Search Results for: The scandal of Ecumenism

The Scandal of Ecumenism – Greek and English

The article was originally written in Greek, and translated into English. Click here to skip down to the English version. 


Ο Σκανδαλισμός του Οικουμενισμού – Αναστάσιος Γεωργίου

Για μας τους Χριστιανούς Ορθοδόξους, ή ταυτότητά μας είναι ή Πίστις μας και η Oρθοδοξία. Όχι Oρθοδοξία «των παπάδων», όχι τῶν Οἰκουμενιστῶν επισκόπων … αλλά Ορθοδοξία του Χριστού, των Αγίων Αποστόλων, των Προφητών και των Αγίων Πατέρων. Αυτή είναι η Ορθοδοξία, για την οποία πρέπει όλοι μας να αγωνιζόμεθα καὶ εάν χρειασθεί να δώσουμε και τη ζωή μας ακόμη, όπως τα εκατομμύρια Μαρτύρων τής πἰστεώς μας.

Ο γνήσιος Ορθόδοξος Χριστιανός δεν παρασύρεται εις τὸν Οικουμενισμό, πού λέει ότι ο Παπισμός είναι εκκλησία, ο Προτεσταντισμός είναι εκκλησία και πρέπει να έχουμε συνεργασία και αγάπη … Ναι, αγάπη! Αγάπη όμως εν Αληθεία, διότι ή Παντοδύναμος Αγάπη συμπορεύεται πάντοτε με την αλήθεια. Ο Θεός διοχετεύει τη δύναμη τής Αγάπης Του, όταν προσκυνήται «ἐν πνεύματι και αληθεία» (Ιωανν. 4,24) Ως Ορθόδοξοι Χριστιανοί αγαπούμε όλους καὶ επιθυμούμε να έρθουν σε επίγνωση της Αληθείας. Έτσι μας δίδαξε «Ο Θεός τής αγάπης». Δεν μισούμε τους ανθρώπους εξ’ αιτίας της αιρέσεως ή της απιστίας των, αλλά και δεν θα αγαπήσουμε ποτέ, μα ποτέ, την απιστία των ή την αίρεσιν χάριν των ανθρώπων, διότι θα αποξενωθούμε από τον Θεόν.

Ο Οικουμενισμός προσπαθεί να βρει κοινά σημεία πίστεως μεταξύ Ορθοδόξων και ετεροδόξων. Ποτέ δεν έλαβε υπόψιν τις βασικές διαφορές που υπάρχουν μεταξύ Ορθοδοξίας και Παπισμού. Διακηρύττει ότι και στις άλλες θρησκείες, ακόμη και στις μονοθεϊστικές, υπάρχει σωτηρία … Έτσι ανατρέπει την θεμελιώδη Χριστιανική πίστη, ότι «ουκ έστιν ἐν άλλω οὐδενὶ ἡ σωτηρία» (Πραξ. 4,12) Ἐν ολίγοις, απορρίπτει τον λόγο τής Άγιας Γραφής.

Προχώρησε ακόμη και στο λατρευτικό επίπεδον. Στην Ασίζη, Ορθόδοξοι Ιεράρχες συμμετείχαν σε πανθρησκειακές εκδηλώσεις και κοινές συμπροσευχές και δοξολογίες με ετεροδόξους, και μάλιστα με Ιουδαίους και Μουσουλμάνους. Στην Καμπέρρα της Αυστραλίας (Ζ’ Γ. Συνέλευση Π.Σ.Ε.), οι Οικουμενιστές κάλεσαν σε συμπροσευχές ακόμη και ειδωλολάτρες, για να αποκτήσουν οἱ Ορθόδοξοι συνείδηση ότι κατά βάθος, μία εκκλησία, ή ένα τζαμί… αποβλέπουν στην ίδια πνευματική καταξίωση του ανθρώπου. Αυτό δεν είναι αυτόματη διαγραφή της εν Χριστώ σωτηρίας και του Ἁγίου Πνεύματος; Αν υπάρχει και κάπου αλλού δυνατότητα σωτηρίας, δηλαδή θεώσεως, τότε γιατί ή εν Χριστώ αποκάλυψη, προφητεία σαρκώσεως στην Π. Διαθήκη, και της ενσαρκώσεως στην Κ. Διαθήκη; Γιατί η Σάρκωση, ἡ Πεντηκοστή, ἡ Εκκλησία, ως Σώμα Χριστού και κοινωνία Αγίων; Αυτές οἱ πράξεις των Οικουμενιστών δεν φανερώνουν απόρριψη του Χριστιανισμού; Επίσης στην Γενεύη, ὁ Γενικός Γραμματέας του Π.Σ.Ε. Eugene Blake, κάλεσε τους ηγέτες όλων των θρησκειών σε μία ὑπερομολογιακή λειτουργία και προσευχή στον καθεδρικό Ναό του Αγίου Πέτρου, όπου ὁ καθένας προσευχήθηκε στη δική του γλώσσα και σύμφωνα με το τυπικό της θρησκείας του. Ἡ ενέργεια αυτή είχε σκοπό να συνυπάρξουν στην λατρεία του ίδιου Θεού.

Όλα αυτά γίνονται για τα συμφέροντα της Νέας Εποχής, και όχι γιὰ την «ἐν Χριστώ αλήθεια», τη ην «εν Αληθεία» ενότητα. Και όμως, το Ιερό Ευαγγέλιο του Χριστού διαψεύδει τις διάφορες προφάσεις και ενέργειες. Όταν οι Οικουμενιστές μας απορρίπτουν και μας περιφρονούν ως φανατικούς και φονταμενταλιστές, ότι δεν έχουμε «πέντε κλωνάρια μυαλό», να γνωρίζουν ότι απορρίπτουν και περιφρονούν τους Αγίους Αποστόλους και τους Αγίους της Εκκλησίας, τους οποίους μιμούμεθα. Αλλά απορρίπτουν και περιφρονούν και αυτόν τον Κύριον, ο οποίος μη θέλοντας να συνάξει οπαδούς θυσιάζοντας την αλήθεια είπε «Μη και ὑμεῖς θέλετε, ὑπάγειν» (Ιωάννης 6,48). Και δεν είναι μόνον αυτές οι προδοσίες των. Είναι πάρα πολλές που είναι δύσκολο να αναφερθούν σ ’αυτό το κείμενο, που γίνονται αιτία να διχάζεται το ποίμνιο της Εκκλησίας.

Αν αγαπούν τον Σωτήρα Χριστό και θυσιάζονται για την πίστη όπως οι προηγούμενοι Άγιοι Πατέρες, πρέπει να απορρίψουν τον Οικουμενισμό και να αντιμετωπίσουν σθεναρά τις δυνάμεις του κόσμου και τις μεθοδεύσεις του. Αλλ’ αυτό απαιτεί την αναβάπτισή μας στην Ορθόδοξη Παράδοσή μας, αλλά και την ενότητα όλων των Ορθοδόξων με την μετοχή στην άκτιστη Θεία Χάρη με τα Μυστήρια της Εκκλησίας. Η παρουσία της Ορθοδοξίας στο σύγχρονο κόσμο οφείλει να είναι πρωταρχικά Πνευματική και Λειτουργική. Η Θεία Λειτουργία, με όλη τη λατρεία μας, είναι ο σημαντικότερος θησαυρός μας, διότι περικλείει και διασώζει δυναμικά το φρόνημα και τη ζωή τῶν Ἁγίων μας, την πίστη και τον Θεϊκό νόμο και τρόπο της ύπαρξής μας. Αν υπάρχει κάτι το πολύτιμο εδώ εις την γῆν, για το οποίον αξίζει να δώσουμε τα πάντα και αυτήν την ζωή μας, είναι ἡ Ορθόδοξος Πίστη του Χριστού μας, τῶν Ἁγίων Αποστόλων, Μαρτύρων, Ιεραρχών, Οσίων, δικαίων καὶ πάντων τῶν Ἁγίων Πατέρων της Ορθοδόξου Εκκλησίας μας.

Βαδίστε, λοιπόν, στα ίχνη τους και πάψτε νὰ σκανδαλίζετε τον πιστό λαό οδηγώντας αυτόν εις την ανυπακοή και τον αποτειχισμόν. Δὲν ἀντέχει άλλο νὰ βλέπει την ισοπέδωση του Χριστού στην πράξη, με τις διάφορες θεότητες. Δεν αντέχει άλλο να βλέπει την ταπείνωση τῆς Ορθοδοξίας. Δὲν ἀντέχει άλλο να βλέπει να ταυτίζεστε με τις δυνάμεις του κόσμου, διότι αγαπήσατε «την δόξα των ανθρώπων μάλλον ἢπὲρ την δόξα του Θεού» (Ιωάννης 12,19). Τί κατάπτωσής! Αλήθεια, σεις οι «ποιμένες» σε ποιόν θεόν πιστεύετε; Τα έργα σας φανερώνουν ότι πιστεύετε στον θεό του Οικουμενισμού που δεν είναι άλλος παρά ο εχθρός του Χριστού, ο Αντίχριστος! Η μήπως δεν γνωρίζετε ότι ο Οικουμενισμός είναι παναίρεσις και οι υπηρετούντες αυτόν είναι αιρετικοί; Πως έχετε λοιπόν την απαίτηση υπακοής από το ποίμνιο, τη στιγμή που το οδηγείτε «στο στόμα του λύκου»;

To Ιερό Ευαγγέλιο μας συμβουλεύει να μένουμε μακριά από τους κακούς ποιμένες, διότι είναι «λύκοι άρπαγες» (Ματθ 7,15) Τα πιστά μέλη της Εκκλησίας του Χριστού, δεν πρόκειται ποτέ να δείξουν υπακοή στους ανάξιους ποιμένες του Οικουμενισμού. Θα μείνουν σταθεροί στην πίστη και θα αγωνισθούν σθεναρά κατά των θεοκάπηλων προδοτών της Ορθοδοξίας και των Πατερικών Παραδόσεων. Μετανοήσατε! Μη γίνεσθε αρνησίχρηστοι, αρνούμενοι το φρόνημα τῶν Ἁγίων Πατέρων οι οποίοι ποτέ δεν συνθηκολόγησαν με αιρετικούς και άρχοντας του κόσμου τούτου σε θέματα πίστεως,

αλλά υπέστησαν τρομερά βασανιστήρια, ακόμη και θάνατον. Ο Κύριος μας παρέδωσε ΜΙΑ ΕΚΚΛΗΣΙΑ, που ομολογούμε στο Σύμβολο της Πίστεως, και μόνον αυτή ή Εκκλησία του Χριστού έχει τη Χάρι να οδηγεί στη σωτηρία της ψυχής.

Καμία θρησκεία εκτός της Ορθοδόξου Χριστιανικής, και καμία Χριστιανική ομολογία δύναται να οδηγήσει στη σωτηρία. Αυτό διδάσκει το Ευαγγέλιο του Χριστού, το οποίο δυστυχώς σεις οι Οικουμενιστές με τα έργα σας το διαγράφετε. Σας παρακαλούμε! Μη γίνεσθε θεομπαίχτες! Μη παραπληροφορείτε το ποίμνιο του Χριστού! Μὴ συνεχίζετε να σκανδαλίζετε τον πιστό λαό. Το ποτήρι της υπομονής του ξεχείλισε. Φοβηθείτε το Θεό, πού σταυρώθηκε και για τη σωτηρία σας. Μετανοήσατε… Δεν είναι αργά.

Scroll Down for English Version


For us Orthodox Christians, our identity is the Orthodox Faith – not the “Orthodoxy of the priests,” or the Orthodoxy of Ecumenist Hierarchs… but the Orthodoxy of Christ, the Holy Apostles, the Prophets, and the Holy Fathers. This is Orthodoxy, for which we must all struggle, and if need be, even give our lives, as did the millions of martyrs who witnessed for the Faith.

10 Martyrs of CreteThe genuine Orthodox Christian is not drawn to Ecumenism, which accepts Roman Catholicism or Protestantism as true churches to whom we must show co-operation and love. Yes, we must love them, but we must love in Truth because Divine Love is always united with Truth. God sends the power of His Love when He is worshiped “in spirit and in truth.” (John 4:24) As Orthodox Christians we love everyone, and we desire that they come to know the Truth. This is what the “God of Love” teaches us. We do not hate anyone because of their heresy or infidelity to Christ, but we will also never love infidelity or heresy for the sake of any person, because that will alienate us from God.

Ecumenism tries to find common ground between the faith of Orthodoxy and heterodoxy, never considering the fundamental differences between the two. Ecumenism proclaims that there is salvation in all religions, thereby overturning the very foundation of the Christian faith and rejecting the teachings of Holy Scripture, which states, “It is by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth … Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved.” (Acts 4:11-12)

Ecumenism even goes so far as to alter Orthodox worship. In Assisi, Orthodox Hierarchs participated in pan-religious events and joint prayers and eulogies with heterodox and even with non-Christians (Muslims and Jews). In Canberra, Australia, (6-3 General Assembly of the World Council of Churches), the Ecumenists even invited pagans and idol-worshippers to joint prayers to persuade the Orthodox conscience that deep down, a church is no different than a mosque in a person’s spirituality. How does this new belief not nullify our salvation in Christ and the power of the Holy Spirit? If humanity’s salvation and theosis are possible elsewhere, then what is the purpose of the Old Testament Prophecies, the Incarnation, the Crucifixion, the Resurrection, Pentecost, and the Church as the Body of Christ? Do these actions of the Ecumenists not demonstrate outright rejection of Christianity? Furthermore, in Geneva, the General Secretary of the WCC, Eugene Blake, invited the world’s religious leaders to a joint liturgy and prayer service at St. Peter’s Cathedral, where everyone prayed in their own language and according to their own confession of faith. The purpose of this was to unite everyone in common prayer to the same God, but not in truth.

All this is done in the interests of the New Age Movement, and not for “Truth in Christ,” or for unity “in Truth.”  And yet the Holy Gospel of Christ rejects as false such actions and pretexts.  When Ecumenists reject us, who uphold Holy Scripture, as fanatics and fundamentalists, they should realize that they not only scorn and reject the Holy Apostles and Saints of the Church, who we imitate, they even scorn and reject the Lord, Himself, who said. “will you also go away?” (John 6:67)

And yet, it is not only these betrayals which cause the flock to be divided, for there are too many others to be listed in this text. If our present-day hierarchs truly loved Christ the Saviour, they would act as did our Holy Fathers, by making sacrifices for the Orthodox Faith, rejecting Ecumenism, and vigorously opposing the idolatrous, blasphemous, and secular forces of this world. Such love demands a rebirth in Holy Orthodox Tradition, but also a unification of all Orthodox faithful through the Sacramental and Liturgical sharing of God’s uncreated Grace in the life of the Holy Orthodox Church.

Orthodox Icon Holy ChurchOrthodoxy’s presence in today’s world must first be Sacramental and Liturgical, a salvific way of life that is found only in the Orthodox Church, the only vessel that can carry us safely through every storm. It is only within this Church that one finds the greatest treasure – the experience of Divine Liturgy and all its worship. This infinite treasure encompasses and preserves the fulness of the Christian Faith, the Mind of God and His Laws as expressed by the Apostles and Holy Fathers, the lives of the Saints, and the meaning of our very existence. If there is anything of unlimited value in this world that is worthy of every sacrifice, even our very lives, it is the Orthodox Faith, which was given to us by Christ, fought for, preserved, and passed down to us by His Holy Apostles, Holy Fathers, Martyrs, Saints and every righteous man or woman of our Holy Orthodox Church.

Therefore, follow in their footsteps and stop scandalizing the Faithful by leading us towards disobedience, heresy, and spiritual failure.  We can no longer bear to watch the degradation and humiliation of Orthodoxy. We can no longer bear the belittling of Christ, the only true God, Whom you lower to the level of other false deities. Nor can we bear to see you consorting with the powers of this world, because you “love the praise of men more than the praise of God” (John 12:43).

What a great fall for you! In which god do you “shepherds” believe then? Your works show that you believe in the god of Ecumenism, who is none other than the enemy of Christ, the Antichrist, the god of the New Age. Do you not realize that Ecumenism is a pan-heresy that incorporates all other past and current heresies? How, therefore, can you expect obedience from your flock, when you are leading us to the “jaws of the wolf”? The Holy Gospel warns us to stay far away far from bad shepherds, for they are “ravenous wolves” (Matthew 7:15) The faithful members of the Orthodox Church of Christ, will never submit to the unworthy shepherds of Ecumenism. They will remain steadfast to the True Faith and will fight vigorously against the traitors of Orthodoxy and her Holy Traditions.

Repent, therefore! Don’t be obstinate in your denial of the phronema and mindset of the Holy Fathers, who never compromised the Faith with heretics and the rulers of this world. Instead, they preferred to endure torture and even death, to uphold The Truth. The Lord, Himself, gave us our Orthodox Church, which we confess in the Creed; and it is only this Church of Christ that has the Grace to lead us to salvation. No other religion or Christian denomination can do this because only Orthodoxy rightly teaches the Gospel of Christ, which you, Ecumenists, distort and undermine. Please stop deceiving the flock of Christ! Stop scandalizing the faithful! Our cup of patience has overflowed. Fear God, Who was also crucified for your salvation. Repent! … before it is too late.

The Lie of Ecumenism

The first duty of every Orthodox Christian is to defend his faith publicly and to be prepared to accept threats, persecution, ridicule, contempt, and so on. He must be particularly sensitive to Ecumenism, which subverts the only correct belief in the one, true God. The learned Hagiorite monk, Theoklitos Dionysiatis, used many examples to expose how devastating Ecumenism is for Orthodoxy. Unfortunately, the pan-heresy of Ecumenism is encouraged and preserved by the Ecumenical Patriarchate, in the hopes that it will become the lifeboat of this critical and highly dangerous era of ours. Clearly this constitutes a delusion, which many clergy and theologians are unable to abandon.

Ecumenism is a cocktail of various peculiar religious beliefs and eccentric philosophies. It is unacceptable syncretism. Everything fits within it – truth and lies, Orthodoxy and heresy. Ecumenism resembles a collapsing roof, beneath which exists everything that humankind can think of. It is a lie most difficult to discern, yet an attractive lie, which tests the conscience, one’s determination, and one’s faith. It is a charming “nothing”, which takes on an existential “hypostasis” within the soul of those who have not experienced the fullness of Orthodoxy, and who have not found “rest for their souls” (Orthodox studies, 1974, pg. 102)

Ecumenism is not [just] a movement that is casually being promoted by certain “foolish individuals of ambition.” It has a clear, global purpose, which if pondered upon, is shocking. Its construct is demonic, for “it claims that there is no truth in anything. With its mosaic composition, it promises to solve all of mankind’s problems. It comprises the means of a new view of life. It is Godless within its own polytheism. It is irreverent in its acceptance of all the irreverent ones under its roof. It sees fragments of truth everywhere – fragments of a broken mirror – which it aspires to unite. It does not accept a personal God and refuses to accept authentic, divinely inspired doctrines. It does not believe in any revealed Truth. [According to Ecumenism] there is no single absolute Truth but rather many imperfect [truths].”

[Recall how on July 15, 2021, Archbishop Elpidophoros, a representative of the Patriarch of Constantinople, stated that all religions are equal, and one should not be put above the other. According to him “all religions are myriads of paths leading to one God”. (UOJ News, Union of Orthodox Journalists, July 19, 2021)]

Furthermore, Ecumenism does not upset anyone; it does not acknowledge the existence of homelands or religions. [In its view] there is only an ambiguous god. Its goal is one universal religion. In other words, ‘let the people have their gods, even if they are idol-worshiping pagans’, provided there are no fanaticisms, so that world peace may prevail, and those most guilty of the misfortunes of the world might have an unrestricted playing field, and undisturbed activity, to take advantage of nations and keep them under oppression and in total dependency.

Therefore, in the face of this great danger – the pan-heresy of Ecumenism – vigilance and a courageous mindset are needed, as well as public outcry and dynamic resistance [to its tenets].

Archpriest, Father Dionysios Tatsis

Five Good Reasons NOT to Visit a Monastery: The Temptations of Monastic Maximalism

Metropolitan Jonah wrote this classic article in 1999 while still a hieromonk, but it has since become largely inaccessible and forgotten. With His Eminence’s blessing, we post it here for ease of access.

We often romanticize pilgrimage as the path to the secret true Orthodoxy. We think that we must find the mythical “old country elders” and climb up a mountain to find the hidden answers. Or we pursue an advanced theology degree, thinking it will uncover some kind of forgotten knowledge. Or we rally around internet celebrity priests, some of whom have problematical teachings, frequently misrepresented as “ancient wisdom”.

But actually for most of us, everything we need for our salvation is in the local parish, either on the altar or on the bookshelf. Accepting salvation is the most difficult achievement of man, but it is always simple and accessible for all of us.

Deuteronomy 30:11-14 — For this command which I give thee this day is not grievous, neither is it far from thee. It is not in heaven above, as if there were one saying, Who shall go up for us into heaven, and shall take it for us, and we will hear and do it? Neither is it beyond the sea, saying, Who will go over for us to the other side of the sea, and take it for us, and make it audible to us, and we will do it? The word is very near thee, in thy mouth, and in thine heart, and in thine hands to do it. [Brenton’s English Septuagint]

–OR Contributor Commentary


The priest looked out of the altar, checking to see if the choir director was ready to begin the hours before the Divine Liturgy. Just as he was ready to say, “Blessed is our God,” his newest convert, Bill, made a grand entrance into the church, having just gotten back from his latest pilgrimage to another monastery. Bill — or Vasili, as he now insisted on being called — had been a normal young evangelical convert, clean-cut, single, and working his first job out of college. Then he discovered Orthodoxy in a bookstore, and with great zeal embraced the Faith. He was chrismated after a usual six-month catechumenate, during which he read just about every book in print on the Orthodox Faith.

After a year or so, Bill had decided to go visit monasteries. This is where his change began. He became more pious and more serious about his faith, but also started to become, well, weird. Like this Sunday morning. Bill/Vasili was not content to come in like everyone else. Rather, prayer ropes flying from his wrists, he made grand bows at the entrance to the nave, and again, the entire congregation watching, with a flourish prostrated before virtually every icon in the church. It was such a display that no one listened to the hours.

Then, just before the time the Liturgy should have begun, Bill came up to the door of the altar and announced he must have confession, or he’d be in big trouble with the holy elders. Father, being patient with zealous youths, went to hear the confession.

“I am the worst of all sinners!” Bill began as usual. Then he read his list, only four pages this morning. “And I only could do two hundred prostrations, not my usual three hundred, and only read four akathists, so I am not fully prepared for communion,” he said. “Besides, I just had to have a cup of coffee, but since everyone else does anyway, can I still go to communion?”

The priest had heard it all before. What does one say? “You did all those prayers, and still had to have a cup of coffee?”

“Well, the Elder said I had to do the prayers, but I couldn’t stay awake to finish them all. So I had some coffee. But doesn’t everyone in this jurisdiction even have breakfast before Liturgy? I heard that Bishop So-and-so even had coffee with those godless Catholics right before Liturgy. Besides, it was at three a.m. when I had the coffee, and it’s almost ten now.

A little after, thought the priest. “Why didn’t you start your rule a little earlier?”

“Well, the book I just read said it must only be done after midnight, as that is the time to battle demons. Besides, Madonna was on Saturday Night Live. Uh. . . the video clips of hers really led me into a big temptation . . . so I did all those prostrations.”

Father really did not know what to address first. “Father,” Bill asked, “don’t you think it’s time to start being more traditional, to get rid of those paraffin candles and use real beeswax? It is more Orthodox. It really bothers me that the choir reads half the texts of the vigil, instead of singing them, like last night. And on the wrong calendar too. It took me three hours just to repeat the vigil on the right calendar! I’m afraid I am going to have to find another jurisdiction that is more Orthodox. Am I the only one in this parish who knows how to do things right? Besides, I have invited my Elder to meet you, and he’ll set you straight on all this stuff. He told me we have to do everything correctly, like they do it, otherwise we’ll all burn in hell.”

Father was losing patience, looking at his watch, 10:20 and counting. “Okay, Vasili, look, there are a number of issues here, and we need to talk about them, but not while the whole church is waiting for you to finish. When did you go to confession last?”

“Yesterday, at the monastery. I think I have finally found a spiritual father worthy of my obedience.”

“And who is he?”

“Fr. So-and-so, from the monastery in the mountains. He is coming to serve with you next Sunday.”

“Bill. .

“Vasili.”

“Okay, Vasili, then. That guy was defrocked years ago. I can’t serve with him! Who gave you a blessing to go see him? Much less submit yourself to him? Much less invite him here?”

“Oh, so you too are continuing to persecute that righteous man! I know in my heart he is truly Orthodox! Besides he baptized me yesterday, making up for what you did not do by chrismating me. Actually,” getting excited, “why am I here anyway? I should really go be with him as the true criterion of Orthodoxy. . . Not in this modernist, ecumenist jurisdiction. My spiritual father may have been defrocked, but he is obedient to God, not those godless bishops! I know it because I feel it in my heart. .

“So,” said Father, rather irritated, “why do you want to go to communion here anyway?”

“What! You would deny me my right to go to communion!” he whined, as he stormed out.

Monastery Life Vs. Parish Life

This story is a rather extreme, but not entirely uncommon, example of what can go wrong when laypeople — especially those who are spiritually immature — take to visiting monasteries for the wrong reasons and in the wrong spirit.

The growth of monasteries in North America over the past thirty years, and especially in the past five years, has brought about a tremendous opportunity for faithful Orthodox Christians to visit monasteries as pilgrims and be exposed to monastic tradition. A monastery, among other things, is a place which practices the liturgical and spiritual life in a maximalist way. This maximalism is expressed in a number of ways, including long, full services, strict ascetic discipline, and very conservative attitudes in everything from language, style, and dress to how one conducts one’s personal life. Many confuse monastic maximalism and conservatism with a kind of reactionary ethnic agenda. This is a great mistake, however.

The monasteries incarnate Orthodox culture, regardless of what ethnic flavor it may have. It is the timeless, universal (Catholic) culture passed on by the holy fathers and mothers of the Orthodox Church, through personal discipleship and obedience. The monastic culture is nothing other than obedience to the Gospel, through discipleship to our spiritual fathers, who convey the tradition of how to live out the Gospel in its fullness. To visit an Orthodox monastery is not just to visit that particular community in that place at that time. It is to enter into that living Christian culture which has been handed over from generation to generation by the holy fathers.

Monasticism, the way of repentance, is a radically different way of life from living in the world, with a family, a job, and in a parish. Parishes are the front lines of where the Church meets the world, where a culture is sanctified and transformed by the Gospel. People lead busy lives in the world, and are not able to lead as active a liturgical life as in a monastery. Parish life seldom is, and often cannot be, maximalist in ethos. Yet a parish is not a compromise, a second-class way of being a Christian. Being a Christian in the world is taking the Gospel to the world, and living and witnessing to Christ while participating fully and actively in the culture. This is a very high calling!

