ευρωπαίοι Βασιλείς δημιούργησαν ένα είδος εταιρίας μεταξύ των οικογενειών των δια μέσου του γάμου. Κρατώντας την εξουσία και τον πλούτο μεταξύ των οικογενειών των, η βασιλική εταιρία  έγινε ένα είδος βασιλικής στοάς με το ίδιο πνεύμα της Μασονίας.

Η Μασονία ίσως να ξεκίνησε από την εποχή που οικοδομείτο ο Ναός του Σολομώντος της Ιερουσαλήμ, και μάλλον έχει σχέση με τον Σιωνισμό. Είναι ριζωμένη στο σύστημα της «Συντεχνίας», (παρόμοια με τις βασιλικές οικογένειες), μια «εταιρία» που δημιουργήθηκε για αλληλοβοήθεια, προστασία και για να προωθήσει επαγγελματικά συμφέροντα. Τα ανώτερα  επίπεδα έχουν και θρησκευτικό σκοπό, η οποία είναι η λατρεία του Εωσφόρου (Σατανά) και η προώθηση του Αντίχριστου, ένας στόχος και των Σιωνιστών. Η Μασονία οργανώθηκε για πρώτη φορά στο Λονδίνο στις 24 Ιουνίου το 1717, σε μία Μέγιστη Στοά, ψηφίζοντας έναν Μέγαν Αρχηγό (τον Anthony Sayer) καθώς και  Μεγάλους Φύλακες. Ενώ η Ελλάδα αναστέναζε κάτω από τον Οθωμανικό ζυγό, αυτή η οργάνωση ξαπλώθηκε διαμέσου της Αγγλικής Αυτοκρατορίας. Προόδευσαν στην Ευρώπη και σχημάτισαν ένα σπουδαίο μέρος της οικονομικής και κοινωνικής ζωής. Σήμερα είναι η μεγαλύτερη παγκόσμια μυστική κοινωνινκή οργάνωση, εις την οποία βρίσκονται πολλοί κυβερνήτες, πολιτικοί, διανοούμενοι, ηγέτες εκκλησιών, ακόμα και «ορθόδοξοι» επίσκοποι.

To 1821, πρωταγωνιστής του συστήματος αυτού ήταν ο Klemens von Metternich (1773 – 1859), ένας Αυστριακός διπλωμάτης βασιλικής γενεάς, ο οποίος αντιδρούσε δυναμικά στον φιλελευθερισμό, στην εθνικότητα και στην εκλογική μεταρρύθμιση, δηλαδή όλα τα Ελληνικά ιδανικά. Αντί να αφήσει την Ελλάδα να δημιουργήσει δική της Δημοκρατία, ο Metternich και άλλοι παρόμοιοι, ήλθαν στην Ελλάδα τάχα να «βοηθήσουν την κυβέρνησή της» επιβάλλοντας μία Μοναρχία η οποία ήταν επέκταση των Ευρωπαϊκών Βασιλικών Οικογενειών (Συντεχνιών).

Με την επιρροή του Metternich, ο Βαυαρικός Πρίγκιπας, ο Otto Friedrich Ludwig, έγινε ο πρώτος βασιλιάς της Ελλάδος το 1832 με τη Σύμβαση του Λονδίνου. Tότε δημοφιλείς ήρωες και ηγέτες της Eλληνικής Eπανάστασης, όπως οι στρατηγοί Θεόδωρος Κολοκοτρώνης και ο Ιωάννης Μακρυγιάννης, οι οποίοι αντέδρασαν στην Βαυαρική κυριαρχία, φυλακίστηκαν ως προδότες και καταδικάστηκαν εις θάνατον. Αργότερα ελευθερώθηκαν εξ αιτίας της πιέσεως του λαού και των δικαστών (όπως ο Αναστάσιος Πολυζωίδης και ο Γεώργιος Τερτσέτης) οι οποίοι αντιστάθηκαν στην Βαυαρική πίεση, αρνούμενοι να υπογράψουν την ποινή του θανάτου.

