Archbishop Elpidophoros Lies About Baptism While Endorsing Surrogacy and Same-Sex Marriage

This is Part Two of our analysis of the most anti-Orthodox interview in history by an Orthodox hierarch. See Part 1 Archbishop Elpidophoros of the Greek Archdiocese is Pro-Choice on Abortion.

It is very important that no one mistakes the opinions of this Archbishop as actual Orthodoxy.


Q. You received homophobic attacks following the baptism in Glyfada. But the Holy Synod of Greece also sent a letter of protest to you and to the Ecumenical Patriarchate. Can we speak of two “classes” of children in the Church: a “privileged” one and a “lesser” one?

If this were my interview, I would have first taken great offense at the use of the term “homophobia” in the question.  I would have made the interviewer restate the question in a neutral way before giving any answer. The loaded term “homophobia” is used to suggest that any opposition to homosexuality is irrational, driven simply by fear and/or prejudice. The term “homophobia” should never be used in an Orthodox Christian context as it is not applicable. Elpidophoros skips right past the use of this word without comment or challenge. That is the same as endorsing its use, along with everything that usage implies.

A: Our Christian faith teaches that God loves all His children and does not separate them by means of any criteria whatsoever.

Of course God loves all His children. But as for separating them? God’s children separate themselves. Sinners who refuse to repent separate themselves from the Church and from God. Those who teach heresy do likewise. This question is about “married” homosexuals who conceived children using surrogate mothers. They are in deep sin, and are harming innocent children who, having been conceived in an unnatural manner, are being denied the love and care of their own mothers. This can never be excused or endorsed by the Church in any way. God does love the sinners, and the innocent children, but avoiding the truth is not helping anyone.

It is perhaps not well known, but the Church does not deny—and, in the case of an infant, cannot deny—the Holy Sacrament of Baptism to anyone. I would even say that the Holy Sacrament of Baptism is the ultimate mystery of God’s absolute grace. How can we block a child’s access to God’s infinite mercy? Even the Holy Synod of the Church of Greece recognized this in the letter which you say was sent to the Ecumenical Patriarchate. In this particular case, the tension emerged because the Church was again called upon to choose between “being” and “appearing.”

Baptism is initiation into the life of the Orthodox Church.  For adults, Baptism is preceded by months of catechism classes to prepare them to live as Orthodox Christians. For children, Baptism is celebrated in the expectation that they will be raised by practicing Orthodox Christians who will impart the Orthodox Faith through a godly homelife and regular participation in the Divine Liturgy. The godparents, themselves assumed to be Orthodox Christians in good standing, will also participate in the spiritual formation of the children.

Below are the requirements for child baptism, for parents and godparents, pulled from the Website of a local parish of the Greek Archdiocese. Based on these requirements, is Archbishop Elpidophoros correct that Baptism can never be denied to an infant? 

Elpidophoros threw out all the rules in order to make this travesty happen. The children baptized were born of surrogate mothers to two “married” homosexual “dads” who are, by definition of their lifestyle, cut off from the Orthodox Church. Of the two “Godmothers”, one was not even a baptized Orthodox Christian. Who will teach these children the Orthodox Faith? How can they participate regularly in the Divine Liturgy, when their own “dads” are excluded from communion because of their sin?  

By this one act, Elpidophoros seemingly justified every criticism that Evangelicals have ever made concerning infant baptism within Orthodoxy. Evangelicals frequently accuse the Orthodox of thinking that Baptism is some kind of magical event that guarantees salvation. It seems Elpidophoros believes that as well. Will their Baptisms really sustain these children, even if they are raised completely outside the Church?

From an Orthodox perspective, the answer is “no”. As any Orthodox Christian knows, the efficacy of one’s Baptism can be lost through our own sin. If you are not living the life of an Orthodox Christian, then your Baptism is of no avail.

In the interview, Elpidophoros actually says that withholding Baptism denies a child God’s absolute grace and blocks a child’s access to God’s infinite mercy.  Does that mean that unbaptized children who die go to Hell? Are innocent children, who are unbaptized, not able to receive God’s protection?  If we will baptize any baby, and the babies are that much in need of it, then why not offer mass baby baptisms at Greek Festivals all over the country? Does that sound insane? Because it is. Why baptize babies into the Orthodox Faith who will not be raised in the Orthodox Church? Especially since the inevitable apostasy of these children will be to the spiritual detriment of all who participated in such mockeries – parents, clergy, and godparents alike.

Perhaps Orthodox norms didn’t apply in this case because both the money and the ideological statement involved were more important to the Archbishop?