Monastics have a different calling: to be “not of this world,” to structure their lives solely by the Gospel, and by the traditions of the Church, especially the liturgical cycles. It is very important to remember that there is no difference between the services prescribed for a parish and those of a monastery. There is no difference in the rules of fasting, prayer, or piety. The main difference is that people in parishes are engaged in the world, and monks are not. The monasteries are critically important to the life of the parishes: they constitute the reservoir of the living Tradition, in its purity, where people can experience the Gospel lived out in a radical way. Monasticism can inform their lives, inspire faithful laity to greater dedication of their lives to Christ and the Gospel, and provide a place of healing and spiritual consolation.

But as Bill/Vasili’s story illustrates, there are also some great temptations that people can fall into in visiting monasteries. These temptations are all centered around spiritual pride, and the prelest (delusion) which can go along with it.

1: The Trap of Spiritual Pride

Spiritual pride is an easy trap for those new to the faith, who are newly exposed to monastic life, and who are seeking and striving to live an authentic Orthodox spiritual life. It can especially be a trap for those visiting monasteries, seeking spiritual direction, and not knowing what an authentic Orthodox life in the world, in a parish, is all about.

Faithful people go to monasteries, and see people’s piety and how things are done in that monastic tradition, and want to emulate it — but without understanding it. Pilgrims go and encounter spiritual elders and monks who live lives which, in their view, are more “spiritual” than that of their own parish priest — so they judge him as inadequate to fit their spiritual needs. They go to confession, develop a spiritual relationship with a spiritual father or mother in a monastery, and think that theirs is the only way to salvation. They receive spiritual direction which they may interpret wrongly. Sometimes, people just get some bad advice, and uncritically turn it into the ultimate criterion of spiritual life. And sometimes people will go to a monastery or spiritual father who has been disciplined by the Church, and disregarded the discipline. Then the pilgrim- turned-disciple gets caught up in the self-justification of the errant elder, which in some cases has created a schism.

Excessive external piety, false humility, preoccupation with gossip and “issues” in the life of the Church, judging people on their piety or stance in these issues, complete assurance that one knows exactly how things should be done, and perhaps most dangerous of all, idolizing a person or place as the ultimate criterion of Orthodoxy, can all be symptoms of this malady. They are all aspects of spiritual immaturity. What is missing in all this is Christ and the real spiritual struggle with oneself.

2: Excessive Piety

Zeal for Christ and the Church are great and wonderful things; but authentic zeal is very different from a zeal that comes from one’s passions. Carnal zeal always has some element of self-gratification or self-centeredness, by which one justifies oneself as truly Orthodox, truly pious, and “in the know.” Authentic zeal is not directed towards anything but union in Christ, or against anything but one’s own fallenness. With true zeal, there is no hypocrisy. False zeal, the delusion of spiritual pride and conceit, is always hypocritical.

Piety is an important way of personalizing the experience and mystery of the faith. Bowing, making the sign of the cross, behaving reverently, and all the other forms given to us by the Tradition are very useful in this. But they are never to be used except to express one’s own love for God. They should never be used to “teach” others who are doing things “wrong,” or to try to “convict” people of their impiety; much less, to show others that “I know how to do things right’ .” In many monasteries, the rules for external expression of piety — bowing, crossing oneself, prostrations, and so forth — are observed very carefully; in parishes, however, they often are not. One should never attract attention to oneself through external piety. That only feeds the pride and self- centeredness that is in us, and distracts other people from their prayers.

The rules of fasting also fall into this category. Monasteries generally follow the rules quite strictly. And there is no difference whatsoever in the rules for fasting between monks and laity. That does not mean, however, that one should ever judge another, much less comment, on how someone fasts or doesn’t fast. Not only is it usually hypocritical, but it misses the point. Fasting, and all the other rules of the Church, are a means and not an end. If we fast, and feel proud about it, and condemn another for not being so strict, it would have been better for us if we had not fasted at all (Romans 14:3 ff).

The same rule applies to the liturgical life of the Church. Monasteries, by their very constitution, serve the liturgical services very fully and according to the ancient St. Sabbas Typikon. Services can go on for hours and hours, sometimes, and occupy a major proportion of each day. There is no difference whatever, at least in the Slavic traditions, in the services prescribed for monasteries and those for parishes. For a pilgrim to a monastery, while at first the services may seem a real chore, and too long, eventually they grow on you, and you want nothing else. Parish services, abbreviated out of pastoral necessity, can seem incomplete.

There are a couple of temptations here. The first is to think that the monasteries are doing it “right,” while the parish is doing it “wrong.” The second temptation is to think that there is not as much grace in the parish services, and that the services and liturgical/spiritual life are not being taken seriously. This inevitably leads to judging the parish priest as less “spiritual” and lazy because he cuts the services. Little do we remember that at our first monastic services, we were the first to sit down when we had a chance, and glance at our watches every five minutes, wondering if and when it was ever going to end! Parishes abbreviate out of pastoral necessity, and at the discretion of the pastor. One must not judge a priest or parish when they are doing all they can!

3: Judgmentalism

The biggest sin is to judge someone, especially the priest. The standard we set for the priest is usually impossibly high, something we ourselves could never live up to. Thus, any such judgment is immediately hypocrisy. The life of a parish priest is very different, filled with completely different cares, concerns, and responsibilities, from that of a priestmonk in a monastery. The laity see very little of the actual life of their priest. Many think he only works for two hours on Sundays! But to be a pastor is actually an eighty-plus-hour-a-week job. How can the laity judge him? And especially his “spirituality”?

The priestmonk may appear to be more “spiritual” because he is in church for six or eight hours a day, and has few other responsibilities. Try to do that with a family, and dozens or hundreds of parishioners to serve! The asceticism of being in the world and serving Christ, whether as priest or layperson, is equally as great as that of a monk in a monastery. It takes as profound a “spirituality” to do it. But the details will differ with the circumstances.

4: Abuse of Spiritual Guidance

Often people will go to monasteries for spiritual guidance and confession. It is a venerable and ancient Orthodox tradition to have a priestmonk in a monastery as a spiritual father, and to submit one’s life to him. Sometimes people will go to a great elder, mostly for the big questions in life. It is also true that some people will connect better with their parish priest than others. This should be supported by the parish clergy.

If the Church is a spiritual hospital, the monasteries are the intensive care wards with the specialists. You don’t go to a family doctor for cancer; but you also don’t go to a neurosurgeon for a cold. The great elders are those specialists who, through years of ascetic purification and experience, know how to deal with many of the big questions in life that people bring. Many have great spiritual gifts. Many do not. Most monastics are not elders by any stretch of the imagination. This does not compromise their ability to serve as confessor, consoler, and spiritual father. Whether it is a parish priest, a priestmonk, an eldress, or a great elder, the source of the advice and consolation is ultimately the same: God.

A true elder is one who always leaves a person with a profound sense of freedom, even when he reveals to a person the will of God. There is never any manipulation or personal agenda. The elder simply wants the salvation of the person, and is a vessel for him of God’s love and forgiveness. The great temptation is to idolize the elder, and even substitute him/her for Christ. A personality cult leads to the destruction of both the elder and the disciples.

Obedience is very important in the spiritual life. Obedience, however, is always within certain boundaries. It can never involve doing what is illegal or immoral. True spiritual obedience has one end: to lead us to obedience to God. It is always within the Church, always toward a more profound level of communion, both ecclesially and personally.

A great temptation, especially for Americans, is to try to find an elder (read also priest or bishop) who is “worthy of my obedience.” This is complete spiritual pride and delusion. We may think that we need a great elder, only the best, to submit ourselves to, because only such a gifted one could understand us, and “I could only associate myself with someone who could recognize and develop my unique potential.” This is presumption, conceit, and arrogance, presuming oneself to be on the highest of spiritual planes. In reality, especially if we have such an attitude, the last person we would be able to deal with would be a great elder of profound spiritual life, who would quickly cut us down to size. Our pride could not handle that, and we would disregard his advice — even, paradoxically, if what he advises would be the best thing for us.

5: Ecclesiastical Gossip

A last great temptation is to get involved in gossip about people, places, practices, and especially the “issues” confronting the Church. Whether it is who is doing what, how they serve this or that service and with whom, or the like, which is all gossip; or whether it involves the greater problems confronting the Church, such as ecumenism, the calendar, or what they are or are not teaching at such and such a seminary; there is very little fruitful and much more that is sinful in all that idle talk. The Lord said that we will be accountable for each word.

Not only does this gossip involve judging people, especially hierarchs, clergy, and teachers who will have to answer for themselves before God; it distracts us from the one thing needful: to pursue our own salvation. We are only accountable to God for our own salvation, not for issues which we can have no effect on. One of the saddest things is that monasteries tend to attract people who, in the name of being serious about their spiritual life, fall into this delusion, while all this kind of gossip and factionalism actually destroys their souls.

It is bad enough that people talk about such things in person; many also read whole publications that are essentially scandal sheets. The Internet is perhaps the worst vehicle for such gossip. This is nothing other than ecclesiastical pornography. It must be avoided at all costs!

Why We Should Visit Monasteries

Faithful Orthodox Christians should go on pilgrimage to monasteries often, should strive to emulate the piety and asceticism of the monastics as far as possible, and should seek the counsel of monastic spiritual fathers and mothers. The temptations and trials come primarily from our own spiritual immaturity and ignorance. We have to be aware of our weaknesses, and strive for the authentic spiritual values of humility, faith, and love.

The prayer of St. Ephraim should always be with us, as the overall guide for our spiritual life:

O Lord and Master of my life, do not give me the spirit of sloth, faintheartedness, lust of power, and idle talk; but give rather the spirit of chastity, humility, patience, and love to Thy servant. Yea, O Lord and King, grant me to see my own sins and not to judge my brother, for blessed art Thou unto ages of ages. Amen!

Fr. Saša’s Warning: Elpidophoros ‘Leads His Entire Archdiocese to Spiritual Destruction’

Elpidophoros with then-U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in New York in Sept. 2020.

Fr. Saša Petrović of St. Nicholas Serbian Orthodox Church in Omaha, Neb., delivered his speech, “Eastern Rite Protestantism: Archbishop Elpidophoros’ Destructive Influence on Orthodoxy in America,” in late August. That title is a mouthful, and so is the speech, which covers the unsavory details of Archbishop Elpidophoros’ reign as the head of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America (GOARCH) since 2019.

Fr. Saša gave his speech by video in his native Serbian tongue to an international conference in Sofia, Bulgaria. The conference, “Blockade Against Aggression Against the Church: Defense of Orthodoxy,” was organized by the International Forum of Orthodox Women and by the Center for Geostrategic Studies of Belgrade. The numerous speakers addressed the plight of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and its implications for Orthodoxy elsewhere as well as other topics.

Archpriest Fr. Saša Petrović of Omaha, Neb.

Although the specific issues that Fr. Saša addresses in his speech are unique to our time, the sentiments that compelled him to speak are common to people of conscience throughout history.

The indomitable American journalist Dorothy Thompson told an audience in 1939: “One cannot exist today as a person — one cannot exist in full consciousness — without having to have a showdown with one’s self, without having to define what it is that one lives by, without being clear in one’s own mind what matters and what does not matter.” St. Athanasius the Great, the fourth-century patriarch of Alexandria, earned the Latin nickname “Athanasius Contra Mundum” — “Athanasius Against the World” — because he denounced the Arian heresy thus: “If the world is against the truth, then I am against the world.”

Now here is Fr. Saša, one of those extremely rare but essential men with chests that we need in a time of crisis. As a solo priest stepping up to critique America’s most well-known Orthodox hierarch, however, Fr. Saša might feel that he too is up against the world. And his boldness may seem strange or shocking to some. The Polish-American writer Czesław Miłosz once described what the truth sounds like to people unaccustomed to hearing it: “In a room where people unanimously maintain a conspiracy of silence, one word of truth sounds like a pistol shot.”

Fr. Saša is no stranger to firing a rhetorical barrage. I gratefully found his article “Masks Forbidden in Church!” during the depths of the Covid tyranny that I battled in my parish of the time, and it inspired me to find the Serbian parish I now attend.

In his latest offering, Fr. Saša exposes the numerous times that the infamous Elpidophoros has violated Orthodox Christian teaching, which is based on Scripture and Tradition and which was formulated in the Ecumenical Councils and the works of the Holy Fathers centuries ago. The Orthodox Church dutifully and humbly guards “the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints” (Jude 1:3), neither adding to it nor subtracting from it. In Orthodoxy, innovating and “winging it” are explicitly avoided, as is any wannabe papism.

I will cover some highlights of Fr. Saša’s speech. An English translation of the entire speech is found on the website of the Center for Geostrategic Studies.

Fr. Saša starts off by explaining that Orthodox Christianity is “the last barrier” to the neo-feudal Antichrist technocracy that is being methodically implemented through assorted tyrannies and a generous dose of gender-bender ideology.

He explains: “The key fistfight of the globalist cabal is the transgender LGBTQ movement, which is designed to break the Orthodox ethos and destroy the family as the basic cell of human society. This movement aims to destroy every national, ethnic, religious, and even sexual identity, in order to eventually have a formless mass that accepts every kind of tyranny, without the ability to distinguish good from evil. In other words, Satan wants the complete annihilation of the human race, and therefore the destruction of the image of God through which man was created.”

Don’t count out subversion as a weapon. “A much more dangerous threat to Orthodoxy,” Fr. Saša explains, “is posed by those who work from within to break up the Orthodox Church, to destroy the Orthodox ethos and dogmatic and moral teaching. In a word, they are very committed to destroying the Church as a God-human institution.”

Enter stage left: Elpidophoros.

Fr. Saša says that, following the example of his boss, Ecumenical Patriarch (EP) Bartholomew, Elpidophoros “has completely put himself in the service of the powers of darkness aimed at the destruction of the Orthodox Church and the reign of the Antichrist.”

Fr. Saša’s dossier begins with Elpidophoros’ endorsement of perennialism, the heretical idea that “all religions have the fullness of truth that leads them to God, only in different ways.”

Fr. Saša quotes the blatant part of Elpidophoros’ 2021 speech at the International Religious Freedom Summit in Washington, D.C., which has circulated online. The gist of the speech is that the Russian Orthodox Church is bad news. However, the perennialist section provides a perfect example of Elpidophoros’ uncanny ability to fit doublespeak, arrogance, and insult into just a few words. He is a true artiste in this regard, telling the assembly: “When you elevate one religion above all others, it is as if you decide there is only one path leading to the top of the mountain. But the truth is you simply cannot see the myriads of paths that lead to the same destination, because you are surrounded by boulders of prejudice that obscure your view.”

Elpidophoros’ subtext is: Take that, you Orthodox fundamentalists! Primitives! Russkies! Cave dwellers!

Subterfuge, prevarication, and ambiguity are his modus operandi. And he is not above enlisting other clerics to do his dirty work. He sent a Greek bishop and a written benediction to the 2023 “Interfaith Harmony Day,” which took place during the festivities inaugurating America’s largest Hindu temple, in Robbinsville, New Jersey.

The bishop who attended the event, Athenagoras Nazianzos, is the chief secretary of GOARCH’s Holy Eparchial Synod. He read a gushing letter penned by Elpidophoros for the occasion, full of joy, gratitude, oneness, and a bunch of other words. He was especially nice because no Slavs were on site.

GOARCH Bishop Athenagoras has since apologized for his 2023 appearance at an interfaith event in New Jersey.

“In the spirit of love and fellowship, I offer my congratulations and blessings for the success and flourishing of this sacred endeavor,” Athenagoras/Elpidophoros told the assembled Hindus, Muslims, ecumenist Christians, Mormons, Jews, and Buddhists.

Since when is a Hindu temple a “sacred endeavor” for Orthodox Christians? Since never. But the best part of this scandalous event was that a few months afterward, a repentant Athenagoras issued a public apology for his participation. Cross that bishop off the list of errand boys.

Fr. Saša explains: “These profane blasphemies directly contradict the Lord Jesus Christ, Who says in John 14:6: ‘I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.’ . . . Can we imagine one of the Holy Apostles attending the opening ceremony of a pagan temple and saying in his homily that the place is holy?!”

No, we cannot.

Elpidophoros spoke at the 2022 March for Life rally in Washington, D.C., held, as Fr. Saša explains, “against the terrible sin of infanticide, which has become so common not only in America but also in many Orthodox countries.” At this major pro-life event, Elpidophoros bizarrely told the crowd: “Every life is worthy of our prayer and our protection, whether in the womb, or in the world. . . . At the same time, we also affirm our respect for the autonomy of women. It is they who bring forth life into the world. By His incarnation, our Lord, God, and Savior Jesus Christ assumed human nature, through His conception in the womb of the Virgin Mary. She freely chose to bring Him into the world, and God respected her freedom.”

Have you ever, in your livelong days, heard a whiff of a rumor of a notion that Mary, the Most Holy Theotokos (literally, “God-bearer”), and the topic of abortion belong in the same conversation? I’ll take your stunned silence as a “No.” What kind of mind equates Mary’s “Yes” to bear the Christ Child with another woman’s “Yes” to abort her unborn child? Truly sinister. My apologies for sullying a famous Churchill quote: Elpidophoros is an obscenity, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma, inside another obscenity.

“In addition to all the scandals committed so far by Archbishop Elpidophoros,” says Fr. Saša, “the culmination of all Satanic Sabbaths is represented by the baptism he performed in a temple on the outskirts of Athens.” That was the Greek Church’s “first openly gay baptism” in 2022, for the daughter and son of a homosexual celebrity couple. (The children were conceived via surrogate mother.) The event photos spread like wildfire across the Internet, as planned. The sadistic and brazen Elpidophoros operates with impunity and rubs your face in it. Is it surprising that he pulled this stunt while also misleading the presiding bishop in Greece about the parents? Neo-papism is as neo-papism does.

After the backlash (frankly, not enough), a petulant Elpidophoros declared, “I baptize children, and I don’t care about the personal life of their parents. I don’t judge people’s lives.” Fr. Saša cites a subsequent interview, where Elpidophoros pontificated: “Our Christian faith teaches that God loves all His children and does not separate them by means of any criteria whatsoever. It is perhaps not well known, but the Church does not deny — and, in the case of an infant, cannot deny — the Holy Sacrament of Baptism to anyone.”

Not so fast, says Fr. Saša: “If we were to be guided by the logic set forth by Archbishop Elpidophoros, then there is no reason why priests should not go door to door and baptize the children of atheists, Muslims, Buddhists, or Satanists. . . . We know that for baptism there must be some preconditions: For adults, faith and repentance, and for children, the godparents [stand-ins for the child] must be exemplary Orthodox Christians.”

The shifty Elpidophoros marches on, mainly because he has friends in high places. In April 2023, in an “historic address” as an “honored guest,” he lectured an audience of spooks at the National Intelligence University in D.C. The GOARCH site says he discussed “the Ecumenical Patriarchate’s granting of autocephaly to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church” [sic] and “the implications of Russia’s distortion of the Orthodox faith in the Ukraine conflict.”

Elpidophoros speaks about “Russia’s Weaponization of Religion in the Ukraine Conflict” at the National Intelligence University. But what about the United States’ weaponization of religion in the region?

That phrase should read, “autocephaly to the schismatic Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU).” There, I fixed it for ya, GOARCH. Oh, by the way, in Orthodoxy, autocephaly cannot be granted unilaterally by any patriarch. See the article “The CIA’s Man in Constantinople.”

Imagine having the gall to rail against the Russian Church while you and your barbarous coterie are trying to destroy the 1,000-year-old canonical Ukrainian Church and replace it with a schismatic counterfeit. Which is what Elpidophoros, Bartholomew, the former Secretary of State (and former CIA Director) Mike Pompeo, and other bigwig orcs are doing, notwithstanding their endless lies and propaganda.

Then-U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo with EP Bartholomew in Istanbul in Nov. 2020.

Meanwhile, Orthodox Christians are tied to wooden posts in neck-deep water while the tide is rising — or just detained, beaten, forced off their property, shot at, and forced underground. America: Click the links to see your taxes at work!

Do Americans realize, or even care, that their government’s destabilization of and warmongering in Ukraine have led to the persecution of Orthodox Christians there? Above, His Eminence Metropolitan Longin of Bancheny after his beating in Jan. 2024, only one example of the crimes being committed against Christians by both commonplace thugs and professional Ukrainian government thugs.

Diogenis Valavanidis of the Center for the Protection of Christian Identity knows. He too spoke at the Bulgarian conference that Fr. Saša addressed. Valavanidis said, “The main reason for the enormous upheavals in the entire Orthodox Church lies in the non-canonical decision of the Constantinople Patriarch Bartholomew I ‘the Barbarian’ to enter the jurisdiction of the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church under the Moscow Patriarchate.” The theologian Vassilianna Merheb, another conference speaker, observed that “an attempt is being made to reduce the Church to a completely secular-managed, geo-religious structure.”

Recently, the pranksters Vovan and Lexus stealthily got Pompeo to admit his prominent role in helping to create the schismatic OCU while secretary of state. (Start at minute 14:55.) Impersonating Petro Poroshenko, Ukraine’s former president, the pranksters teased the truth out of Pompeo: He is proud that the schismatic church, set up by key player EP Bartholomew, “has made a difference in the war.” The duo also teased out Pompeo’s neoconservative delusions: There’s no persecution of Orthodox Christians! The war must go on!

I am neither left nor right, and I condemn the Russians for their disgraceful role in the Ukrainian calamity. (I have this habit of reacting poorly to bloodletting, no matter who is doing it.) But let’s be clear: Elpidophoros and Bartholomew serve the U.S. military-industrial complex (MIC). Not even the late, great Smedley Butler, who knew militarism inside and out, would be able to fathom this pair’s treachery against their coreligionists. In 1935, Butler, a highly decorated Marine Corps general, repudiated his long career in a short book, called War Is a Racket. In a magazine piece of the time, Butler admits to having been “a high-class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the bankers. . . . Looking back on it, I feel I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three city districts. We Marines operated on three continents.”

Butler’s trenchant critiques apply to all facets of the MIC today, including its religious wing. Elpidophoros and Bartholomew do the bidding of MIC oligarchs and institutions, which are inextricably linked with the U.S. government. You gotta serve somebody, Bob Dylan once observed.

The U.S. government are the globalists. They run about 1,000 military bases around the world. They control the world’s reserve currency, ultimately backed by their military, which is backed by the MIC. They have consolidated power into history’s largest, most invasive empire, over the past 120 years or so, through continuous warfare. Capiche?

What else can we say? Time does not allow to tell of Elpidophoros’ ecumenism, his Holy Communion innovations, his authoritarian push for the deadly Covid vaccines, or his hobnobbing with defrocked clerics, Freemasons, homosexuals, Filioque reciters, BLM agitators, and gender hustlers — all of whom, Fr. Saša patiently explains, “publicly oppose the moral and dogmatic teaching of the Orthodox Church.”

It is Freemasons, provocateurs, and gays all the way down, baby. And when you hit bottom, you land in a filthy heap of worthless paper currencies.

After painstakingly presenting his evidence, Fr. Saša proclaims what every careful observer has been waiting to hear from a clerical authority: “It is clear that Archbishop Elpidophoros is not an Orthodox bishop and leads his entire archdiocese to spiritual destruction, while from within he destroys the already shattered unity of the Orthodox Church.”

As they say in Latin: Q.E.D. The argument is complete. There is no celebrating, however. Grab sackcloth and ashes for yourself and your Orthodox brethren. This is a mess — with more mess to come.

Fr. Saša has sounded the alarm. He has exposed the rap sheet. He has collared the notorious Elpidophoros because no one else did. How many clerics and laymen share Fr. Saša’s observations but remain stubbornly mute and inert and comfortable, even as they witness Elpidophoros’ abject mockery of their Church? Why is Fr. Saša the only cleric bold enough to speak in a manner befitting the circumstances? “For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind,” declares 2 Timothy 1:7.

It is time for the “showdown with one’s self” that Dorothy Thompson described, time to decide what really matters. And then it may be time for another showdown.

“The question arises for all local Orthodox Churches: How long will this situation be tolerated?” Fr. Saša asks. “How long will they serve together with the clerics of this quasi-church, anti-Orthodox, political, and secularist group? When will a local or Pan-Orthodox Council be convened to judge heretics and restore the canonical order and unity of Orthodox Christians? And the final question is: Are there any red lines for us Orthodox?”

—Cassandra St. John, an Orthodox Christian

Heresy at the Antiochian House of Studies

Our staff has validated that the article below comes from an actively enrolled student at the Antiochian House of Studies. AHOS is an institution that offers the following accredited degrees: Master of Theological Studies, Master of Pastoral Care & Counseling, Master of Divinity, Doctor of Ministry, PhD in Orthodox Studies. As you read through the article, please keep some important points in mind.

First, there is no Papacy, no Vatican, and no Magisterium within Orthodoxy. Our decentralized nature normally acts as a “firewall” against the rapid spread of heresy. While the Patriarch of Alexandria can inflict female ordination on Zimbabwe in the form of a “female deacon”, there exists no mechanism by which others are forced to participate in such an outrage. Ditto for whatever might, in the future, flow out of Constantinople. Or really any corner of the Orthodox world. There is no possibility of an Orthodox “Vatican II” suddenly transforming all of global Orthodoxy into something unrecognizable. Though, in all fairness, we never know what certain local jurisdictions might have up their sleeves that can make our lives difficult, especially when operating in concert with secular power for political ends.

Second, unfortunately for us, there are still pathways open to transforming Orthodoxy over time through the “long march through the institutions”This phrase, coined by a student socialist activist in 1967, describes a strategy of infiltrating government, academia, media, religion, and other institutions to transform them from within. You first become part of the “establishment”. Then you, on the surface at least, give the impression of continuity with the past while radically breaking with it behind the scenes. This is referred to as a “revolution within the form”. You keep saying the same prayers, doing the same liturgies, the same mysteries, but you slowly reinterpret them, expand them, “reform them” so as to eventually get to the desired, progressive outcome. Done slowly enough, and in the right way, you can avoid stampeding the normal laity until any hope of resistance has long faded. This, historically, was also how many so-called “Uniate” churches came into existence. The local people kept going to the same churches, with the same priests, doing the same things, without realizing (in many cases) that they were now “under Rome” courtesy of having been sold out by their local bishops.

Third, when dealing with Churches, it is necessary to seize the faculties of the seminaries. After that, you can indoctrinate future generations of priests, some of whom will eventually go on to high office (even the Episcopate). With an army of priests, even if the “official doctrines” do not change, you will eventually change how the Faith is taught and lived at the parish level. Grab the shepherds, most of the sheep will follow. It is a long game, but one that has already been at play since the 60’s. The results are everywhere around us. Simply review the last few decades of the Episcopal Church or the Roman Catholic Church. Or even what is happening in some Orthodox jurisdictions.

Fourth, problems with heresy among academic theologians, priests, and bishops are not confined to any one Orthodox jurisdiction. One can readily find false teaching among the Greeks, the OCA, ROCOR, and Antioch. Conversely, one can also find faithful Orthodox teaching in each of those same jurisdictions. The battle ahead of us for the future of Orthodoxy will probably be less between jurisdictions and more within them.