Η Αγγλία και η τράπεζα του Rothschild, που έδιναν τα δάνεια στην Ελλάδα, επέβαλαν στους Έλληνες φόρους πιο αβάσταχτους από τους φόρους των Τούρκων. Ο λαός φώναζε ότι αντάλλαξαν τους μισιτούς Ωθωμανούς με Βαυαρούς. Επιπλέον ο Ρωμαιοκαθολικός βασιλιάς δεν σέβονταν τα Ελληνικά ήθη και έθιμα, και πολλοί Έλληνες Ορθόδοξοι τον θεωρούσαν αιρετικό. Ωστόσο οι κληρονόμοι του βασιλιά έπρεπε να είναι Ορθόδοξοι, σύμφωνα με το Σύνταγμα του 1843. Έπειτα από πολλούς αγώνες, οι Έλληνες πέτυχαν την εκθρόνιση του βασιλέως Οθωνα το 1862. Όμως, το 1863 οι Μεγάλες Δυνάμεις της Ευρώπης επανέφεραν τον Πρίγκιπα Wilhelm of Denmark, τον Γεώργιο τον Πρώτο, ως επόμενο βασιλέα των Eλληνων. Η Ελλάδα μετεβλήθη από σκλαβιά των Ωθωμανών σε ψευτοελευθερία κάτω από την πιο δυνατή «Βασιλική Εταιρία».

Η Μοναρχία επίσημα εξαλείφθηκε και εξορίστηκε το 1974, αλλά από τότε, και πάλι επι την επιρροή ξένων δυνάμεων, οι ίδιες οικογένειες εξακολουθούν να κυβερνούν την Ελλάδα στις επομενες «εκλογες» της. Πολλοί από αυτούς τους πολιτικούς έχουν φωτογραφηθεί να παραβρίσκονται στις Μασονικές εκδηλώσεις, π.χ. Rotary, και να δίνουν ένα διαφορετικό χαιρετισμό ο ένας στον άλλον, ο οποίος δυστυχώς, θυμίζει τις μυστικές χειραψίες οι οποίες σχετίζονται με την Μασονία.  Οι Μασόνοι εισχώρησαν μέσα σε πολλά τμήματα της Ελληνικής Κυβέρνησης, ακόμη και στην Ελληνορθόδοξη Εκκλησία. Επίσης οι Μασόνοι συνεχίζουν να διαχειρίζονται την Στοά του Βασιλέως Γεωργίου του Πρώτου οι οποίοι οι ίδιοι το ομολογούν στο δικτυακό τόπο τους «Μεγάλη Στοά Ελλάδος Φοίνιξ».

Η Στοά Φοίνιξ δημιουργήθηκε στην Ελλάδα στις 13 Μαΐου το 1926 για να αντικαταστήσει την ανενεργή Βασιλική Στοά του Bασιλέως Γεωργίου του Πρώτου. Η Στοά επικράτησε μετά από την αναστήλωση της Μοναρχίας το 1935 και είναι ριζωμένη στην Μασονία. Στοιχεία είναι τα σύμβολα τα οποία η Μοναρχία δανείζεται από την Στοά των Knights Templar (full name: The United Religious, military and Masonic Orders of the Temple and of St John of Jerusalem, Palestine, Rhodes and Malta).

Υπάρχουν πολλές ενδείξεις πως κάποιοι συνεργάζονται με την Μασονία. Οι λέξεις « Μέγας Διοικητής/Ταξίαρχος», «Τάγμα», «Στοά», «Ζώνη» κ.λ.π., συνδέονται συνήθως με την Μασονία και δεν έχουν καμία σχέση με την Ορθοδοξία. Η Μασονία έχει ενσωματώσει τα σύμβολα και τις τελετές πολλών Μασονικών στρατιωτικών στοών σε πολλά Μασονικά σωματεία, τουλάχιστον από το 18ον αιώνα. Αυτό μπορεί να το δει κανείς στον «Κόκκινο Σταυρό του Κωσταντίνου» στην «Στοά της Μάλτας» που έλαβε ο Πάπας Φραγκίσκος το 2019, και στην «Στοά του Τέμπλου».