This complete fiasco of a baptism, and the Archbishop’s justifications for it, will be thrown in our faces for years by Protestant and Roman Catholic apologists alike. It will confuse those Orthodox Christians who lack knowledge of the Faith. Unless soundly repudiated, this is the kind of compromise with the world that can eventually introduce heresy into the canonical Church, potentially even resulting in a loss of the Orthodox Faith in the Greek Archdiocese.

And that is not all.

Scroll Down to Continue Reading

Through his actions, Elpidophoros also embraced surrogate motherhood, a practice which all right-thinking Orthodox find abhorrent. Lawmakers in Russia have been trying to ban the practice as a type of slavery, turning as it does both women and babies into commodities to be bought and sold. Here are excerpts from one article about the proposed ban from the perspective of the Church:

Draft law on prohibition of surrogate motherhood was submitted to the State Duma on Monday. “Using a surrogate motherhood technology is a choice of parents. The Church cannot support such choice, since it believes that surrogate motherhood humiliates human dignity and is a morally dubious technology of reproductive health,” said Mr Kipshidze.

 

According to Kipshidze, surrogate new-born babies are not at all worse or better than other children. However, the Church can baptize them only after the repentance of those who made a decision on such a non-traditional birth of a child.

 

“This position is connected with the fact that parents wishing to have their child baptized cannot but share a moral standpoint of the Church, which considers such reproductive choice to be morally unacceptable,” explained the interviewee.

 

He also noted particularly that in the event of life threat to a newborn, he/she can be baptized without any delay or compliance with any preliminary terms.

 

The Church believes if a husband or a wife is infertile, they have to accept their childlessness with humbleness. In such cases spouses are recommended to think about fostering a child.

 

The only acceptable medical assistance in case of infertility, according to the Church, is artificial fertilization by the husband’s germ cells, since it “does not ruin the marriage integrity, makes just a slight difference from natural fertilization and takes place in the context of marital relationships.”

Notice that a child born of surrogacy can be baptized, but only after the repentance of the parents for participating in an unnatural act? Clearly the Russian Church does not share Elpidophoros’ zeal for indiscriminate baptism of infants. The homosexual “fathers” of the two children Elpidophoros baptized are very, very proud of themselves, their gay “marriage”, and their use of rented wombs for procreation. There is no repentance there. Also, did you notice, in the quote above, that surrogacy is illicit even for heterosexual couples?

Much focus has been placed on this scandalous baptism because the “parents” are homosexual. As bad as that is, the implicit endorsement of surrogacy by Archbishop Elpidophoros is actually a much bigger problem. 

Surrogacy is the immoral conception of a child, through unnatural means, with the intent that the child will be denied the love of his or her own biological mother by design. Nothing could be crueler or more inhumane. It is the implicit denial of the biological reality that both a mother and a father are needed to create new life. It makes a mockery of the differences between the sexes, treating two “dads” in a home as being just as good as a normal family. Surrogacy is also an integral component of the Transhumanist movement – controlled pro-creation being essential for the future “directed” evolution of mankind.

In addition to embracing surrogacy, Elpidophoros also normalized homosexual parenting. How can we oppose gay adoption, for example, when a Greek hierarch in good standing just endorsed a family structure with two “dads”? Of course, it goes without saying that through his actions, Elpidophoros also put his personal approval on homosexual sex and so-called “same-sex” marriage.

To defend the Archbishop’s actions, multiple “Orthodox” progressives have come forward to argue that the most pro-family, and most traditional, Christian Church on the planet doesn’t support “family values”.  The fall out from this will be ongoing for years.  Progressives and Orthodox who are not strong in their knowledge of the Orthodox Faith might actually believe this nonsense.

The pro-homosexual crowd within Orthodoxy absolutely noticed the “shift” in Orthodox teaching lead by Elpidophoros concerning same-sex relationships and all that it entails.

Q: The Greek Prime Minister has pledged to legalize same-sex marriage. Do you agree with him?

 

A: Mr. Mitsos, let me quote the scriptural “Render to Caesar the things that belong to Caesar.” The Prime Minister has the knowledge and discernment to make decisions in a way that serves the Greek people in its entirety. The Church, of course, will express the faith, conviction, and tradition that it has expressed and practiced for ages.

Archbishop – what is the “faith, conviction, and tradition” that the Church has expressed and practiced for ages? Why would an Archbishop refer to the Church’s teaching on marriage, but not take the opportunity to explain it? Is it because the question has been “politicized”? That has never stopped Elpidophoros before. The Archbishop, in fact, is usually not at all shy about speaking up about the Ukrainian War, climate change, gun control, “equity”, “systemic racism”, and many other political topics.  However, when it comes to the Greek government redefining marriage, Archbishop Elpidophoros suddenly wants to stay on the sidelines and let “Caesar” handle it? Why such reticence? Greek Orthodox Christians have the right to be heard as part of this process, do they not?