Therefore, it is incumbent upon us to watch all our seminaries closely. Without a robust, devout, faithful priesthood, there is no Orthodox Church. To that end, we present the following report from a student at the Antiochian House of Studies on some troubling, heretical teachings that are being presented there. This is not done in the spirit of causing scandal, but of genuinely seeking to bring problems to light before any more harm results. If other seminarians would like to share their own, similar stories, please contact us.

–OR Staff

Scroll Down to Continue


There are many things to love about the Antiochian House of Studies. Not only does the Archdiocese work hard to make the school affordable for seminarians, but they offer a wide variety of programs and focuses in which students can choose to specialize. Notably, five of its degree programs are accredited through the Association of Theological Schools. The variety of professors guarantees that one can learn a great deal there in whatever course of study is most appealing.

However, there are theological and ecclesiological errors taught by certain professors which seem to completely escape the notice of AHOS oversight – specifically, Bishop Thomas and Metropolitan Saba. Given the number of students who have noticed and discussed these issues with others at AHOS, it seemed appropriate at this time to make the matter more public, in order to make sure that the necessary scrutiny is applied to what seminarians are learning at the school. The Orthodox seminarians at AHOS are America’s next generation of subdeacons, deacons, and priests; is there anything more important to the souls of the faithful – and the Archdiocese as a whole – than ensuring they know what they’re talking about?

I have direct and personal confirmation of each of the following incidents. These are consistent, and typically receive no pushback (except by the students, to each other, after hearing and processing such sentiments). I also have to note, for context, that AHOS is also America’s largest Coptic (Non-Chalcedonian) seminary. The Coptics are, thankfully, not allowed to commune or serve Divine Liturgy at AHOS. However, I fear that this may someday change – without the required repentance and conversion that would bring the Non-Chalcedonians into the Orthodox fold – given the overall and very open atmosphere of ecumenism festering in certain professors’ rejection of the statements given by our Holy Fathers and Ecumenical Councils on this topic. The following examples ought to prove the point sufficiently for anyone serious about the Orthodox faith.

  1. Each class generally opens with prayer, and Non-Chalcedonian seminarians have been invited to say these opening prayers. Every Canon dealing with this topic strictly forbids praying with heretics and schismatics. What would the authors of those Holy Canons say about Orthodox seminary classes being opened by schismatic prayer?

  2. Another professor taught his class that “theologically, there is no reason to baptize babies.” Needless to say for those familiar with the Canons and Ecumenical Councils, such a statement is not only absent from any conciliar decree on the topic…it is formally anathema. Canonically, statements like this are akin to stating that Christ is not Divine, or that Mary is not Theotokos but only Christotokos. The Church spent centuries dealing with such heresies, and has declared at every possible opportunity that Holy Baptism is normatively necessary to salvation – even for infants, who have committed no personal sins. This can be found in every Canon and Council which has addressed the topic, most notably in the African Code (Carthage 419) which was subsequently granted universal authority by the Ecumenical Councils of Trullo and Nicaea 2.

  3. Another professor, discussing the non-Chalcedonian “Indian Orthodox”, as they relate to the historic and canonical Orthodox Church, proclaimed that “globally, we’re one Church!” Once again, we are left without a single statement – by even a single Canon, Council, or Saint – that agrees with such a sentiment.

  4. In a live lecture during the Residency portion of the school year, a professor asked the room: “When were the Apostles saved?” Various answers were given such as “at the Resurrection,” “when they repented,” “when they were baptized,” and the like. The professor then told them that none of these answers were correct, and that the Apostles were saved “at the Incarnation.” The obvious implication of this erroneous statement is that repentance, Baptism, and the Resurrection were not necessary. In fact, if all mankind were saved “at the Incarnation” with absolutely nothing else required, then Christianity itself is both unnecessary and irrelevant. Why join the Church if we’re already saved while living in atheism and filth? Why repent? Why pray? Thankfully, a number of students pushed back on this answer and began to ask the professor for what reason Christ had died if nothing after the Incarnation was necessary. He responded that “the only reason Christ died was to show us an example of death-to-self.” This appalling soteriology caused multiple students to exit the room, one of whom began shouting that he would “never come back to AHOS again.” He was not the only student so infuriated by the error that he was unable to think straight for a time afterward.

As far as I can tell, nothing at all has been done to correct these professors on what they’ve been teaching. The only two conclusions I can reach are that either 1) The Bishops overseeing AHOS do not actually know what’s being taught there, or 2) said Bishops actually agree with these perversions of the Orthodox Faith. I desperately wish to believe that the Bishops are simply too busy to know what the professors are teaching in their classes, and that if they were aware of what was being taught – and the effect it’s having on the students who are in any way familiar with these topics – that they would immediately seek to discover and correct these errors anywhere and everywhere that they can be found. If we are indeed dealing with the former case, then I ask these Bishops’ forgiveness for my making these things known, and ask them to understand that I did not perceive any better path by which to have these issues addressed. I love the Church and the Orthodox Faith. I love that so many students are eager to soak up seminary wisdom and join the ranks of clergy. And I love those who will be learning from these future teachers enough to do whatever is in my measly power, with the help and by the grace of God, to ensure that what they learn will save their souls.

Amen.

–A Student and Sinner

Archbishop Sotirios of Canada and The Order of The Phoenix: A Few Simple But Important Questions for His Eminence

If the title of this article caught your eye and you’re thinking … Hmmm, why does this title seem familiar … it may be because part of it is identical to the title of the 2007 occult fantasy film (targeted at children) Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix.[i]  And for some of you, that should get your Orthodox Christian spidey senses tingling.

The following – which is the very last line of Archbishop Sotirios’ (“AB Sot”) online BIO (with my underlining added) – certainly got my senses prickling:

“His Eminence has also been named Grand Commander of the Order of Phoenix of Greece.”

As unbelievable as this may sound, I didn’t just make it up.  It’s a real thing and its unacceptable, in my view, that this high-ranking Orthodox Christian hierarch holds this title, proudly, so it seems.  But, don’t take my word about this; instead, verify this for yourself here: https://goarchdiocese.ca/archbishop-biography/.  (In fact, remember the following rule as you delve deeper into our faith, regardless of what or who your source is: trust but verify and do not just repeat rumors or sayings from others.)

Before you read further (if you choose to do so), I would like you to know that my goal in writing this expose is not to disparage “his eminence” but rather, to give him the opportunity to address three simple questions:

Q1: Were you aware that the Order of Phoenix of Greece is connected to Freemasonry?

Q2: If “No” to Q1 (and you confirm the connection), will you publicly renounce your Grand Commander title?

Q3: Will you issue an official statement declaring, as Archbishop of the Archdiocese of Canada, that the religion of Freemasonry is not compatible with Christianity and unequivocally renounce it?

If AB Sot decides that he is above having to address these questions – which I believe he should address as the leader of the Greek Orthodox Church in Canada – then, his silence will raise the following question: Why would he remain silent when he could easily quash all doubt about being a Freemason by humbling himself to his parishioners in Canada and answering these question directly, unambiguously and unequivocally.[ii]

In short, if AB Sot “pleads the fifth”[iii] on these questions, then how do we – Greek Orthodox Christians in Canada – remain obedient to him in terms of funding him through our Churches’ membership dues and, more importantly, taking spiritual guidance from him.  On my part, let me more blunt about how I will feel about him if he continues to dodge these questions: I will give him the same respect that I give to the prosperity tele-evangelists of our time.

Who is Archbishop Sotirios?

For non-Canadian readers who may not be familiar with AB Sot, he is the top dog of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of Canada since 2019.  Before then, he was Metropolitan Sotirios … since 1996 … and before then, he was Bishop Sotirios of Toronto beginning in 1979.  Yes, AB Sot has been around a long time and has had a steady (and some might say ruthless) climb to the top.

My first memories of him go back to the late 1990s when I saw him in full regalia in various churches in my hometown.  And, as a fun fact in the six degrees of separation department, AB Sot co-signed my birth and baptismal certificate as the junior priest to the senior one (name purposely withheld) who baptized me.  However, AB Sot really caught my attention during the COVID-19 experiment when he was content to go along to get along instead of being our most senior – Orthodox Christian – voice of protest in Canada.

If AB Sot remains silent in the face of the questions I have posed, then, I would urge caution to my fellow Greek Orthodox Christians in Canada in the event that this hierarch asks you to go along to get along (again) with respect to future governmental action that limits, restricts or denies your right to practice our faith and worship the Lord, Jesus Christ, in the same way that we have done for the last 2000 years or so.  For example, if new laws prohibit the proclamation or discussion of certain parts of the Gospels and Epistles about the passion of the Lord – during the Divine Liturgy in Church and in Bible Study – because they are characterized as “antisemitic”, and AB Sot remains silent to the Government, but asks us to go along with this, will you obey his directive?

Sidebar on Signs of the Times: If your reaction to the above is “this writer is being an alarmist…” or “this is never gonna happen in my lifetime …”, I offer three retorts below in the forms of a rhetorical question, a reference to two literary sources that are modern-day Cassandra-calls about governmental surveillance and “soft-totalitarianism” and an actual and imminent legislative threat in Canada.

First, let me take you back about 10 years ago.  What would you say to someone who told you that a time is coming that there will be more than two gender choices on a Canadian Passport Application?

Second, I urge you to read Rod Dreher’s book Live Not by Lies to understand what soft totalitarianism means and The Age of Surveillance Capitalism (courtesy of Shoshana Zuboff) to understand how extensively governments monitor our movements, our purchases and generally, our behaviours, 24/7.[iv]  And then, just think about how governments everywhere are slowly chipping away at fundamental freedoms, especially speech and religion, through tyrannical laws promoted and passed by secular leaders, who are boldly and openly hostile to Christianity, using technologies that have never before existed.  (If this does not resonate with you, you are being willfully blind.)

Third, read Bill C-367, (first reading in our House of Commons completed in late November 2023; see https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bill/44-1/c-367).  (For American readers, our House of Commons is the equivalent of your House of Representatives.)  If this Bill (as it now stands) becomes law, Christian pastors (including Orthodox Priests) can (and, in my view) will be charged and convicted for proclaiming and preaching the Gospels.  And one more point on this threat: Don’t expect relief from our Supreme Court of Canada if this Bill become law and is challenged as a violation of our fundamental freedoms.  Why do I say this? Well, because of what our courts said about “public health” versus “freedom of religion” just a few years ago, in the context of a recent, worldwide experiment in human behavioural compliance.[v]

The Placement of the “Grand Commander” Reference in AB Sot’s BIO

Is anyone else wondering why the reference to AB Sot’s curious honorificGrand Commander of the Order of Phoenix of Greece – is buried at the end of his BIO?

I don’t think it’s a coincidence.

Doesn’t this last line seem to be hiding in plain sight?[vi]

In my view, his Grand Commander title is exactly where it is – buried in the last line – for a reason: to demonstrate, outwardly and boldly, his allegiance to a certain fraternal organization without attracting any attention from the casual onlooker or admirer, the occasional church-goers who see AB Sot at their church every once in awhile or even the groupies that follow him from church to church, across Canada.

In other words, AB Sot seems to be hiding this title in plain sight.

Think about it: after 45 years of AB Sot’s bishopric in Canada (see above), I am betting that 99% of the Canadian-Greek Orthodox Christians don’t even know about his Order of the Phoenix title.

And perhaps I would have never noticed it either if I did not become curious about the lacuna in his leadership that was revealed during the worldwide governmental experiment of COVID-19.

When Trudeau and provincial premieres (which means state governors, for my American friends) mandated the closure of churches – for the greater good of public health – while keeping “essential services” like liquor and big box stores open, I waited and waited for a statement by AB Sot condemning these closures and for him to fight against these closures but he didn’t do either – and that’s when I became suspicious of his ethos.[vii]

As I watched Orthodox Christian Priests and commentators (and even Roman Catholics and Protestants) speak out against these mandated closures and defy them, at great risk to their priesthoods (i.e. their livelihoods) and, in some cases, their freedom, all I could hear from AB Sot’s HQ in Toronto was crickets and, even worse, bromides and platitudes.

I know that AB Sot was approached by Canadian-Greek Orthodox lawyers to challenge the law, on a pro bono basis – not for immediate relief because litigation (especially constitutional litigation) takes time to make its way to the Supreme Court of Canada – but, rather, to establish a few key precedents as possible “shields” against future governmental action that would seek to deny the free exercise of religion (which is a so-called fundamental freedom in Canada).[viii]

See PDF here for evidence of offer of pro bono legal assistance in protecting religious freedom in Canada.

There was Protestant opposition to church closings in Canada, but where was Archbishop Sotirios in the fight? 

And what did AB Sot do with this offer from the Greek Orthodox legal bar in Canada?

Nothing.  Nada.  He remained silent about it from his papal-like “See” in Toronto.

He ignored it because it would violate his apparent ethos of – we need to go along to get along – a phrase which sickened me in the context of the state’s suppression of our right to worship God in the way that His Son, the Lord Jesus Christ, showed His Apostles and, in turn, they have showed us, by their successors – our Bishops – in an unbroken succession since Pentecost.  In my view, AB abdicated his responsibility during COVID-19 as a Bishop to his Greek-Orthodox constituencies across Canada by not being a loud voice of protest against the Trudeau and provincial governments.

Circling back to the last line of AB Sot’s BIO, to me, it is saying the following:

“I am telling you who I am and what I believe in and yet, I have attained the highest level of ecclesiastical authority in Canada over you … and there’s not a damn thing you can do about it”.

I hope I am totally wrong about what this Grand Commander title means about AB Sot … and I suppose time will tell … if we come to the point, in his lifetime, where the state puts Christians to the ultimate choice: deny Christ or I will put you to death, directly, or indirectly, by making you a criminal and then depriving you of your ability to buy and sell.[ix]

Unfortunately, what I have observed and experienced personally in AB Sot and heard, from first-person testimony, from those who have sat with him, while he conducted the “business” of running Greek Orthodox churches in Canada, have confirmed certain things about him that I did not want to believe.

Now, for anyone that may use this revelation about AB Sot as an excuse to abandon your membership in the body of Christ (i.e. the Church) or become cynical about Greek Orthodox Christianity in Canada, there is a lesson about this in the Gospel of John 11:49-52, which the Orthodox Study Bible (the “OSB”) explains as follows:

“The failings and even wickedness of the officeholder do not diminish the grace of the office itself.” 

Well said, OSB commentators.

However, what that Gospel does not say is to defer to our hierarchs no matter what they say or omit to say.  That would not be in line with the Orthodox Christian ethos that our Saints showed us.  Before they were Saints, these beautiful and bold souls were the elect, the laity – like we – Greek-Canadian Orthodox Christians – are.  And, as the latter, we are full members of the Church and one of the four orders of the Church (with the other three being Bishops, Priests and Deacons) who have the right – and I would say duty – to question, respectfully, the bona fides of an officeholder (even the highest hierarch) and ask him, respectfully, to answer basic questions or explain himself about his actions (or inactions) or titles if they appear to be contrary to the tenets of our faith.[x]

Scroll Down to Continue

Who Am I to Question this Grand Commander?

Let me be clear: I am a struggling sinner but, that doesn’t mean that you should use this an excuse to disregard my message in this article.  As I stated at the outset, verify the things you read for yourself and draw your own conclusions.  It took me years to decide to write this article and submit it for publication.  If you have any concerns or questions about AB Sot – that have arisen over the years because of his actions or omissions – then you may wish to keep reading.

For most of my life, I was an Orthodox Christian in name only and a fair-weather one (literally) at best.  However, for the last several years, I have re-discovered the beauty and richness of our faith and I wanted to know why I should stick with it as opposed to resolving myself to statements, such as this one:

“… all religions are myriads of paths leading to one God.”

This is a very dangerous statement designed to plant a seed of doubt about our Orthodox Christian faith from another top Greek Orthodox hierarch in North America.[xi]

Why do I say dangerous?

Because it is one of those statements that seems innocuous and admirable (to the casual Christian) and consensus-building (to the liberal in all of us) until you read it carefully and try to reconcile it with one of the clearest pronouncements about the Christian faith, directly from Christ Himself in John 14:6 (OSB):

“Jesus said to him [i.e. to the Apostle Thomas], ‘I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.’

How then, do we, Christians, reconcile the statement above about “all religions… leading to one God” with Christ’s own words to us?

Do Buddhism, Islam, or Judaismgiven their stance on Christ – lead to the same God that Orthodox Christians seek to unite with via the process of theosis?

The answer is, unequivocally, “No.”

Furthermore, we, Orthodox Christians, do not have to try to reconcile this heretical statement by Archbishop Elpidophoros (“AB Elpi”) because we know that any religion that rejects the role of the second person of the Trinity – Jesus Christ, the God-man – as the way, the truth and the life and the path to the Kingdom of Heaven is not reconcilable with our Orthodox Christian faith.

Sidebar on Grace and Orthodoxy: I would like to be clear that Orthodox Christians do not discount the Grace of Christ, who will judge all of us (even non-Christians) when our life on earth ends.  I do not want my non-Orthodox Christian friends to think that we, Orthodox Christians, have any say in how or on whom the Lord decides to bestow His Grace, despite any individual members of our faith (including hierarchs) saying anything to the contrary.  The latter is not for us to say.  However, we, Orthodox Christians, can say – and justify beyond a reasonable doubt, (the standard which man uses to judge one another, even for death sentences) using historical evidence – that we practice Christianity in the way that Christ taught his original disciples.  Those practices were then captured in written words and in demonstrable traditions explained to us by the divinely-inspired “Fathers” of the Church and passed down to us since Pentecost.  These two elements – the Word and Holy Tradition – are what we mean by “Orthodox” and “Orthodoxy”. Our bottom line is this: Christ established one churchHis Church, the Church – which has been attacked since the day it became manifest on earth, has suffered schisms (including within the Church itself) and will continue to be attacked from the outside and from within but which can never be broken or divided.  For my protestant friends, I recommend the book Thirsting for God in a Land of Shallow Wells by Matthew Gallatin to understand the differences between the various (thousands) of Protestant denominations and Orthodoxy.  In my view, the following quote from this book captures what Orthodoxy is, succinctly and eloquently, at pages 179-180 of the softcover edition: “The misconception is this: Christianity is essentially a faith that one can individually interpret and apply as one pleases … Thus, true Christianity has no room for personal interpretations, preferences, qualifications, exemptions, or adjustments.  Anyone … who wants to enter into a real relationship with Jesus Christ must accept the fact that the Faith of the Apostles preserved in Holy Orthodoxy is an historical reality, not just a theological school”.  For my Catholic friends, I recommend that you research pre-1054 Catholicism and the slippery-slope changes that your various Popes have introduced since then – and make your way back onto an Orthodox Christian path.

For a more in-depth review of why AB Elpi’s statement is dangerous and heretical – and about some other irreconcilable words and actions spoken and done by him – you should read this article: The Lie of Ecumenism at https://orthodoxreflections.com/the-lie-of-ecumenism/.

But, I digressed slightly – but, purposely – so that you, the Orthodox Christian reader, can begin to question the words and actions of our hierarchs with the eyes and ears that God gave you after doing these things: reading the lives of Saints and various writings from the Fathers of the Church; seeking the advice of a spiritual father or father confessor about the basic tenets and “hard sayings” of Orthodoxy; and finding a good Bible Study group and listening intently and then taking the leader(s) and the presiding priest aside and asking questions – even tough ones.[xii]  Doing these things is important for your growth as an Orthodox Christian and an excellent “check and balance” when hubris gets the best of you (and it will) and you start interpreting the Gospels yourself (as Protestants do) to justify your custom practice of our faith or for the purposes of adapting it (as the RC Popes have done) to the secular world.

And – to finally get to the crux of this article – one of the warnings that I came across during my journey back to Orthodoxy was about the infiltration of Freemasons in our Orthodox Christian Churches[xiii] – especially in the “overseeing” bodies (notice I did not say “governing” bodies) – such as our Archdioceses and, most troubling, in our Patriarchate, called the Phanar, which is currently occupied by Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew (“EP Bart”).

At first, I thought, so what?  Who are Freemasons and why should I be concerned with them being members, deacons or priests or hierarchs in various levels of our Orthodox churches?

Until recently, I didn’t really know much about Freemasonry.

I knew it was some sort of organization or club with a strange symbol on its “temples” but, I never realized that it was a religion until I started reading about Freemasonry’s “god”, its rituals, and and how its members hide in plain sight.[xiv]

And make no mistake about Freemasonry: it is very much a religion that worships a “supreme being”which is not our trinitarian God – but rather, the “light bearer” (i.e. Lucifer) and celebrates and promotes teachings that are diametrically opposed to the tenets of the Church.

Albert Pike, American Civil War general, Sovereign Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite’s Southern Jurisdiction,  author of a book called Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry

To date, the best written source that I have come across about Freemasonry is Michael Witcoff’s excellent exposé: On The Masons And Their Lies: What Every Christian Needs To Know.

Witcoff is a former Freemason (now an Orthodox Christian) and his book provides objectively verifiable proof of his contentions. All Christians would do well to read it so that you understand that Freemasonry is not just an altruistic social club or network of people (mostly men) who will help you climb the corporate ladder.  It is a religion that will cost you your soul, if you do not renounce it and repent before you die.

In On The Masons, Witcoff cites two “… prominent and influential Masonic occultists” who are clear that Freemasonry is a religion.

“[Albert] Pike later asserts that Masonry is ‘the universal, eternal, immutable religion, such as God planted it in the heart of universal humanity … The ministers of this religion are all Masons who comprehend it and are devoted to it; it sacrifices to God are good works, the sacrifices of the base and disorderly passions, the offering up of self-interest on the altar of humanity, and perpetual efforts to attain to all the moral perfection of which man is capable.’”

“Manly P. Hall echoes Pike’s religious indifference, stating that ‘The true Mason is not creed-bound. He realizes with the divine illumination of his lodge that as a Mason his religion must be universal: Christ, Buddha or Mohammed, the name means little, for he recognizes only the light and not the bearer. He worships at every shrine, bows before every altar, whether in temple, mosque or cathedral, realizing with his truer understanding the oneness of all spiritual truth … No Mason can be narrow, for his Lodge is the divine expression of broadness.’”

Having just read these two quotes from these occultists, think back to AB Elpi’s statement that “… all religions are myriads of paths leading to one God…” and compare it to Pike’s view that Masonry is the “… the universal, eternal, immutable religion…” and Hall’s point that the Masonic religion is “universal.”

Is the top US Greek Orthodox Hierarch (and perhaps, his Canadian counterpart, AB Sot, and their “overseer”, EP Bart) trying to gaslight us – via his (and their) silence – that Eastern Orthodox Christianity is no different than Freemasonry?[xv]

If they are not members of the religion of Freemasonry, they should speak up now!

AB Sot’s Apparent Connection to and Silence About Freemasonry

Let’s get back to AB Sot and start with this question about his Grand Commander title: What, exactly, is the Order of Phoenix of Greece? 

Well, according to Wikipedia, it is this (with my underlining added):

“The Order of the Phoenix is an order of Greece, established on 13 May 1926, by the republican government of the Second Hellenic Republic to replace the defunct Royal Order of George I.

The order was retained after the restoration of the monarchy in 1935 and continues to be awarded by the current Third Republic.

The honour is bestowed by the Greek government to Greek citizens who have excelled in the arts and literature, science, public administration, shipping, commerce, and industry. It is also awarded to foreigners who have helped raise Greece’s international prestige.”

Well, that seems OK, right?  Not so fast; let’s take a closer look.

Wikipedia tells us that the current “Order of Phoenix of Greece” replaced the now defunct “Royal Order of George I”, which begs this question: What are the origins of this latter Order?

Another in-depth article in this publication[xvi] has already pointed out the connection of this Royal Order to Freemasonry, so I won’t belabour the point in this article.

However, I will provide this quote from that article which explains the Masonic symbols used by the Royal Order of George I:

“… as evidenced by its symbols which are borrowed from the Knights Templar (full name: The United Religious, military and Masonic Orders of the Temple and of St John of Jerusalem, Palestine, Rhodes and Malta)”.

Given the above, I think it is reasonable to ask AB Sot: Did you know about the connection between your Grand Commander title and Freemasonry?

And, assuming for a moment that AB Sot did not know, (which is doubtful), now that this article (the second one directed at him) has informed him of this connection, he cannot plead ignorance. Here then is another question to his “eminence”: Will you renounce this title and cease wearing its symbols?

It seems to me that AB Sot should – as the true Good Shepherd, our Lord Jesus Christ, always did when his Disciples asked Him – explain himself to his Greek Orthodox “flock” in Canada.

AB Sot’s silence in this situation, will not be golden; on the contrary, it will convict him. (Please see PDF of letter sent by this author to AB Sot asking him to clarify his position concerning Freemasonry.)

AB Sot’s silence is extremely troubling when other Orthodox and non-Orthodox Christian churches and hierarchs have officially, and publicly, renounced Freemasonry as not being compatible with our Christian faith. Renunciations Witcoff has compiled in On The Masons … in Chapter 10 Masonry and the Churches and which I have excerpted below, with my underlining added:

Roman Catholics: “… the 1983 Congregation For the Doctrine Of The Faith formalized a new Declaration on Masonic Associations. … Under the new rule, any Roman Catholic who participates in Freemasonry is considered to be ‘in a grave state of sin and may not receive Holy Communion … the Church’s negative judgment in regard to Masonic association(s) remains unchanged since their principles have always been considered irreconcilable with the doctrine of the Church and therefore membership in them remains forbidden.’”

Protestantism: “For this section, I will speak only of two major Protestant groups which, despite being heterodox themselves, nevertheless confess an orthodox view of the Holy Trinity. … The Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod declared that ‘… Freemasonry serves as a primary example of such an organization that espouses and promotes teachings and practices that conflict with the fundamental teachings of the Christian faith. … One of the Landmarks of Freemasonry is the belief in the existence of a Supreme Being. However, the supreme being of Freemasonry is officially a generic god designed by intent to be universally acceptable to all who would seek admittance to the Masonic Lodge. This god is a unitarian, not trinitarian Supreme Being. … The Scriptures teach that Christians with integrity are to confess Christ and His Gospel boldly and without compromise … In the view of this evaluation, it is a compromise of the Christian confession to take part in ritual, religious acts, in the name of a generic deity, that intentionally delete the name of the true God and Jesus Christ whom God has sent to be the only savior of the world.’

“The Orthodox Presbyterian Church came to precisely the same conclusions in 1942.  In their Report Of The Committee on Secret Societies, their Ninth General Assembly wrote that ‘The committee finds that the evidence presented concerning the religion of Masonry permits but one conclusion.  … that Masonry is a religious institution and as such is definitely anti-Christian. … [and] that membership in the Masonic fraternity is inconsistent with Christianity. …”

Eastern Orthodox Churches and Hierarchs: “On its official website, the Orthodox Church of America unambiguously declares that It is forbidden for an Orthodox Christian to be a member of the Masonic Fraternity because many of its teachings stand in direct conflict with those of Orthodox Christianity.’