Παρατηρήστε την ομοιότητα στις οχτώ μύτες των ασημένιων αστέρων της Στοάς Φοίνιξ, της Βασιλικής Στοάς του Γεωργίου του Πρώτου, και του Κόκκινου Σταυρού του Κωσταντίνου. Στην επιφάνεια, ένας σταυρός φαίνεται σωστός, αλλά είναι μία κοινή Μασονική πρακτική για να συνδυάζει απόκρυφα με Χριστιανικά σύμβολα. Η φράσης «Ισχύς μου η αγάπη του λαού» στο κέντρο του Σταύρου της Βασιλικής Στοάς του Γεωργίου Πρώτου, δείχνει το υποκείμενο πνεύμα το οποίο η Αγία γραφή μας καλεί να ερευνήσουμε. Σύμφωνα με την Αγία γραφή που λέγει «Ο Κύριος μου είναι η ελπίδα μου και η δύναμίς μου» (Ψαλμός 28,7) και «Ο Κύριος είναι η δύναμις της ζωής μου» (Ψαλμός 27,1), είναι πολύ προβληματικό όταν ένας Ορθόδοξος ηγέτης θεωρεί πως η δύναμή του προέρχεται από την αγάπη του λαού, παρά από τον Θεό.

Άλλο ένα σύμβολο της Μασονίας είναι το αστέρι με πέντε μύτες το οποίο βρίσκεται στο επάνω μέρος του σταυρού του περιδέραιου του Μέγα Διοικητού της Στοάς Φοίνιξ. Αρχιεπίσκοπος  της Αμερικανικής Ηπείρου που υπάγεται στο Πατριαρχείο της Κωνσταντινουπόλεως, ονομάστηκε Μέγας Διοικητής της Στοάς Φοίνιξ στην Ελλάδα και έλαβε το περιδέραιο αυτό με το έμβλημά του. Αυτό σημαίνει ότι έχει αναγνωριστεί για την προώθηση των Μασονικών αρχών και ιδανικών.

Οι Μασόνοι προσποιούνται (εκκλησιάζονται, και λαμβάνουν μέρος και στα Άγια Μυστήρια) ότι είναι πιστοί στο Χριστό και ονομάζει ο ένας τον άλλον «αδελφό». Ονομάζουν «αδελφούς» τους Ορθόδοξους Χριστιανούς οι οποίοι πιστεύουν στην Αγία Τριάδα, αλλά και τα μέλη της Μασονικής Στοάς η οποία δογματίζει ότι ο «Μέγας Αρχιτέκτον του Σύμπαντος» είναι κάποιος άλλος θεός. Το να έχει κανείς αδέλφια σε δύο οικογένειες συνεπάγεται ότι έχει και δύο πατέρες –  τον Θεό και τον Σατανά. Ο Ιησούς Χριστός όμως, διδάσκει ότι «κανείς δεν μπορεί να υπηρετεί δύο κυρίους» (Ματθαίος 6,24), και γι’ αυτό η επίσημη Ορθόδοξη Εκκλησία της Ελλάδος απαγορεύει τα μέλη της να συμμετέχουν σε μυστικές λέσχες όπου απεχθάνεται ο Θεός.

Παρά αυτές τις προειδοποιήσεις, πολλοί βρίσκουν δελεαστικές τις Μασονικές υποσχέσεις να «ανήκουν» σε ένα «σωματείο» που θα τους προσφέρει κοσμικό πλούτο και δύναμη. Η προδοσία του Ιούδα για 30 αργύρια (η τιμή ενός σκλάβου τότε) δείχνει πως η προδοσία της Πίστεως και Πατρίδος δεν είναι κάτι το καινούργιο. Το ότι τα Μασονικά σωματεία προωθούν «φιλανθρωπικά» έργα είναι αμφισβητήσιμα από απόψεως της Αγία γραφής. Όταν ο Ιούδας επέστρεψε τα 30 αργύρια, ακόμη και οι δολοφόνοι Αρχιερείς του Ναού θεώρησαν ακατάλληλο να επιστραφούν «χρήματα αίματος» στο ταμείο, και τα μεταχειρίστηκαν για την αγορά ενός κτήματος για να θάβονται οι ξένοι. Επομένως η φιλανθρωπία δεν είναι σωστό να χρησιμοποιείται ως «μάσκα» προδοσίας, και δεν ακυρώνει την αμαρτία. Επιπλέον η Αγία γραφή διδάσκει να μη επιδεικνύουμε τις προσωπικές μας δωρεές για να μας τιμούν και επαινούν οι άνθρωποι, αλλά ο Θεός