Evidently, an Archbishop is more qualified to discuss gun rights than marriage.

The issue, you know, is not that the Church understands things differently to the state or a section of the population. The issue lies in the process and reasoning whereby the Church deliberates and decides. As hierarchs today, we cannot groundlessly insist on things, expressing opinions or issuing decisions without any explanation. In today’s world, it is not enough to publish public “affirmations” or “statements” regarding the teaching of the Gospel, while ignoring the severe criticism from those who disagree or seek to hold a conversation with us. Dialogue with other points of view has always helped the Church to deepen its understanding of the Gospel’s teaching, while at the same time compelling it to speak the language of every generation and avoiding marginalization. As our Patriarch said recently: “In authentic dialogue, there are no losers.”

 

In fact, I would add that, today, we theologians cannot support our views by looking to the past alone, however sacred and mighty it may be. We should also respect contemporary developments in science, medicine, and psychology. And it is a great blessing and a great advantage that experienced clergy-physicians and theologian-psychologists serve the Church today.

The Orthodox Faith is God’s own self-revelation. The Orthodox Faith was not invented by men, but was given to us by God. The Church is the “ground and pillar” of the truth of this Faith.  Just as Jesus is the same yesterday and today, so is the Deposit of the Faith. If this is not true, then the Orthodox Church is false and we should all find another way to spend our Sunday mornings. But if Orthodoxy is true (which it is), then Orthodox hierarchs have not only the authority but also the duty to defend and articulate the “Faith once delivered to the saints”, including the Church’s teachings on sexual morality.

Archbishop Elpidophoros does not want to defend the Orthodox teaching on marriage, so he pretends that new circumstances in the world prevent him from doing so. Times have changed, so he says, and he can’t just repeat historical Orthodox teaching. Others might not like it. We have to “dialogue” now with those who disagree with God. How that helps Orthodoxy is anyone’s guess. Throughout all these “dialogues”, it seems that only the Orthodox side ever compromises itself. The anti-Orthodox never change their positions or their demands on anything. The Greek Prime Minister is most certainly not “dialoguing”. The Greek Prime Minister has an already made-up mind and is trying to achieve a political outcome that will transform Greek society, while making the Global Elite happy as well.

Nor will “same-sex” marriage be the end of this “evolution”.  A New York judge has already found a “right” to legal protections for polyamorous relationships. This will spread to any nation that redefines marriage from the traditional norm. Here’s looking at you Greece in a few years, if you follow America’s lead into this nightmare.

It should be clear to everyone that Archbishop Elpidophoros supports same-sex marriage. He does not even want to articulate the teaching of the Church on real marriage, much less defend it. Archbishop Elpidophoros appears to hope that endless “dialogue” on same-sex marriage will eventually afford him the opportunity to embrace such perversity fully and publicly.  This is especially clear as he mentions “contemporary developments in science, medicine, and psychology.” This is typical language for progressive “Orthodox” Christians looking to introduce same-sex marriage into the Orthodox Church. According to their way of thinking, sexual orientation is innate (like skin color), so denying same-sex “marriage” is unacceptable discrimination. Of course, these are the same people who teach that actual biological sex is infinitely mutable, while physical attraction to men or women is immutable.  A boy can become a girl, and a girl can become a boy, but you are born “gay” forever and the Church has to “modernize” to accept that fact. Follow the TheScience™!

What hogwash. No one has ever successfully changed his or her biological sex, but there are untold numbers of former homosexuals who can attest to the power of Christ to deliver us from our sins.

Archbishop Elpidophoros may reach a point where he feels comfortable fully “coming out of the closet” in support of same-sex marriage. Or, perhaps he will end up “backdooring” acceptance of same-sex marriage by gleefully complying with future “hate” / “discrimination” laws. After all, Archbishop Elpidophoros enthusiastically complied with all the “pandemic” government edicts, even going so far as to use Orthodox Theology to justify them. Why wouldn’t Archbishop Elpidophoros comply with edicts mandating the Church accept same-sex marriage or be fined / punished in some way? Especially since such laws would send him in the direction he already wanted to take the Church?

For a great discussion on same-sex marriage and the recent OCA pastoral statement on sexual morality, led by a repentant former homosexual convert from Catholicism to Orthodoxy, please click here.

Nicholas – member of the Western Rite Vicariate, a part of the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese in America

Oh hi there 👋
It’s nice to meet you.

Sign up to receive awesome content in your inbox each time new articles are published.

We don’t spam or share your email address! You can unsubscribe at any time.