“The Archbishop of Cyprus in 1815, Cyprianus, made the same point – but far more graphically.  In The Aphorism Against Freemasonry, he wrote that [they] ‘… that pursue after such a diabolic and lawless employment of Freemasonry, and all they that follow unto their infatuation and unto their error, let them be excommunicated and cursed by the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. After death, they shall be unpardoned, indissoluble, and bloated. Groaning and trembling, as Cain, shall they be upon the earth. … The wrath of God shall be upon their heads, and their portion together with Judas the betrayer.  As angel of the Lord will prosecute them with a flaming sword and, unto their life’ termination, they will not know of progress.  …’

The bishops of the Church of Greece also convened in 1933 to study the Lodge as group. After careful examination, they concluded that Freemasonry is not simply a philanthropic union or a philosophical school, but constitutes a mystagogical system which reminds us of the ancient heathen mystery-religions and cults from which it descends, and is their continuation and regeneration … Such a link between Freemasonry and the ancient idolatrous mysteries is also manifested by all that is enacted and performed at the initiations … Thus Freemasonry is, as granted, a mystery-religion, quite different, separate, and alien to the Christian faith.’

The Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia insists on excommunication for Masonic affiliation.  In 1932, the ROCOR Council of Bishops wrote to the Faithful that Freemasonry is a secret international organisation to struggle with God, Christianity, and all National Governments, and especially Christian Governments.  In the international organization the first place of influence and importance belongs to the Jewish membership.  Because of this, and other important reasons, it is forbidden for all Orthodox Christians to become Freemasons.

Noticeably absent are statements similar to the above from the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of Canada and the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America and the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople lorded over by, you guessed it, AB Sot, AB Elpi and EP Bart, respectively.[xvii]

In light of the above, I think it behooves AB Sot – if he is not a Mason – to declare, on his television program that the religion of Freemasonry is not compatible with Orthodox Christianity, and to circulate an encyclical to this effect, to be read by parish priests in Canada, for the first seven weeks of the new Orthodox year that begins on September 1, 2024.  (And, I would urge my American Orthodox Brothers and Sisters to ask AB Elpi to do the same.)

If AB Sot remains silent, well, then, I would urge him to re-read the book The Soul After Death – and not just the 296-pager for laypeople but, rather the 1200+ page ‘desk reference’ manual that he should have read at some point during his careers – which may lead him to renounce Freemasonry and repent, sincerely, before he dies.

If AB Sot “Takes the 5th” on Freemasonry, What Can Canadian-Greek Orthodox Christians Do About it?

As members of the body of Christ, we, the elect, are the fourth pillar of the Church (in addition to deacons, priests and bishops) and as such have a moral obligation to be conscientious objectors if any of the latter are behaving – by their acts or omissions – in ways that are contrary to the tenets our faith.

Obviously, one must have evidence of acts or omissions before one should demand answers, and in the case of AB Sot, we have his act of accepting a Masonic title (unknowingly or not) and his omission (his silence to date) regarding the religion of Freemasonry.

In my view, it’s very simple what needs to done to get AB Sot to explain his Grand Commander title and renounce Freemasonry: demand answers, respectfully, and if he ignores our demands, cut off his funding!

Here’s a Three-Step Plan to request and obtain answers to the questions noted-above:

  • Step 1 – Petition AB Sot: Your local parish council or board of your local Greek-Orthodox church in Canada should resolve to send AB Sot a formal petition requesting answers to the questions I posed in the introduction.[xviii]
  • Step 2 – If AB Sot Ignores You, Stop Paying Your Dues: If AB Sot chooses to ignore your petition, your parish council or board should resolve to suspend the payment of AB Sot’s monthly vig until he breaks his silence on the above-noted questions.
  • Step 3 – If Your Parish or Board Ignores You, Withhold Your Funds: If your parish council or board ignores you, the parishioners of your local church – then you have a moral obligation to withhold your membership dues and donations – pending action by your parish council and board and answers from his “eminence”. Instead of your donations in church, copy and print out the following and put it in the collection basket, until your parish council or board takes action to issue the petition to AB Sot and AB Sot answers the questions noted-above:

“UNTIL YOU SEND A PETITON TO AB SOT TO EXPLAIN HIS GRAND COMMANDER TITLE AND RENOUNCE FREEMASONRY AND HIS EMINENCE ADDRESSES BOTH, I AM WITHHOLDING MY MEMBERSHIP DUES AND MY DONATIONS.” 

Now, before implementing the above-noted plan – especially Step 3 – you should pray about it.  (As Orthodox Christians, we know that we must pray before any task, decision, or action; we may not always do so but, we should do so in this case and for those who have one, seek the advice of your spiritual father.)

And here are three other things to do in connection with above-noted Three-Step Plan:

  • First, make sure that your Church has enough money to pay its overhead and obligations to civil authorities;
  • Second, put aside the membership dues you withhold in a bank account or in a safe place at home until your parish takes action and AB Sot addresses the three questions above – or resigns; and
  • Third, consider redirecting your withheld weekly church donations to the poor or to monasteries for prayers for the living and the dead (in addition, of course, to your own daily prayers for both).

These three things will assure that you do not use the petition to AB Sot as an excuse to not give the alms that you were going to give, which is an important and edifying duty of every Orthodox Christian.

I know that the above plan may seem a bit harsh – and that your local priest will try to convince you that you should not withhold your financial help to your church – but, as I said above, make sure that your church has enough money to pays its bills … and then be firm on withholding the monthly dues that AB Sot collects.  (If AB Sot takes legal action against you – get together with other parishes and retain one lawyer to defend all of you. If this extremely unlikely and scandalous scenario materializes – he will have revealed who he is.)

Look, we are living in very strange, clearly apostatic times, where we are not sure that we can trust our governments or our spiritual leaders in Canada (given what happened during the COVID-19 era).  These times require that we, Orthodox Christians, in local parishes, make sure that we are being led by hierarchs that are faithful leaders of Orthodoxy and not wolves in sheep’s clothing or false teachers.

Remember, the questions that we are asking his “eminence” to answer are “no brainers” – that any deacon, priest or hierarch who has no affiliation or allegiance to Freemasonry can and should address humbly and unambiguously.

As of the date I finished this article (early September 2024), I could not find any record of anyone ever asking AB Sot, directly, to address his Grand Commander Title and renounce Freemasonry … so I am asking now, via this article.

Maybe his “eminence” will answer these questions when someone in his close circle notifies him of this article (and make no mistake, the PR industrial complex that surrounds him keeps tabs on anything and everything relating to his image.)

Maybe he will surprise us and humble himself to his parishioners and provide us with answers to the questions above, which will inspire confidence that he is the Orthodox Christian leader that we want and need in Canada, given the imminent and further Canadian government encroachments into our freedom of religion.

This is his “eminence’s” chance to address these questions once and for all and put an end to the cloud of controversy that surrounds this hierarch and Freemasonry.

On the other hand, if AB Sot remains silent, becomes indignant and states, or implies, in an encyclical or on his television program that he does not have to address the three questions above, then, in my view, he will be revealing who he really is and you – and I – can govern ourselves accordingly with respect to this man now and for the times to come.

To be clear, I am truly hoping that I have gotten AB Sot completely wrong about what spirit seems to be animating and sustaining him in the high office he holds (for now).

—Stratis Georgiou: A concerned Orthodox Christian who will call out pandering by Church leaders wherever he finds it.


[i] It is beyond the scope of this article to examine the likely spirit of the author of the Harry Potter series of books, J.K. Rowling but, I would like to point out one thing about her now that may be an indicator of where she stands on Christians and Christianity.  In 2019, even though she had been against tattoos for most of her life, she got one that says: Solve et Coagula. For Ortho-Christians who have done their research into Freemasonry, this should be enough to distance yourself from her and her writings.  Why? Because the Freemasons worship, among other satanic images, the Baphomet. Here is a good, succinct description of what the Baphomet image is, from a BBC website (but with my underlining added): “The best-known modern image of Baphomet was drawn in 1856 by the French occultist Eliphas Levi, in his book Transcendental Magic: Its Doctrine and Ritual. He envisaged a winged hermaphrodite with a torch between his horns and a pentagram on his forehead. Its arms bore the Latin words SOLVE (separate) and COAGULA (join together) – the powers of “binding and loosing” usurped from God. Levi’s drawing was the inspiration for the Satanic Temple’s new monument. “It contains all these binary opposites – above and below, part animal, part human. Male and female,” says Greaves. “It embodies opposites and celebrates contrasts.” (https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-33682878#:~:text=Levi’s%20Baphomet&text=Its%20arms%20bore%20the%20Latin,the%20Satanic%20Temple’s%20new%20monument.) I purposely chose not to reproduce this image because I will not do their (i.e. Satanists’) bidding.  However, I urge you, as a serious Ortho-Christian to do your research about Freemasonry so that you can recognize its spirit in the people around you, in well-known (falsely altruistic) institutions (domestic and global), the political age in which we live, the secular leaders of the West, and, sadly, in some of our Eastern Orthodox hierarchs.  May they come to repentance and may God have mercy on all of them, especially the last group who are false teachers and the modern-day “brood of vipers” of which St. John the Baptist and Christ spoke.

[ii] For those who may be thinking … this writer is being disrespectful and disobedient to His Eminence … I would like to offer this perspective: I don’t think its disrespectful to ask tough questions of the leaders of the Orthodox Church. However, to be clear, when we interact with our priests, spiritual fathers, father confessors, and any hierarchs, we must honour the office – as the lesson behind John 11:49-52 tells us.  But – and please edify me if I am stating something heretical – any and every Christian is permitted to ask respectful questions and express legitimate concerns to any one of the foregoing persons and receive an answer.  Their answers may not satisfy us but, unlike Christ, who was the perfect, sinless, God-Man who did not have to answer Pontius Pilate or the Pharisees who tried to trap him using His Word, silence from our hierarchs about acts and omissions that appear to be irreconcilable with the tenets of our faith is not acceptable.

[iii] I used this well-known American phrase – because it just rolls off the tongue when one reads it – even though “pleading the 5th” is not a thing in Canada.  Rather, in Canada, the right to remain silent (to prevent oneself from self-incrimination), is in Section 7 of our Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the “Charter”), which is embedded in our Constitution and which is, theoretically, the highest law of the Canadian land. In practice, however, our Charter is much weaker in wording than the Bill of Rights in the US Constitution.  Why? Because our Prime Minister of the time – Pierre Elliot Trudeau … yes, Justin Trudeau’s father – who got our provinces to repatriate our Canadian Constitution (in 1981 …which is not that long ago compared to 1774) from Britain had to make compromises.  The net result is that our Constitution’s weaker wording and the inclusion of a major loophole in it (the now infamous “Notwithstanding Clause”, which allows our provinces to override our so-called fundamental freedoms by simply invoking this clause), makes it laughable in terms of protecting individual and supposedly inalienable rights.  And, as if these two giant holes in our Constitution were not enough, when you combine the latter with a lefty-trendy-touchy-feely Supreme Court of Canada that is openly anti-Christian, you get a precarious situation for Christians in Canada as it descends deeper into the abyss of secularism in every facet of its society.  Again, apologies for the digression but, for some of the readers of this article, it will be important to understand why Canada is not a great place to live anymore if you’re straight, Christian and believe in meritocracy.  But again, don’t take my word for it; take a look at what Jordan Petersen thinks of Canada now versus the Canada of 20 or even 10 years ago in this National Post article from August 9, 2024: https://nationalpost.com/opinion/i-will-see-this-contemptible-re-education-process-through-to-its-absurd-end.

[iv] I would be remiss to not mention two earlier “Cassandras”, George Orwell and Aldous Huxley for their brilliant, dystopian novels, 1984 and Brave New World, respectively.  I absolutely love the phrase “Christianity without tears” in the latter work.  This three-word phrase captures what people expect of Christianity today and why many abandon their faith when they face trials in their life and ask this demonically-inspired question, which atheists love to promote: “Where was God when X happened?” … where X is any problem in life, from an unjustifiable (by worldly standards) death, a devastating illness, a serious financial loss to absurdly secular problems like not being able to get the latest Birkin bag because you don’t have a connection at Hermes!  One of the things I love about our Eastern Orthodox faith is that is tells us, in no uncertain terms, that Christians will suffer on this earth just because they are Christians. It also warns us that betrayals will come from everywhere (from within, from your own family and from without, in various forms) but, that those who endure will end up in the Kingdom of Heaven.  Now, for non-Christians and for fair-weather Christians, who are completely enamoured with life in this world and are scared about or don’t really believe in life after death, this hard Christian teaching must be absolutely terrifying to them … so terrifying that they call us fools for believing it.  For me, as I read more and more about the lives of Saints and I use my eyes and ears to see and hear what is happening in this world, I am terrified about remaining in it for long enough to experience Revelation. I pray for the strength and guidance (and especially grace) from our trinitarian God to stick to the Orthodox path that I began not long ago.  I still have many passions to kill so I hope that God gives me the time I need to kill all of them; however, for me, my biggest fear is dying before that happens … not leaving this world behind.  Make no mistake, I am not trying to sound like a hero.  I still worry too much but, I trust Christ more and more because I have lived long enough to experience answers to my prayers.  For reasons only He knows, God has been very merciful to me.  I have had my share of tribulations but, not like others; I have not truly suffered in life and sometimes, I wonder why.  And for the pop-psychologists who will use this line to suggest that I have lost my mind, I wonder about why God has been so merciful to me in a healthy way and I thank God every day for my good fortune.  At this point in my life, I pray for one main thing: to have the strength to lay down my life before denying Christ in any way.

[v] For those that did not guess the (obvious) answer, I am referring to COVID-19.  (And, as I write this, I see that “Dr.” Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (let’s call him “Ted Ross”), the current Director-General of the World Health Organization is beginning to lay another foundation for repeating another world-wide lockdown due to a monkey-pox outbreak in Africa.  Look, if you believe Ted Ross, then, you probably also believe that Ted Lasso is real too.  You will recall that in the US, conservative judges stopped the tyranny of the secular-liberal majorities who attempted, under the guise of COVID-19, to close synagogues and churches in so-called red states. However, you might want to ask yourself: What happens when the composition of the US Supreme Court justices (conservative vs. liberal) changes?  The conservative courts in the US are the last frontiers in the West resisting new laws that have been labeled as “anti-hate speech” laws.  The major issue with these new laws is that they do not define what hate speech is. This is a very dark worldwide trend because it gives prosecutors discretion to target and charge Christian “dissidents” and hand them over to activist judges, who may then decide and declare that our Christian Gospels are hateful and must no longer be allowed to be proclaimed by anyone.  If you think I am hyperbolizing, take a minute to look at this YouTube video, which is spot-on: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/hZWHip3xfC8?feature=share. However, before you – my American Orthodox Christian friends – take comfort in the current conservative majority of your Supreme Court, you should know that there is a new threat to freedom of speech and religion that has emerged from within, that is, from Republican or so-called “red” states with high concentrations of Christian Zionists who have lobbied for the passing of “antisemitism” laws that will criminalize certain parts of the Gospels. This is based on Protestant Evangelicals’ staunch belief in the religious theory of Dispensationalism, which is a direct result of Sola Scriptura. (If you have ever wondered why Orthodox Christians are so against the doctrine of Sola Scriptura when it comes to understanding the Word of God, these latest laws are a case in point!) Finally, if you think that this misdirected zeal by Evangelicals will blow over because it is only at the state level, you underestimate the power of the this lobby in Washington: on Wednesday, May 1, 2024 (a ironic date for this type of legislation … or maybe not), the US House passed the Antisemitism Awareness Act, which is aimed at stopping pro-Palestinian protests on college campuses. However, like its state-level counterparts, it will have unintended consequences on Christians’ free practice of our religion.  And, although there are no (apparently) Evangelical justices on your Supreme Court, it remains to be seen whether any of the current judges will risk being labeled as antisemites if they strike down legislation that has resulted in the successful criminalization of the proclamation of the Gospels. Therefore, please stay watchful and vigilant of tyranny my American friends, lest it creep in while you slumber!

[vi] The italicised phrase in the latter part of this sentence is a not so subtle hint about what Freemasons do in our society, which is staying under the radar (except to other “brothers”) or hiding in plain sight.  Again, don’t take my word for it: read about Freemasonry for yourself and then think back to this article and AB Sot.

[vii] I am sure that people will come out of the woodwork and focus on my criticism about keeping liquor stores and other retail stores open and closing churches during COVID-19 … just to try to lure me into a rabbit hole that would take away from the main point of this article.  Please, save your words because I won’t take the bait.  Look, I have heard all of the reasons why we needed to keep liquor and big box stores open and none can get around the fact that Canadian governments (at all levels) chose to suspend the fundamental freedom of religion which is (supposedly) “guaranteed” in our Charter; see Endnote iii about this fake guarantee.   Our Canadian Constitution (our theoretical highest law of the land) was supposed to be a proclamation not a grant – of rights that all human beings have (bestowed by God).  Instead, it’s a sham document that was subordinated to the “privileges” of buying alcohol and going to Costco during state-imposed lockdowns in COVID-19 era.  To me, it’s simple and it boils down the this: our secular governments completely devalued our spiritual hospitals – that is, our Eastern Orthodox Churches – in the name of the greater good and sought to make us, Orthodox Christians, pariahs for wanting to worship God during – and thank Him – for the mild-tribulation of COVID-19.  Yes, you read that right, Thank God for COVID-19!  Again, I included this as a reminder, to my fellow Orthodox Christians, about the words of St. John Chrysostom (the “Golden-Mouth”) because we tend forget to Thank God for All things!  This is another topic that I would like to cover in another piece but, if you’re an Orthodox Christian and you’ve never heard this saying before and are curious about why we would thank God in bad times, please research it and also try to pick up a short (65-page) book titled, Life’s Difficulties are Blessings, Saint Nektarios Monastery, Roscoe, New York, which is a compilation of sayings about this from Saints and Monks from the Holy Mountain.

[viii] The case in point is the Canadian Truckers Blockade in Ottawa, dubbed the Freedom Convoy, that resulted in arrests of protesters who were not violent or destructive of private property (unlike the professional mobs and anarchists acting under the guise of BLM in the US).  As the world knows, Justin “the Hair” or “His Nibs” Trudeau not only charged the leaders but, used the power of our Federal government to acquire the names of protesters and ordinary people who contributed funds to the support the protest and freeze their bank accounts.  If you’re thinking, wait … “Wouldn’t freezing people’s bank accounts cut off their ability to buy and sell?” … you would be spot on. It’s truly scary what a low threshold the Hair used to implement the Emergencies Act (a despicable piece of Canadian legislation because of its vagueness) on February 14, 2022. Trudeau’s invocation was litigated and in late January 2024, our Federal Court (Trial Level) ruled that this action was unreasonable and unconstitutional (… Ya think?).  The case is called Canadian Frontline Nurses v. Canada (Attorney General) and you can click on this link if you want to read all 183 pages of it.  Or, you can just flip to Paragraph [372] and read the crux of it.  The decision came way too late, after the damage has been done to the protesters who were charged and jailed and to those whose bank accounts were seized but, at least the case established a precedent that can be used to, perhaps, get an injunction before His Nibs (or his successor) tries this again. By the way, His Nibs is appealing the trial decision so we’ll get some insight into how our Canadian Federal Court of Appeal sees this issue and, who knows, it may even reach our Canadian Supreme Court.

[ix] Ten years ago, I would have said “NFW” to anyone who said that anti-hate speech laws will be directed against the Christian Gospels.  I would have replied as follows: “Not gonna happen in my lifetime, even if a guy named Gavin Newsom gets elected as the California Governor.” Fast-forward 10 years and just think about the executive orders that Newsom – that little French Laundry-eating, slick-willy looking, pencil-neck metrosexual – issued during COVID-19 and is now using to promote LBGTQ literature in state schools. The existence of Gavin Newsom alone strengthens my belief that I will live to see the words of the Lord Himself come to be: “And you will be hated by all for My name’s sake.” (Matthew 10:22, OSB).  Although this scenario may seem frightening to think about if you are Christian, don’t let it (and them, the demonically-inspired and powered secular globalists hiding in plain sight) put you in despair because you know how this ends for us … and them: IC XC NIKA!  The best way to combat this fear is to trust the Lord when He says “But when they deliver you up, do not worry about how or what you should speak.  For it will be given to you in that hour what you should speak…” and “…he who endures to the end will be saved.” (Matthew 10:19 and 10:22, OSB, respectively).  The key is repentance, walking an Orthodox path (and gathering, without proselytizing, people within your sphere of influence to join this path) and prayer “without ceasing” (as St. Paul says) to the Lord to give you the strength to endure the things that are coming as this age comes to a close.  And if you think that this will take supernatural strength, you’re right but, only the kind infused in humans by the Holy Spirit because in those times, those who have sold their souls to the little troublemaker (as St. Paisios refers to the devil) and turn to him for help will understand that he lied and is now ready to torment your soul for eternity.  Finally, for those who may be wondering “Where can I read about people with the type of strength that I need?”, I direct you to read the lives of Christian Saints and to eye-witness testimony of those who endured the gulags and torture in the 20th century, which was the bloodiest century for Christians.  See, for example, the 1989 interview of Pastor Richard Wurmbrand available here: https://youtu.be/4GUC5HyxTDw?si=-Jv5guqbcxbPnlM1.  This humble man describes how he smiled as he was arrested and taken by the secret police to his imminent death. When these thugs asked him why he was smiling, he explained that he was reminded of what Jesus Christ promised him about this situation, which is what I quoted above.  I don’t know if the average Christian knows how bad the 20th century was for Christianity – in terms of killings – far worse than the brutal first three hundred years after Christ’s reign on earth: “Estimates suggest that 45–70 million Christians were martyred in the 20th century, making up more than half of all Christian martyrs in the last two millennia. This includes Christians killed in situations of witness, as a result of human hostility, or who lost their lives prematurely. Some say the average annual rate of martyrs at the end of the 20th century was around 160,000, or 1.6 million between 1990 and 2000. This number includes many Christians killed in the Rwandan genocide and the Sudanese civil wars, as well as over 20 million in Soviet prison camps.”  The source of this quote is the unholy Google search engine as at August 19, 2024, which generated this answer via AI.  This is the search query I used when researching this question: “How many Christians were killed in the 20th century”.  Again, please don’t take my word for it; instead, repeat my query and see what you get from Google for yourself.  (I wonder how long it will take Google to direct its programmers to manipulate its current AI algorithm to disappear the answer I received.)  Finally, I believe that the 21st century will be worse than the 20th century in terms of Christan killings and I hope that if faced with the same fate of Pastor Wurmbrand, I have one iota of his strength to be as fearless as he was and to proclaim – to the police who arrest me, the judge who sentences me, and to my jailors, torturers or executioners – that Jesus Christ is Lord and to feel free to kill me for His name’s sake.  Like I said, this is what I pray for these days.

[x] See Endnote ii.

[xi] I chose this statement on purpose and some of you may have recognized, immediately, who said it.  For those who didn’t, it was US Archbishop Elpidophoros (“AB Elpi”), on July 15, 2021, during his speech at the International Religious Freedom Summit held in New York City. When I first read the commentary about this statement, about four years ago, I did not appreciate how dangerous the statement was, coming from this hierarch, who is, by the way, very chummy-chummy with AB Sot and EP Bart.

[xii] Please do not be the gal or the guy who attends Bible Study for social reasons, to hear your own voice, to disrupt the lesson of the day, to argue, or to make gratuitous comments.  You are there to learn about the lessons in the Gospels.  You should prepare for each session and, by all means, note questions that arise in your mind because of the lesson and write them down and think about them and seek answers to them … before posing them to the leaders or the presiding priest.  And, even when you receive answers from the leaders or presiding priest, you may want to check the answers with a spiritual father or an elder (male or female) at a Monastery.  The answers you get in parish context may not always be aligned with what a spiritual father or monk or nun may advise … and eventually, you will sense (through the help of the Holy Spirit) when you are customizing our faith rather than struggling to follow it.

[xiii] We have had at least one Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople (Meletius IV) who was a 33rd Degree Scottish Rite Mason (and if you are familiar with Albert Pike’s book, you will understand how astonishing and disgusting this is).  I really hope that this man, Meletius, repented before he died because if he didn’t, I can only imagine how he will be judged by Christ who, in his own words, called-out the hypocrites and false teachers of his time directly to their faces.  EP Meletius was, in effect, the highest false teacher one can be in our Orthodox Christian hierarchy and I am sure that when he died – if he did not repent sincerely before he died – his soul had a treacherous journey to its current state, which is only a foretaste of what awaits him.  If he didn’t repent and renounce Freemasonry, I think he is experiencing the anguish that the Rich Man experienced – as related in the parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus – multiplied by 100.

[xiv] Here are two videos about Freemasonry that should pique your curiosity about what Freemasonry is. The first one is only about 5.5 minutes long: https://youtu.be/2S4LFiUa7Zw?si=U3FoI5jdaUtnwJja. The second one is a mammoth 5-hour exposé that provides specific information about Freemasonry that can be verified independently: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Yhv9ZMby68Ig/.  I have no idea how much longer the latter video will remain available.  The latter link is a “Bitchute” link because the previous YouTube link that I used to watch it, over a year ago, was taken down a few weeks after I watched it.  And remember what I said earlier: trust but verify all sources and their pronouncements before forming your own conclusions.

[xv] One possible answer to this question is: only if AB Elpi means the “supreme being” that Freemasons worship … i.e. Lucifer (according to Abert Pike).  In my view, AB Elpi’s statement should have been grounds for EP Bart to convene a synod to question what, exactly, the US archbishop meant by this statement … unless, of course, EP Bart is of the same view or ethos as AB Elpi (which may also include AB Sot).  Look, I understand that I am being provocative by this statement but, Freemasonry is the polar opposite of Eastern Orthodox Christianity in its theology, Christology and soteriology and I find it very suspect that the Greek Orthodox Archdioceses of Canada and the US and the Phanar have not condemned Freemasonry as being incompatible with Christianity.

[xvi] See the article Is Freemasonry Systemic in the Greek Orthodox Church? published on October 7, 2020 and available here: https://orthodoxreflections.com/is-freemasonry-systemic-in-the-greek-orthodox-church/. I think this article poses a rhetorical question.  To me, it is a call to action to us, the elect, to root out the Masonic infiltrators in our local Orthodox churches, expose them and prevent them from rising in ranks and using their positions to deceive unassuming Orthodox Christian about what being a Freemason means.

[xvii] The Antiochian Archdiocese has also been noticeably silent about condemning Freemasonry, and although I have not looked into this archdiocese deeply, there are many sources available on the Internet that state, unequivocally, that this Archdiocese is teaming with Freemasons in all of their senior ranks.   (However, I would be remiss if I did not warn you about vetting your Internet sources very carefully before rushing to judgment.  My list of “Go To” sources on the Internet is very small and constantly vetted for proclamations that can be verified.)