H Μασονία και τα «Βασιλικά Τμήματα» έχουν επηρεάσει αρνητικά όχι μόνο το κράτος της Ελλάδος αλλά, ως φαίνεται, και ορισμένους Ιεράρχες στην Ορθόδοξη Εκκλησία. Δεν είναι, λοιπόν, καθόλου τυχαίο ότι ορισμένοι Ορθόδοξοι επίσκοποι έπεσαν στην αίρεση του Οικουμενισμού και συνεργάστηκαν με τους κυβερνήτες τους την εποχή του κορονοϊού, να κλείσουν εκκλησίες, λόγω, τάχα αγάπης και υγείας, αλλά στην πραγματικότητα, να καταδιώξουν την Ορθόδοξη Εκκλησία, καθώς και η Ελληνική κυβέρνηση έπειτα συνεχίζει να κατασπαράζει τα Ορθόδοξα ιδανικά (με τον γκέι γάμο και υιοθέτηση παιδιών) και κατόπιν την ελευθερία των Ελλήνων (με την νέα ηλεκτρονική κάρτα ταυτότητας). Αυτά όλα είναι στόχους και αποτελέσματα μιας Μασονικής κυβέρνησης. Να ξέρετε ότι η Μασονία μισεί τον Χριστό και τον Έλληνα επειδή είναι Ορθόδοξος. Αυτά τα δυο στοιχεία την εμποδίζουν στους στόχους της.

Επομένως η Ελλάδα ποτέ δεν ήταν ελεύθερη μετά από την άλωση της Κωνσταντινουπόλεως. Το μικρό αλλά καταπληκτικό κράτος ακόμη αγωνίζεται από την καταστροφική Τέταρτη Σταυροφορία του Πάπα, η οποία την άφησε ευάλωτη επικίνδυνα στους Τούρκους, και έπειτα σε μεγαλύτερα κακά. Σύμφωνα με την επίσημη απόφαση Συνόδου της Εκκλησίας της Ελλάδος το 1933, «οι Ορθόδοξοι Χριστιανοί πρέπει να απορρίψουν το Μασονικό κίνημα και να παραιτηθούν από αυτό εάν έχουν ενταχθεί σε αυτό αγνοώντας τους στόχους των».

Η Ελλάδα, το λίκνο της Δημοκρατίας και της Ορθοδοξίας, αποτελεί απειλή για τις αρχές και τους στόχους της Μασονίας, η οποία φαίνεται να είναι αποφασισμένη να την καταστρέψει με τα πολλά πλοκάμια της και να την κατακτήσει από μέσα, με τις επιθέσεις της στην κυβέρνησή της, στην οικονομία της, στην κοινωνία της, και στην Ορθόδοξη Εκκλησία της. Τι λοιπόν πέτυχε η Επανάσταση του 1821; Αγαπητοί μου, έκανε μια πολύ δύσκολη και ματωμένη αρχή. Η μικρή κι ευλογημένη χώρα μας συνεχίζει να εχθρεύεται και να πολεμάται από πολλούς. Γι’ αυτό το αίμα των Ελλήνων ηρώων  εξακολουθεί να κράζει από τα άγια χώματά της, όχι απλώς και μόνο να αντισταθούμε στους ορατούς και πνευματικούς εχθρούς μας, αλλά να τους ξεριζώσουμε ολοκληρωτικά.

Η επανάσταση του 1821 δεν ήταν ποτέ μόνο μια επανάσταση της Ελλάδος. Ήταν και παραμένει μια επανάσταση των κόσμων όλων ενάντια στην τυραννία του διαβόλου. Θα πετύχουμε στην επανάσταση αυτή μόνο εάν μείνουμε σταθεροί στην Ορθόδοξη Πίστη και στα ιδανικά του έθνους μας.

Demetrios Georgiou

For Orthodox Subversion, a Picture is Worth a Thousand Words

A couple of years ago, I had to attend the heterodox wedding of the child of one of the couples from our parish. They had embraced Orthodoxy, but their adult children had stayed Episcopalian. One of their daughters was getting married in an Episcopal ceremony, and they asked a few of us to attend for moral support. When my wife and I arrived, we saw that our priest was already there. He was dressed inconspicuously in a suit and tie. I had never before seen him in public without a cassock. Sitting next to him, I asked him why he was in “civilian” attire.

“Because,” he said, “If I were here in a cassock and pectoral cross, some people could think I am endorsing what is happening here. There could be pictures of me. They could put those next to pictures of an Episcopalian priestess on Social Media, and the result will be confusion on all sides. I’m only here because two of my parishioners needed me here.”

He sat quietly through the marriage “service” conducted by the Episcopalian priestess. He then spent a few minutes at the reception, before hugging his parishioners, congratulating the happy couple, and quietly making his way to the exit.