[xviii] Here is a simple letter that all Parish Council and/or Boards in Canada can use to petition AB Sot to answer three simple questions relating to Freemasonry:

[Date]

By E-Mail: office@goarchdiocese.ca

Archbishop Sotirios

Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of Canada

86 Overlea Boulevard

Toronto, Ontario, Canada  M4H 1C6

Your Eminence,

It has come to our Parish’s attention that, according to your biography on the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of Canada’s website, you hold the title “Grand Commander of the Order of Phoenix of Greece”.  Based on our research, this title replaces the now defunct title of “Royal Order of George I”, which has a strong connection to Freemasonry.

Based on our research about Freemasonry, we understand that it is a religion which is not compatible with our Orthodox Christian faith.  In fact, Freemasonry has been renounced by Protestant Church denominations, the Roman Catholic Church, and several Eastern Orthodox Churches.  In light of our research into Freemasonry, we, the Parish Council or Board of ■ [insert name of your church] respectfully request your answers to the following questions, within 30 days of the date of this letter:

Q1: Were you aware that the Order of Phoenix of Greece is connected to Freemasonry?

Q2: If your answer to Q1 is “No”, now that you are aware that the Order of Phoenix of Greece is connected to Freemasonry, will you publicly renounce your Grand Commander title?

Q3: Will you issue an official statement declaring, as Archbishop of the Archdiocese of Canada, that the religion of Freemasonry is not compatible with Christianity and that you unequivocally renounce it?

Your Eminence, we mean no disrespect by asking these questions of you, the answers to which we believe are simple.

As you can appreciate, it is of utmost importance to us to confirm that our Church and especially our hierarchs have not been infiltrated by Freemasons.

We look forward to your responses.

Sincerely,

 

                                                                 

[Name]

President

  1. Board Members and All Parish Members

The National Security State versus the Orthodox Faith

The following post was originally published as part of Why the US National Security State’s Orthodox Christian Obsession? That is a very lengthy post, and there was concern among some readers that the information below was not getting the exposure it deserves. After multiple requests, we are publishing just this section as a stand-alone piece dedicated to the topics of undermining the Russian Orthodox Church and the Orthodox Faith generally. 

For those who have not read the original article, here is what is meant by the word: “blob” used below:

The US National Security State is so lavishly funded that it has swallowed up almost all of society (media, Pharma, manufacturing, technology, NGOs, foundations, education, research, development, religious organizations, non-profits, think tanks). Many analysts openly refer to this interlocking system of control as the blob.

Isolate and Neuter as Much of the Russian Orthodox Church as Possible

The actual Russian Church on Russian soil is out of reach for the blob. Protected by a formidable Russian military and security establishment, armed even with nuclear weapons, the Russian Church at worst sustains pin pricks from the blob.

However, the Russian Orthodox Church also operates on foreign territories where she is way more vulnerable. The Ukrainian Orthodox Church, though it was self-governing for decades before the war, was considered part of the canonical territory of Moscow. Since 2022, the UOC has been undergoing horrific persecution at the hands of the government in Kiev. Her lawyer, Robert Amsterdam, revealed in February 2024 that his team had learned from the Assistant Secretary of State under President Trump that the destruction of the UOC was a primary goal of US policy. The UOC had refused to fully break with Moscow (before the war, a formal break in May 2022 did occur as a result of the fighting), refused to be a nationalist propaganda organization, and had refused to embrace the modern American “democratic” agenda (LGBTQ, drug legalization, Climate Change, anti-Russian extremism, abortion). To crush this “disobedience” to the dictates of the National Security State, a plot was hatched involving former Ukrainian President Poroshenko, Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, and the US Government to create a compliant replacement for the UOC (the so-called “Orthodox Church of Ukraine”) and then to destroy the canonical church.

According to Amsterdam, thanks to a traitorous Patriarch Bartholomew, the UOC has become the “target of a vicious and unlimited campaign of intimidation, perpetrated by the Ukrainian authorities.” Independent third parties, such as the UN, have reported on the violence and persecution against the UOC. The vast majority of canonical Orthodox Christians in the world have continued to support the UOC.

Paschal Homily of Metropolitan Onuphry in 2023 to the suffering Ukrainian Orthodox Church

Of course, the US justifies all this under the guise of combatting the “soft power” (a phrase repeated ad nauseum in anti-Orthodox hit pieces) the Russian Orthodox Church represents for the nefarious Putin regime. Of course, if the blob’s entire rule were not based on economic exploitation and the immoral destruction of civil society, perhaps such “soft power” would be less of a threat? Or, perhaps if “democratically” elected leaders better represented the concerns of the majority of their constituents, rather than those of sexual and other minorities, such “soft power” would also be less of a threat? No one really explores such questions, as the answers would threaten the power of the blob. Better to try and “cancel” the Orthodox Church instead.

Ukraine was just the beginning. Government meddling in the affairs of local Orthodox Churches has now spread to Estonia, home to hundreds of thousands of ethnic Russians who are also canonically Orthodox. Estonia, a member of NATO, is trying to break the ties between its local Orthodox Church and the Russian Church:

The Estonian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate (MPEÕK) cannot continue its activities under the jurisdiction of the head of the Russian Orthodox Church, Patriarch Kirill, who has threatened Western countries, including Estonia, and called for the killing of Ukrainians, said Interior Minister Lauri Läänemets (SDE).

 

“Looking at what he has said, what their (MPEÕK – ed.) boss has said, what difference is left between a Muslim religious leader who suggests that everyone in the West needs to be slaughtered and Moscow Patriarch Kirill who says that every Ukrainian needs to be killed and that they’re in a holy war against all other religions,” Läänemets told ERR Friday.

 

Läänemets said that while the synod’s position is acceptable and constitutes movement in the right direction, “the problem remains. It does not solve the problem because the church’s head in Moscow, in whose jurisdiction it remains, is still Patriarch Kirill,” he added.

 

“The problem will be solved once this subordination is no more. How they’ll do it, whether the decision will be made in Moscow or whether they’ll make it in Estonia, I cannot say,” the minister said. “Words must be followed by actions. We cannot be completely sure they are being sincere until that happens,” Läänemets noted.

So much for freedom of religion and free association. Or even simple honesty, as Moscow Patriarch Kirill has never said that every Ukrainian needs to be killed. In fact, Orthodox bishops never call for anyone to be killed. As for a Russian Orthodox Holy War, that is not against the Ukrainians. It is against the blob itself.

The blob will, of course, make sure that the Estonian Orthodox Church compliantly separates from Moscow. Either that, or it will be replaced as in Ukraine. And after the Orthodox Christians in Estonia are isolated, then will come the demands for them to “modernize”. Just as in Ukraine, where even blob official news outlets admit that the persecution of the UOC is not really about a no longer existing tie to the Russian Church, but is really about the acceptance of gay sex:

One of the largest American media, NBC News , claims to have found out the reason for the persecution of the UOC . According to journalists, believers and priests are oppressed and discredited because they are the most ardent opponents of LGBT people.

 

The material says that Kyiv accuses Orthodox priests of spying for Moscow, but they deny such accusations.

 

Journalists also cite the words of LGBT activist Maxim Mishkin, who called believers and priests of the UOC “the most anti-gay people in Ukraine.”

First they came for the UOC, then the Estonians. We should expect the blob to come for all Orthodox Christians everywhere they can reach. As Greek Protopresbyter Theodore Zisis has warned, this looks like a global campaign against all of Orthodoxy:

The aim of the heretical West, incited by the Devil, is to, in time, dismantle the Orthodox Church, that is, the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, and to de-Christianize the Orthodox East, as it has already de-Christianized itself.

Just breaking ties between Moscow and historically related Orthodox Churches is not enough. That is nibbling at the edges, no matter how successful the efforts are to force the newly isolated Orthodox Christians to embrace US-sanctioned “modernity”.

The blob needs to completely discredit the Russian Orthodox Church.

To that end, paid, kept, Western Orthodox academics, journalists, and clergy are highly useful. This includes the Fordham University dwellers of the Orthodox Christian Studies Center. They are currently running a petition asking religious leaders to denounce the Russian Orthodox Church:

These pressing issues are amplified within the context of the Russian war of aggression in Ukraine. From the very beginning, this conflict took on a distinctive character, in which Russia, a nation primarily identifying itself as Orthodox Christian, invaded Ukraine, another predominantly Christian nation, without any immediate provocation from the side of the latter. Ironically, citizens of both countries were, until recently, affiliated with one and the same Orthodox Church.

 

It is of utmost importance to emphasize that President Vladimir Putin of the Russian Federation, alongside Russia’s politicians and soldiers, has not only violated their international obligations. More profoundly, he has committed a blasphemy against God. This pertains to individuals who identify themselves as Christians and who often criticize the West for deviating from Christian values. Despite engaging in the construction of new churches and monasteries, lighting candles, fervent prayer, participation in sacraments, and partaking of Holy Communion, these individuals paradoxically compound their sins by issuing orders for murders, personally engaging in war crimes, and publicly justifying actions that run contrary to humanity and the Creator.

 

The support of this “hybrid war” of unprovoked aggression, the justification of its violence, and the persecution of any priest and believer who speaks the truth against the war—all these committed acts demonstrate a conscious and deliberately-argued position. All these testify to the extent that the Russian Orthodox Church has deviated from the Gospel and preaches something alternative to the Word of God. All Christians must critically ask whether the teaching preached publicly and unabashedly by the representatives of the Russian Orthodox Church is indeed the true message of the Christ event.

 

We beseech you to actively and immediately engage with the appropriate international institutions to facilitate the establishment of an international task force dedicated to holding accountable, through sincere and impartial analysis, those bishops, priests, and laity within the Russian Orthodox Church whose statements, testimonials, sermons, communications, and fabrications have sanctioned and bestowed divine approval upon violence, war, and aggression against the people of Ukraine.

 

Numerous publications have meticulously analyzed these distressing facts, underscoring the urgency for a formalized initiative that compels the attention of Churches and cannot be disregarded. Your active engagement in establishing such an entity will be a significant step toward addressing these critical issues at an institutional level.

 

A Church that only outwardly remains “Christian” but has lost its evangelical spirit cannot be a sister to those Churches and communities that follow the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ.

 

The endeavors elucidated above transcend a mere conflict with the Russian Orthodox Church. Rather, they embody a dedicated striving on its behalf—for the Church, for the community of believers guided by the Holy Spirit and the Gospel, liberated from deceptive political theology and detrimental religious ideology. Progressing resolutely toward genuine peace requires the fearless proclamation of truth, regardless of the inherent challenges it may pose.

 

You are summoned to denounce injustices, advocate for repentance and atonement, and actively seek transformative change within the temporal realm. We ask you, our pastors, to courageously proclaim the inconvenient yet profound truth.

According to the official narrative, the Russian Orthodox Church is not really a “church” so much as a state-supported shill for unprovoked Russian aggression. The Russian Church has betrayed the Gospel and is worthy only of loathing and condemnation, just like the Russian Government which controls it. (That traditionalist Orthodox “betray” the modern Gospel of Inclusion is a charge leveled at all of us, not just the Russian Church.) Further, the Russian Church outwardly looks “Orthodox”, but has really been infested with evil.

So nothing to admire here you mistaken Westerners. Liars, crooks, and murderers the whole lot of them. Just move along, embrace the WOKE agenda, and be the demoralized slaves the blob needs you to be. Slava Ukraini!

That none of this is true is completely irrelevant to those whose ultimate source of funding, and ultimate object of loyalty, is the blob. That the war in Ukraine was deliberately provoked by the West, that the government in Kiev persecutes Christians, and that the Russian Orthodox Church has absolutely not endorsed or committed war crimes are all truths that the “Orthodox Fifth Column” will never admit. Instead, they will keep pushing this false narrative as long as the blob feels threatened by the moral stature of the Russian Orthodox Church.

Ruin What You Can Reach

While the core of the Russian Orthodox Church is beyond the reach of the blob, the Patriarchate of Constantinople is firmly under its control. For us in the West, this is the source of our greatest danger. If the blob can’t stop traditionalist-minded Westerners from seeking inspiration from Orthodoxy, then perhaps it can ruin it so that no one cares about it anymore. In this drive to destroy the Orthodox Faith in the West, the blob can rely on more than a few Orthodox collaborators.

To ruin Orthodoxy, there must be substantial changes to teaching and practice that will make the “official” looking church no longer the actual church. Before we look at some of those necessary changes, let us recognize that the Patriarchate of Constantinople unilaterally doing the things below would probably result in a global schism.

If you are trying to destroy Orthodoxy as a competing worldview, however, breaking the unity of the Church is most definitely a benefit.

With that in mind, here are some of the distinctive things about the Orthodox Church the blob is trying to be rid of.

The Orthodox Church is the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church

There is one true path to God, and that is through the Church founded by His Son and Our Lord Jesus Christ. Further, the Orthodox Church teaches that she, herself, is the Israel of God – not a secular country in the Middle East currently committing unspeakable crimes. Such calm assurance of unchanging truth is attractive to Westerners, besieged as they are on all sides by uncertainty and doubt.

So that has to go, and the vehicle to get rid of it is the ecumenical movement, particularly through engagement with Rabbinic Judaism and the Roman Catholic Church. Through this movement of “dialog” and “cooperation”, changes can be made to the Orthodox Faith and to her claims about herself. Changes that make Orthodoxy just like all the other failed “religions” of the West, and thus removes the threat Orthodoxy poses for the blob.

To start with, the Church’s vision of herself as the continuation of Israel, and thus her hostility to both the Talmud and Zionism, has got to go! But don’t worry, the blob has people working on that right now. One of them is Eugen J. Peniuc, professor and author of The Old Testament in Eastern Orthodox Tradition. Pentiuc is the Dean (under Constantinople) of Holy Cross Seminary and a modernizing influence par excellence. The information below is taken from a review of his book, with screen captures of his actual words following:

He urges both Orthodox hierarchs and the grass-roots faithful to take a stand against ‘these perilous teachings,’ beginning with a plea to revise anti-Jewish statements in hymns and liturgy, especially those on Good Friday. He refers favorably to the changes Pope John XXIII instigated in the Roman Catholic church when he interrupted the 1959 Good Friday liturgy to ask that the adjective ‘perfidious’ be removed from the prayer for the Jews (39–40). This section exemplifies two notable aspects of the many that make Pentiuc’s book so valuable: it acknowledges the unsavory treatment Jews and their scriptures have suffered at the hands of Christians, and it puts Orthodoxy into conversation with the Western church in a refreshingly sanguine fashion. At the same time, Pentiuc suggests that a mild Christian supersessionism may be unavoidable if the Orthodox church is to remain consistent with its historical hermeneutics, which it most certainly will do. Christian triumphalism, on the other hand, is ‘easily discarded,’ and the author punctuates his point with a nod to Ephrem the Syrian: ‘Humility is so powerful that even the all-conquering God did not conquer without it.’ Pentiuc argues that the strongest blow against supersessionism is in fact the complementarity of the two biblical testaments. As Origen wrote, there is one God, whose main attributes are love and justice, and both attributes are present in both testaments (59). Pentiuc gracefully allows his readers to draw the connection between Origen’s dictum and the Mount Sinai icon that introduced the book for themselves.

The above passages point the way towards what is called “dual covenant” theology (Jews are saved by being Jews, Christians through Christ). This is a radical innovation in Church teaching. Pentiuc’s book also endorses serious liturgical changes, postulates that Rabbinic Jews understand the Old Testament better than the Orthodox Church, and calls for rooting out antisemitism, even when that means censoring / suppressing historical writings such as those of St. John Chrysostom. The Church must change, says Pentiuc, to be more acceptable to Rabbinic Jews. This man is Dean of an Orthodox Seminary, not just some random academic.

As noted by Pentiuc in his book, liturgical and other reforms to make a Christian body more acceptable to Rabbinic Jews have already occurred in the Roman Catholic Church:

It’s well known that the Catholic Church put many restrictions on Jewish power and influence historically, such as totally barring them from positions of power during the Fourth Lateran Council. This Jewish anxiety over Christian antisemitism has led the ADL to take significant interest in even obscure issues of the Church, such as the use of the Latin Mass. After restrictions on the Latin Mass were lifted by Pope Benedict XVI, the ADL released a lengthy complaint, including references to the Church’s “2,000-year history of anti-Semitism” and the “great suffering and pain imposed on the Jews by the church through the centuries,” and finally summarized by stating how “The wider use of the Latin Mass will make it more difficult to implement the doctrines of Vatican II and Pope John Paul II, and could even set in motion retrograde forces within the church on the subject of the Jews, none of which are in the interest of either the church or the Jewish people.”

Do the proponents of the Latin Mass realize that Jewish groups are, at least partially, responsible for not only the Vatican II liturgical reforms, but also the continuing suppression of the TLM? How is this all working out for the Roman Catholics? Does anyone think it will work any better for the Orthodox, should we go down that path? Constantinople trying this on its own will no doubt lead to a serous schism. But, then again, maybe for the blob that is exactly the point?

Pentiuc is not alone in his desire to remake the Orthodox Church into a more Jewish-friendly institution. Archbishop Elpidophoros of the Greek Archdiocese has also been concerned about an increase in antisemitism:

“I am worried by the spread of antisemitism internationally,” Archbishop Elpidophoros of America, spiritual leader of Greek Orthodox faithful in North and South America, told an audience in Thessaloniki, Greece’s second largest city.

 

He added that he is particularly worried that “the ointment of the Church does not heal wounds, but spreads the fire” of antisemitism, though he didn’t give any specific examples.

 

“Evil has a name, an identity and a history, and it is called fascism and Nazism. … It has no relation to Christian theology despite the efforts of some to dress their far-right ideology with the cloak of Christianity,” Elpidophoros said.

Emphasis added to make sure the reader spots the same ideas as in Pentiuc’s writing. His Eminence Archbishop Elpidophoros of America is the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Holy Cross. The same board that appointed Pentiuc to his current position. The Archbishop and the academic are obviously on the same page when it comes to modifying the Orthodox Faith in regards to her traditional teachings on Rabbinic Judaism.

An interesting tidbit concerning Pentiuc is that part of his work at Holy Cross was underwritten by a grant from the Lilly Endowment:

Holy Cross recently received a grant of $ 1,125,995 from Lilly Endowment Inc. through its Compelling Preaching Initiative to help establish The Scriptorium: Preaching and Teaching the Word of God in a Digital Age, the proposal for which was designed and written by Fr. Pentiuc in consultation with Dr. James C. Skedros, outgoing Interim Dean of Holy Cross, and Dn. Gary Alexander, HCHC’s Vice President for Administration and Finance. The aim of the initiative is to foster and support preaching that inspires, encourages, and guides people to come to know and love God and to live out their Christian faith more fully.

The use of foundation money to “buy” results from academics is something Orthodox Reflections has explored before.

As a last example of the anti-“antisemitism” movement within Patriarchate of Constantinople-affiliated Churches, please see the announcement below:

The Holy Synod was informed that the MoC was signed on 27 February in Nicosia between the Orthodox Church of Greece, the Orthodox Church of Cyprus, the Church of Greece, the Ministries of Education of Greece and Cyprus, the Central Board of Jewish Communities in Greece (KIS) and the Jewish Museum of Greece (JMG). It provides for the implementation of actions aimed at preserving the memory of the Holocaust and combating anti-Semitism and any form of racism.

 

In addition, the Holy Synod was informed that the Church of Greece’s Inter-Orthodox Centre was invited specifically as the only representative of Greece to attend the European Practitioners Network against Antisemitism (EPNA), which includes organizations from the entire European Union.

All of this focus on combatting “antisemitism” in the Orthodox Church really astounds given the situation in Gaza and the West Bank. Most Palestinian Christians are Orthodox. Hundreds of them are in Gaza, and an historic Orthodox Church there was bombed by the IDF with serious loss of life.  Thousands of Palestinian Orthodox Christians are suffering oppression under brutal Israeli occupation in the West Bank. The Patriarchs of Jerusalem and Antioch are speaking out against these atrocities on a daily basis. On the other hand, the Patriarchate of Constantinople and related Churches feel the need to focus on combatting “antisemitism”, which is evidently just as bad as mass murder.

Thank God the blob seems to have less control over Tucker Carlson than over the Patriarchate of Constantinople. (Click here for Carlson’s show on Christian persecution in Israel.)

The ecumenical movement within the Orthodox Church is not just fixated on changing our truth claims associated with Rabbinic Judaism. We are also barreling towards ever closer ties to the Roman Catholic Church. Pope Francis and Patriarch Bartholomew have now published a book together on environmentalism, of course.

The Atlantic magazine, one of the most official of all the mouthpieces for the blob, just ran a glowing comparison between the “modernizing” of Pope Francis and Patriarch Bartholomew versus the “bastion of militancy” to be found in Moscow under Patriarch Kirill:

On one side, Bartholomew has spent three decades trying to make Orthodoxy more compatible with the modern liberal world. He openly urges the faithful to accept evolution and other scientific tenets. He has been a passionate advocate for environmental protection. And, like Pope Francis, he has quietly promoted a more accepting attitude toward homosexuality. But Bartholomew’s power is more limited than the pope’s. There are eight other Orthodox patriarchs, each of whom presides over a national or regional Church, and Bartholomew’s role is that of “first among equals.”

 

Kirill, who heads by far the largest national Church, has made it into a bastion of militancy. He has given the war against Ukraine his full-throated support, and some of his priests go further, preaching about the glory of firing Grad rockets and dying in battle for Russia. Kirill’s tediously Manichaean tirades—about saintly Russia defending “traditional values” against the gay-pride parades of the decadent West—are much more than a justification for Putin’s autocracy. His anti-modern ideology has become an instrument of soft power that is eagerly consumed by conservatives across the Orthodox world as well as by right-wing figures in Europe (such as Hungary’s Viktor Orbán). It has even won adherents in the United States, where some evangelicals and right-wing Catholics seek a stronger hand in the culture wars.

When everyone, even a writer for the Atlantic, realizes that Patriarch Bartholomew is closer to Pope Francis than to a fellow Orthodox Patriarch, the handwriting is on the wall. The divide is real, and the blob fully intends to keep pushing the Orthodox patriarchates further apart, and Constantinople ever closer to Rome. Recently, the Patriarch of Constantinople expressed a desire that Christians in the East and the West begin celebrating Easter on a “unified date” rather than adhere to separate Lenten calendars:

“It is a scandal to celebrate separately the unique event of the one resurrection of the one Lord,” Patriarch Bartholomew I, who holds the title “first among equals” in Eastern Orthodoxy, said in a recent homily, according to Orthodox Times.

 

The ecumenical patriarch made the comments during a homily on March 31, which marked Easter on the Western calendar and the second Sunday of Lent on the Eastern calendar.

 

“We extend a heartfelt greeting of love to all Christians around the world who celebrate holy Easter today,” Bartholomew said during the homily. “We beseech the Lord of Glory that the forthcoming Easter celebration next year will not merely be a fortuitous occurrence but rather the beginning of a unified date for its observance by both Eastern and Western Christianity.”

Changing Orthodox teaching on the Church as Israel, purging our liturgies of “antisemitic” references, suppressing the “antisemitic” writings of our saints, and aligning calendars will all bring Constantinople closer to the Roman Catholic Church, while almost assuredly completely severing any remaining ties with Moscow, and a large portion of the rest of the Orthodox world as well.

Well done, blob. Well, done.

We could list many, many other reasons for concern about the growing ties between the Patriarchate of Constantinople and Roman Catholicism (encouraged and funded by the blob, of course), but we are already running long in this article as it is.

Time to Welcome the LGBTQ and the God of Democracy!

LGBTQ issues would seem to be settled in the Orthodox Church. Marriage is between one man and one woman. Sex outside of marriage is a sin. The case seems pretty air tight. In fact, when Greece became the first Christian Orthodox-majority country to legalize “same-sex marriage”, the Church’s reaction was swift and strong. Met. Seraphim of Piraeus was just one of the hierarchs who publicly excommunicated Greek MPs who had voted for same-sex marriage: “No, no, no we will not accept those who do this. To fall away from the Christian faith, it is a betrayal of Christ. And unfortunately, it would be better if they had not been born.” His Eminence also, “raised issues of overturning human ontology and physiology by implementing the woke agenda, which aims to deconstruct Christian doctrine, ethics and culture.”

But for the blob, gay sex is a sacrament. The refusal of the Church to normalize and bless it cannot be allowed to stand. Luckily, the blob has allies within Orthodoxy for whom gay sex, women’s ordination, and transgenderism are very much open questions in need of dialog and “engagement”. The description below is from a video produced by the Orthodox Christian Studies Center at Fordham:

Orthodox Christians are called, first and foremost, to love all—for “God is love.” But the reality for many lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Orthodox Christians today is that their relationship to the Church is defined not by love but by apathy, exclusion, and condemnation. As a faith, we must choose love and compassion—to “love thy neighbor”— instead. This requires no change of faith, but a fuller, more compassionate understanding of what our faith in loving God truly requires of us.

 

We are pleased to present this conversation about ministering to LGBTQ+ Christians. Drs. Christina Traina of Fordham University and Ashely Purpura of Purdue University discuss the opportunities, challenges, and resources for ministry among LGBTQ+ faithful. “We cannot say we are loving God & be cruel to the people who we encounter in our lives. If you are not letting that love transform you & your relationships, then I do not know what Orthodoxy is.”

The video is below. From endorsing rogue do-it-yourself Orthodox same-sex “weddings” and female ordinations, to speculating on transgender saints, to casting aspersions on the celibacy of monks and nuns, to speculating on the future of polyamory within Orthodoxy – packing this much blasphemy into a single video is truly a satanic tour de force.

The probable key, to eventually changing so much Orthodox teaching in the West, could be summed up in one word (a favorite of the blob) – Democracy! Many “Orthodox” hierarchs, clergy, and academics speak glowingly of liberal democracy heralding the dawn of a Golden Age of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Once the people, as manipulated and controlled by the blob, have spoken through their Democratic God, then we mere mortals have no choice but to comply. An example of the obsequiousness of some “Orthodox” hierarchs towards democracy and the US political order are the remarks of Archbishop Elpidophoros at the ceremony in the White House honoring Greek Independence in 2024:

In addition to these democratic ideals, which are sadly being diminished around the globe, we are here to acclaim and remember those whose commitment to the cause of liberty and democracy cost them the dearest price of all – their lives: The Immortal Heroes of 1821, who like those of 1776 and those of every generation who have been willing to lay “so costly a sacrifice upon the altar of Freedom.” We say “Eternal Memory” to all our brave warriors for peace and justice.

 

Mr. President, you have long been a close and trusted friend of the Greek-American family, and we consider you to be one of our very own, even from those very early days in Wilmington. But you are so much more than our beloved friend.

 

As President of our Great Country, you have led the world in championing freedom and the sovereignty of Nations. You continue to be the leading advocate for the cause of our Ukrainian brothers and sisters, who are still fighting two years later for their very lives against the unjust and inhuman invasion of their land. You continue to stand with Ukraine and for your unbreakable and unshakeable support, we are very grateful indeed.

 

Also, as sons and daughters of the Mother Church of Constantinople, whose longest serving leader in history, His All-Holiness Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, counts you, Mr. President, as a beloved friend – we thank you for your unwavering support of the purely spiritual mission of our Ecumenical Patriarchate.