He drew no attention to himself. He caused no scandal. Few at the wedding even realized he was an Orthodox priest. A simple parish priest understood the power that images of him at such an event, attired in clerical garb, would have had for Orthodox and heterodox alike. He wisely avoided all that, while still being there to support his beloved parishioners who were both happy (wedding, yeah!) and troubled (heterodox, boo!) at the same time.

If only more of our Orthodox Bishops displayed such discernment. As we shall see, some of our bishops are either clueless about optics, or they are intentionally trying to undermine the Orthodox Faith. We tend to think the latter is the case, but intentional or not, the effects are harmful.

Here are some examples.

On October 4, 2023, a His Grace Bishop Athenagoras Nazianzos of the Patriarchate of Constantinople’s Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America participated in an “Interfaith Harmony Day” held at a large Hindu temple in Robbinsville, New Jersey. The event brough together representatives from Hinduism, Islam, Christianity, Mormonism, Judaism, and Buddhism. It was part of the celebrations that culminated in the consecration of the temple a few days later on October 8.

At the event, Bishop Athenagoras read a letter from Archbishop Elpidophoros, head of GOARCH. Here are some of the sentiments expressed:

In the boundless tapestry of creation, we are called to recognize and celebrate the diverse ways in which humanity seeks to connect with the divine. As Orthodox Christians, we are continually reminded of the Apostle Paul’s words, for from Him and through Him and for Him are all things.

 

In this spirit, we celebrate the unity and oneness that underline our shared human journey towards a world of peace and reconciliation. May the opening of this beautiful shrine be a beacon of joy, understanding, harmony within the Hindu community and beyond. May this unique peace of Indian art stand as a testament to our common humanity and may its sacred hall be a place where hearts are uplifted and souls find solace.

Such words are very much in keeping with the ecumenist beliefs frequently expressed by the Patriarch of Constantinople and the bishops under him such as Archbishop Elpidophoros. After all, it was not long ago that His Eminence scandalized so many with his “many paths to God” speech at a conference on freedom of religion.

This is from a speech given by Patriarch Bartholomew on February 1, 2024 at the Church of the Nativity of the Theotokos in Constantinople.

To this end, we must recognize that there is nothing to divide us from our brothers and sisters of other denominations or religions. On the contrary, there are many things that unite us; the life of every individual, irrespective of their religious beliefs, unfolds as a sequence of crucifixion and resurrection moments and days. It is precisely this sequence that will bring us closer, enabling us to offer one another encouragement, optimism, vigor, and hope. This mutual support will assist us in navigating through challenging situations, knowing that resurrection days will come.

Such ecumenist teaching is very much at odds with Orthodox Christian Tradition. They are the sentiments of politicians looking to build coalitions, not the thoughts of holy men who rightly divide the Word of Truth. Ecumenism of this variety falls in line with the expressed goals of the Global Elite, Freemasons, New Agers, and others who, inspired by Demonic beliefs, seek to join all religions into one. Such talk from “Orthodox” hierarchs demoralizes the Orthodox Faithful, while giving inquirers the wrong idea about who and what the Orthodox Church really is.

But while the speeches, interviews, articles, books, and academic writings espousing ecumenist teaching are bad, the pictures are worse. Way, way worse. As Orthodoxy has understood for over 2,000 years, you may forget words, but images stay indelibly etched in your mind. Below are two of the pictures of Bishop Athenagoras at the “Interfaith Day”.


These striking images go far beyond being a “good neighbor”. They also go far beyond merely being an advocate for religious freedom. A bishop of the Church, posing with non-Christians in celebration of their paganism, will be seen as endorsing an equal status for that religion to Orthodoxy – “We are all just seeking God in our own way, so bless you in your search!”

A few days later, Bishop Athenagoras did apologize for his participation. While any act of public contrition by an Orthodox Hierarch is a welcome change-of-pace, an apology is of no real value. Bishop Athenagoras was not sent there by accident. The men who sent him are not idiots. They knew exactly what they were doing, and why. This was not a “mistake”. This was a calculated move to push forward the ecumenist agenda within Orthodoxy. Another opportunity to habituate Orthodox Christians to images of our hierarchs praying / officiating / participating with heterodox Christians and non-Christians.

As the images pile up, those of us complaining will get a pat on the head, and a condescending smile, while we are told, in a voice full of pity, “There’s nothing to see here. We’ve been doing this for years. Don’t be such a paranoid conspiracy theorist.”