 

Mr. President, we thank you for your commitment to Greece and to Cyprus, and for a just and peaceful solution to this Island Nation, that has been scarred by a violent invasion and forced division for half a century, a solution that will abide by the international law and a rules-based international order. We are on your side, Mr. President, just as you are on the side of democracy and liberty.

 

May God bless you, Mr. President, together with the First Lady, your family, and our Nation’s armed forces, with health, long life, His abiding grace, and His invincible strength.

How can an Orthodox hierarch openly discuss an “altar of Freedom”? Orthodox temples have altars. They are not dedicated to human freedom, but to God. This phrase makes no sense, except as a nationalist sentiment in which we don’t worship God, but some kind of manifestation of the liberal world order of the blob. Given our history in Orthodoxy of royal saints, this phrasing couldn’t be more out of place. Orthodoxy can work within almost any system of government, but there is precious little in the history of liberal democracy to commend it as spiritually superior in any way. We also see in the speech his fawning over Biden. Archbishop Elpidophoros is extremely prone to sucking up to powerful men, be they presidents, political operators, or business tycoons. Extra points if they have Greek heritage!

The short speech was like a National Security State “buzzword bingo” card. Praise for “democratic ideals”? Check! Praise for the US? Check! Praise for President Biden personally? Check! Cover up Ukrainian persecution of the Orthodox Church? Check! Blame the war in Ukraine solely on the Russians? Check! Talk glowingly about the rules-based international order? Check! Freedom and democracy? Check! Praise the armed forces of the United States? Check!

Does any rationally thinking person believe Archbishop Elpidophoros would ever stand up to any dictates of the blob he so enthusiastically serves? Of course not. Whatever the “democratic” will of the people dictates, that he shall do. “We must marry same-sex couples, ordain women, oppose any form of patriotism or border control, support the availability of abortions, and forever be continuously open to changing anything and everything about our Orthodox Faith! Otherwise, we will be guilty of discrimination under democratically enacted laws! Are we a Church that preaches the Gospel of love, or a far-right extremist organization?”

Nicholas – member of the Western Rite Vicariate, a part of the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese in America

Why the US National Security State’s Orthodox Christian Obsession?

Russia is not just an enemy of the West. Russia, and her Orthodox Church, are the enemy of the West. Russia, under her deranged dictator Vladimir Putin, is out to destroy everything the West stands for. The war in Ukraine, unless the rampaging Mongol Hordes are stopped, is just a prelude to invading Europe. Only the might and financial resources of NATO, led by the United States, can save the world!

Thus was it in the beginning. Is now. And ever shall be. That is, at least until Russia is defeated, broken up, and stripped for spare parts.

But, why? Independent analysts, politicians, world leaders, and thinkers of all stripes very much doubt the truth of the preceding narrative. As President Trump asked, during the 2016 election season, “Why can’t we get along with Russia?” Even the Obama administration had tried to improve relations with Russia at one point, offering the famous “reset”. Not anymore.  Almost two full presidential terms since Trump asked that pertinent question, the official fearmongering around Russia is higher than ever.

Why?

Money, power, and control. Russia is the only remotely believable justification for our trillion dollar system of “national security”. A system that completely owns and runs America. In the last 20 year period, the US has spent $14 TRILLION on foreign interventions. Our military budget, everything included, exceeds $1 trillion a year. The total for Ukraine has been over $100 billion in just the past two years. There is so much money sloshing around, that the Pentagon routinely announces having “lost track” of billions of dollars. No one bats an eye. More just keeps getting allocated.

Being even remotely related to “National Security” means never being accountable for anything.

Americans know our tax dollars get converted into ships, missiles, tanks, artillery, aircraft, satellites, spy networks, drones, etc. But that’s just the tip of the iceberg. There is so much more that Americans have no clue about. For example, the US has an enormous, secretive, bioweapons program whose size and funding over the last two decades have exploded. According to RFK Jr.’s research, 13,000 scientists around the world are currently employed by it, funded by unknown billions (trillions?) of dollars, working in some 400 labs. What are they working on? The holy grail of warfare – bioweapons that can decimate the enemy while new vaccines are developed to protect our own population against them.

The influence of this massive bioweapons apparatus was shown during COVID. Our COVID responses were labeled “countermeasures” and were ordered by the US Department of Defense (DOD) in partnership with the HHS. On its own, HHS did not have the authority to sign contracts for hundreds of millions of novel medical products. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) noted in its July 2021 report on “Covid-19 Contracting:” HHS “partnered” with DoD to “leverage DoD’s Other Transaction Authorities (OTA)…which HHS lacked.” (p. 24)

Acting as separate federal agencies within the limits of their authorities, neither HHS nor DOD would have been able to order 100 million doses of unapproved, untested “vaccine”. So they “partnered” in order to break the constraints of their authorities.

Isn’t government of the people, by the people, and for the people a wonderful thing? How would the US public have reacted, had more people realized the DoD oversaw the development, manufacture, and distribution of the COVID countermeasures, and not the “public health” establishment?

Unfortunately, most Americans still have no clue about any of that. The censorship has simply been too extensive. Mike Benz, the executive director of the Foundation for Freedom Online, dropped these truths in a chilling podcast with Tucker Carlson:

  • “What I’m essentially describing is military rule. What’s happened with the rise of the censorship industry is a total inversion of the idea of democracy itself.”
  • “Democracy is getting the NGOs to agree with Blackrock, to agree with the Wall Street Journal, to agree with the community and activist groups who are onboarded with respect to a particular initiative.”
  • “The fundamental nature of war changed [with Crimea’s annexation]. And NATO, at that point, declared something that they first called the Gerasimov doctrine… All you need to do is control the media and the social media ecosystem, because that’s what controls elections.”
  • “Google began as a DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) grant by Larry Page and Sergey Brin when they were Stanford PhDs… and then became a military contractor.”
  • “NATO was publishing white papers saying that the biggest threat NATO faces is not actually a military invasion from Russia. It’s losing domestic elections across Europe to all these right-wing populist groups.” – (Watch for more on this below.)

Why is the CIA trying to close down a conservative financial news Website? 

Speaker Johnson believes so strongly in limited government that he supports the FBI being able to break the law. Why do the policies never change, no matter who is officially “in charge”?

Under the guise of protecting the West from the “Russian threat”, the National Security State can exercise extreme censorship, buy journalistic access, spy on anyone, publish blatant lies, manipulate elections, set up blackmail schemes, and then just cover it all up. Politicians, of course, get in on the act. Lost an election? Must be Russian interference. Incriminating evidence found? Must be a Russian intelligence operation. As long as there is a veneer of “democracy” behind which to hide, who is ever going to be the wiser?

Even when people are exposed to the truth, they often dismiss what is happening directly before their eyes. How could any of this be true? How could “they” get away with all this?

Money. Great big, huge piles of filthy money. The US National Security State is so lavishly funded that it has swallowed up almost all of society (media, Pharma, manufacturing, technology, NGOs, foundations, education, research, development, religious organizations, non-profits, think tanks). Many analysts openly refer to this interlocking system of control as the blob.

Unlimited control. Unlimited budgets. Forget being king, this is power on a godlike level.

Power that is predicated on Americans, and Westerners in general, accepting that Russia is such an existential threat that we have to believe, fund, and follow those who are “protecting” us from the evil Mongol Horde.

Which brings us to a really big problem for the National Security State and all the pigs feeding from that seemingly bottomless trough of sweet, sweet tax payer money. Many Westerners, particularly middle and working class Americans, don’t feel threatened by Russia anymore.

The blob, it turns out, is really bad at running things. Whether that is by accident or by design is debatable. What is not debatable is that a whole lot of very normal Americans are sick of wars, inflation, debt, lack of well-paying jobs, poor health care, poisoned food, collapsing infrastructure, unchecked migration, crime, collapsing morals, the constant LGBTQ propaganda, transgenderism everywhere, bad schools, censorship, and loss of privacy. Above all, we are sick of feeling like our government hates us and wants us dead.

Many Americans don’t believe anymore that the West is spreading goodness and truth around the world. We aren’t the good guys. Our wars all end up lost, fought for reasons that make no sense, and with horrific consequences. What it means to be a patriotic American has been turned on its head.

Citizens of Western countries know things are dangerously off kilter, but they have no idea what to do about it. In truth, Western citizens are so beaten down and demoralized that they can no longer even imagine a better world. A world in which their societies are being built up, instead of torn down. A world in which their leaders care about them.

But then there is Russia, which seems like a beacon of sanity in an insane world. Not only are many Westerners losing their fear of Russia, they are actually seeing it as a possible role model for revitalizing their own failing civilizations!

The blob has noticed that even formerly stalwart supporters of the National Security State, such as American Evangelicals, are asking uncomfortable questions while rejecting the National Security “narrative”. Knowing a threat to its power when it sees one, the blob is deploying journalists to write about Americans with the utter gall to openly admire a nation that they have been explicitly commanded to fear and vilify.

One such effort is called ‘Crisis of masculinity’: The American Right’s bromance with Vladimir Putin by Cristina Maza, the National Security Correspondent of the National Journal:

Nevertheless, a growing number of right-wing Americans view Putin as an attractive leader and a symbol of moral purity. And some are even converting to the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia, known as ROCOR. This phenomenon was on display when popular right-wing media personality Tucker Carlson traveled to Russia in February to conduct a fawning interview with Putin, allowing the Russian leader to pontificate about Moscow’s imperial ambitions for hours. Carlson’s interview might be the most high-profile example of the Right’s adoration of Putin. But a growing body of research suggests that admiration for the Russian leader’s brand of authoritarian Christian nationalism is proliferating among the American Right.

 

“The Russian church has become this instrument of soft power for Russia around the world. It really sought to position itself as a global moral leader,” said Katherine Kelaidis, a research fellow at the Institute of Orthodox Christian Studies, Cambridge who focuses on Western approaches to Eastern Christianity. “It’s meant as this tool to bring conservative people and traditionalists, particularly on the issues of gender and sexuality, in North America and Western Europe onto the Russian side. And it’s been super effective.

 

“I’m shocked, when I listen to Fox News or talk radio, the extent to which there is a reflexive sympathy for Russia that I don’t think you would have seen even five years ago,” Kelaidis added. “The amount of chatter you can see online of the vilification of Ukraine among American conservatives is also fascinating.”

 

In her recent book Holy Russia? Holy War? Why the Russian Church is Backing Putin Against Ukraine, Kelaidis argues that Putin’s brand of religious nationalism is increasingly attractive to those on the American Right, who fear and resent the so-called “woke agenda” of the liberal Left.

 

While the U.S. legalized same-sex marriage, Russia labeled the LGBTQ movement as an extremist group and banned any mention of gay rights in public. Such moves are aspirational for segments of the Right in the United States.

 

Researchers such as Kelaidis argue that the number of converts to Russian Orthodoxy in the U.S. is small compared to the ballooning number of Christian nationalists who share a general admiration for Putin and his brand of hyper-masculine, authoritarian politics. Figures like Putin and Orbán are also attractive to the Far Right because they demonstrate an alternative to liberal democracy.

 

“It’s a crisis of masculinity,” Kelaidis said. “Putin and the Russian Orthodox Church very self-consciously style themselves as this very muscular, masculine Christianity. But I think the thing underneath that is a deeper disaffection with Western civilization’s relationship with itself. … They’re dissatisfied with what liberalism has wrought, philosophically speaking.”

Clearly the author, a supposedly “serious” journalist, is not trying to fairly present what is going on either within American Orthodoxy, or among the “Right-wing” Evangelicals (the larger problem) who admire some aspects of Russia. While there are a lot of factual errors in this article, it is not really our goal here to debunk this or any other “hit piece”. We can’t pass up, however, pointing out that the writer is too brainwashed to realize we actually do have a crisis of masculinity in the West.

Rather, our goal, after looking at a couple more examples of hit pieces, is to address the most important question of all – why are so many of these pieces being written now?

Another hit piece was done by Meagan Clark Saliashvili in Texas Monthly. Here is how Orthodox priest Fr. John Whiteford, the good man at the center of this “journalistic” atrocity, described his experience with her:

“Sometime last year, Meagan Clark Saliashvili contacted me about whether I would agree to be interviewed for an article she wrote for Texas Monthly on the growth of Orthodoxy in Texas. Meagan is an independent reporter who is a convert to Orthodoxy, married to a Georgian man, and a graduate of Harvard Divinity School. I was not unaware of the liberal bent to her past reporting, but I hoped since she was a recent convert that she would be honest and sincere, even though I had reasons to doubt she would be. However, I figured if she was going to write a hit piece, it probably wouldn’t matter whether I spoke to her or not, and speaking to her might help.

 

As it turned out, the article was not about the growth of Orthodoxy in Texas at all but was an extremely biased attempt to paint me, my parish, and other Orthodox Christians as racists, conspiracy theorists, and authoritarians. However, the fact that I did talk to her, and allowed her to visit my parish resulted in her putting in many details that contradicted much of what she was trying to accomplish. I am not sure if these things were included in the original version of the story or not, but I was contacted by a fact checker from Texas Monthly (a first from any news outlet I have ever interacted with) and pointed out to him several relevant facts that did appear in the article as published. On the other hand, I did not anticipate how this would negatively impact some people in the parish, and that is my biggest regret about agreeing to this.”

Saliashvili has an Ivy League education with a Masters from Harvard Divinity School. She is a freelancer, having lost her job at Religion Unplugged back in 2023. She was able to gain a good priest’s trust as an Orthodox convert, only to then pepper her article with the same kind of alleged Orthodox links to racism, extremism, and authoritarianism as seen in the Maza piece excerpted above.

One of the pioneers of anti-Orthodox hit pieces is Sarah Riccardi-Swartz, a “scholar” of Orthodoxy in the U.S. and author of the book Between Heaven and Russia. Supposedly an Orthodox Christian herself, she has made a career attacking “fellow” Orthodox as being “right-wing” extremists in the thrall of Vladimir Putin:

“Because Orthodoxy is small (in the U.S.), they think that these Orthodox figures online are helpful because we’re getting more converts in,” she said. “They think we are building American Orthodoxy. No, we’re not. We’re creating an American Orthodoxy that’s not in line with the gospel but rather with right-wing extremism.”

 

These tensions — over gender, nationalism and the impacts of the Russia-Ukraine war — reflect the identity battles fragmenting Orthodoxy around the world.

Regardless of the author or the publication, one has to wonder where the real money comes from to finance such “journalism”? And more importantly, why are these pieces being written?

To spread fear, and to establish a “good” versus “bad” concept of Orthodoxy.

Linking the targets of these articles (traditionalist Orthodox converts, other Christians who admire Russian cultural renewal) to extremism, racism, and (possible) treason is all about spreading fear. The fear of “cradle” Orthodox that their beloved Church is being hijacked by a dangerous political movement. The fear of potential Orthodox converts that, while they are seeking an authentic encounter with God in the Church founded by Jesus Christ, they could really be joining some kind of radical cult. Fear of even being seen visiting an Orthodox Church, because now you could be associated with “those people”. Fear of traditional Orthodox Christians that going to Church might be dangerous, because Antifa and other violent extremists could be watching. The fear that employers may find your Orthodox affiliation online, and fire you under the pretense your Church is an extremist organization. The fear that the FBI and other three-letter agencies will now have the cover they need to investigate, harass, spy on, and censor Orthodox Christians and other conservatives as threats to national security. Fear that some of the more “liberal” Orthodox bishops in the West may feel compelled / empowered to take action against traditionalist priests and parishes.

Fear that this unwanted attention is only the beginning.

The blob draws its power from fear. Fear of Russia, and fear of the consequences of not following the official narrative of the blob.

Hit pieces like these will have impacts, but less than the authors and their handlers would like. The Orthodox Church is not a political organization. The moral teachings of the Orthodox Church were never meant to be part of the political processes of a malfunctioning, oligarchic state. The Orthodox Church is here to bring humanity face-to-face with the Living God, not to win elections. The Church builds saints, not activists, and Orthodox saints are not known for surrendering to fear.

On the political side of all this, however, the obsession with “Right-wing Extremism” betrays the fact that the populist “Right” (as noted above in the list from Benz) scares the blob in ways that the “Left” does not. The Left is comprised of people the blob can easily control. Their list of concerns is quite small, and easy for the blob to deliver on: LGBTQ rights, Climate Change, abortion on demand, and the never ending fight against “systemic racism”. These people are easy to bribe. Easy to manipulate. Easy to distract. They don’t do deep analysis. They don’t demand structural changes to address deep-rooted economic problems. They hate Russia with a passion, and have become extremely, dangerously “patriotic” thanks to the US Govt’s WOKE agenda. Even when they riot, they only engage in fits of destructive rage. There is never any danger they could, or would, actually take on the blob. They are the ultimate handmaidens to tyranny.

The “Left” is also easy to terrify. Just pointing out that Russia, and actual Orthodoxy, are opposed to their modern “rights”, such as abortion and “same-sex marriage”, is enough to send them into hysterics. The bad man is coming who wants America to look more like Russia in ways that actually look a lot like New York City circa 1961.

The actual “Right-wing”, however, is a real threat to the blob. The authentic “Right” focuses on local autonomy, reducing the federal government, withdrawing from NATO, balanced budgets with massively reduced spending, truly solving economic problems (increasing job growth, taming inflation, reducing the cost of living), a pro-peace foreign policy, an orderly civil society, border enforcement, reducing crime, protecting children from sexualization, quality education, and parental rights. That is a blob killing agenda. All the more frightening for the blob, the “Right” has proven its ability to put hundreds of thousands of ordinary, pissed off people on the streets of Washington just by asking them to come. For the blob, this is all completely unacceptable. Clearly, anything that bolsters the “Right” has to be discredited, or at least co-opted.

It’s not what actually happened on J6 that keeps “them” up at night.

Another purpose of all these hit pieces is to establish the official narrative of the “good” (modernized, often cradle) Orthodoxy run from Constantinople versus the “bad” (traditional, often convert) Orthodoxy run from nationalistic, evil, mean Moscow. That is why hit pieces like these usually praise certain hierarchs and academics, while casting others as “villains”. How that develops in the future could prove very dangerous for Orthodox traditionalists. The blob, as we will cover more in depth later, has not shied away from outlawing Orthodox Churches while founding “new” Orthodox bodies to replace them. No thinking individual should believe that what the blob is willing to do to Ukrainians, it would be unwilling to do to Americans. Lots of people currently in jail wrongly believed the Constitution was worth the paper it is printed on.

Still, hit pieces calling traditionalist Orthodox Christians bad names are unlikely to do enough to prevent Americans from discovering the True Church founded by Christ through His Apostles. Nor are mere words likely to discourage enough non-Orthodox conservatives from noticing that, morally and economically, Russia is moving in the opposite direction of the West.

More “direct action” is needed. Which, of course, the blob is already pursuing.

Isolate and Neuter as Much of the Russian Orthodox Church as Possible

The actual Russian Church on Russian soil is out of reach for the blob. Protected by a formidable Russian military and security establishment, armed even with nuclear weapons, the Russian Church at worst sustains pin pricks from the blob.

However, the Russian Orthodox Church also operates on foreign territories where she is way more vulnerable. The Ukrainian Orthodox Church, though it was self-governing for decades before the war, was considered part of the canonical territory of Moscow. Since 2022, the UOC has been undergoing horrific persecution at the hands of the government in Kiev. Her lawyer, Robert Amsterdam, revealed in February 2024 that his team had learned from the Assistant Secretary of State under President Trump that the destruction of the UOC was a primary goal of US policy. The UOC had refused to fully break with Moscow (before the war, a formal break in May 2022 did occur as a result of the fighting), refused to be a nationalist propaganda organization, and had refused to embrace the modern American “democratic” agenda (LGBTQ, drug legalization, Climate Change, anti-Russian extremism, abortion). To crush this “disobedience” to the dictates of the National Security State, a plot was hatched involving former Ukrainian President Poroshenko, Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, and the US Government to create a compliant replacement for the UOC (the so-called “Orthodox Church of Ukraine”) and then to destroy the canonical church.

According to Amsterdam, thanks to a traitorous Patriarch Bartholomew, the UOC has become the “target of a vicious and unlimited campaign of intimidation, perpetrated by the Ukrainian authorities.” Independent third parties, such as the UN, have reported on the violence and persecution against the UOC. The vast majority of canonical Orthodox Christians in the world have continued to support the UOC.

Paschal Homily of Metropolitan Onuphry in 2023 to the suffering Ukrainian Orthodox Church

Of course, the US justifies all this under the guise of combatting the “soft power” (a phrase repeated ad nauseum in anti-Orthodox hit pieces) the Russian Orthodox Church represents for the nefarious Putin regime. Of course, if the blob’s entire rule were not based on economic exploitation and the immoral destruction of civil society, perhaps such “soft power” would be less of a threat? Or, perhaps if “democratically” elected leaders better represented the concerns of the majority of their constituents, rather than those of sexual and other minorities, such “soft power” would also be less of a threat? No one really explores such questions, as the answers would threaten the power of the blob. Better to try and “cancel” the Orthodox Church instead.

Ukraine was just the beginning. Government meddling in the affairs of local Orthodox Churches has now spread to Estonia, home to hundreds of thousands of ethnic Russians who are also canonically Orthodox. Estonia, a member of NATO, is trying to break the ties between its local Orthodox Church and the Russian Church:

The Estonian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate (MPEÕK) cannot continue its activities under the jurisdiction of the head of the Russian Orthodox Church, Patriarch Kirill, who has threatened Western countries, including Estonia, and called for the killing of Ukrainians, said Interior Minister Lauri Läänemets (SDE).

 

“Looking at what he has said, what their (MPEÕK – ed.) boss has said, what difference is left between a Muslim religious leader who suggests that everyone in the West needs to be slaughtered and Moscow Patriarch Kirill who says that every Ukrainian needs to be killed and that they’re in a holy war against all other religions,” Läänemets told ERR Friday.

 

Läänemets said that while the synod’s position is acceptable and constitutes movement in the right direction, “the problem remains. It does not solve the problem because the church’s head in Moscow, in whose jurisdiction it remains, is still Patriarch Kirill,” he added.

 

“The problem will be solved once this subordination is no more. How they’ll do it, whether the decision will be made in Moscow or whether they’ll make it in Estonia, I cannot say,” the minister said. “Words must be followed by actions. We cannot be completely sure they are being sincere until that happens,” Läänemets noted.

So much for freedom of religion and free association. Or even simple honesty, as Moscow Patriarch Kirill has never said that every Ukrainian needs to be killed. In fact, Orthodox bishops never call for anyone to be killed. As for a Russian Orthodox Holy War, that is not against the Ukrainians. It is against the blob itself.

The blob will, of course, make sure that the Estonian Orthodox Church compliantly separates from Moscow. Either that, or it will be replaced as in Ukraine. And after the Orthodox Christians in Estonia are isolated, then will come the demands for them to “modernize”. Just as in Ukraine, where even blob official news outlets admit that the persecution of the UOC is not really about a no longer existing tie to the Russian Church, but is really about the acceptance of gay sex:

One of the largest American media, NBC News , claims to have found out the reason for the persecution of the UOC . According to journalists, believers and priests are oppressed and discredited because they are the most ardent opponents of LGBT people.

 

The material says that Kyiv accuses Orthodox priests of spying for Moscow, but they deny such accusations.

 

Journalists also cite the words of LGBT activist Maxim Mishkin, who called believers and priests of the UOC “the most anti-gay people in Ukraine.”

First they came for the UOC, then the Estonians. We should expect the blob to come for all Orthodox Christians everywhere they can reach. As Greek Protopresbyter Theodore Zisis has warned, this looks like a global campaign against all of Orthodoxy:

The aim of the heretical West, incited by the Devil, is to, in time, dismantle the Orthodox Church, that is, the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, and to de-Christianize the Orthodox East, as it has already de-Christianized itself.

Just breaking ties between Moscow and historically related Orthodox Churches is not enough. That is nibbling at the edges, no matter how successful the efforts are to force the newly isolated Orthodox Christians to embrace US-sanctioned “modernity”.

The blob needs to completely discredit the Russian Orthodox Church.

To that end, paid, kept, Western Orthodox academics, journalists, and clergy are highly useful. This includes the Fordham University dwellers of the Orthodox Christian Studies Center. They are currently running a petition asking religious leaders to denounce the Russian Orthodox Church:

These pressing issues are amplified within the context of the Russian war of aggression in Ukraine. From the very beginning, this conflict took on a distinctive character, in which Russia, a nation primarily identifying itself as Orthodox Christian, invaded Ukraine, another predominantly Christian nation, without any immediate provocation from the side of the latter. Ironically, citizens of both countries were, until recently, affiliated with one and the same Orthodox Church.

 

It is of utmost importance to emphasize that President Vladimir Putin of the Russian Federation, alongside Russia’s politicians and soldiers, has not only violated their international obligations. More profoundly, he has committed a blasphemy against God. This pertains to individuals who identify themselves as Christians and who often criticize the West for deviating from Christian values. Despite engaging in the construction of new churches and monasteries, lighting candles, fervent prayer, participation in sacraments, and partaking of Holy Communion, these individuals paradoxically compound their sins by issuing orders for murders, personally engaging in war crimes, and publicly justifying actions that run contrary to humanity and the Creator.

 

The support of this “hybrid war” of unprovoked aggression, the justification of its violence, and the persecution of any priest and believer who speaks the truth against the war—all these committed acts demonstrate a conscious and deliberately-argued position. All these testify to the extent that the Russian Orthodox Church has deviated from the Gospel and preaches something alternative to the Word of God. All Christians must critically ask whether the teaching preached publicly and unabashedly by the representatives of the Russian Orthodox Church is indeed the true message of the Christ event.

 

We beseech you to actively and immediately engage with the appropriate international institutions to facilitate the establishment of an international task force dedicated to holding accountable, through sincere and impartial analysis, those bishops, priests, and laity within the Russian Orthodox Church whose statements, testimonials, sermons, communications, and fabrications have sanctioned and bestowed divine approval upon violence, war, and aggression against the people of Ukraine.

 

Numerous publications have meticulously analyzed these distressing facts, underscoring the urgency for a formalized initiative that compels the attention of Churches and cannot be disregarded. Your active engagement in establishing such an entity will be a significant step toward addressing these critical issues at an institutional level.

 

A Church that only outwardly remains “Christian” but has lost its evangelical spirit cannot be a sister to those Churches and communities that follow the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ.

 

The endeavors elucidated above transcend a mere conflict with the Russian Orthodox Church. Rather, they embody a dedicated striving on its behalf—for the Church, for the community of believers guided by the Holy Spirit and the Gospel, liberated from deceptive political theology and detrimental religious ideology. Progressing resolutely toward genuine peace requires the fearless proclamation of truth, regardless of the inherent challenges it may pose.

 

You are summoned to denounce injustices, advocate for repentance and atonement, and actively seek transformative change within the temporal realm. We ask you, our pastors, to courageously proclaim the inconvenient yet profound truth.