Unfortunately, there is something to see here. There is a faction of Orthodox hierarchs, academics, rich laity, and clergy that truly believe Orthodoxy is antiquated and greatly in need of “modernization”. We have covered them before.

When trying to transform a 2,000 year old Divine / Human organization that prides itself on never changing, one thing above all is crucial. People cannot be allowed to connect the dots on what you are doing. Each subversive action must appear to be an isolated incident. If a pattern becomes too obvious, Orthodox Christians might actually wake up and take some action.

Ecumenism is not the only front on which attempts are being made to change Orthodoxy. There is a serious drive afoot to “revive” the office of Deaconess. The newly re-envisioned office of Deaconess is expected to have a liturgical role, unlike the historic office which most definitely did not. But a liturgical role for women brings up a problem. Orthodox Christians are not used to seeing women at the Altar. Suddenly putting women there would cause an uproar, and might even bring about a schism. It is necessary to go slowly in a way that gets the laity accustomed to seeing women functioning in liturgical roles.

Which brings us to The Most Reverend Michael, Archbishop of New York and New Jersey. (There’s New Jersey again, just like with the Hindu Temple incident!) It has been reported to us, by a member of one of his parishes, that at least 4 times, most recently on 2/25, His Eminence Michael has blessed a female Seminary student, Amber Prather, to give the homily at Sunday Divine Liturgy. The St. Vlad’s student is pictured below. Find the video here (her sermon is around the 1:32:00 minute mark). Amber’s husband is Andrew, who appears to be working towards ordination in the Orthodox Church.


Probably all of us have attended workshops, speeches, classes, etc. with female Theologians. A woman teaching is not an issue, if her talk is separated from the Divine Liturgy. However, this was not the case with Amber Prather. In the middle of a campaign to “modernize” the roles of women in the Church, Archbishop Michael has seen fit to put a woman in front of the Altar on multiple occasions to preach the homily at Divine Liturgy. There is no way Archbishop Michael is unaware that this symbolism bolsters the drive towards deaconesses and more. His Eminence must have seen the work of the Archons of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, who have have put real money and effort into promoting deaconesses. We have even seen Ancient Faith Radio recently wade into this debate by hosting a roundtable discussion on the topic.

Of course, it’s not just women preaching homilies. We are also seeing attempts to put female acolytes at the Altar. The picture below is of Varvara Gulina and her daughter. An Antiochian parish in Boston let her stand on the solea with her daughter and the acolytes. The Metropolitan had to “talk to” the clergy there to correct the situation. Perhaps such an incident will not be repeated in that parish. Unfortunately, however, Varvara had already got what she wanted – pictures that she put into public view, and a guest column on Public Orthodoxy to promote female acolytes titled Orthodox Christian Altar Girl.

By the way, Varvara is wearing a tiara in the picture above. She does not have a Theological education, and seems inclined to play “princess” dress-up at Church. An individual who knows her described her as “not well” and little more than a “tool” for those pushing for women at the Altar. As you might suppose, this isn’t really about women Deacons or women preaching homilies or female Altar servers. Those are all just steps towards making Orthodox Christians comfortable seeing women at the Altar, taking on male roles. After a specific comfort level has been reached, the next move is the real goal – women’s ordination to the priesthood. A goal that the most honest opponents of Orthodox Tradition, such as Aristotle Papanikolaou from Fordham’s Orthodox Christian Studies Center, are already open about.

Of course women can preach! Archbishop Michael has given his blessing on multiple occasions for a woman to preach homilies in one of his churches. What other hierarchs will join him in doing so? That remains to be seen, but it is a good bet that more will. Women can obviously serve at the Altar, look at all the pictures proving that!  At some point in the future, the modernizers will remind us that the world did not end when women preached homilies and fulfilled Liturgical roles. So why would the world end just because women can now be ordained?

Please do yourself and Orthodoxy a favor – don’t think all of these things are simply coincidences. This is a sophisticated propaganda effort along the lines of the ones used to successfully transform Rome, the Episcopal Church, and other mainline Protestant denominations. Do all of the people playing roles in this even understand the combined ramifications of all these efforts? Surely not. But we owe it to ourselves to understand what is happening, while there is still time to do something about it.

Nicholas – member of the Western Rite Vicariate, a part of the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese in America