According to the official narrative, the Russian Orthodox Church is not really a “church” so much as a state-supported shill for unprovoked Russian aggression. The Russian Church has betrayed the Gospel and is worthy only of loathing and condemnation, just like the Russian Government which controls it. (That traditionalist Orthodox “betray” the modern Gospel of Inclusion is a charge leveled at all of us, not just the Russian Church.) Further, the Russian Church outwardly looks “Orthodox”, but has really been infested with evil.

So nothing to admire here you mistaken Westerners. Liars, crooks, and murderers the whole lot of them. Just move along, embrace the WOKE agenda, and be the demoralized slaves the blob needs you to be. Slava Ukraini!

That none of this is true is completely irrelevant to those whose ultimate source of funding, and ultimate object of loyalty, is the blob. That the war in Ukraine was deliberately provoked by the West, that the government in Kiev persecutes Christians, and that the Russian Orthodox Church has absolutely not endorsed or committed war crimes are all truths that the “Orthodox Fifth Column” will never admit. Instead, they will keep pushing this false narrative as long as the blob feels threatened by the moral stature of the Russian Orthodox Church.

Ruin What You Can Reach

While the core of the Russian Orthodox Church is beyond the reach of the blob, the Patriarchate of Constantinople is firmly under its control. For us in the West, this is the source of our greatest danger. If the blob can’t stop traditionalist-minded Westerners from seeking inspiration from Orthodoxy, then perhaps it can ruin it so that no one cares about it anymore. In this drive to destroy the Orthodox Faith in the West, the blob can rely on more than a few Orthodox collaborators.

To ruin Orthodoxy, there must be substantial changes to teaching and practice that will make the “official” looking church no longer the actual church. Before we look at some of those necessary changes, let us recognize that the Patriarchate of Constantinople unilaterally doing the things below would probably result in a global schism.

If you are trying to destroy Orthodoxy as a competing worldview, however, breaking the unity of the Church is most definitely a benefit.

With that in mind, here are some of the distinctive things about the Orthodox Church the blob is trying to be rid of.

The Orthodox Church is the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church

There is one true path to God, and that is through the Church founded by His Son and Our Lord Jesus Christ. Further, the Orthodox Church teaches that she, herself, is the Israel of God – not a secular country in the Middle East currently committing unspeakable crimes. Such calm assurance of unchanging truth is attractive to Westerners, besieged as they are on all sides by uncertainty and doubt.

So that has to go, and the vehicle to get rid of it is the ecumenical movement, particularly through engagement with Rabbinic Judaism and the Roman Catholic Church. Through this movement of “dialog” and “cooperation”, changes can be made to the Orthodox Faith and to her claims about herself. Changes that make Orthodoxy just like all the other failed “religions” of the West, and thus removes the threat Orthodoxy poses for the blob.

To start with, the Church’s vision of herself as the continuation of Israel, and thus her hostility to both the Talmud and Zionism, has got to go! But don’t worry, the blob has people working on that right now. One of them is Eugen J. Peniuc, professor and author of The Old Testament in Eastern Orthodox Tradition. Pentiuc is the Dean (under Constantinople) of Holy Cross Seminary and a modernizing influence par excellence. The information below is taken from a review of his book, with screen captures of his actual words following:

He urges both Orthodox hierarchs and the grass-roots faithful to take a stand against ‘these perilous teachings,’ beginning with a plea to revise anti-Jewish statements in hymns and liturgy, especially those on Good Friday. He refers favorably to the changes Pope John XXIII instigated in the Roman Catholic church when he interrupted the 1959 Good Friday liturgy to ask that the adjective ‘perfidious’ be removed from the prayer for the Jews (39–40). This section exemplifies two notable aspects of the many that make Pentiuc’s book so valuable: it acknowledges the unsavory treatment Jews and their scriptures have suffered at the hands of Christians, and it puts Orthodoxy into conversation with the Western church in a refreshingly sanguine fashion. At the same time, Pentiuc suggests that a mild Christian supersessionism may be unavoidable if the Orthodox church is to remain consistent with its historical hermeneutics, which it most certainly will do. Christian triumphalism, on the other hand, is ‘easily discarded,’ and the author punctuates his point with a nod to Ephrem the Syrian: ‘Humility is so powerful that even the all-conquering God did not conquer without it.’ Pentiuc argues that the strongest blow against supersessionism is in fact the complementarity of the two biblical testaments. As Origen wrote, there is one God, whose main attributes are love and justice, and both attributes are present in both testaments (59). Pentiuc gracefully allows his readers to draw the connection between Origen’s dictum and the Mount Sinai icon that introduced the book for themselves.

The above passages point the way towards what is called “dual covenant” theology (Jews are saved by being Jews, Christians through Christ). This is a radical innovation in Church teaching. Pentiuc’s book also endorses serious liturgical changes, postulates that Rabbinic Jews understand the Old Testament better than the Orthodox Church, and calls for rooting out antisemitism, even when that means censoring / suppressing historical writings such as those of St. John Chrysostom. The Church must change, says Pentiuc, to be more acceptable to Rabbinic Jews. This man is Dean of an Orthodox Seminary, not just some random academic.

As noted by Pentiuc in his book, liturgical and other reforms to make a Christian body more acceptable to Rabbinic Jews have already occurred in the Roman Catholic Church:

It’s well known that the Catholic Church put many restrictions on Jewish power and influence historically, such as totally barring them from positions of power during the Fourth Lateran Council. This Jewish anxiety over Christian antisemitism has led the ADL to take significant interest in even obscure issues of the Church, such as the use of the Latin Mass. After restrictions on the Latin Mass were lifted by Pope Benedict XVI, the ADL released a lengthy complaint, including references to the Church’s “2,000-year history of anti-Semitism” and the “great suffering and pain imposed on the Jews by the church through the centuries,” and finally summarized by stating how “The wider use of the Latin Mass will make it more difficult to implement the doctrines of Vatican II and Pope John Paul II, and could even set in motion retrograde forces within the church on the subject of the Jews, none of which are in the interest of either the church or the Jewish people.”

Do the proponents of the Latin Mass realize that Jewish groups are, at least partially, responsible for not only the Vatican II liturgical reforms, but also the continuing suppression of the TLM? How is this all working out for the Roman Catholics? Does anyone think it will work any better for the Orthodox, should we go down that path? Constantinople trying this on its own will no doubt lead to a serous schism. But, then again, maybe for the blob that is exactly the point?

Pentiuc is not alone in his desire to remake the Orthodox Church into a more Jewish-friendly institution. Archbishop Elpidophoros of the Greek Archdiocese has also been concerned about an increase in antisemitism:

“I am worried by the spread of antisemitism internationally,” Archbishop Elpidophoros of America, spiritual leader of Greek Orthodox faithful in North and South America, told an audience in Thessaloniki, Greece’s second largest city.

 

He added that he is particularly worried that “the ointment of the Church does not heal wounds, but spreads the fire” of antisemitism, though he didn’t give any specific examples.

 

“Evil has a name, an identity and a history, and it is called fascism and Nazism. … It has no relation to Christian theology despite the efforts of some to dress their far-right ideology with the cloak of Christianity,” Elpidophoros said.

Emphasis added to make sure the reader spots the same ideas as in Pentiuc’s writing. His Eminence Archbishop Elpidophoros of America is the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Holy Cross. The same board that appointed Pentiuc to his current position. The Archbishop and the academic are obviously on the same page when it comes to modifying the Orthodox Faith in regards to her traditional teachings on Rabbinic Judaism.

An interesting tidbit concerning Pentiuc is that part of his work at Holy Cross was underwritten by a grant from the Lilly Endowment:

Holy Cross recently received a grant of $ 1,125,995 from Lilly Endowment Inc. through its Compelling Preaching Initiative to help establish The Scriptorium: Preaching and Teaching the Word of God in a Digital Age, the proposal for which was designed and written by Fr. Pentiuc in consultation with Dr. James C. Skedros, outgoing Interim Dean of Holy Cross, and Dn. Gary Alexander, HCHC’s Vice President for Administration and Finance. The aim of the initiative is to foster and support preaching that inspires, encourages, and guides people to come to know and love God and to live out their Christian faith more fully.

The use of foundation money to “buy” results from academics is something Orthodox Reflections has explored before.

As a last example of the anti-“antisemitism” movement within Patriarchate of Constantinople-affiliated Churches, please see the announcement below:

The Holy Synod was informed that the MoC was signed on 27 February in Nicosia between the Orthodox Church of Greece, the Orthodox Church of Cyprus, the Church of Greece, the Ministries of Education of Greece and Cyprus, the Central Board of Jewish Communities in Greece (KIS) and the Jewish Museum of Greece (JMG). It provides for the implementation of actions aimed at preserving the memory of the Holocaust and combating anti-Semitism and any form of racism.

 

In addition, the Holy Synod was informed that the Church of Greece’s Inter-Orthodox Centre was invited specifically as the only representative of Greece to attend the European Practitioners Network against Antisemitism (EPNA), which includes organizations from the entire European Union.

All of this focus on combatting “antisemitism” in the Orthodox Church really astounds given the situation in Gaza and the West Bank. Most Palestinian Christians are Orthodox. Hundreds of them are in Gaza, and an historic Orthodox Church there was bombed by the IDF with serious loss of life.  Thousands of Palestinian Orthodox Christians are suffering oppression under brutal Israeli occupation in the West Bank. The Patriarchs of Jerusalem and Antioch are speaking out against these atrocities on a daily basis. On the other hand, the Patriarchate of Constantinople and related Churches feel the need to focus on combatting “antisemitism”, which is evidently just as bad as mass murder.

Thank God the blob seems to have less control over Tucker Carlson than over the Patriarchate of Constantinople. (Click here for Carlson’s show on Christian persecution in Israel.)

The ecumenical movement within the Orthodox Church is not just fixated on changing our truth claims associated with Rabbinic Judaism. We are also barreling towards ever closer ties to the Roman Catholic Church. Pope Francis and Patriarch Bartholomew have now published a book together on environmentalism, of course.

The Atlantic magazine, one of the most official of all the mouthpieces for the blob, just ran a glowing comparison between the “modernizing” of Pope Francis and Patriarch Bartholomew versus the “bastion of militancy” to be found in Moscow under Patriarch Kirill:

On one side, Bartholomew has spent three decades trying to make Orthodoxy more compatible with the modern liberal world. He openly urges the faithful to accept evolution and other scientific tenets. He has been a passionate advocate for environmental protection. And, like Pope Francis, he has quietly promoted a more accepting attitude toward homosexuality. But Bartholomew’s power is more limited than the pope’s. There are eight other Orthodox patriarchs, each of whom presides over a national or regional Church, and Bartholomew’s role is that of “first among equals.”

 

Kirill, who heads by far the largest national Church, has made it into a bastion of militancy. He has given the war against Ukraine his full-throated support, and some of his priests go further, preaching about the glory of firing Grad rockets and dying in battle for Russia. Kirill’s tediously Manichaean tirades—about saintly Russia defending “traditional values” against the gay-pride parades of the decadent West—are much more than a justification for Putin’s autocracy. His anti-modern ideology has become an instrument of soft power that is eagerly consumed by conservatives across the Orthodox world as well as by right-wing figures in Europe (such as Hungary’s Viktor Orbán). It has even won adherents in the United States, where some evangelicals and right-wing Catholics seek a stronger hand in the culture wars.

When everyone, even a writer for the Atlantic, realizes that Patriarch Bartholomew is closer to Pope Francis than to a fellow Orthodox Patriarch, the handwriting is on the wall. The divide is real, and the blob fully intends to keep pushing the Orthodox patriarchates further apart, and Constantinople ever closer to Rome. Recently, the Patriarch of Constantinople expressed a desire that Christians in the East and the West begin celebrating Easter on a “unified date” rather than adhere to separate Lenten calendars:

“It is a scandal to celebrate separately the unique event of the one resurrection of the one Lord,” Patriarch Bartholomew I, who holds the title “first among equals” in Eastern Orthodoxy, said in a recent homily, according to Orthodox Times.

 

The ecumenical patriarch made the comments during a homily on March 31, which marked Easter on the Western calendar and the second Sunday of Lent on the Eastern calendar.

 

“We extend a heartfelt greeting of love to all Christians around the world who celebrate holy Easter today,” Bartholomew said during the homily. “We beseech the Lord of Glory that the forthcoming Easter celebration next year will not merely be a fortuitous occurrence but rather the beginning of a unified date for its observance by both Eastern and Western Christianity.”

Changing Orthodox teaching on the Church as Israel, purging our liturgies of “antisemitic” references, suppressing the “antisemitic” writings of our saints, and aligning calendars will all bring Constantinople closer to the Roman Catholic Church, while almost assuredly completely severing any remaining ties with Moscow, and a large portion of the rest of the Orthodox world as well.

Well done, blob. Well, done.

We could list many, many other reasons for concern about the growing ties between the Patriarchate of Constantinople and Roman Catholicism (encouraged and funded by the blob, of course), but we are already running long in this article as it is.

Time to Welcome the LGBTQ and the God of Democracy!

LGBTQ issues would seem to be settled in the Orthodox Church. Marriage is between one man and one woman. Sex outside of marriage is a sin. The case seems pretty air tight. In fact, when Greece became the first Christian Orthodox-majority country to legalize “same-sex marriage”, the Church’s reaction was swift and strong. Met. Seraphim of Piraeus was just one of the hierarchs who publicly excommunicated Greek MPs who had voted for same-sex marriage: “No, no, no we will not accept those who do this. To fall away from the Christian faith, it is a betrayal of Christ. And unfortunately, it would be better if they had not been born.” His Eminence also, “raised issues of overturning human ontology and physiology by implementing the woke agenda, which aims to deconstruct Christian doctrine, ethics and culture.”

But for the blob, gay sex is a sacrament. The refusal of the Church to normalize and bless it cannot be allowed to stand. Luckily, the blob has allies within Orthodoxy for whom gay sex, women’s ordination, and transgenderism are very much open questions in need of dialog and “engagement”. The description below is from a video produced by the Orthodox Christian Studies Center at Fordham:

Orthodox Christians are called, first and foremost, to love all—for “God is love.” But the reality for many lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Orthodox Christians today is that their relationship to the Church is defined not by love but by apathy, exclusion, and condemnation. As a faith, we must choose love and compassion—to “love thy neighbor”— instead. This requires no change of faith, but a fuller, more compassionate understanding of what our faith in loving God truly requires of us.

 

We are pleased to present this conversation about ministering to LGBTQ+ Christians. Drs. Christina Traina of Fordham University and Ashely Purpura of Purdue University discuss the opportunities, challenges, and resources for ministry among LGBTQ+ faithful. “We cannot say we are loving God & be cruel to the people who we encounter in our lives. If you are not letting that love transform you & your relationships, then I do not know what Orthodoxy is.”

The video is below. From endorsing rogue do-it-yourself Orthodox same-sex “weddings” and female ordinations, to speculating on transgender saints, to casting aspersions on the celibacy of monks and nuns, to speculating on the future of polyamory within Orthodoxy – packing this much blasphemy into a single video is truly a satanic tour de force.

The probable key, to eventually changing so much Orthodox teaching in the West, could be summed up in one word (a favorite of the blob)Democracy! Many “Orthodox” hierarchs, clergy, and academics speak glowingly of liberal democracy heralding the dawn of a Golden Age of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Once the people, as manipulated and controlled by the blob, have spoken through their Democratic God, then we mere mortals have no choice but to comply. An example of the obsequiousness of some “Orthodox” hierarchs towards democracy and the US political order are the remarks of Archbishop Elpidophoros at the ceremony in the White House honoring Greek Independence in 2024:

In addition to these democratic ideals, which are sadly being diminished around the globe, we are here to acclaim and remember those whose commitment to the cause of liberty and democracy cost them the dearest price of all – their lives: The Immortal Heroes of 1821, who like those of 1776 and those of every generation who have been willing to lay “so costly a sacrifice upon the altar of Freedom.” We say “Eternal Memory” to all our brave warriors for peace and justice.

 

Mr. President, you have long been a close and trusted friend of the Greek-American family, and we consider you to be one of our very own, even from those very early days in Wilmington. But you are so much more than our beloved friend.

 

As President of our Great Country, you have led the world in championing freedom and the sovereignty of Nations. You continue to be the leading advocate for the cause of our Ukrainian brothers and sisters, who are still fighting two years later for their very lives against the unjust and inhuman invasion of their land. You continue to stand with Ukraine and for your unbreakable and unshakeable support, we are very grateful indeed.

 

Also, as sons and daughters of the Mother Church of Constantinople, whose longest serving leader in history, His All-Holiness Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, counts you, Mr. President, as a beloved friend – we thank you for your unwavering support of the purely spiritual mission of our Ecumenical Patriarchate.

 

Mr. President, we thank you for your commitment to Greece and to Cyprus, and for a just and peaceful solution to this Island Nation, that has been scarred by a violent invasion and forced division for half a century, a solution that will abide by the international law and a rules-based international order. We are on your side, Mr. President, just as you are on the side of democracy and liberty.

 

May God bless you, Mr. President, together with the First Lady, your family, and our Nation’s armed forces, with health, long life, His abiding grace, and His invincible strength.

How can an Orthodox hierarch openly discuss an “altar of Freedom”? Orthodox temples have altars. They are not dedicated to human freedom, but to God. This phrase makes no sense, except as a nationalist sentiment in which we don’t worship God, but some kind of manifestation of the liberal world order of the blob. Given our history in Orthodoxy of royal saints, this phrasing couldn’t be more out of place. Orthodoxy can work within almost any system of government, but there is precious little in the history of liberal democracy to commend it as spiritually superior in any way. We also see in the speech his fawning over Biden. Archbishop Elpidophoros is extremely prone to sucking up to powerful men, be they presidents, political operators, or business tycoons. Extra points if they have Greek heritage!

The short speech was like a National Security State “buzzword bingo” card. Praise for “democratic ideals”? Check! Praise for the US? Check! Praise for President Biden personally? Check! Cover up Ukrainian persecution of the Orthodox Church? Check! Blame the war in Ukraine solely on the Russians? Check! Talk glowingly about the rules-based international order? Check! Freedom and democracy? Check! Praise the armed forces of the United States? Check!

Does any rationally thinking person believe Archbishop Elpidophoros would ever stand up to any dictates of the blob he so enthusiastically serves? Of course not. Whatever the “democratic” will of the people dictates, that he shall do. “We must marry same-sex couples, ordain women, oppose any form of patriotism or border control, support the availability of abortions, and forever be continuously open to changing anything and everything about our Orthodox Faith! Otherwise, we will be guilty of discrimination under democratically enacted laws! Are we a Church that preaches the Gospel of love, or a far-right extremist organization?”

Nicholas – member of the Western Rite Vicariate, a part of the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese in America

For Orthodox Subversion, a Picture is Worth a Thousand Words

A couple of years ago, I had to attend the heterodox wedding of the child of one of the couples from our parish. They had embraced Orthodoxy, but their adult children had stayed Episcopalian. One of their daughters was getting married in an Episcopal ceremony, and they asked a few of us to attend for moral support. When my wife and I arrived, we saw that our priest was already there. He was dressed inconspicuously in a suit and tie. I had never before seen him in public without a cassock. Sitting next to him, I asked him why he was in “civilian” attire.

“Because,” he said, “If I were here in a cassock and pectoral cross, some people could think I am endorsing what is happening here. There could be pictures of me. They could put those next to pictures of an Episcopalian priestess on Social Media, and the result will be confusion on all sides. I’m only here because two of my parishioners needed me here.”

He sat quietly through the marriage “service” conducted by the Episcopalian priestess. He then spent a few minutes at the reception, before hugging his parishioners, congratulating the happy couple, and quietly making his way to the exit.

He drew no attention to himself. He caused no scandal. Few at the wedding even realized he was an Orthodox priest. A simple parish priest understood the power that images of him at such an event, attired in clerical garb, would have had for Orthodox and heterodox alike. He wisely avoided all that, while still being there to support his beloved parishioners who were both happy (wedding, yeah!) and troubled (heterodox, boo!) at the same time.

If only more of our Orthodox Bishops displayed such discernment. As we shall see, some of our bishops are either clueless about optics, or they are intentionally trying to undermine the Orthodox Faith. We tend to think the latter is the case, but intentional or not, the effects are harmful.

Here are some examples.

On October 4, 2023, a His Grace Bishop Athenagoras Nazianzos of the Patriarchate of Constantinople’s Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America participated in an “Interfaith Harmony Day” held at a large Hindu temple in Robbinsville, New Jersey. The event brough together representatives from Hinduism, Islam, Christianity, Mormonism, Judaism, and Buddhism. It was part of the celebrations that culminated in the consecration of the temple a few days later on October 8.

At the event, Bishop Athenagoras read a letter from Archbishop Elpidophoros, head of GOARCH. Here are some of the sentiments expressed:

In the boundless tapestry of creation, we are called to recognize and celebrate the diverse ways in which humanity seeks to connect with the divine. As Orthodox Christians, we are continually reminded of the Apostle Paul’s words, for from Him and through Him and for Him are all things.

 

In this spirit, we celebrate the unity and oneness that underline our shared human journey towards a world of peace and reconciliation. May the opening of this beautiful shrine be a beacon of joy, understanding, harmony within the Hindu community and beyond. May this unique peace of Indian art stand as a testament to our common humanity and may its sacred hall be a place where hearts are uplifted and souls find solace.

Such words are very much in keeping with the ecumenist beliefs frequently expressed by the Patriarch of Constantinople and the bishops under him such as Archbishop Elpidophoros. After all, it was not long ago that His Eminence scandalized so many with his “many paths to God” speech at a conference on freedom of religion.

This is from a speech given by Patriarch Bartholomew on February 1, 2024 at the Church of the Nativity of the Theotokos in Constantinople.

To this end, we must recognize that there is nothing to divide us from our brothers and sisters of other denominations or religions. On the contrary, there are many things that unite us; the life of every individual, irrespective of their religious beliefs, unfolds as a sequence of crucifixion and resurrection moments and days. It is precisely this sequence that will bring us closer, enabling us to offer one another encouragement, optimism, vigor, and hope. This mutual support will assist us in navigating through challenging situations, knowing that resurrection days will come.

Such ecumenist teaching is very much at odds with Orthodox Christian Tradition. They are the sentiments of politicians looking to build coalitions, not the thoughts of holy men who rightly divide the Word of Truth. Ecumenism of this variety falls in line with the expressed goals of the Global Elite, Freemasons, New Agers, and others who, inspired by Demonic beliefs, seek to join all religions into one. Such talk from “Orthodox” hierarchs demoralizes the Orthodox Faithful, while giving inquirers the wrong idea about who and what the Orthodox Church really is.

But while the speeches, interviews, articles, books, and academic writings espousing ecumenist teaching are bad, the pictures are worse. Way, way worse. As Orthodoxy has understood for over 2,000 years, you may forget words, but images stay indelibly etched in your mind. Below are two of the pictures of Bishop Athenagoras at the “Interfaith Day”.


These striking images go far beyond being a “good neighbor”. They also go far beyond merely being an advocate for religious freedom. A bishop of the Church, posing with non-Christians in celebration of their paganism, will be seen as endorsing an equal status for that religion to Orthodoxy – “We are all just seeking God in our own way, so bless you in your search!”

A few days later, Bishop Athenagoras did apologize for his participation. While any act of public contrition by an Orthodox Hierarch is a welcome change-of-pace, an apology is of no real value. Bishop Athenagoras was not sent there by accident. The men who sent him are not idiots. They knew exactly what they were doing, and why. This was not a “mistake”. This was a calculated move to push forward the ecumenist agenda within Orthodoxy. Another opportunity to habituate Orthodox Christians to images of our hierarchs praying / officiating / participating with heterodox Christians and non-Christians.

As the images pile up, those of us complaining will get a pat on the head, and a condescending smile, while we are told, in a voice full of pity, “There’s nothing to see here. We’ve been doing this for years. Don’t be such a paranoid conspiracy theorist.”

Unfortunately, there is something to see here. There is a faction of Orthodox hierarchs, academics, rich laity, and clergy that truly believe Orthodoxy is antiquated and greatly in need of “modernization”. We have covered them before.

When trying to transform a 2,000 year old Divine / Human organization that prides itself on never changing, one thing above all is crucial. People cannot be allowed to connect the dots on what you are doing. Each subversive action must appear to be an isolated incident. If a pattern becomes too obvious, Orthodox Christians might actually wake up and take some action.

Ecumenism is not the only front on which attempts are being made to change Orthodoxy. There is a serious drive afoot to “revive” the office of Deaconess. The newly re-envisioned office of Deaconess is expected to have a liturgical role, unlike the historic office which most definitely did not. But a liturgical role for women brings up a problem. Orthodox Christians are not used to seeing women at the Altar. Suddenly putting women there would cause an uproar, and might even bring about a schism. It is necessary to go slowly in a way that gets the laity accustomed to seeing women functioning in liturgical roles.

Which brings us to The Most Reverend Michael, Archbishop of New York and New Jersey. (There’s New Jersey again, just like with the Hindu Temple incident!) It has been reported to us, by a member of one of his parishes, that at least 4 times, most recently on 2/25, His Eminence Michael has blessed a female Seminary student, Amber Prather, to give the homily at Sunday Divine Liturgy. The St. Vlad’s student is pictured below. Find the video here (her sermon is around the 1:32:00 minute mark). Amber’s husband is Andrew, who appears to be working towards ordination in the Orthodox Church.


Probably all of us have attended workshops, speeches, classes, etc. with female Theologians. A woman teaching is not an issue, if her talk is separated from the Divine Liturgy. However, this was not the case with Amber Prather. In the middle of a campaign to “modernize” the roles of women in the Church, Archbishop Michael has seen fit to put a woman in front of the Altar on multiple occasions to preach the homily at Divine Liturgy. There is no way Archbishop Michael is unaware that this symbolism bolsters the drive towards deaconesses and more. His Eminence must have seen the work of the Archons of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, who have have put real money and effort into promoting deaconesses. We have even seen Ancient Faith Radio recently wade into this debate by hosting a roundtable discussion on the topic.

Of course, it’s not just women preaching homilies. We are also seeing attempts to put female acolytes at the Altar. The picture below is of Varvara Gulina and her daughter. An Antiochian parish in Boston let her stand on the solea with her daughter and the acolytes. The Metropolitan had to “talk to” the clergy there to correct the situation. Perhaps such an incident will not be repeated in that parish. Unfortunately, however, Varvara had already got what she wanted – pictures that she put into public view, and a guest column on Public Orthodoxy to promote female acolytes titled Orthodox Christian Altar Girl.

By the way, Varvara is wearing a tiara in the picture above. She does not have a Theological education, and seems inclined to play “princess” dress-up at Church. An individual who knows her described her as “not well” and little more than a “tool” for those pushing for women at the Altar. As you might suppose, this isn’t really about women Deacons or women preaching homilies or female Altar servers. Those are all just steps towards making Orthodox Christians comfortable seeing women at the Altar, taking on male roles. After a specific comfort level has been reached, the next move is the real goal – women’s ordination to the priesthood. A goal that the most honest opponents of Orthodox Tradition, such as Aristotle Papanikolaou from Fordham’s Orthodox Christian Studies Center, are already open about.

Of course women can preach! Archbishop Michael has given his blessing on multiple occasions for a woman to preach homilies in one of his churches. What other hierarchs will join him in doing so? That remains to be seen, but it is a good bet that more will. Women can obviously serve at the Altar, look at all the pictures proving that!  At some point in the future, the modernizers will remind us that the world did not end when women preached homilies and fulfilled Liturgical roles. So why would the world end just because women can now be ordained?

Please do yourself and Orthodoxy a favor – don’t think all of these things are simply coincidences. This is a sophisticated propaganda effort along the lines of the ones used to successfully transform Rome, the Episcopal Church, and other mainline Protestant denominations. Do all of the people playing roles in this even understand the combined ramifications of all these efforts? Surely not. But we owe it to ourselves to understand what is happening, while there is still time to do something about it.

Nicholas – member of the Western Rite Vicariate, a part of the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese in America

The Orthodox Church of Today: What is Happening and Why, Part II

Please click here for Part 1 of this article. 

Imposter Bishops (continued)

God waits for the sinner to repent, but there is a limit to how long He will wait. When He gave Life and Freedom to all His logical creatures – the angelic powers and mankind – He also assigned accountability. While Lucifer and his bodiless followers were plotting their rebellion against God (which the All-knowing was always aware of) they were still members of the Church in Heaven – until they consummated their sin and were thrown out. That was the first mutinous persecution of the Church by Satan, and one third of the angelic powers who fell with him.

Satan’s rage against God and all of Creation – but especially His Church – has never diminished since. After Adam and Eve also sinned (and were thrown out of Eden), there has been war between Satan and God, with humanity as the battleground. Which of them wins over us depends on how we use our freedom. There have always been people in both camps, persecutions both without and within the Church. From Judas’ kiss to Diocletian’s bloody executions, followed by the Arians, the Nestorians, the Iconoclasts, the Crusaders, the Western schismatics, the Ottomans, and finally the Ecumenists of today – all these and many, many other assailants throughout Church history, have incessantly rocked the Ark of Salvation. And yet, despite the volleys of betrayals, massacres, heresies and prodigal bishops, the Church has and will stay the course with Christ at the helm.

We know this because Christ promised, “on this rock [of faith] I will build My Church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it” (Matthew 16:18).  This never meant that the Church on Earth would find things easy. It meant that Christ’s Church, those in and of her, would never be overcome by the evil one. It is this rock-like faith that led millions to martyrdom. Just like Jesus, they won the war by dying. Their physical deaths did not end their membership in the Church, but further sealed it with their confession of faith. Despite the death toll of the early martyrs, the Church not only survived, but increased. These Christian martyrs understood Christ when He told Pilate, “My Kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36). They knew that although they were in the world, they were not of the world either. They were sojourners on earth who strove for a permanent membership in the Kingdom of Heaven.

Judas - The Original Orthodox KarenTherefore, if some of us lament the abysmal quality of some hierarchs in the Orthodox Church today, listen to what Christ said to His Disciples: “Did I not choose you, the twelve? And yet one of you is a devil?” (John 6:70).  Being the all-knowing God, and not interfering with the free will of His creatures, but giving them every opportunity to know Him and follow Him, Jesus knew in advance that Judas Iscariot, despite following Him closely for three years, would betray Him. He knew he would do it with a kiss and would not seek forgiveness, but would destroy himself. Christ gave Judas every opportunity to repent, but when Judas would not return to the Master, the Master used the devil to abolish the devil’s power over us by allowing his freely made choices to play out. Although one of the “twelve,” Judas did not cultivate the rock-like faith required for the gates of hell not to prevail against him. He succumbed to his final temptation, becoming “the son of perdition” (John 17:12). He was in the Church, but he was not of the church – a condition of the heart and mind that can apply to anyone, including bishops.

As She did from the very beginning, the Church continues Her struggle against both external and internal enemies. It is the “kissing” internal ones that pose the greatest threat to the flock, the ones that lie to the Holy Spirit when they say, “nor will I give You a kiss as did Judas.” The New Testament refers to such as these as Judaizers (refuted by St. Paul), the sexually immoral Nicolaitans (in Revelations), false teachers, false prophets and wolves masquerading in sheep’s clothing. While Papal heresies led to the Protestant Reformation in the West, the East struggled under the Ottoman yoke, keeping Orthodoxy alive by the light of the moon. During her occupation, many more new martyrs of the suffering Church on Earth were added to the Church in the Heavenly Kingdom.

About a century after the Eastern Church was liberated, Her hierarchs began yielding to the seductions of the West. Operating like papal “primates”, with their arbitrary innovations to the Faith, the more recent patriarchs of Constantinople, beginning with Joachim III and Meletios IV (Metaxakis) all the way to present-day Bartholomew, have been yearning after the new pan-heresy of unorthodox Ecumenism. This heresy aims to lead all faiths to one global religion, one all-accepting watered-down creed that accepts everyone’s god. This type of ecumenism, which can only be accomplished by destroying the Orthodox Church, has been the long-term plan of Freemasonry.

Freemasonry is a secret, neo-gnostic, occult religion, with its own theology, rituals and symbolism (icons). The higher levels have attracted many wealthy intellectuals who hold key positions in society and politics, including many religious and political leaders. Freemasonry rejects the Holy Trinity and anything having to do with faith, accepting only knowledge (gnosis) in the form of science or rationalism. They look upon faithful Christians with disdain, as those being “in the dark.” Ironically, the higher levels of Freemasonry still practice a form of faith in that they worship Lucifer as the “good god”, who enlightens and illumines his followers and strives to overcome the “bad” God, the Creator of matter. This is hypocritical because science and rationalism have everything to do with matter. Freemasonry is a form of idolatry, where the false god being worshiped is Satan, for God said, “You shall have no other gods before me” (Exodus 20:3; Deuteronomy 5:7).6 Of course, people are free to worship any god they choose, and follow any lifestyle they wish, but anyone who claims to be Christian knows that they “cannot serve two masters” (Luke 16:13). If this is true for all Orthodox Christians, how much truer is it for Orthodox clergy? 

 The Greek Orthodox Church (in Greece, not Constantinople) officially condemned Freemasonry first in 1933, and again in 2014. Scholar and Monk Seraphim (Zissis) details how multiple Greek Patriarchs of Constantinople, like Joachim III and Meletios IV (Metaxakis), other Greek bishops, and Greek theologians were secret Freemasons who endorsed the early ecumenical movement and helped create the World Council of Churches (WCC) to promote it. Patriarch Joachim III was the first to name the Roman Catholics and Protestants “Churches” from an Orthodox perspective. Patriarch Meletios IV (Metaxakis) adopted the new calendar to align with the other “churches”, and was very interested in the Anglican church when most of their clergy were Masons. Political Freemasonry played a key role in the February 1917 Revolution in Russia, which established Communism, an ideology that heavily persecuted the Russian Orthodox Church.

In abuse of their honorary “ecumenical” titles, the Freemason patriarchs of Constantinople began exercising a papal type of authority, creating divides in the Orthodox Church. They did this by arbitrarily consecrating new bishops as autocephalous leaders in other countries and jurisdictions. Patriarch Bartholomew’s interference in Ukraine in 2019 was not the first example, nor will it be the last.  In addition, Bartholomew threatened to break communion with the Autocephalous Greek Orthodox Church in Greece if She did not transfer to his control 36 of her dioceses.  The Church of Greece capitulated to prevent schism. Using similar means, he also absorbed many churches of the diaspora that were under the control of other patriarchates, who also conceded to prevent schism.  This year, he has gone so far as to announce his intention to consecrate the dregs of rogue clergy, like Alexander Belya (planned to be the new bishop of Nicopolis) previously defrocked by ROCOR, and the divisive Theophan Koja, of whom the Autocephalous Orthodox Church of Albania had grave concerns. Theophan Koja (now the new bishop of Philomelion) was no sooner consecrated when he recited the Creed with the Latin filioque at his consecration! Despite severe criticism, these two are being used by Bartholomew to create Slavic and Albanian “Vicariates” (under the American Archdiocese of Elpidophoros) based on the ethno phyletism of the laity, so as to absorb this flock and their temples into Bartholomew’s see.

What is this all about? It is about achieving the end goal of unorthodox Ecumenism, the child of the Constantinopolitan Freemason hierarchy, which they have been planning for over the past 100 years.  April 20th, 2025 is the much-anticipated calendar date when the Roman Catholic Easter and the Orthodox Pascha will coincide. It will mark the 1700th year anniversary of the First Ecumenical Council, and as Bartholomew and his bishops have already announced, their planned union of the Roman Catholic Church of the West to the Eastern Orthodox Church of the East, thereby symbolically annulling all previous Ecumenical Council decisions. This explains Patriarch Bartholomew’s global meddling in other Orthodox jurisdictions, his high-handed take-over of diaspora Churches, and his seemingly endless crowning of riffraff “Charlemagnes.”4 He rushes to non canonically expand as much as he can, the size of the Eastern Orthodox Church, while setting Her up for a devastating downfall in a false union with Rome. The mutinous patriarch of “shock and awe” hurries to bring as many followers as possible into perdition with him, as his father, Lucifer, did before him. On the North American continent, this would include all Greek Orthodox Churches of the American Archdiocese under colorful Elpidophoros, and all those of the Greek Canadian Archdiocese, controlled by sinister Sotirios. It would take too long to list the churches in Australia and other parts of the world that are in Bartholomew’s see.

If consummated, the result of this false union will be a schism similar in tragedy and trajectory to that of 1054, but the Freemasons don’t care because their goal is to destroy the Orthodox Church anyway. Patriarch Bartholomew told us so himself, when he was asked in 2021 how he felt when the Moscow Patriarchate severed full communion with the Phanar, because of his meddling in Moscow’s jurisdiction by granting autocephaly (independence) to the newly created Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU). This new “autocephaly” was an affront to the already established Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC), which was self-governing under the see of Moscow. The schism was hoped to be a temporary disciplinary measure to make Bartholomew recant and restore unity, but his response was –  σκασίλα μου – he just didn’t care.

The Holy Fathers, on the other hand, cared a great deal about schisms. St. Irenaeus of Lyons, sums it up perfectly with these words: “He [God] shall also judge those who give rise to schisms, who are destitute of the love of God, and who look to their own special advantage rather than to the unity of the Church; and who for…any kind of reason which occurs to them, cut in pieces and divide the great and glorious body of Christ, and so far as in them lies, destroy it – men who prate of peace while they give rise to war.” Hieromartyr Ignatius the God-bearer could not make it more clear in his Epistle to the Philadelphians: “Do not err, my brethren. If any man follows him that makes a schism in the Church, he shall not inherit the Kingdom of God.” It is vital to note here that it is he who makes the schism that is the schismatic, which is why the faithful must not leave their schismatic church until after the schism is made, to remain blameless of this enormous sin.

 Bartholomew and his predecessors justify their uncanonical activities by abusing their honorary title of “ecumenical” (which means universal) Patriarch, also expressed as “first among equals” (first in honor). Not long ago, Bartholomew went further by (uncanonically, of course) adopting the title “first without equal,” unprecedented in the Orthodox Church, but well known to the popes of Rome who invented it. This new title was defended in a 2014 essay by the incumbent American “orthodox” Archbishop Elpidophoros, who, in 2019, was rewarded with a hierarchy of his very own by his mentor … Bartholomew. Many of the papal heresies and fabrications that led to the Great Schism of 1054 are strikingly similar to those of the Constantinopolitan patriarchs during the past 100 years.4 Bishops like these fully disregard that the Apostles never selected amongst themselves a “first among equals” let alone a “first without equal.”

Instead of working on the more important and pressing issues that concern the Church today, such as pandemic issues, abortion issues, contemporary morality issues or properly framed reunification issues, all of which should have “a return to Orthodoxy” as their basic tenet (this is proper Orthodox ecumenism); and instead of strengthening the bonds between existing Orthodox jurisdictions and resolving political and cultural differences that have divided some Orthodox Churches, the “first without equal” (in all manner of “shock and awe”) does the opposite. By “lording it over” all other patriarchates, he creates and widens inter-Orthodox rifts while focusing on “union” with the non-Orthodox, without any indication of their conversion to the Orthodox Faith from which they have tragically departed.  Ecumenical dialogue has focused predominantly on “similarities,” opportunities for ‘economia’ (which should only be used for rare exceptions), and a “downplaying” and even avoidance of dogmatic differences. As they did in Kolymbari, Bartholomew and his bishops keep drifting into the most emetic of “lukewarm” arenas of the dilution of our Faith, which makes our Lord Jesus Christ so upset, He says, “I will vomit you out of my mouth” (Revelation 3:16). Should this false union ever be consummated, he and his bishops will be thrown out of the Church by God Himself, like their father, Lucifer. Woe to the blind, complacent and lukewarm sheep who follow them into the abyss of an easy, convenient and false “Christianity.” The true Church will not follow these deceivers! She knows the voice of the Good Shepherd and will follow Him, staying the course.

 In the Name of “Love”

The Orthodox Church is essential, not only as the Ark of Salvation, but also as the spiritual hospital for the healing of the soul.1 Spiritual growth and healing, however, can only be accomplished through the in-person (never virtual) sacraments of Holy Baptism, Repentance (Holy Confession) and Holy Communion. In the name of “love,” too many misguided “orthodox” bishops have disregarded these soul-saving tools, to enforce unprecedented political temple lockdowns and vaccine mandates – because these, and not Christ, will save us. In the name of “love,” they have embraced  sexual immorality, and the non-Orthodox without calling anyone to repentance. They have even served Holy Communion with multiple spoons – because the “Giver of Life” spreads disease and death –  and marched and celebrated under a rainbow flag, as did Archbishop Elpidophoros, twice, at Anglican St. Bart’s Cathedral, all in the name of “love,” for as they say, “God is Love”. Yes, that He is, but love without truth is a lie. God is Love and Truth. God is true Love, not an exhibition of “love” where “everything goes.” Love without Truth is not the Love of God, and lust is not love. God said, Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.’ The second [commandment] is this: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’(Mark 12:28-34). In true Love, obedience to God and His commandments always comes first because He is Love and He is Truth. Christ also commanded us: Love one another as I have loved you. Greater love has no one than this: to lay down one’s life for one’s friends” (John 15:9-17), which Christ did for us. True love is sacrificial. There is nothing lustful or selfish about it; and there is nothing sacrificial in lust.

In the name of “love,” these same bishops have denied the Power of God in the Holy Chalice; they have denied the flock access to the Holy Gifts; and they continue to deny to the non-Orthodox knowledge of the Truth, lest these convert and judge them. When did any of these “lovers” of ours risk their lives to commune the faithful during the lockdowns? When did any of them even conduct a litany for God to lift the pandemic? Are these “lovers” of sexual immorality and all its ideologies, now ready to lay down their lives for their LGBTQ+ “friends?” or is it because they secretly practice sexual immoralities together with them that they publicly support their sin? They haven’t left much to the imagination when a number of “orthodox” hierarchs are already known to have open and unrepented homosexual lifestyles. And even if they don’t, do they really think that they love the stray sheep more than God loves them?

In their arrogance, they forget that the fallen human condition (which includes theirs) cannot even begin to fathom the mystical depths of God’s Power, Mercy and Love. Theirs is more a love of the self and the body, manifested as lust, greed, and hypocrisy. In their self-serving delusions, they have lost the meaning of Love because the Holy Spirit has departed from them, and the “other” spirit has made its abode in them. Saint Peter warns about false teachers, like these bishops, who are unholy and communicate heresy. They are arrogant, sensual and greedy deceivers, denying accountability in their lives. Isolating themselves from Apostolic doctrine concerning Christ, they hold their own “private interpretations,” misconstruing doctrines and Holy Scripture (2 Peter 2:1-3). These are not the words of the author. These are the words of the Orthodox Study Bible.5

 Homosexuality among the Eastern Orthodox hierarchy under the Constantinopolitan patriarchate, is more prevalent than meets the eye. It is rumored that “to become a bishop in the Eastern Orthodox Church, one must be an ecumenist, a Freemason and a homosexual.”  You must belong to the “other” club before you can belong to Bartholomew’s. This explains the ‘rogue clergy’ consecrations that we see taking place in rapid succession, the cowardice of established hierarchs who did nothing to spiritually support their flock during Covid, and the countless hushed up reports of open episcopal homosexuality, witnessed by scandalized laity, which this author is also privy to. Bishops such as these are not worthy of their ordination according to the impediments set out by the Holy Canons of the Church and they must be deposed.6  St. Paul said, “…an overseer [bishop] must be above reproach…” (1 Timothy 3:1-2), but if you are an imposter patriarch (bishop), you need other imposters worse than yourself, to support your agenda and not hold you accountable! The fish rots from the head!

Recent publication from our friends at Fordham University Press, home of the Orthodox Christian Studies Center which has extremely close ties to the Patriarchate of Constantinople

St. John the Theologian records Christ’s message to the bishop of the Church of Ephesus: …”but you have this in your favor, you hate the deeds of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate” (Revelations 2:6). In his book of homilies, Archimandrite Athanasios Mitilinaios explains below:

“The Nicolaitans were gnosticizing heretics … Gnosticism did not die and will not die until the end of history …The Nicolaitans … had a very lax attitude towards idolatry and carnal sins…they had great difficulty accepting the commandments of God …  more specifically, in the area of bodily sins. They were tremendously loose … specifically regarding the subject of abstinence or sexual control …

 

Gnosticism attempts to create a melting pot of all the ideologies of all times. It is a mixture: a little philosophy, a little Christianity, a little Buddhism, a little bit of this, a little bit of that, a little idolatry. It is a smorgasbord of all religions [like unorthodox Ecumenism] that maintains the name of Christianity; but it is a Christianity of maximum distortion. They were classified as heretics because they attempted to give themselves a Christian garb, a Christian color, while their abuse and distortion of the Gospel was horrendous …

 

Freemasonry is a revival of Gnosticism …neo-Gnosticism … They claim to have the light, the illumination, and the pathway to the depth of knowledge, the depth of wisdom, the depth of philosophy … [which are] the depths of Satan … [Their] hope [is] to destroy all religions and especially Orthodox Christianity.”7  

 “There is nothing new under the sun” (Ecclesiastes 1:9). The Holy Apostles were painfully aware of spiritual dangers like Gnosticism, the oldest and most pervasive heresy in Christian history. Saint Peter warns, “be sober-minded, be watchful. Your adversary, the devil, prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour” (1 Peter 5:9). Saint Paul admonishes, “In their case the god of this world [Satan] has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God” (2 Corinthians 4:4). Saint John also writes, “We know we are from God, and the whole world lies in the power of the evil one” (1 John 5:19).

The Holy Apostles admonished and exhorted their flock to guard against the dangers of the secular world. Which Eastern Orthodox pulpit or encyclical today, warns the Church about the dangers that are being propagated by politicians around the world as “freedom and rights for all”?  Which hierarch has urged their flock to “stand firm and hold to the traditions that [the Apostles] taught” (2 Thessalonians 2:15) because 2000 years of Orthodox Christian Tradition comes in direct conflict with “modern society’s teachings” in our schools, governments, and institutions around the industrialized world today? What bishop has taught our children that the Garden of Eden was lost because not everything is a “FREE FOR ALL,” but that God had placed a single restriction on mankind – to love and obey Him.

Certainly not those hierarchs who already serve two masters, hating The One and loving the “other.” Freemason “Grand Commanders” like Canadian Archbishop Sotirios, have never stood up to the slings and arrows that buffet the Church; they only capitulate to them, as they capitulated to Covidism, to unorthodox ecumenism, and to a false union with Rome in 2025, to strip Holy Orthodoxy down to Her “commonalities” with all other religions. Their goal, as we said, is to align all citizens of the world with one “common global religion,” the “other” master being “common” to all. The false union with Rome will not stop there; there will be many other false unions.

How do “orthodox” hierarchs fall for such deceit? Actually, they don’t. They are fully on board with the neo-Gnostic “system” that selected them and elected them, purposely “groomed” them in the cult of Freemasonry and “approved” them to fill the role in the way that enables their agenda.  This is why in the last hundred years or so, the new hierarchy stopped consecrating hieromonks as bishops to succeed them, and craftily figured out how to remove the laity from the electoral process to select new hierarchs. With all arrogance, these present-day, neo-Gnostic Nicolaitans hijacked the Orthodox Church, and through the preferential ordinations of like-minded, lascivious jackals, they have multiplied their numbers to circumvent accountability, and to destroy the Church from within. Such as these shall be the new leaders of the harlot church. “…and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns…decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication: And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH” (Revelations 17:3).

These harlot hierarchs will not heed the voice of the Good Shepherd because they neither love Him nor believe in Him. Willful, shameless and unrepentant sodomites and piranhas, “in the name of Jesus,” they extract and extort millions of dollars from the temples of a pious flock that naively funds them for the false unification of all religions and the destruction of Truth. What more evidence do we need? “[We]…know them by their [rotten] fruits” (Matthew 7:16)!

The Time is Near

When Jesus warned, “Beware of false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravening wolves” (Matthew 7:15), He was not exaggerating. These self-serving hierarchs are the neo-Gnostic wolves in sheep’s clothing against whom Saint Paul warned, “O Timothy, guard the deposit entrusted to you. Avoid the irreverent babble and contradictions of what is falsely called “knowledge,” for by professing it some have swerved from the faith…” (1 Timothy 6:20-21); and “See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ” (Colossians 2:8). Saint John also warned, “Whoever says “I know Him” but does not keep His commandments is a liar, and the truth is not in him.” (1 John 2:4) See how carefully the Holy Apostles trained and prepared those like Timothy, who they ordained as bishops to continue the Apostolic mission in service to the Church!

The faithful “Timothies”, in the Eastern Orthodox Church today, are tragically outnumbered by the “devils” and “liars” who have taken over behind an “orthodox” facade. Blinded by their lust for their true master, Satan, they despise the true Love of God. These duplicitous, high-ranking Freemasons repeatedly injure the Body of Christ, His Church, with their demonic innovations, arrogant power-grabs and hypocritical justifications to the sheep, who they also despise, claiming they are “orthodox” bishops who must be obeyed because they have the Apostolic succession through ordination, an ordination they desecrate, mock and usurp. They forget, or rather, they do not believe or care, that when the Pharisees puffed themselves up because they were descendants of Abraham, Christ responded, “…do not think to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father. ‘ For I say to you that God is able to raise up children to Abraham from these stones” (Matthew 3: 9-10).

If they do not repent, they will “bring on themselves swift destruction” (2 Peter 2:1), as did all their wicked predecessors before them (2 Peter 2:4-22). The same holds true for the complacent, comfortable, lukewarm sheep that enable them. Over and over, God’s providence uses His enemies, just as He used “the son of perdition” to accomplish His purpose. Even if things seem they can get no worse, as they did from the foot of the Cross, that is when Christ will renew and purify His suffering Church, leading Her to glory, for He has built her on the rock of Faith and “…the gates of hell shall not prevail against Her” (Matthew 16:18).

It is very tempting to be scandalized by all that has been taking place in the Orthodox Church these days, but Christ said, “such things must come” (Matthew 6:8). Why? Because, even now, God is using the evil ones who are in but not of His Church to separate the sheep from the goats. According to His Divine Justice, everyone will use their free will to sort themselves out, like wheat from chaff, depending on who they follow. Will they follow the steep and narrow path of the Good Shepard, or will they follow the wide and easy path of Satan’s harlot church? See how the enemies of God cannot and will not destroy His Body, His Church! All they can do is leave and by doing so, they will create the schism. Therefore, they will not inherit the Kingdom of God. Those that do not know the voice of the Good Shepherd, those who are not of His flock, will all fall away. “They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us; but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us” (1 John 2:19)

But as for us, “if we endure, we will also reign with Him” (2 Timothy 2:11-13). So, let us prepare ourselves. Let us find a trusted Orthodox spiritual father, even if he belongs to another jurisdiction, and seek advice from him; let us withhold our financial support from corrupt hierarchy who use our donations to promote their blasphemous agenda; let us worship in the temples of other Orthodox jurisdictions, but if that is not possible, remember that (until the false union takes place) God’s grace is still imparted to the faithful even if unworthy bishops are in charge. Do not abstain from the Divine Liturgy or from the Holy Gifts because of scandal; and do not be afraid of becoming spiritually orphaned. God will provide for his sheep. Above all, do not leave the Orthodox Church, for She is the Ark of Salvation, no matter how many “Judases” lurk inside. They will not be there for much longer and some of them may even repent.

When the traitors leave, the authentic Orthodox Church may become smaller, but having been cleansed, She will shine much brighter, and more faithful sheep will find Her and flock to Her; for She will reject all idolatry and immorality, all lies and falsehoods, all heresies and blasphemies. She will hold a proper and true Great and Holy Ecumenical Synod and will put everything in order, properly missionizing “in spirit and in truth” (John 4:24). The sham church with her harlot bishops, will follow the globalists and ultimately the Antichrist.8 While the devil does his work, Christ is already revealing true and worthy priests and bishops that will properly guide the faithful; bishops who recognize and follow the voice of the Good Shepherd, up the narrow path, leading His Church to the top of the mountain. There, the full number of saints (of whom God has foreknowledge) will be completed; and then, the history of the world will be ended by God, who will abolish all evil forever.

The time is near. Let us all correct ourselves. Let us “exhort one another daily…lest any of [us] be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin” (Hebrews 3:13). Let us be vigilant, “wise as serpents and harmless as doves” (Matthew 10:16). While the enemies of God war against Him as they did from the beginning of time, let us steadfastly pray and study God’s word, choosing wisely, exercising repentance with patient endurance in these spiritually hard times (Hebrews 6:15). The Lord will win for us, provided we persevere like “a woman in travail” (John 16:21-23; Revelations 12:1-6), up the steep and narrow path, the only Path, in and of the only Church, the only Ark that leads to the Heavenly Kingdom. Let us be able to say “yes” to the Lord’s question, “…when the Son of Man comes, shall He find faith on earth?” (Luke 18:8).

Demetrios Georgiou


Do you support freedom of worship for the Ukrainian Orthodox Church? Then please read, sign, and share our petition supporting Metropolitan Onuphry and his Church.

References:

  1. Fr. George Nicozisin. The Orthodox Church, A Well-Kept Secret – A Journey Through Church History. Light & Life Publishing Company, Minneapolis MN
  2. The Orthodox Study Bible – New Testament and Psalms, New King James Version. Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville, Tennessee. Peter 2:1-3 (Footnoted Exegesis, pp 563-564)
  3. Fr. Ted Bobosh. Canonical Ordination and Deposition https://frted.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/canonical-ordination-and-deposition/
  4. Archimandrite Athanasios Mitilinaios. Homilies on the Book of the Revelation, Volume One. Translation, Foreword and Notes by Constantine Zalalas, St. Nicodemus Publications, Bethlehem PA 2009 (Chapter 9, pp 133-134; Chapter 16 – Freemasonry – the Depths of Satan)
  5. G.M. Davis, PhD. Antichrist: The Fulfillment of Globalization – The Ancient Church and the End of History. Uncut Mountain Press, 2022